Moses was a murder-er multiple times.,.,.,.

[surada]

A handful of atheists - a very small handful, granted - make a very powerful argument for salvation to be bestowed only on the Jews. Jesus came for his own people. Everyone else had their own theologies.

Those Romans were very self centered.

Not as much as the Jews. Christians sought refuge among the Romans as the Jews - or at least the Zealots - destroyed their own traditions.

"the 'zealots' destroyed their own traditions" HUH??

Yep. Not one of the more traditional, philosophical sects (Sadducees, Pharisees, Essenes), they emerged in protest to Roman occupation and ended up burning down their temple and destroying their capital city.

you screwed it up again-----the Sadducees were PRO ROMAN---in
that they acted as roman shills------not rebels. The essenes were a
small monastic sect------persons withdrawn----FAR FROM THE MADDING
CROWD . It was the Roman armies that destroyed the temple and
Jerusalem ----(sheeeesh---blaming the victim again) <<< that's
why you guys made up a story " dey only crucified him because DA
JOOOOS INSISTED " (ps----it was da Pharisees who not only outlawed
crucifixtion but rendered all capital punishment virtually abolished... fret
not----the paragon of ROMAN EMPIRE CULT---ADOLF----hated
the Pharisees too. Well ----as for the crucifixions ---aka 'entertainment
roman style' -----the sadducees facilitated----the romans did it, and the
Pharisees resisted

You screwed it up again. I did not say the Sadducees were anti-Roman. I said the Zealots were.

A Roman soldier threw the torch that ignited the flame in the temple, much to Titus' dismay. The fire and the destruction would not have occurred, however, had the Zealots not instigated the conflict. The other Jews were compliant, and the Romans were not out to harm anyone or alter their ways of life.

The Jews were quite divided in that time. The Herodians were compliant. Herod's granddaughter was the mistress of Titus. The Essenses left town. The Sicaarri and Zealots fought the Romans and other Jews.

Its no wonder it turned out so badly.

 

[surada]

A shithole desperate for Jews; offering to build synagogues.

If it wasn't for US $$$$$$ Israel would have already dried up and blown away---

Israel: Loan guarantees are not considered foreign aid so the $7.9 billion in guarantees have been excluded from this table (see Loan Guarantees for Israel

Source: Jeremy Sharp, “U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel,” Congressional Research Service, (April 10, 2018)


(In Millions of Dollars)

Military---------Economic------ Resettlement----- ASHA ----------All Other------------- Total

$94,792.790 --$30,897.0-------- $1,708.2---- $162.075---- $15,592.635---$134,764.080

Total U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel (1949-Present)

-

Remember the Six Day War In 1967?
Israel was one day away from taking out it’s five neighbors and President Lyndon Johnson stopped them.
The US owes Israel big time.

They did attack Egypt unexpectedly while Egyptian troops were fighting in Yemen. Read Moshe Dayan. The Israelis wanted that war for over a decade.

 

[surada]

Those Romans were very self centered.

Not as much as the Jews. Christians sought refuge among the Romans as the Jews - or at least the Zealots - destroyed their own traditions.

"the 'zealots' destroyed their own traditions" HUH??

Yep. Not one of the more traditional, philosophical sects (Sadducees, Pharisees, Essenes), they emerged in protest to Roman occupation and ended up burning down their temple and destroying their capital city.

you screwed it up again-----the Sadducees were PRO ROMAN---in
that they acted as roman shills------not rebels. The essenes were a
small monastic sect------persons withdrawn----FAR FROM THE MADDING
CROWD . It was the Roman armies that destroyed the temple and
Jerusalem ----(sheeeesh---blaming the victim again) <<< that's
why you guys made up a story " dey only crucified him because DA
JOOOOS INSISTED " (ps----it was da Pharisees who not only outlawed
crucifixtion but rendered all capital punishment virtually abolished... fret
not----the paragon of ROMAN EMPIRE CULT---ADOLF----hated
the Pharisees too. Well ----as for the crucifixions ---aka 'entertainment
roman style' -----the sadducees facilitated----the romans did it, and the
Pharisees resisted

You screwed it up again. I did not say the Sadducees were anti-Roman. I said the Zealots were.

A Roman soldier threw the torch that ignited the flame in the temple, much to Titus' dismay. The fire and the destruction would not have occurred, however, had the Zealots not instigated the conflict. The other Jews were compliant, and the Romans were not out to harm anyone or alter their ways of life.

you live a lie------the romans were murdering wholesale and taxing the
nation to death--------sheeeesh------even Italians I have known ADMIT----
PS--Jesus was a Pharisee --------the romans were genocidal animals.
Ask the brits-------for that matter----ask the greeks

Rome didn't interfer with the religious practices of the Jews.

 

[surada]

Please don't forget that Europe had persecuted the Jews for nearly 2000 years. Millions of Jews were killed, tortured and exiled across Europe.

The United States actually benefits by having Israel as a trusted, loyal and dedicated friend and ally. Israel is the only country in the Middle East that provides America with trusted military support.

If America has a problem in the Mid East or anywhere nearby, the US can send American men and woman in the military to Israel and they will be protected, respected and treated with honor with the full support of every Israeli leader in the entire country.

This makes us more successful and effective in getting the things we need to get accomplished in the world and the fact is, the life of the State of Israel depends on the USA being successful in the Middle East.


Isa 49:6 And he said, It is a light thing that thou shouldest be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the preserved of Israel: I will also give thee for a light to the Gentiles, that thou mayest be my salvation unto the end of the earth.

When has Israel provided any military support for the US?

 

[watchingfromafar]

When has Israel provided any military support for the US?

The USA does not need Israel support, now or ever.

Israel, on the other hand needs US support and I pray as the Lord is my witness, the US stops giving Israel money and murdering machines; NOW!!!!!
-

 

[Indeependent]

A handful of atheists - a very small handful, granted - make a very powerful argument for salvation to be bestowed only on the Jews. Jesus came for his own people. Everyone else had their own theologies.

Those Romans were very self centered.

Not as much as the Jews. Christians sought refuge among the Romans as the Jews - or at least the Zealots - destroyed their own traditions.

"the 'zealots' destroyed their own traditions" HUH??

Yep. Not one of the more traditional, philosophical sects (Sadducees, Pharisees, Essenes), they emerged in protest to Roman occupation and ended up burning down their temple and destroying their capital city.

you screwed it up again-----the Sadducees were PRO ROMAN---in
that they acted as roman shills------not rebels. The essenes were a
small monastic sect------persons withdrawn----FAR FROM THE MADDING
CROWD . It was the Roman armies that destroyed the temple and
Jerusalem ----(sheeeesh---blaming the victim again) <<< that's
why you guys made up a story " dey only crucified him because DA
JOOOOS INSISTED " (ps----it was da Pharisees who not only outlawed
crucifixtion but rendered all capital punishment virtually abolished... fret
not----the paragon of ROMAN EMPIRE CULT---ADOLF----hated
the Pharisees too. Well ----as for the crucifixions ---aka 'entertainment
roman style' -----the sadducees facilitated----the romans did it, and the
Pharisees resisted

You screwed it up again. I did not say the Sadducees were anti-Roman. I said the Zealots were.

A Roman soldier threw the torch that ignited the flame in the temple, much to Titus' dismay. The fire and the destruction would not have occurred, however, had the Zealots not instigated the conflict. The other Jews were compliant, and the Romans were not out to harm anyone or alter their ways of life.

The Jews were quite divided in that time. The Herodians were compliant. Herod's granddaughter was the mistress of Titus. The Essenses left town. The Sicaarri and Zealots fought the Romans and other Jews.

Its no wonder it turned out so badly.

The assimilation rate was high and the Godly Jews won and that's why we're still here annoying you.

 

[irosie91]

Those Romans were very self centered.

Not as much as the Jews. Christians sought refuge among the Romans as the Jews - or at least the Zealots - destroyed their own traditions.

Of course YOU ---"KNOW" that neither did the wonderfully accomodating muslim invaders and rapists

"the 'zealots' destroyed their own traditions" HUH??

Yep. Not one of the more traditional, philosophical sects (Sadducees, Pharisees, Essenes), they emerged in protest to Roman occupation and ended up burning down their temple and destroying their capital city.

you screwed it up again-----the Sadducees were PRO ROMAN---in
that they acted as roman shills------not rebels. The essenes were a
small monastic sect------persons withdrawn----FAR FROM THE MADDING
CROWD . It was the Roman armies that destroyed the temple and
Jerusalem ----(sheeeesh---blaming the victim again) <<< that's
why you guys made up a story " dey only crucified him because DA
JOOOOS INSISTED " (ps----it was da Pharisees who not only outlawed
crucifixtion but rendered all capital punishment virtually abolished... fret
not----the paragon of ROMAN EMPIRE CULT---ADOLF----hated
the Pharisees too. Well ----as for the crucifixions ---aka 'entertainment
roman style' -----the sadducees facilitated----the romans did it, and the
Pharisees resisted

You screwed it up again. I did not say the Sadducees were anti-Roman. I said the Zealots were.

A Roman soldier threw the torch that ignited the flame in the temple, much to Titus' dismay. The fire and the destruction would not have occurred, however, had the Zealots not instigated the conflict. The other Jews were compliant, and the Romans were not out to harm anyone or alter their ways of life.

you live a lie------the romans were murdering wholesale and taxing the
nation to death--------sheeeesh------even Italians I have known ADMIT----
PS--Jesus was a Pharisee --------the romans were genocidal animals.
Ask the brits-------for that matter----ask the greeks

Rome didn't interfer with the religious practices of the Jews.

other than appointing the high priests and an ILLEGETAMATE KING and imposing
Roman law and excessive taxes? yeah they did.-----but then again you were TOLD
that muslim rulers ALSO interfere in no religious practices and have "THE MOST |
TOLERATION" (for the record---the actual reason that Jesus attacked the
MONEY CHANGERS in the temple courtyard was BECAUSE THEY WERE ROMAN
SHILLS------I attended "sunday school" ----christians are TAUGHT TO BELIEVE THAT
THE "money changers" were dishonest jewish bankers'------tell me I lied about that little
STINKING LIBEL---islamo nazi pig

 

[surada]

A handful of atheists - a very small handful, granted - make a very powerful argument for salvation to be bestowed only on the Jews. Jesus came for his own people. Everyone else had their own theologies.

Those Romans were very self centered.

Not as much as the Jews. Christians sought refuge among the Romans as the Jews - or at least the Zealots - destroyed their own traditions.

"the 'zealots' destroyed their own traditions" HUH??

Yep. Not one of the more traditional, philosophical sects (Sadducees, Pharisees, Essenes), they emerged in protest to Roman occupation and ended up burning down their temple and destroying their capital city.

you screwed it up again-----the Sadducees were PRO ROMAN---in
that they acted as roman shills------not rebels. The essenes were a
small monastic sect------persons withdrawn----FAR FROM THE MADDING
CROWD . It was the Roman armies that destroyed the temple and
Jerusalem ----(sheeeesh---blaming the victim again) <<< that's
why you guys made up a story " dey only crucified him because DA
JOOOOS INSISTED " (ps----it was da Pharisees who not only outlawed
crucifixtion but rendered all capital punishment virtually abolished... fret
not----the paragon of ROMAN EMPIRE CULT---ADOLF----hated
the Pharisees too. Well ----as for the crucifixions ---aka 'entertainment
roman style' -----the sadducees facilitated----the romans did it, and the
Pharisees resisted

You screwed it up again. I did not say the Sadducees were anti-Roman. I said the Zealots were.

A Roman soldier threw the torch that ignited the flame in the temple, much to Titus' dismay. The fire and the destruction would not have occurred, however, had the Zealots not instigated the conflict. The other Jews were compliant, and the Romans were not out to harm anyone or alter their ways of life.

The Jews were quite divided in that time. The Herodians were compliant. Herod's granddaughter was the mistress of Titus. The Essenses left town. The Sicaarri and Zealots fought the Romans and other Jews.

Its no wonder it turned out so badly.

The assimilation rate was high and the Godly Jews won and that's why we're still here annoying you.

Are you saying that the Godly Jews brought on the destruction of the Temple ?

According to Josephus it was pretty bad.. people were starving to death.

 

[irosie91]

A handful of atheists - a very small handful, granted - make a very powerful argument for salvation to be bestowed only on the Jews. Jesus came for his own people. Everyone else had their own theologies.

Those Romans were very self centered.

Not as much as the Jews. Christians sought refuge among the Romans as the Jews - or at least the Zealots - destroyed their own traditions.

"the 'zealots' destroyed their own traditions" HUH??

Yep. Not one of the more traditional, philosophical sects (Sadducees, Pharisees, Essenes), they emerged in protest to Roman occupation and ended up burning down their temple and destroying their capital city.

you screwed it up again-----the Sadducees were PRO ROMAN---in
that they acted as roman shills------not rebels. The essenes were a
small monastic sect------persons withdrawn----FAR FROM THE MADDING
CROWD . It was the Roman armies that destroyed the temple and
Jerusalem ----(sheeeesh---blaming the victim again) <<< that's
why you guys made up a story " dey only crucified him because DA
JOOOOS INSISTED " (ps----it was da Pharisees who not only outlawed
crucifixtion but rendered all capital punishment virtually abolished... fret
not----the paragon of ROMAN EMPIRE CULT---ADOLF----hated
the Pharisees too. Well ----as for the crucifixions ---aka 'entertainment
roman style' -----the sadducees facilitated----the romans did it, and the
Pharisees resisted

You screwed it up again. I did not say the Sadducees were anti-Roman. I said the Zealots were.

A Roman soldier threw the torch that ignited the flame in the temple, much to Titus' dismay. The fire and the destruction would not have occurred, however, had the Zealots not instigated the conflict. The other Jews were compliant, and the Romans were not out to harm anyone or alter their ways of life.

The Jews were quite divided in that time. The Herodians were compliant. Herod's granddaughter was the mistress of Titus. The Essenses left town. The Sicaarri and Zealots fought the Romans and other Jews.

Its no wonder it turned out so badly.

The assimilation rate was high and the Godly Jews won and that's why we're still here annoying you.

Are you saying that the Godly Jews brought on the destruction of the Temple ?

According to Josephus it was pretty bad.. people were starving to death.

of course----just like german jews built Auschwitz. I read your propaganda as a child in the
1950s ------and just like ADOLF was a jew----------but----bad news for islamo nazis-----
the PHARISEES (Jesus was a pharisee) WON

 

[irosie91]

Please don't forget that Europe had persecuted the Jews for nearly 2000 years. Millions of Jews were killed, tortured and exiled across Europe.

The United States actually benefits by having Israel as a trusted, loyal and dedicated friend and ally. Israel is the only country in the Middle East that provides America with trusted military support.

If America has a problem in the Mid East or anywhere nearby, the US can send American men and woman in the military to Israel and they will be protected, respected and treated with honor with the full support of every Israeli leader in the entire country.

This makes us more successful and effective in getting the things we need to get accomplished in the world and the fact is, the life of the State of Israel depends on the USA being successful in the Middle East.


Isa 49:6 And he said, It is a light thing that thou shouldest be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the preserved of Israel: I will also give thee for a light to the Gentiles, that thou mayest be my salvation unto the end of the earth.

When has Israel provided any military support for the US?

the US military----shares technology with Israel whilst islamo nazis murder
us-------address me as MA'AM I am a separated navy officer

 

[surada]

A handful of atheists - a very small handful, granted - make a very powerful argument for salvation to be bestowed only on the Jews. Jesus came for his own people. Everyone else had their own theologies.

Those Romans were very self centered.

Not as much as the Jews. Christians sought refuge among the Romans as the Jews - or at least the Zealots - destroyed their own traditions.

"the 'zealots' destroyed their own traditions" HUH??

Yep. Not one of the more traditional, philosophical sects (Sadducees, Pharisees, Essenes), they emerged in protest to Roman occupation and ended up burning down their temple and destroying their capital city.

you screwed it up again-----the Sadducees were PRO ROMAN---in
that they acted as roman shills------not rebels. The essenes were a
small monastic sect------persons withdrawn----FAR FROM THE MADDING
CROWD . It was the Roman armies that destroyed the temple and
Jerusalem ----(sheeeesh---blaming the victim again) <<< that's
why you guys made up a story " dey only crucified him because DA
JOOOOS INSISTED " (ps----it was da Pharisees who not only outlawed
crucifixtion but rendered all capital punishment virtually abolished... fret
not----the paragon of ROMAN EMPIRE CULT---ADOLF----hated
the Pharisees too. Well ----as for the crucifixions ---aka 'entertainment
roman style' -----the sadducees facilitated----the romans did it, and the
Pharisees resisted

You screwed it up again. I did not say the Sadducees were anti-Roman. I said the Zealots were.

A Roman soldier threw the torch that ignited the flame in the temple, much to Titus' dismay. The fire and the destruction would not have occurred, however, had the Zealots not instigated the conflict. The other Jews were compliant, and the Romans were not out to harm anyone or alter their ways of life.

The Jews were quite divided in that time. The Herodians were compliant. Herod's granddaughter was the mistress of Titus. The Essenses left town. The Sicaarri and Zealots fought the Romans and other Jews.

Its no wonder it turned out so badly.

The assimilation rate was high and the Godly Jews won and that's why we're still here annoying you.

Are you saying that the Godly Jews brought on the destruction of the Temple ?

According to Josephus it was pretty bad.. people were starving to death.

of course----just like german jews built Auschwitz. I read your propaganda as a child in the
1950s ------and just like ADOLF was a jew----------but----bad news for islamo nazis-----
the PHARISEES (Jesus was a pharisee) WON

Sounds like you;ve gone stark raving mad, rosie.

 

[irosie91]

A handful of atheists - a very small handful, granted - make a very powerful argument for salvation to be bestowed only on the Jews. Jesus came for his own people. Everyone else had their own theologies.

Those Romans were very self centered.

Not as much as the Jews. Christians sought refuge among the Romans as the Jews - or at least the Zealots - destroyed their own traditions.

"the 'zealots' destroyed their own traditions" HUH??

Yep. Not one of the more traditional, philosophical sects (Sadducees, Pharisees, Essenes), they emerged in protest to Roman occupation and ended up burning down their temple and destroying their capital city.

you screwed it up again-----the Sadducees were PRO ROMAN---in
that they acted as roman shills------not rebels. The essenes were a
small monastic sect------persons withdrawn----FAR FROM THE MADDING
CROWD . It was the Roman armies that destroyed the temple and
Jerusalem ----(sheeeesh---blaming the victim again) <<< that's
why you guys made up a story " dey only crucified him because DA
JOOOOS INSISTED " (ps----it was da Pharisees who not only outlawed
crucifixtion but rendered all capital punishment virtually abolished... fret
not----the paragon of ROMAN EMPIRE CULT---ADOLF----hated
the Pharisees too. Well ----as for the crucifixions ---aka 'entertainment
roman style' -----the sadducees facilitated----the romans did it, and the
Pharisees resisted

You screwed it up again. I did not say the Sadducees were anti-Roman. I said the Zealots were.

A Roman soldier threw the torch that ignited the flame in the temple, much to Titus' dismay. The fire and the destruction would not have occurred, however, had the Zealots not instigated the conflict. The other Jews were compliant, and the Romans were not out to harm anyone or alter their ways of life.

The Jews were quite divided in that time. The Herodians were compliant. Herod's granddaughter was the mistress of Titus. The Essenses left town. The Sicaarri and Zealots fought the Romans and other Jews.

Its no wonder it turned out so badly.

The assimilation rate was high and the Godly Jews won and that's why we're still here annoying you.

Are you saying that the Godly Jews brought on the destruction of the Temple ?

According to Josephus it was pretty bad.. people were starving to death.

of course----just like german jews built Auschwitz. I read your propaganda as a child in the
1950s ------and just like ADOLF was a jew----------but----bad news for islamo nazis-----
the PHARISEES (Jesus was a pharisee) WON

Sounds like you;ve gone stark raving mad, rosie.

of course------I seem mad to ALL ISLAMO NAZIS-----long ago I tried to convince
a pakistani educated surgeon that MAIMONIDES was a jew. He had been taught
that Maimonides was BORN a jew but then REVERTED to islam and became a
great doctor of Medieval times (after all how was personal physician to Saladin).
I failed-----he ALSO told me that I am NUTS-----just a brain-washed Jewess. SEE, \
saruda----I KNOW YOU WELL

 

[irosie91]

A shithole desperate for Jews; offering to build synagogues.

If it wasn't for US $$$$$$ Israel would have already dried up and blown away---

Israel: Loan guarantees are not considered foreign aid so the $7.9 billion in guarantees have been excluded from this table (see Loan Guarantees for Israel

Source: Jeremy Sharp, “U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel,” Congressional Research Service, (April 10, 2018)


(In Millions of Dollars)

Military---------Economic------ Resettlement----- ASHA ----------All Other------------- Total

$94,792.790 --$30,897.0-------- $1,708.2---- $162.075---- $15,592.635---$134,764.080

Total U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel (1949-Present)

-

Remember the Six Day War In 1967?
Israel was one day away from taking out it’s five neighbors and President Lyndon Johnson stopped them.
The US owes Israel big time.

They did attack Egypt unexpectedly while Egyptian troops were fighting in Yemen. Read Moshe Dayan. The Israelis wanted that war for over a decade.

for those out there who might be confused by islamo-nazi propaganda----BAATHIST PIG,
GAMAL ABDUL NASSER ---asserted, with utmost confidence, that he would bring his
troops into tel aviv to rape and murder, He assembled his army on the Sinai border
complete with massive numbers of russian tanks and Russian military experts in the
field. ----had had already blocked the straits of Tiran -----but islamo nazi propagandaists
claim that the 1967 war was a "SURPRISE" ------I had just finished my finals ----freshman
college student-----MIND PRIMED to memory-----I ACED every course and watched the HYSTERICAL arab ambassadors spit their shit in the UN on TV during CRISIS IN THE
MIDDLE EAST-----all day for the last weeks of May------somehow it was a SURPRISE in the
addled mind of Surada? gee-----I was not surprised

 

[ding]

I am NUTS

I concur.

 

[irosie91]

I am NUTS

I concur.

ding-bat-----the emulator of "christ" just altered my post at noted
above------he is a TERRIFIC CHRISTIAN

 

[ding]

I am NUTS

I concur.

ding-bat-----the emulator of "christ" just altered my post at noted
above------he is a TERRIFIC CHRISTIAN

I didn't alter anything.

And I don't believe I have ever claimed to be a saint or even good. So there's that. But I'd bet that you see yourself as good. Am I right? Or am I right?

 

[irosie91]

I am NUTS

I concur.

ding-bat-----the emulator of "christ" just altered my post at noted
above------he is a TERRIFIC CHRISTIAN

I didn't alter anything.

And I don't believe I have ever claimed to be a saint or even good. So there's that. But I'd bet that you see yourself as good. Am I right? Or am I right?

You are a product of your early education as am I (something you already noted)
My early education was very christian. I grew up in a christian town that had been
"restricted" prior to the post world war II BABY BOOM when building little houses on
the deserted little farms and fruit Orchards became REALLY PROFITABLE. I went to
sunday school lots and colored cartoons of Jesus holding a lamb and sang ----
a waaaaay in the manger no crib for a BEEEDDDDDDD. There were few books around---
so I read the bible-----compliments of little old ladies who gave out tiny pocket
versions around christmas. . I read all the time-----even in school ---surreptitiously
-----anything----useless stuff over and over. I never had a "JEWISH EDUCATION" ---
as is consistent with the version of jews to which you were introduced in sunday
school, at home, and on the playground-------remember the "MONEY CHANGERS"
lesson?-----actually as dumb and politicized as the "SAMARITIN" lesson.
I learned your version in childhood----but I actually READ THE BOOK.
You do present yourself as having read the book.

 

[BreezeWood]

Moses was a murder-er multiple times.,.,.,.

By,.,.,.,.,.,. no longer believing this—

Exo 12:21 KJV) Then Moses called for all the elders of Israel, and said unto them, Draw out and take you a lamb according to your families, and kill the passover.

When later, Moses gives us the Ten Commandments.,./\.,./\.,. /\.,./\.,./\.,./\.,./\.,./\.,./\;.,/\
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Out of the “Ten Commandment’s”; which do you believe they truly follow today-?

Ten Commandments

1. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.

3. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.

4. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.

5. Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.

6. Thou shalt not kill. (murder)

7. Thou shalt not commit adultery.

8. Thou shalt not steal.

9. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.

10. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.

7/10’s (70%) of the Ten commandments have been put into public “law” in every recognized country member in the United Nations.

Can you guess which one’s-?

Or just speak your mind one way or another
-

.

1. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

.
written by moses gives an insight for their ambition ... or someone's, whoever wrote it.

 

[surada]

Those Romans were very self centered.

Not as much as the Jews. Christians sought refuge among the Romans as the Jews - or at least the Zealots - destroyed their own traditions.

Of course YOU ---"KNOW" that neither did the wonderfully accomodating muslim invaders and rapists

"the 'zealots' destroyed their own traditions" HUH??

Yep. Not one of the more traditional, philosophical sects (Sadducees, Pharisees, Essenes), they emerged in protest to Roman occupation and ended up burning down their temple and destroying their capital city.

you screwed it up again-----the Sadducees were PRO ROMAN---in
that they acted as roman shills------not rebels. The essenes were a
small monastic sect------persons withdrawn----FAR FROM THE MADDING
CROWD . It was the Roman armies that destroyed the temple and
Jerusalem ----(sheeeesh---blaming the victim again) <<< that's
why you guys made up a story " dey only crucified him because DA
JOOOOS INSISTED " (ps----it was da Pharisees who not only outlawed
crucifixtion but rendered all capital punishment virtually abolished... fret
not----the paragon of ROMAN EMPIRE CULT---ADOLF----hated
the Pharisees too. Well ----as for the crucifixions ---aka 'entertainment
roman style' -----the sadducees facilitated----the romans did it, and the
Pharisees resisted

You screwed it up again. I did not say the Sadducees were anti-Roman. I said the Zealots were.

A Roman soldier threw the torch that ignited the flame in the temple, much to Titus' dismay. The fire and the destruction would not have occurred, however, had the Zealots not instigated the conflict. The other Jews were compliant, and the Romans were not out to harm anyone or alter their ways of life.

you live a lie------the romans were murdering wholesale and taxing the
nation to death--------sheeeesh------even Italians I have known ADMIT----
PS--Jesus was a Pharisee --------the romans were genocidal animals.
Ask the brits-------for that matter----ask the greeks

Rome didn't interfer with the religious practices of the Jews.

other than appointing the high priests and an ILLEGETAMATE KING and imposing
Roman law and excessive taxes? yeah they did.-----but then again you were TOLD
that muslim rulers ALSO interfere in no religious practices and have "THE MOST |
TOLERATION" (for the record---the actual reason that Jesus attacked the
MONEY CHANGERS in the temple courtyard was BECAUSE THEY WERE ROMAN
SHILLS------I attended "sunday school" ----christians are TAUGHT TO BELIEVE THAT
THE "money changers" were dishonest jewish bankers'------tell me I lied about that little
STINKING LIBEL---islamo nazi pig

The moneychangers weren't Romans.. They were Jews..


The Money Changers

The word "moneychanger" means money-banker or money-broker. They would make large profits at the expense of the pilgrims. Every Israelite, rich or poor, who had reached the age of twenty was obligated to pay a half shekel as an offering to Jehovah into the sacred treasury. This tribute was in every case to be paid in the exact Hebrew half shekel. At Passover everyone in the world who was an adult male and wished to worship at the Temple would bring his "offering" or purchase a sacrificial animal at the Temple. Since there was no acceptance of foreign money with any foreign image the money changers would sell "Temple coinage" at a very high rate of exchange and assess a fixed charge for their services.

The judges, who sat to inspect the offerings that were brought by the pilgrims, were quick to detect any blemish in them. This was expensive for the wealthy pilgrims, not to say how ruinous this was for the poor who could only offer their turtle-doves and pigeons. There was no defense for them or court of appeal, seeing that the priestly authorities took a large percentage on every transaction.

Bible History, Maps, Images, Articles, and Resources for Biblical History

Bible History Images and Resources for Biblical History. Resources, Free Bible Software, Bible Art, Biblical History Topics and Study, and ancient Bible maps of Rome, Greece, and ancient Near East.

www.bible-history.com

 

[surada]

A shithole desperate for Jews; offering to build synagogues.

If it wasn't for US $$$$$$ Israel would have already dried up and blown away---

Israel: Loan guarantees are not considered foreign aid so the $7.9 billion in guarantees have been excluded from this table (see Loan Guarantees for Israel

Source: Jeremy Sharp, “U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel,” Congressional Research Service, (April 10, 2018)


(In Millions of Dollars)

Military---------Economic------ Resettlement----- ASHA ----------All Other------------- Total

$94,792.790 --$30,897.0-------- $1,708.2---- $162.075---- $15,592.635---$134,764.080

Total U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel (1949-Present)

-

Remember the Six Day War In 1967?
Israel was one day away from taking out it’s five neighbors and President Lyndon Johnson stopped them.
The US owes Israel big time.

They did attack Egypt unexpectedly while Egyptian troops were fighting in Yemen. Read Moshe Dayan. The Israelis wanted that war for over a decade.

for those out there who might be confused by islamo-nazi propaganda----BAATHIST PIG,
GAMAL ABDUL NASSER ---asserted, with utmost confidence, that he would bring his
troops into tel aviv to rape and murder, He assembled his army on the Sinai border
complete with massive numbers of russian tanks and Russian military experts in the
field. ----had had already blocked the straits of Tiran -----but islamo nazi propagandaists
claim that the 1967 war was a "SURPRISE" ------I had just finished my finals ----freshman
college student-----MIND PRIMED to memory-----I ACED every course and watched the HYSTERICAL arab ambassadors spit their shit in the UN on TV during CRISIS IN THE
MIDDLE EAST-----all day for the last weeks of May------somehow it was a SURPRISE in the
addled mind of Surada? gee-----I was not surprised

Nasser didn't have troops on the Sinai border. No Israeli flagged ship had passed thru the Straits of Tiran for 14 months. Nasser had that same week called for a summit to resolve the problem of the Straits. 70,000 Egyptian troops were deployed in Yemen from 1962 to 1970.

Read Moshe Dayan.