Politifact is a Soros funded propaganda organ.
No, it's owned by the organization started by Walter Annenberg, one of Reagan's best frends.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Politifact is a Soros funded propaganda organ.
Legal Mexicans also send remittances, dumbass.
A sitting President of a nation meeting with a Candidate, raises the prestige of the CANDIDATE.
This very meeting undermines the narrative that the left is trying to sell, that Trump has no chance.
That was Marco Gutierrez, founder of the group Latinos for Trump,
Maybe the radical left is so used to a freaking president who spent at least six years of his incumbency traveling around the world apologizing for America's existence.
Walter Annenberg is a commie. His name on half the leftwing programs broadcast on PBS.Politifact is a Soros funded propaganda organ.
No, it's owned by the organization started by Walter Annenberg, one of Reagan's best frends.
That was Marco Gutierrez, founder of the group Latinos for Trump,
According to HERA, a non-profit state organization which helps people with housing issues, Gutierrez is a serial scammer. In their 2013-2014 Annual Report, they describe their own dealings with him, when his abuses of immigrants and their loan modifications came to light.
Abuses leveled at immigrants can be particularly vicious. As part of a foreclosure rescue scam, Marco Gutierrez bullied and intimidated HERA’s monolingual Spanish-Speaking homeowner client, charging over $16,000 for a loan modification. He took the homeowner’s car as partial payment but never changed registration, racking up unpaid tickets under the homeowner’s name. When HERA helped the homeowner complain to authorities, the scammer filed a meritless lawsuit against the homeowner (and against a HERA staffer). In the course of defending the case, HERA discovered that Gutierrez was a serial litigant who had filed dozens of actions against his “clients”. Gutierrez was using the court system to bully vulnerable residents across several counties into paying amounts they did not owe him and to retaliate against those who complained about his practices. After defeating Gutierrez’s claims HERA brought a successful vexatious litigant motion against Gutierrez. As a result, both HERA’s client and countless other unrepresented homeowners who might have fallen prey to Gutierrez’s tactics are now protected.
Here I am near the end of a thread, having not read any of it.
Does everyone agree that Mexico will not pay for the wall?
Mainly because they said "they will not pay for the wall"?
Here I am near the end of a thread, having not read any of it.
Does everyone agree that Mexico will not pay for the wall?
Mainly because they said "they will not pay for the wall"?
They won't pay for it. Trump in his naive gated-community mentality thinks one country can do what they want to another and nothing well happen in return. These people need to start reading up on trade wars. Trump is in way over his head.
A sitting President of a nation meeting with a Candidate, raises the prestige of the CANDIDATE.
This very meeting undermines the narrative that the left is trying to sell, that Trump has no chance.
MORON......McCain ALSO visited Mexico during his campaign.....How did that turn out?
Bottom line is this: Trump's extortionist tactics about denying the Mexicans their remittances, could ONLY work (well, just for argument sake) IF and only IF Trump does not deport all those illegals....
Conversely, if Trump deports all those illegals (its funny just to type this bullshit) what exactly is the INCENTIVE for Mexico to "pay for the wall".....
(Unless Trump threatens to fill the Mexican TV airwaves with reruns of The Apprentice.....now, that may loosen Mexico's purse-strings.)
Well, our "beloved" Donald has conjured up a somewhat extortionist scheme to have Mexico pay for the building of the "beautiful" border wall.
The scheme involves the stopping of the $25 B that Mexicans in the US send back to their home country as money transference better known as "remittances"....
Trump vows that the ban on these remittances would be lifted if Mexico pays up front $10 B to build the wall.
Sounds good, doesn't it????
But, a couple of snags emerge in Trump-land rationale....
The first snag is actually minor and it involves Mexico paying for a wall that would keep out not only Mexicans from the US, but the millions of Central and South Americans who also cross the border...Maybe a per capita fee will be worked out by Trump's accountants.....
BUT, the second snag is a bit more thorny.......
Trump has also NOT relented on his "promise" to deport 11 million (or so) illegals (without really stating where these illegals would be deported to since not all are Mexicans.)
NOW, if you were the Mexican government......and you expected that high Mexican percentage of the 11 million illegals to be shipped back, the "threat" of the remittances becomes moot, doesn't it?
If all those illegal Mexicans are shipped back across the border, there are no remittances to also be shipped back to Mexico....
Soooooooo, unless we think of Mexicans as complete idiots, WHY should they pay for the Wall???????
Why would anyone vote for that skank unless they had no morals
Interesting question.....Take that up at your next Klan rally.....LOL
The bottom line actually is, if someone illegally enters your home, instead of giving then food, shelter, health insurance and education, you kick them out.
so, if someone entered your home you would give the shelter, health insurance education and food?The bottom line actually is, if someone illegally enters your home, instead of giving then food, shelter, health insurance and education, you kick them out.
Moron.......This nation was FOUNDED on "someones illegally entering someone else's home".....