Moses was a murder-er multiple times.,.,.,.

[irosie91]

irosie91

Trust me.. Islam has NOTHING to do with what is written in the Gospels inspite of your stupid accusations and insults.
.................................................

.............................................

rosie says-------where did I mention Islam?

A few posts back you were raving about "Islamo Nazis". I'm a WASP, you idiot and an Episcopalian.

Where did I suggest that YOU are a Muslim? I grew up in WASP/EPISCOPALIAN
land. The town was founded pre-colonial and harbored lots of persons descended from the
original British "farmer" settlers. The anti-jewish propaganda was ALL OVER THE PLACE
in little seedy pamphlets with information that the local yokels actually believed. Significant
amounts of it were writtten by escapees from the Nuremburg trials that made their lives
in Syria and Egypt. It was REMARKABLY "islamo-nazi" and you, clearly, know the material,
chapter and verse. Muslims of today------I have worked and socialized with HUNDREDS ---
know "JESUS" from catholic missionaries and BRITISH COLONIZERS. The propaganda
was written for the "arab/muslim/christian" cause was VERY ISLAM FRIENDLY and ACCOMODATING and very hostile to----GUESS WHO.

 

[irosie91]

Why Jesus Kicked People Out Of The Temple

www.wordsofhakim.com

Again Surada presents the ISLAMO-NAZI version of Jesus. Hakim..com is a
MUSLIM site. Not news to me----for more of this BS visit a mosque in which
english is spoken. That which is left out is FACT-----that it was the PHARISEES
who despised the ROMAN INSTALLED PRIESTS and the Pharisees (like Jesus)
who were the talmudists and who mediated Judaism SINCE the time of the
ROMAN OPPRESSIONS. When it suits islam------muslims kiss the asses of
the ROMANS-----includiing the Third Holy Roman Empire-----the Third Reich.
The BS about bankers and licenses is----just that BS. There are no such
law in Judaism. The oppression was ROMAN TAXATION. As to
OBLIGATORY SACRIFICES OF LAMBS-----by the poor-----more BS----
never happened. There is so much correct information in the NT that
islamo nazis MUST PERVERT IT

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

ccaugusta.org

Did Jesus call the Pharisees hypocrites? For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees , you hypocrites ! Did Jesus call the Pharisees vipers? Pharisees and Sadducees come. to his baptism, he said unto. them, O generation of vipers , who hath warned you to flee.

easy-----Jesus was a pharisee and did not castigate the pharisees. The ROMAN NICEAN council did

According the scripture Jesus did castigate the Pharisees. I have posted several links for you.

Jesus considered them hypocrites.

Jesus SOMEHOW failed to write anything. The only evidence available suggest that
he was literate----but SOMEHOW failed to write anything. Matthew---if one wishes to
believe that he authored the Book of Matthew-----wrote his stuff decades after Jesus
died and there is no real evidence that either he or his close collaborators-----like LUKE
ever REALLY met Jesus. Matthew was a Roman employee------aka SHILL

Nobody is saying Jesus wrote the Book of Matthew or any of the Gospels. It appears from the scripture that Jesus was a Pharisee without approving of them.

Your claim has zero evidence.

Why Did the Pharisees Hate Jesus So Much?

Why Did the Pharisees Hate Jesus So Much?

When you talk to people who are non-Christians today, they are usually very complimentary of Jesus. They’ll say: “I don’t believe that He was the Messiah, and I don’t believe that He was the Son of God, but Jesus was certainly a great person. He was a great teacher. Maybe He was prophet.”

www.ligonier.org

The people loved Jesus, and they received Him gladly, but what they felt from the Pharisees was judgment. The only thing the Pharisees looked at was the people’s sin, and so they had a certain contempt for the common people. They saw Jesus associating with the common people and saw them cheering Him, loving Him.

Bullshit ^^^^ The pharisees were generally not only literate but prolific writers.
The only "EVIDENCE" that "THE CHURCH" could conjure up that "the pharisees hated
Jesus are forgeries and convoluted misinterpretations of lines in the Talmud. There is
AMPLE evidence that the Pharisees hated CAIAPHAS and ----HEROD-----but somehow the
writings of the new testament ----SKIP THAT STUFF. The statement that Pharisees were
THE ELITES is a kind of libel------interestingly there are lots of idiots using the term ELITE
today to describe powerful sociopathic politicians. The usages are SO HILLBILLY-----that
I am reminded of EASTERBUNNY sunday school of my childhood, The Pharisees in Roman
controlled Judea had no power at all except for short episodes when they manage to
successfully rebel against them-------they were the ones being crucified. People
EMPLOYED by the Romans----like Caiaphas and Matthew had POWER and were despised by
Pharisees and the beloved pets of Rome------even invited to ENJOY the gladiator
monstrosities

The Leaven of the Pharisees and the Leaven of Herod ...

The Leaven of the Pharisees and the Leaven of Herod

Yeast is the secret to making bread rise. When added to a lump of bread dough, the yeast ferments the starches in the dough and causes the dough to increase in size. Without yeast to ...

www.ligonier.org

Christ may be referring to Herod and the Pharisees’ contentment with Roman rule. Herod enjoyed political power because of Rome, and though many Jews wanted Rome overthrown, the Pharisees were basically fine with the Romans as long as Caesar allowed them to study the law in peace.

IDIOT ALERT-----it was the PHARISEES that hated Roman rule and rebelled against the filth
that LATTER christians licked. The pharisees were the victims of crucifixions. As for the commentator you cited-------warn him not to quit his day job. Leaven as a symbol
of evil (actually something like death) is actually a PHARISEE CONCEPT ------that precedes Jesus and Mark etc by centuries -----sheeeeeesh

 

[surada]

Why Jesus Kicked People Out Of The Temple

www.wordsofhakim.com

Again Surada presents the ISLAMO-NAZI version of Jesus. Hakim..com is a
MUSLIM site. Not news to me----for more of this BS visit a mosque in which
english is spoken. That which is left out is FACT-----that it was the PHARISEES
who despised the ROMAN INSTALLED PRIESTS and the Pharisees (like Jesus)
who were the talmudists and who mediated Judaism SINCE the time of the
ROMAN OPPRESSIONS. When it suits islam------muslims kiss the asses of
the ROMANS-----includiing the Third Holy Roman Empire-----the Third Reich.
The BS about bankers and licenses is----just that BS. There are no such
law in Judaism. The oppression was ROMAN TAXATION. As to
OBLIGATORY SACRIFICES OF LAMBS-----by the poor-----more BS----
never happened. There is so much correct information in the NT that
islamo nazis MUST PERVERT IT

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

ccaugusta.org

Did Jesus call the Pharisees hypocrites? For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees , you hypocrites ! Did Jesus call the Pharisees vipers? Pharisees and Sadducees come. to his baptism, he said unto. them, O generation of vipers , who hath warned you to flee.

easy-----Jesus was a pharisee and did not castigate the pharisees. The ROMAN NICEAN council did

According the scripture Jesus did castigate the Pharisees. I have posted several links for you.

Jesus considered them hypocrites.

Jesus SOMEHOW failed to write anything. The only evidence available suggest that
he was literate----but SOMEHOW failed to write anything. Matthew---if one wishes to
believe that he authored the Book of Matthew-----wrote his stuff decades after Jesus
died and there is no real evidence that either he or his close collaborators-----like LUKE
ever REALLY met Jesus. Matthew was a Roman employee------aka SHILL

Nobody is saying Jesus wrote the Book of Matthew or any of the Gospels. It appears from the scripture that Jesus was a Pharisee without approving of them.

Your claim has zero evidence.

Why Did the Pharisees Hate Jesus So Much?

Why Did the Pharisees Hate Jesus So Much?

When you talk to people who are non-Christians today, they are usually very complimentary of Jesus. They’ll say: “I don’t believe that He was the Messiah, and I don’t believe that He was the Son of God, but Jesus was certainly a great person. He was a great teacher. Maybe He was prophet.”

www.ligonier.org

The people loved Jesus, and they received Him gladly, but what they felt from the Pharisees was judgment. The only thing the Pharisees looked at was the people’s sin, and so they had a certain contempt for the common people. They saw Jesus associating with the common people and saw them cheering Him, loving Him.

Bullshit ^^^^ The pharisees were generally not only literate but prolific writers.
The only "EVIDENCE" that "THE CHURCH" could conjure up that "the pharisees hated
Jesus are forgeries and convoluted misinterpretations of lines in the Talmud. There is
AMPLE evidence that the Pharisees hated CAIAPHAS and ----HEROD-----but somehow the
writings of the new testament ----SKIP THAT STUFF. The statement that Pharisees were
THE ELITES is a kind of libel------interestingly there are lots of idiots using the term ELITE
today to describe powerful sociopathic politicians. The usages are SO HILLBILLY-----that
I am reminded of EASTERBUNNY sunday school of my childhood, The Pharisees in Roman
controlled Judea had no power at all except for short episodes when they manage to
successfully rebel against them-------they were the ones being crucified. People
EMPLOYED by the Romans----like Caiaphas and Matthew had POWER and were despised by
Pharisees and the beloved pets of Rome------even invited to ENJOY the gladiator
monstrosities

The Leaven of the Pharisees and the Leaven of Herod ...

The Leaven of the Pharisees and the Leaven of Herod

Yeast is the secret to making bread rise. When added to a lump of bread dough, the yeast ferments the starches in the dough and causes the dough to increase in size. Without yeast to ...

www.ligonier.org

Christ may be referring to Herod and the Pharisees’ contentment with Roman rule. Herod enjoyed political power because of Rome, and though many Jews wanted Rome overthrown, the Pharisees were basically fine with the Romans as long as Caesar allowed them to study the law in peace.

IDIOT ALERT-----it was the PHARISEES that hated Roman rule and rebelled against the filth
that LATTER christians licked. The pharisees were the victims of crucifixions. As for the commentator you cited-------warn him not to quit his day job. Leaven as a symbol
of evil (actually something like death) is actually a PHARISEE CONCEPT ------that precedes Jesus and Mark etc by centuries -----sheeeeeesh

Under Herod (37 b.c.-4 b.c.) the Pharisees were influential, but carefully controlled by the king. Some individual Pharisees did oppose Herod on occasion. Josephus gives almost no information about the Pharisees from the death of Herod until the outset of the revolt against Rome (about a.d. 66).
Who Were the Pharisees? Bible Definition and Meaning
www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/pharisees/
www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/pharisees/

 

[irosie91]

Why Jesus Kicked People Out Of The Temple

www.wordsofhakim.com

Again Surada presents the ISLAMO-NAZI version of Jesus. Hakim..com is a
MUSLIM site. Not news to me----for more of this BS visit a mosque in which
english is spoken. That which is left out is FACT-----that it was the PHARISEES
who despised the ROMAN INSTALLED PRIESTS and the Pharisees (like Jesus)
who were the talmudists and who mediated Judaism SINCE the time of the
ROMAN OPPRESSIONS. When it suits islam------muslims kiss the asses of
the ROMANS-----includiing the Third Holy Roman Empire-----the Third Reich.
The BS about bankers and licenses is----just that BS. There are no such
law in Judaism. The oppression was ROMAN TAXATION. As to
OBLIGATORY SACRIFICES OF LAMBS-----by the poor-----more BS----
never happened. There is so much correct information in the NT that
islamo nazis MUST PERVERT IT

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

ccaugusta.org

Did Jesus call the Pharisees hypocrites? For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees , you hypocrites ! Did Jesus call the Pharisees vipers? Pharisees and Sadducees come. to his baptism, he said unto. them, O generation of vipers , who hath warned you to flee.

easy-----Jesus was a pharisee and did not castigate the pharisees. The ROMAN NICEAN council did

According the scripture Jesus did castigate the Pharisees. I have posted several links for you.

Jesus considered them hypocrites.

Jesus SOMEHOW failed to write anything. The only evidence available suggest that
he was literate----but SOMEHOW failed to write anything. Matthew---if one wishes to
believe that he authored the Book of Matthew-----wrote his stuff decades after Jesus
died and there is no real evidence that either he or his close collaborators-----like LUKE
ever REALLY met Jesus. Matthew was a Roman employee------aka SHILL

Nobody is saying Jesus wrote the Book of Matthew or any of the Gospels. It appears from the scripture that Jesus was a Pharisee without approving of them.

Your claim has zero evidence.

Why Did the Pharisees Hate Jesus So Much?

Why Did the Pharisees Hate Jesus So Much?

When you talk to people who are non-Christians today, they are usually very complimentary of Jesus. They’ll say: “I don’t believe that He was the Messiah, and I don’t believe that He was the Son of God, but Jesus was certainly a great person. He was a great teacher. Maybe He was prophet.”

www.ligonier.org

The people loved Jesus, and they received Him gladly, but what they felt from the Pharisees was judgment. The only thing the Pharisees looked at was the people’s sin, and so they had a certain contempt for the common people. They saw Jesus associating with the common people and saw them cheering Him, loving Him.

Bullshit ^^^^ The pharisees were generally not only literate but prolific writers.
The only "EVIDENCE" that "THE CHURCH" could conjure up that "the pharisees hated
Jesus are forgeries and convoluted misinterpretations of lines in the Talmud. There is
AMPLE evidence that the Pharisees hated CAIAPHAS and ----HEROD-----but somehow the
writings of the new testament ----SKIP THAT STUFF. The statement that Pharisees were
THE ELITES is a kind of libel------interestingly there are lots of idiots using the term ELITE
today to describe powerful sociopathic politicians. The usages are SO HILLBILLY-----that
I am reminded of EASTERBUNNY sunday school of my childhood, The Pharisees in Roman
controlled Judea had no power at all except for short episodes when they manage to
successfully rebel against them-------they were the ones being crucified. People
EMPLOYED by the Romans----like Caiaphas and Matthew had POWER and were despised by
Pharisees and the beloved pets of Rome------even invited to ENJOY the gladiator
monstrosities

The Leaven of the Pharisees and the Leaven of Herod ...

The Leaven of the Pharisees and the Leaven of Herod

Yeast is the secret to making bread rise. When added to a lump of bread dough, the yeast ferments the starches in the dough and causes the dough to increase in size. Without yeast to ...

www.ligonier.org

Christ may be referring to Herod and the Pharisees’ contentment with Roman rule. Herod enjoyed political power because of Rome, and though many Jews wanted Rome overthrown, the Pharisees were basically fine with the Romans as long as Caesar allowed them to study the law in peace.

IDIOT ALERT-----it was the PHARISEES that hated Roman rule and rebelled against the filth
that LATTER christians licked. The pharisees were the victims of crucifixions. As for the commentator you cited-------warn him not to quit his day job. Leaven as a symbol
of evil (actually something like death) is actually a PHARISEE CONCEPT ------that precedes Jesus and Mark etc by centuries -----sheeeeeesh

Under Herod (37 b.c.-4 b.c.) the Pharisees were influential, but carefully controlled by the king. Some individual Pharisees did oppose Herod on occasion. Josephus gives almost no information about the Pharisees from the death of Herod until the outset of the revolt against Rome (about a.d. 66).
Who Were the Pharisees? Bible Definition and Meaning
www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/pharisees/
www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/pharisees/

Long ago-----I was a very young------"intern' health care trainee. A patient sporting a large
cross left the book he had been reading------"Works of Josephus Flavius" Well---I kinda
had already read a bit of Josephus-----but this book had a forward written by an INDIGNANT
christian "? scholar" He praised the book but SHARPLY criticized it because ........
JOSEPHUS WROTE ADMIRINGLY ABOUT THE PHARISEES who were "as will all know-----
evil etc etc etc" For those who do not know-----Josephus is a mildly controversial figure
amongst jews. He was part of the REBELLION against Rome but he also counselled a kind of "conciliation" with the Romans to limit bloodshed------like a treaty. In background he is
a "COHEN" that is a person of the Tribe of Levi and descended from Aaron and a pharisee.
THUS there were jews who politically hated his guts at the time. Surada's citation is just about
as SOPHISTICALLY IDIOTIC as was that forward in the book left by the christian with the big cross. For clarification------PHARISEE HISTORY----well documented, actually reveals no
animosity to a person named "JESUS" or anyone like Jesus. But the Pharisees in the
tradition of EZRA are the main formers of DIASPORA JUDAISM (ie the AD STUFF)---and
they rejected Christianity-------so christians HATE THEIR GUTS ------the the saga marches on

 

[irosie91]

Why Jesus Kicked People Out Of The Temple

www.wordsofhakim.com

Again Surada presents the ISLAMO-NAZI version of Jesus. Hakim..com is a
MUSLIM site. Not news to me----for more of this BS visit a mosque in which
english is spoken. That which is left out is FACT-----that it was the PHARISEES
who despised the ROMAN INSTALLED PRIESTS and the Pharisees (like Jesus)
who were the talmudists and who mediated Judaism SINCE the time of the
ROMAN OPPRESSIONS. When it suits islam------muslims kiss the asses of
the ROMANS-----includiing the Third Holy Roman Empire-----the Third Reich.
The BS about bankers and licenses is----just that BS. There are no such
law in Judaism. The oppression was ROMAN TAXATION. As to
OBLIGATORY SACRIFICES OF LAMBS-----by the poor-----more BS----
never happened. There is so much correct information in the NT that
islamo nazis MUST PERVERT IT

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

ccaugusta.org

Did Jesus call the Pharisees hypocrites? For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees , you hypocrites ! Did Jesus call the Pharisees vipers? Pharisees and Sadducees come. to his baptism, he said unto. them, O generation of vipers , who hath warned you to flee.

easy-----Jesus was a pharisee and did not castigate the pharisees. The ROMAN NICEAN council did

According the scripture Jesus did castigate the Pharisees. I have posted several links for you.

Jesus considered them hypocrites.

Jesus SOMEHOW failed to write anything. The only evidence available suggest that
he was literate----but SOMEHOW failed to write anything. Matthew---if one wishes to
believe that he authored the Book of Matthew-----wrote his stuff decades after Jesus
died and there is no real evidence that either he or his close collaborators-----like LUKE
ever REALLY met Jesus. Matthew was a Roman employee------aka SHILL

Nobody is saying Jesus wrote the Book of Matthew or any of the Gospels. It appears from the scripture that Jesus was a Pharisee without approving of them.

Your claim has zero evidence.

Why Did the Pharisees Hate Jesus So Much?

Why Did the Pharisees Hate Jesus So Much?

When you talk to people who are non-Christians today, they are usually very complimentary of Jesus. They’ll say: “I don’t believe that He was the Messiah, and I don’t believe that He was the Son of God, but Jesus was certainly a great person. He was a great teacher. Maybe He was prophet.”

www.ligonier.org

The people loved Jesus, and they received Him gladly, but what they felt from the Pharisees was judgment. The only thing the Pharisees looked at was the people’s sin, and so they had a certain contempt for the common people. They saw Jesus associating with the common people and saw them cheering Him, loving Him.

Bullshit ^^^^ The pharisees were generally not only literate but prolific writers.
The only "EVIDENCE" that "THE CHURCH" could conjure up that "the pharisees hated
Jesus are forgeries and convoluted misinterpretations of lines in the Talmud. There is
AMPLE evidence that the Pharisees hated CAIAPHAS and ----HEROD-----but somehow the
writings of the new testament ----SKIP THAT STUFF. The statement that Pharisees were
THE ELITES is a kind of libel------interestingly there are lots of idiots using the term ELITE
today to describe powerful sociopathic politicians. The usages are SO HILLBILLY-----that
I am reminded of EASTERBUNNY sunday school of my childhood, The Pharisees in Roman
controlled Judea had no power at all except for short episodes when they manage to
successfully rebel against them-------they were the ones being crucified. People
EMPLOYED by the Romans----like Caiaphas and Matthew had POWER and were despised by
Pharisees and the beloved pets of Rome------even invited to ENJOY the gladiator
monstrosities

The Leaven of the Pharisees and the Leaven of Herod ...

The Leaven of the Pharisees and the Leaven of Herod

Yeast is the secret to making bread rise. When added to a lump of bread dough, the yeast ferments the starches in the dough and causes the dough to increase in size. Without yeast to ...

www.ligonier.org

Christ may be referring to Herod and the Pharisees’ contentment with Roman rule. Herod enjoyed political power because of Rome, and though many Jews wanted Rome overthrown, the Pharisees were basically fine with the Romans as long as Caesar allowed them to study the law in peace.

IDIOT ALERT-----it was the PHARISEES that hated Roman rule and rebelled against the filth
that LATTER christians licked. The pharisees were the victims of crucifixions. As for the commentator you cited-------warn him not to quit his day job. Leaven as a symbol
of evil (actually something like death) is actually a PHARISEE CONCEPT ------that precedes Jesus and Mark etc by centuries -----sheeeeeesh

Under Herod (37 b.c.-4 b.c.) the Pharisees were influential, but carefully controlled by the king. Some individual Pharisees did oppose Herod on occasion. Josephus gives almost no information about the Pharisees from the death of Herod until the outset of the revolt against Rome (about a.d. 66).
Who Were the Pharisees? Bible Definition and Meaning
www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/pharisees/
www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/pharisees/

"some individual pharisees did oppose Herod" {surada} NOPE---they all opposed and like
PHARISEE JESUS were not at all "fine with" Roman rule Josephus
was a pharisee-------he was not writing an autobiography---he wrote a history of jewish
wars----and had been involved in the rebellion but was captured and chose to
SURVIVE by cooperating with the Roman concept of a CIVILIZED WORLD UNDER ROMAN
RULE" (borrowed from Alexander's concept of his "NEW WORLD" modeled on Greek
culture)

 

[surada]

Why Jesus Kicked People Out Of The Temple

www.wordsofhakim.com

Again Surada presents the ISLAMO-NAZI version of Jesus. Hakim..com is a
MUSLIM site. Not news to me----for more of this BS visit a mosque in which
english is spoken. That which is left out is FACT-----that it was the PHARISEES
who despised the ROMAN INSTALLED PRIESTS and the Pharisees (like Jesus)
who were the talmudists and who mediated Judaism SINCE the time of the
ROMAN OPPRESSIONS. When it suits islam------muslims kiss the asses of
the ROMANS-----includiing the Third Holy Roman Empire-----the Third Reich.
The BS about bankers and licenses is----just that BS. There are no such
law in Judaism. The oppression was ROMAN TAXATION. As to
OBLIGATORY SACRIFICES OF LAMBS-----by the poor-----more BS----
never happened. There is so much correct information in the NT that
islamo nazis MUST PERVERT IT

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

ccaugusta.org

Did Jesus call the Pharisees hypocrites? For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees , you hypocrites ! Did Jesus call the Pharisees vipers? Pharisees and Sadducees come. to his baptism, he said unto. them, O generation of vipers , who hath warned you to flee.

easy-----Jesus was a pharisee and did not castigate the pharisees. The ROMAN NICEAN council did

According the scripture Jesus did castigate the Pharisees. I have posted several links for you.

Jesus considered them hypocrites.

Jesus SOMEHOW failed to write anything. The only evidence available suggest that
he was literate----but SOMEHOW failed to write anything. Matthew---if one wishes to
believe that he authored the Book of Matthew-----wrote his stuff decades after Jesus
died and there is no real evidence that either he or his close collaborators-----like LUKE
ever REALLY met Jesus. Matthew was a Roman employee------aka SHILL

Nobody is saying Jesus wrote the Book of Matthew or any of the Gospels. It appears from the scripture that Jesus was a Pharisee without approving of them.

Your claim has zero evidence.

Why Did the Pharisees Hate Jesus So Much?

Why Did the Pharisees Hate Jesus So Much?

When you talk to people who are non-Christians today, they are usually very complimentary of Jesus. They’ll say: “I don’t believe that He was the Messiah, and I don’t believe that He was the Son of God, but Jesus was certainly a great person. He was a great teacher. Maybe He was prophet.”

www.ligonier.org

The people loved Jesus, and they received Him gladly, but what they felt from the Pharisees was judgment. The only thing the Pharisees looked at was the people’s sin, and so they had a certain contempt for the common people. They saw Jesus associating with the common people and saw them cheering Him, loving Him.

Bullshit ^^^^ The pharisees were generally not only literate but prolific writers.
The only "EVIDENCE" that "THE CHURCH" could conjure up that "the pharisees hated
Jesus are forgeries and convoluted misinterpretations of lines in the Talmud. There is
AMPLE evidence that the Pharisees hated CAIAPHAS and ----HEROD-----but somehow the
writings of the new testament ----SKIP THAT STUFF. The statement that Pharisees were
THE ELITES is a kind of libel------interestingly there are lots of idiots using the term ELITE
today to describe powerful sociopathic politicians. The usages are SO HILLBILLY-----that
I am reminded of EASTERBUNNY sunday school of my childhood, The Pharisees in Roman
controlled Judea had no power at all except for short episodes when they manage to
successfully rebel against them-------they were the ones being crucified. People
EMPLOYED by the Romans----like Caiaphas and Matthew had POWER and were despised by
Pharisees and the beloved pets of Rome------even invited to ENJOY the gladiator
monstrosities

The Leaven of the Pharisees and the Leaven of Herod ...

The Leaven of the Pharisees and the Leaven of Herod

Yeast is the secret to making bread rise. When added to a lump of bread dough, the yeast ferments the starches in the dough and causes the dough to increase in size. Without yeast to ...

www.ligonier.org

Christ may be referring to Herod and the Pharisees’ contentment with Roman rule. Herod enjoyed political power because of Rome, and though many Jews wanted Rome overthrown, the Pharisees were basically fine with the Romans as long as Caesar allowed them to study the law in peace.

IDIOT ALERT-----it was the PHARISEES that hated Roman rule and rebelled against the filth
that LATTER christians licked. The pharisees were the victims of crucifixions. As for the commentator you cited-------warn him not to quit his day job. Leaven as a symbol
of evil (actually something like death) is actually a PHARISEE CONCEPT ------that precedes Jesus and Mark etc by centuries -----sheeeeeesh

Under Herod (37 b.c.-4 b.c.) the Pharisees were influential, but carefully controlled by the king. Some individual Pharisees did oppose Herod on occasion. Josephus gives almost no information about the Pharisees from the death of Herod until the outset of the revolt against Rome (about a.d. 66).
Who Were the Pharisees? Bible Definition and Meaning
www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/pharisees/
www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/pharisees/

Long ago-----I was a very young------"intern' health care trainee. A patient sporting a large
cross left the book he had been reading------"Works of Josephus Flavius" Well---I kinda
had already read a bit of Josephus-----but this book had a forward written by an INDIGNANT
christian "? scholar" He praised the book but SHARPLY criticized it because ........
JOSEPHUS WROTE ADMIRINGLY ABOUT THE PHARISEES who were "as will all know-----
evil etc etc etc" For those who do not know-----Josephus is a mildly controversial figure
amongst jews. He was part of the REBELLION against Rome but he also counselled a kind of "conciliation" with the Romans to limit bloodshed------like a treaty. In background he is
a "COHEN" that is a person of the Tribe of Levi and descended from Aaron and a pharisee.
THUS there were jews who politically hated his guts at the time. Surada's citation is just about
as SOPHISTICALLY IDIOTIC as was that forward in the book left by the christian with the big cross. For clarification------PHARISEE HISTORY----well documented, actually reveals no
animosity to a person named "JESUS" or anyone like Jesus. But the Pharisees in the
tradition of EZRA are the main formers of DIASPORA JUDAISM (ie the AD STUFF)---and
they rejected Christianity-------so christians HATE THEIR GUTS ------the the saga marches on

One book left behind decades ago is your sole source?

irosie91

Trust me.. Islam has NOTHING to do with what is written in the Gospels inspite of your stupid accusations and insults.
.................................................

.............................................

rosie says-------where did I mention Islam?

A few posts back you were raving about "Islamo Nazis". I'm a WASP, you idiot and an Episcopalian.

Where did I suggest that YOU are a Muslim? I grew up in WASP/EPISCOPALIAN
land. The town was founded pre-colonial and harbored lots of persons descended from the
original British "farmer" settlers. The anti-jewish propaganda was ALL OVER THE PLACE
in little seedy pamphlets with information that the local yokels actually believed. Significant
amounts of it were writtten by escapees from the Nuremburg trials that made their lives
in Syria and Egypt. It was REMARKABLY "islamo-nazi" and you, clearly, know the material,
chapter and verse. Muslims of today------I have worked and socialized with HUNDREDS ---
know "JESUS" from catholic missionaries and BRITISH COLONIZERS. The propaganda
was written for the "arab/muslim/christian" cause was VERY ISLAM FRIENDLY and ACCOMODATING and very hostile to----GUESS WHO.

I was NEVER subjected to any anti-Jewish propaganda of any kind growing up. I didn't live in that kind of town or around that kind of people. I never knew a Christian who hated the Pharisees.

Wasn't Josephus a Roman citizen and in their employ?

Josephus was granted Roman citizenship and employment by Rome as a Jewish historian.
Josephus – Pharisee Turned Roman Jewish Historian | The Odds
theodds.website/josephus-pharisee-turned-roman-jewish-historian/

Josephus – Pharisee Turned Roman Jewish Historian | The Odds

Josephus, a Jewish Pharisee turned Roman citizen, became Caesar's historian of the Jews. Were his historical references to Jesus of Nazareth as the Christ, true?

theodds.website

 

[BreezeWood]

.

The very same book that people use to accuse Moses of murder

This very same book explains why Moses killed an Egyptian

The Egyptians had enslaved the Hebrew people and were forcing them to abort their little babies - after they were born alive.

Moses was defending his own people - specifically, a fellow Hebrew man was who was being severely beaten and tortured.

The verses says - Exo 2:11 that { Moses } - went out unto his brethren, and looked on their burdens: and he spied an Egyptian smiting an Hebrew, one of his brethren.

This Hebrew word " SMITE " is the word - H5221 - נָכָה - nâkâh - naw-kaw' - Meaning = To strike - To beat, cast forth, clap, give [ wounds ] kill, make [slaughter], murderer, punish, slaughter, slay, (give) stripes, To Wound.

When this word is used and someone is being " SMOTE " it literally means that someone is being hit and beaten to the point of death or near death.
As we see here - Exo 21:20 And if a man " SMITE " his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he dies under his hand; he shall be surely punished.

Moses saw that the Egyptian was beating and wounding His fellow Hebrew Tribesmen and he defended the man and killed the man who was wounding and beating him. When this word is used 99 % of the time it means to beat and attack someone to the point that they are rendered disabled or killed or so severely wounded that they are physically hurt to the point of death or near-death

.

The very same book that people use to accuse Moses of murder

This very same book explains why Moses killed an Egyptian

.
howabout destroying tablets etched in heaven - is that explained in the same book also ... the murderer clearly had an agenda all their own.

 

[Indeependent]

Why Jesus Kicked People Out Of The Temple

www.wordsofhakim.com

Again Surada presents the ISLAMO-NAZI version of Jesus. Hakim..com is a
MUSLIM site. Not news to me----for more of this BS visit a mosque in which
english is spoken. That which is left out is FACT-----that it was the PHARISEES
who despised the ROMAN INSTALLED PRIESTS and the Pharisees (like Jesus)
who were the talmudists and who mediated Judaism SINCE the time of the
ROMAN OPPRESSIONS. When it suits islam------muslims kiss the asses of
the ROMANS-----includiing the Third Holy Roman Empire-----the Third Reich.
The BS about bankers and licenses is----just that BS. There are no such
law in Judaism. The oppression was ROMAN TAXATION. As to
OBLIGATORY SACRIFICES OF LAMBS-----by the poor-----more BS----
never happened. There is so much correct information in the NT that
islamo nazis MUST PERVERT IT

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

ccaugusta.org

Did Jesus call the Pharisees hypocrites? For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees , you hypocrites ! Did Jesus call the Pharisees vipers? Pharisees and Sadducees come. to his baptism, he said unto. them, O generation of vipers , who hath warned you to flee.

Why?
Why do you insult people?
Because you’re starting a new movement.

 

[irosie91]

Why Jesus Kicked People Out Of The Temple

www.wordsofhakim.com

Again Surada presents the ISLAMO-NAZI version of Jesus. Hakim..com is a
MUSLIM site. Not news to me----for more of this BS visit a mosque in which
english is spoken. That which is left out is FACT-----that it was the PHARISEES
who despised the ROMAN INSTALLED PRIESTS and the Pharisees (like Jesus)
who were the talmudists and who mediated Judaism SINCE the time of the
ROMAN OPPRESSIONS. When it suits islam------muslims kiss the asses of
the ROMANS-----includiing the Third Holy Roman Empire-----the Third Reich.
The BS about bankers and licenses is----just that BS. There are no such
law in Judaism. The oppression was ROMAN TAXATION. As to
OBLIGATORY SACRIFICES OF LAMBS-----by the poor-----more BS----
never happened. There is so much correct information in the NT that
islamo nazis MUST PERVERT IT

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

ccaugusta.org

Did Jesus call the Pharisees hypocrites? For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees , you hypocrites ! Did Jesus call the Pharisees vipers? Pharisees and Sadducees come. to his baptism, he said unto. them, O generation of vipers , who hath warned you to flee.

Why?
Why do you insult people?
Because you’re starting a new movement.

he parrots BOTH the fairy tales of sunday school and the mosque khutbah jumaat
feces fling material

 

[surada]

Why Jesus Kicked People Out Of The Temple

www.wordsofhakim.com

Again Surada presents the ISLAMO-NAZI version of Jesus. Hakim..com is a
MUSLIM site. Not news to me----for more of this BS visit a mosque in which
english is spoken. That which is left out is FACT-----that it was the PHARISEES
who despised the ROMAN INSTALLED PRIESTS and the Pharisees (like Jesus)
who were the talmudists and who mediated Judaism SINCE the time of the
ROMAN OPPRESSIONS. When it suits islam------muslims kiss the asses of
the ROMANS-----includiing the Third Holy Roman Empire-----the Third Reich.
The BS about bankers and licenses is----just that BS. There are no such
law in Judaism. The oppression was ROMAN TAXATION. As to
OBLIGATORY SACRIFICES OF LAMBS-----by the poor-----more BS----
never happened. There is so much correct information in the NT that
islamo nazis MUST PERVERT IT

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

ccaugusta.org

Did Jesus call the Pharisees hypocrites? For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees , you hypocrites ! Did Jesus call the Pharisees vipers? Pharisees and Sadducees come. to his baptism, he said unto. them, O generation of vipers , who hath warned you to flee.

Why?
Why do you insult people?
Because you’re starting a new movement.

I can't change the Bible or first century history.

 

[irosie91]

Why Jesus Kicked People Out Of The Temple

www.wordsofhakim.com

Again Surada presents the ISLAMO-NAZI version of Jesus. Hakim..com is a
MUSLIM site. Not news to me----for more of this BS visit a mosque in which
english is spoken. That which is left out is FACT-----that it was the PHARISEES
who despised the ROMAN INSTALLED PRIESTS and the Pharisees (like Jesus)
who were the talmudists and who mediated Judaism SINCE the time of the
ROMAN OPPRESSIONS. When it suits islam------muslims kiss the asses of
the ROMANS-----includiing the Third Holy Roman Empire-----the Third Reich.
The BS about bankers and licenses is----just that BS. There are no such
law in Judaism. The oppression was ROMAN TAXATION. As to
OBLIGATORY SACRIFICES OF LAMBS-----by the poor-----more BS----
never happened. There is so much correct information in the NT that
islamo nazis MUST PERVERT IT

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

ccaugusta.org

Did Jesus call the Pharisees hypocrites? For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees , you hypocrites ! Did Jesus call the Pharisees vipers? Pharisees and Sadducees come. to his baptism, he said unto. them, O generation of vipers , who hath warned you to flee.

Why?
Why do you insult people?
Because you’re starting a new movement.

I can't change the Bible or first century history.

Scriptural writings are what they are------no one should CHANGE them, but SHOULD
evaluate them with, at least, a modicum of discernment.

 

[surada]

Why Jesus Kicked People Out Of The Temple

www.wordsofhakim.com

Again Surada presents the ISLAMO-NAZI version of Jesus. Hakim..com is a
MUSLIM site. Not news to me----for more of this BS visit a mosque in which
english is spoken. That which is left out is FACT-----that it was the PHARISEES
who despised the ROMAN INSTALLED PRIESTS and the Pharisees (like Jesus)
who were the talmudists and who mediated Judaism SINCE the time of the
ROMAN OPPRESSIONS. When it suits islam------muslims kiss the asses of
the ROMANS-----includiing the Third Holy Roman Empire-----the Third Reich.
The BS about bankers and licenses is----just that BS. There are no such
law in Judaism. The oppression was ROMAN TAXATION. As to
OBLIGATORY SACRIFICES OF LAMBS-----by the poor-----more BS----
never happened. There is so much correct information in the NT that
islamo nazis MUST PERVERT IT

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

ccaugusta.org

Did Jesus call the Pharisees hypocrites? For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees , you hypocrites ! Did Jesus call the Pharisees vipers? Pharisees and Sadducees come. to his baptism, he said unto. them, O generation of vipers , who hath warned you to flee.

Why?
Why do you insult people?
Because you’re starting a new movement.

I can't change the Bible or first century history.

Scriptural writings are what they are------no one should CHANGE them, but SHOULD
evaluate them with, at least, a modicum of discernment.

You have to read it before you can evaluate it.

 

[irosie91]

Why Jesus Kicked People Out Of The Temple

www.wordsofhakim.com

Again Surada presents the ISLAMO-NAZI version of Jesus. Hakim..com is a
MUSLIM site. Not news to me----for more of this BS visit a mosque in which
english is spoken. That which is left out is FACT-----that it was the PHARISEES
who despised the ROMAN INSTALLED PRIESTS and the Pharisees (like Jesus)
who were the talmudists and who mediated Judaism SINCE the time of the
ROMAN OPPRESSIONS. When it suits islam------muslims kiss the asses of
the ROMANS-----includiing the Third Holy Roman Empire-----the Third Reich.
The BS about bankers and licenses is----just that BS. There are no such
law in Judaism. The oppression was ROMAN TAXATION. As to
OBLIGATORY SACRIFICES OF LAMBS-----by the poor-----more BS----
never happened. There is so much correct information in the NT that
islamo nazis MUST PERVERT IT

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

ccaugusta.org

Did Jesus call the Pharisees hypocrites? For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees , you hypocrites ! Did Jesus call the Pharisees vipers? Pharisees and Sadducees come. to his baptism, he said unto. them, O generation of vipers , who hath warned you to flee.

Why?
Why do you insult people?
Because you’re starting a new movement.

I can't change the Bible or first century history.

Scriptural writings are what they are------no one should CHANGE them, but SHOULD
evaluate them with, at least, a modicum of discernment.

You have to read it before you can evaluate it.

so true-----so many people believe what they hear in "sermons" having never read
the books. Long, long ago, I used to laugh at Billy Graham's interpretation of
OT stories------my impression was that he never read the book. First century history
IS reflected in the NT-------but is nothing like the idiocy that is taught in Sunday school
or Sunday sermons.

 

[surada]

Why Jesus Kicked People Out Of The Temple

www.wordsofhakim.com

Again Surada presents the ISLAMO-NAZI version of Jesus. Hakim..com is a
MUSLIM site. Not news to me----for more of this BS visit a mosque in which
english is spoken. That which is left out is FACT-----that it was the PHARISEES
who despised the ROMAN INSTALLED PRIESTS and the Pharisees (like Jesus)
who were the talmudists and who mediated Judaism SINCE the time of the
ROMAN OPPRESSIONS. When it suits islam------muslims kiss the asses of
the ROMANS-----includiing the Third Holy Roman Empire-----the Third Reich.
The BS about bankers and licenses is----just that BS. There are no such
law in Judaism. The oppression was ROMAN TAXATION. As to
OBLIGATORY SACRIFICES OF LAMBS-----by the poor-----more BS----
never happened. There is so much correct information in the NT that
islamo nazis MUST PERVERT IT

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

ccaugusta.org

Did Jesus call the Pharisees hypocrites? For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees , you hypocrites ! Did Jesus call the Pharisees vipers? Pharisees and Sadducees come. to his baptism, he said unto. them, O generation of vipers , who hath warned you to flee.

Why?
Why do you insult people?
Because you’re starting a new movement.

I can't change the Bible or first century history.

Scriptural writings are what they are------no one should CHANGE them, but SHOULD
evaluate them with, at least, a modicum of discernment.

You have to read it before you can evaluate it.

so true-----so many people believe what they hear in "sermons" having never read
the books. Long, long ago, I used to laugh at Billy Graham's interpretation of
OT stories------my impression was that he never read the book. First century history
IS reflected in the NT-------but is nothing like the idiocy that is taught in Sunday school
or Sunday sermons.

I agree. Billy Graham was anchored in the Scofield heresy and the teachings of the Dallas Theological Seminary.

 

[irosie91]

Why Jesus Kicked People Out Of The Temple

www.wordsofhakim.com

Again Surada presents the ISLAMO-NAZI version of Jesus. Hakim..com is a
MUSLIM site. Not news to me----for more of this BS visit a mosque in which
english is spoken. That which is left out is FACT-----that it was the PHARISEES
who despised the ROMAN INSTALLED PRIESTS and the Pharisees (like Jesus)
who were the talmudists and who mediated Judaism SINCE the time of the
ROMAN OPPRESSIONS. When it suits islam------muslims kiss the asses of
the ROMANS-----includiing the Third Holy Roman Empire-----the Third Reich.
The BS about bankers and licenses is----just that BS. There are no such
law in Judaism. The oppression was ROMAN TAXATION. As to
OBLIGATORY SACRIFICES OF LAMBS-----by the poor-----more BS----
never happened. There is so much correct information in the NT that
islamo nazis MUST PERVERT IT

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

ccaugusta.org

Did Jesus call the Pharisees hypocrites? For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees , you hypocrites ! Did Jesus call the Pharisees vipers? Pharisees and Sadducees come. to his baptism, he said unto. them, O generation of vipers , who hath warned you to flee.

easy-----Jesus was a pharisee and did not castigate the pharisees. The ROMAN NICEAN council did

According the scripture Jesus did castigate the Pharisees. I have posted several links for you.

Jesus considered them hypocrites.

Jesus SOMEHOW failed to write anything. The only evidence available suggest that
he was literate----but SOMEHOW failed to write anything. Matthew---if one wishes to
believe that he authored the Book of Matthew-----wrote his stuff decades after Jesus
died and there is no real evidence that either he or his close collaborators-----like LUKE
ever REALLY met Jesus. Matthew was a Roman employee------aka SHILL

Nobody is saying Jesus wrote the Book of Matthew or any of the Gospels. It appears from the scripture that Jesus was a Pharisee without approving of them.

Your claim has zero evidence.

Why Did the Pharisees Hate Jesus So Much?

Why Did the Pharisees Hate Jesus So Much?

When you talk to people who are non-Christians today, they are usually very complimentary of Jesus. They’ll say: “I don’t believe that He was the Messiah, and I don’t believe that He was the Son of God, but Jesus was certainly a great person. He was a great teacher. Maybe He was prophet.”

www.ligonier.org

The people loved Jesus, and they received Him gladly, but what they felt from the Pharisees was judgment. The only thing the Pharisees looked at was the people’s sin, and so they had a certain contempt for the common people. They saw Jesus associating with the common people and saw them cheering Him, loving Him.

Bullshit ^^^^ The pharisees were generally not only literate but prolific writers.
The only "EVIDENCE" that "THE CHURCH" could conjure up that "the pharisees hated
Jesus are forgeries and convoluted misinterpretations of lines in the Talmud. There is
AMPLE evidence that the Pharisees hated CAIAPHAS and ----HEROD-----but somehow the
writings of the new testament ----SKIP THAT STUFF. The statement that Pharisees were
THE ELITES is a kind of libel------interestingly there are lots of idiots using the term ELITE
today to describe powerful sociopathic politicians. The usages are SO HILLBILLY-----that
I am reminded of EASTERBUNNY sunday school of my childhood, The Pharisees in Roman
controlled Judea had no power at all except for short episodes when they manage to
successfully rebel against them-------they were the ones being crucified. People
EMPLOYED by the Romans----like Caiaphas and Matthew had POWER and were despised by
Pharisees and the beloved pets of Rome------even invited to ENJOY the gladiator
monstrosities

The Leaven of the Pharisees and the Leaven of Herod ...

The Leaven of the Pharisees and the Leaven of Herod

Yeast is the secret to making bread rise. When added to a lump of bread dough, the yeast ferments the starches in the dough and causes the dough to increase in size. Without yeast to ...

www.ligonier.org

Christ may be referring to Herod and the Pharisees’ contentment with Roman rule. Herod enjoyed political power because of Rome, and though many Jews wanted Rome overthrown, the Pharisees were basically fine with the Romans as long as Caesar allowed them to study the law in peace.

IDIOT ALERT-----it was the PHARISEES that hated Roman rule and rebelled against the filth
that LATTER christians licked. The pharisees were the victims of crucifixions. As for the commentator you cited-------warn him not to quit his day job. Leaven as a symbol
of evil (actually something like death) is actually a PHARISEE CONCEPT ------that precedes Jesus and Mark etc by centuries -----sheeeeeesh

Under Herod (37 b.c.-4 b.c.) the Pharisees were influential, but carefully controlled by the king. Some individual Pharisees did oppose Herod on occasion. Josephus gives almost no information about the Pharisees from the death of Herod until the outset of the revolt against Rome (about a.d. 66).
Who Were the Pharisees? Bible Definition and Meaning
www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/pharisees/
www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/pharisees/

Long ago-----I was a very young------"intern' health care trainee. A patient sporting a large
cross left the book he had been reading------"Works of Josephus Flavius" Well---I kinda
had already read a bit of Josephus-----but this book had a forward written by an INDIGNANT
christian "? scholar" He praised the book but SHARPLY criticized it because ........
JOSEPHUS WROTE ADMIRINGLY ABOUT THE PHARISEES who were "as will all know-----
evil etc etc etc" For those who do not know-----Josephus is a mildly controversial figure
amongst jews. He was part of the REBELLION against Rome but he also counselled a kind of "conciliation" with the Romans to limit bloodshed------like a treaty. In background he is
a "COHEN" that is a person of the Tribe of Levi and descended from Aaron and a pharisee.
THUS there were jews who politically hated his guts at the time. Surada's citation is just about
as SOPHISTICALLY IDIOTIC as was that forward in the book left by the christian with the big cross. For clarification------PHARISEE HISTORY----well documented, actually reveals no
animosity to a person named "JESUS" or anyone like Jesus. But the Pharisees in the
tradition of EZRA are the main formers of DIASPORA JUDAISM (ie the AD STUFF)---and
they rejected Christianity-------so christians HATE THEIR GUTS ------the the saga marches on

One book left behind decades ago is your sole source?

irosie91

Trust me.. Islam has NOTHING to do with what is written in the Gospels inspite of your stupid accusations and insults.
.................................................

.............................................

rosie says-------where did I mention Islam?

A few posts back you were raving about "Islamo Nazis". I'm a WASP, you idiot and an Episcopalian.

Where did I suggest that YOU are a Muslim? I grew up in WASP/EPISCOPALIAN
land. The town was founded pre-colonial and harbored lots of persons descended from the
original British "farmer" settlers. The anti-jewish propaganda was ALL OVER THE PLACE
in little seedy pamphlets with information that the local yokels actually believed. Significant
amounts of it were writtten by escapees from the Nuremburg trials that made their lives
in Syria and Egypt. It was REMARKABLY "islamo-nazi" and you, clearly, know the material,
chapter and verse. Muslims of today------I have worked and socialized with HUNDREDS ---
know "JESUS" from catholic missionaries and BRITISH COLONIZERS. The propaganda
was written for the "arab/muslim/christian" cause was VERY ISLAM FRIENDLY and ACCOMODATING and very hostile to----GUESS WHO.

I was NEVER subjected to any anti-Jewish propaganda of any kind growing up. I didn't live in that kind of town or around that kind of people. I never knew a Christian who hated the Pharisees.

Wasn't Josephus a Roman citizen and in their employ?

Josephus was granted Roman citizenship and employment by Rome as a Jewish historian.
Josephus – Pharisee Turned Roman Jewish Historian | The Odds
theodds.website/josephus-pharisee-turned-roman-jewish-historian/

Josephus – Pharisee Turned Roman Jewish Historian | The Odds

Josephus, a Jewish Pharisee turned Roman citizen, became Caesar's historian of the Jews. Were his historical references to Jesus of Nazareth as the Christ, true?

theodds.website

gee----you don't know. Josephus was enslaved as a CAPTIVE OF WAR by the Romans.
The Romans were VERY IMPRESSED with anyone actually SCHOLARLY and LEARNED----
as was Josephus ----so much so that they used ENSLAVED SCHOLARS as teachers----
both Greeks (whom they admired just for language) and Jews-----Josephus rose up as
a recognized scholar while a slave in the house of FLAVIUS-----and was eventually granted
Roman citizenship. There were Greeks who also managed to "SUCCEED" Gee Surada---
I thought everyone knew that. His life's work was HISTORY OF THE JEWISH WARS----very
well done stuff but the works rankled christians because Josephus evaluated PHARISEES
very positively-----the Vatican got their grubby paws on the original manuscripts and the
rest is history

 

[Indeependent]

Why Jesus Kicked People Out Of The Temple

www.wordsofhakim.com

Again Surada presents the ISLAMO-NAZI version of Jesus. Hakim..com is a
MUSLIM site. Not news to me----for more of this BS visit a mosque in which
english is spoken. That which is left out is FACT-----that it was the PHARISEES
who despised the ROMAN INSTALLED PRIESTS and the Pharisees (like Jesus)
who were the talmudists and who mediated Judaism SINCE the time of the
ROMAN OPPRESSIONS. When it suits islam------muslims kiss the asses of
the ROMANS-----includiing the Third Holy Roman Empire-----the Third Reich.
The BS about bankers and licenses is----just that BS. There are no such
law in Judaism. The oppression was ROMAN TAXATION. As to
OBLIGATORY SACRIFICES OF LAMBS-----by the poor-----more BS----
never happened. There is so much correct information in the NT that
islamo nazis MUST PERVERT IT

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

ccaugusta.org

Did Jesus call the Pharisees hypocrites? For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees , you hypocrites ! Did Jesus call the Pharisees vipers? Pharisees and Sadducees come. to his baptism, he said unto. them, O generation of vipers , who hath warned you to flee.

Why?
Why do you insult people?
Because you’re starting a new movement.

I can't change the Bible or first century history.

Scriptural writings are what they are------no one should CHANGE them, but SHOULD
evaluate them with, at least, a modicum of discernment.

You have to read it before you can evaluate it.

so true-----so many people believe what they hear in "sermons" having never read
the books. Long, long ago, I used to laugh at Billy Graham's interpretation of
OT stories------my impression was that he never read the book. First century history
IS reflected in the NT-------but is nothing like the idiocy that is taught in Sunday school
or Sunday sermons.

I agree. Billy Graham was anchored in the Scofield heresy and the teachings of the Dallas Theological Seminary.

Here's the scoop...
Look up the Orthodox Rabbis of the last 1,000 years who were respected for their secular knowledge and let me know how many national leaders shoot the breeze you.

 

[surada]

Why Jesus Kicked People Out Of The Temple

www.wordsofhakim.com

Again Surada presents the ISLAMO-NAZI version of Jesus. Hakim..com is a
MUSLIM site. Not news to me----for more of this BS visit a mosque in which
english is spoken. That which is left out is FACT-----that it was the PHARISEES
who despised the ROMAN INSTALLED PRIESTS and the Pharisees (like Jesus)
who were the talmudists and who mediated Judaism SINCE the time of the
ROMAN OPPRESSIONS. When it suits islam------muslims kiss the asses of
the ROMANS-----includiing the Third Holy Roman Empire-----the Third Reich.
The BS about bankers and licenses is----just that BS. There are no such
law in Judaism. The oppression was ROMAN TAXATION. As to
OBLIGATORY SACRIFICES OF LAMBS-----by the poor-----more BS----
never happened. There is so much correct information in the NT that
islamo nazis MUST PERVERT IT

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

ccaugusta.org

Did Jesus call the Pharisees hypocrites? For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees , you hypocrites ! Did Jesus call the Pharisees vipers? Pharisees and Sadducees come. to his baptism, he said unto. them, O generation of vipers , who hath warned you to flee.

easy-----Jesus was a pharisee and did not castigate the pharisees. The ROMAN NICEAN council did

According the scripture Jesus did castigate the Pharisees. I have posted several links for you.

Jesus considered them hypocrites.

Jesus SOMEHOW failed to write anything. The only evidence available suggest that
he was literate----but SOMEHOW failed to write anything. Matthew---if one wishes to
believe that he authored the Book of Matthew-----wrote his stuff decades after Jesus
died and there is no real evidence that either he or his close collaborators-----like LUKE
ever REALLY met Jesus. Matthew was a Roman employee------aka SHILL

Nobody is saying Jesus wrote the Book of Matthew or any of the Gospels. It appears from the scripture that Jesus was a Pharisee without approving of them.

Your claim has zero evidence.

Why Did the Pharisees Hate Jesus So Much?

Why Did the Pharisees Hate Jesus So Much?

When you talk to people who are non-Christians today, they are usually very complimentary of Jesus. They’ll say: “I don’t believe that He was the Messiah, and I don’t believe that He was the Son of God, but Jesus was certainly a great person. He was a great teacher. Maybe He was prophet.”

www.ligonier.org

The people loved Jesus, and they received Him gladly, but what they felt from the Pharisees was judgment. The only thing the Pharisees looked at was the people’s sin, and so they had a certain contempt for the common people. They saw Jesus associating with the common people and saw them cheering Him, loving Him.

Bullshit ^^^^ The pharisees were generally not only literate but prolific writers.
The only "EVIDENCE" that "THE CHURCH" could conjure up that "the pharisees hated
Jesus are forgeries and convoluted misinterpretations of lines in the Talmud. There is
AMPLE evidence that the Pharisees hated CAIAPHAS and ----HEROD-----but somehow the
writings of the new testament ----SKIP THAT STUFF. The statement that Pharisees were
THE ELITES is a kind of libel------interestingly there are lots of idiots using the term ELITE
today to describe powerful sociopathic politicians. The usages are SO HILLBILLY-----that
I am reminded of EASTERBUNNY sunday school of my childhood, The Pharisees in Roman
controlled Judea had no power at all except for short episodes when they manage to
successfully rebel against them-------they were the ones being crucified. People
EMPLOYED by the Romans----like Caiaphas and Matthew had POWER and were despised by
Pharisees and the beloved pets of Rome------even invited to ENJOY the gladiator
monstrosities

The Leaven of the Pharisees and the Leaven of Herod ...

The Leaven of the Pharisees and the Leaven of Herod

Yeast is the secret to making bread rise. When added to a lump of bread dough, the yeast ferments the starches in the dough and causes the dough to increase in size. Without yeast to ...

www.ligonier.org

Christ may be referring to Herod and the Pharisees’ contentment with Roman rule. Herod enjoyed political power because of Rome, and though many Jews wanted Rome overthrown, the Pharisees were basically fine with the Romans as long as Caesar allowed them to study the law in peace.

IDIOT ALERT-----it was the PHARISEES that hated Roman rule and rebelled against the filth
that LATTER christians licked. The pharisees were the victims of crucifixions. As for the commentator you cited-------warn him not to quit his day job. Leaven as a symbol
of evil (actually something like death) is actually a PHARISEE CONCEPT ------that precedes Jesus and Mark etc by centuries -----sheeeeeesh

Under Herod (37 b.c.-4 b.c.) the Pharisees were influential, but carefully controlled by the king. Some individual Pharisees did oppose Herod on occasion. Josephus gives almost no information about the Pharisees from the death of Herod until the outset of the revolt against Rome (about a.d. 66).
Who Were the Pharisees? Bible Definition and Meaning
www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/pharisees/
www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/pharisees/

Long ago-----I was a very young------"intern' health care trainee. A patient sporting a large
cross left the book he had been reading------"Works of Josephus Flavius" Well---I kinda
had already read a bit of Josephus-----but this book had a forward written by an INDIGNANT
christian "? scholar" He praised the book but SHARPLY criticized it because ........
JOSEPHUS WROTE ADMIRINGLY ABOUT THE PHARISEES who were "as will all know-----
evil etc etc etc" For those who do not know-----Josephus is a mildly controversial figure
amongst jews. He was part of the REBELLION against Rome but he also counselled a kind of "conciliation" with the Romans to limit bloodshed------like a treaty. In background he is
a "COHEN" that is a person of the Tribe of Levi and descended from Aaron and a pharisee.
THUS there were jews who politically hated his guts at the time. Surada's citation is just about
as SOPHISTICALLY IDIOTIC as was that forward in the book left by the christian with the big cross. For clarification------PHARISEE HISTORY----well documented, actually reveals no
animosity to a person named "JESUS" or anyone like Jesus. But the Pharisees in the
tradition of EZRA are the main formers of DIASPORA JUDAISM (ie the AD STUFF)---and
they rejected Christianity-------so christians HATE THEIR GUTS ------the the saga marches on

One book left behind decades ago is your sole source?

irosie91

Trust me.. Islam has NOTHING to do with what is written in the Gospels inspite of your stupid accusations and insults.
.................................................

.............................................

rosie says-------where did I mention Islam?

A few posts back you were raving about "Islamo Nazis". I'm a WASP, you idiot and an Episcopalian.

Where did I suggest that YOU are a Muslim? I grew up in WASP/EPISCOPALIAN
land. The town was founded pre-colonial and harbored lots of persons descended from the
original British "farmer" settlers. The anti-jewish propaganda was ALL OVER THE PLACE
in little seedy pamphlets with information that the local yokels actually believed. Significant
amounts of it were writtten by escapees from the Nuremburg trials that made their lives
in Syria and Egypt. It was REMARKABLY "islamo-nazi" and you, clearly, know the material,
chapter and verse. Muslims of today------I have worked and socialized with HUNDREDS ---
know "JESUS" from catholic missionaries and BRITISH COLONIZERS. The propaganda
was written for the "arab/muslim/christian" cause was VERY ISLAM FRIENDLY and ACCOMODATING and very hostile to----GUESS WHO.

I was NEVER subjected to any anti-Jewish propaganda of any kind growing up. I didn't live in that kind of town or around that kind of people. I never knew a Christian who hated the Pharisees.

Wasn't Josephus a Roman citizen and in their employ?

Josephus was granted Roman citizenship and employment by Rome as a Jewish historian.
Josephus – Pharisee Turned Roman Jewish Historian | The Odds
theodds.website/josephus-pharisee-turned-roman-jewish-historian/

Josephus – Pharisee Turned Roman Jewish Historian | The Odds

Josephus, a Jewish Pharisee turned Roman citizen, became Caesar's historian of the Jews. Were his historical references to Jesus of Nazareth as the Christ, true?

theodds.website

gee----you don't know. Josephus was enslaved as a CAPTIVE OF WAR by the Romans.
The Romans were VERY IMPRESSED with anyone actually SCHOLARLY and LEARNED----
as was Josephus ----so much so that they used ENSLAVED SCHOLARS as teachers----
both Greeks (whom they admired just for language) and Jews-----Josephus rose up as
a recognized scholar while a slave in the house of FLAVIUS-----and was eventually granted
Roman citizenship. There were Greeks who also managed to "SUCCEED" Gee Surada---
I thought everyone knew that. His life's work was HISTORY OF THE JEWISH WARS----very
well done stuff but the works rankled christians because Josephus evaluated PHARISEES
very positively-----the Vatican got their grubby paws on the original manuscripts and the
rest is history

LOLOL. Christians don't have anything negative to say about Josephus or the Pharisees.. You are looking for something to rave about.. Some new reason to feel persecuted .....

 

[irosie91]

Why Jesus Kicked People Out Of The Temple

www.wordsofhakim.com

Again Surada presents the ISLAMO-NAZI version of Jesus. Hakim..com is a
MUSLIM site. Not news to me----for more of this BS visit a mosque in which
english is spoken. That which is left out is FACT-----that it was the PHARISEES
who despised the ROMAN INSTALLED PRIESTS and the Pharisees (like Jesus)
who were the talmudists and who mediated Judaism SINCE the time of the
ROMAN OPPRESSIONS. When it suits islam------muslims kiss the asses of
the ROMANS-----includiing the Third Holy Roman Empire-----the Third Reich.
The BS about bankers and licenses is----just that BS. There are no such
law in Judaism. The oppression was ROMAN TAXATION. As to
OBLIGATORY SACRIFICES OF LAMBS-----by the poor-----more BS----
never happened. There is so much correct information in the NT that
islamo nazis MUST PERVERT IT

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

ccaugusta.org

Did Jesus call the Pharisees hypocrites? For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees , you hypocrites ! Did Jesus call the Pharisees vipers? Pharisees and Sadducees come. to his baptism, he said unto. them, O generation of vipers , who hath warned you to flee.

easy-----Jesus was a pharisee and did not castigate the pharisees. The ROMAN NICEAN council did

According the scripture Jesus did castigate the Pharisees. I have posted several links for you.

Jesus considered them hypocrites.

Jesus SOMEHOW failed to write anything. The only evidence available suggest that
he was literate----but SOMEHOW failed to write anything. Matthew---if one wishes to
believe that he authored the Book of Matthew-----wrote his stuff decades after Jesus
died and there is no real evidence that either he or his close collaborators-----like LUKE
ever REALLY met Jesus. Matthew was a Roman employee------aka SHILL

Nobody is saying Jesus wrote the Book of Matthew or any of the Gospels. It appears from the scripture that Jesus was a Pharisee without approving of them.

Your claim has zero evidence.

Why Did the Pharisees Hate Jesus So Much?

Why Did the Pharisees Hate Jesus So Much?

When you talk to people who are non-Christians today, they are usually very complimentary of Jesus. They’ll say: “I don’t believe that He was the Messiah, and I don’t believe that He was the Son of God, but Jesus was certainly a great person. He was a great teacher. Maybe He was prophet.”

www.ligonier.org

The people loved Jesus, and they received Him gladly, but what they felt from the Pharisees was judgment. The only thing the Pharisees looked at was the people’s sin, and so they had a certain contempt for the common people. They saw Jesus associating with the common people and saw them cheering Him, loving Him.

Bullshit ^^^^ The pharisees were generally not only literate but prolific writers.
The only "EVIDENCE" that "THE CHURCH" could conjure up that "the pharisees hated
Jesus are forgeries and convoluted misinterpretations of lines in the Talmud. There is
AMPLE evidence that the Pharisees hated CAIAPHAS and ----HEROD-----but somehow the
writings of the new testament ----SKIP THAT STUFF. The statement that Pharisees were
THE ELITES is a kind of libel------interestingly there are lots of idiots using the term ELITE
today to describe powerful sociopathic politicians. The usages are SO HILLBILLY-----that
I am reminded of EASTERBUNNY sunday school of my childhood, The Pharisees in Roman
controlled Judea had no power at all except for short episodes when they manage to
successfully rebel against them-------they were the ones being crucified. People
EMPLOYED by the Romans----like Caiaphas and Matthew had POWER and were despised by
Pharisees and the beloved pets of Rome------even invited to ENJOY the gladiator
monstrosities

The Leaven of the Pharisees and the Leaven of Herod ...

The Leaven of the Pharisees and the Leaven of Herod

Yeast is the secret to making bread rise. When added to a lump of bread dough, the yeast ferments the starches in the dough and causes the dough to increase in size. Without yeast to ...

www.ligonier.org

Christ may be referring to Herod and the Pharisees’ contentment with Roman rule. Herod enjoyed political power because of Rome, and though many Jews wanted Rome overthrown, the Pharisees were basically fine with the Romans as long as Caesar allowed them to study the law in peace.

IDIOT ALERT-----it was the PHARISEES that hated Roman rule and rebelled against the filth
that LATTER christians licked. The pharisees were the victims of crucifixions. As for the commentator you cited-------warn him not to quit his day job. Leaven as a symbol
of evil (actually something like death) is actually a PHARISEE CONCEPT ------that precedes Jesus and Mark etc by centuries -----sheeeeeesh

Under Herod (37 b.c.-4 b.c.) the Pharisees were influential, but carefully controlled by the king. Some individual Pharisees did oppose Herod on occasion. Josephus gives almost no information about the Pharisees from the death of Herod until the outset of the revolt against Rome (about a.d. 66).
Who Were the Pharisees? Bible Definition and Meaning
www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/pharisees/
www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/pharisees/

Long ago-----I was a very young------"intern' health care trainee. A patient sporting a large
cross left the book he had been reading------"Works of Josephus Flavius" Well---I kinda
had already read a bit of Josephus-----but this book had a forward written by an INDIGNANT
christian "? scholar" He praised the book but SHARPLY criticized it because ........
JOSEPHUS WROTE ADMIRINGLY ABOUT THE PHARISEES who were "as will all know-----
evil etc etc etc" For those who do not know-----Josephus is a mildly controversial figure
amongst jews. He was part of the REBELLION against Rome but he also counselled a kind of "conciliation" with the Romans to limit bloodshed------like a treaty. In background he is
a "COHEN" that is a person of the Tribe of Levi and descended from Aaron and a pharisee.
THUS there were jews who politically hated his guts at the time. Surada's citation is just about
as SOPHISTICALLY IDIOTIC as was that forward in the book left by the christian with the big cross. For clarification------PHARISEE HISTORY----well documented, actually reveals no
animosity to a person named "JESUS" or anyone like Jesus. But the Pharisees in the
tradition of EZRA are the main formers of DIASPORA JUDAISM (ie the AD STUFF)---and
they rejected Christianity-------so christians HATE THEIR GUTS ------the the saga marches on

One book left behind decades ago is your sole source?

irosie91

Trust me.. Islam has NOTHING to do with what is written in the Gospels inspite of your stupid accusations and insults.
.................................................

.............................................

rosie says-------where did I mention Islam?

A few posts back you were raving about "Islamo Nazis". I'm a WASP, you idiot and an Episcopalian.

Where did I suggest that YOU are a Muslim? I grew up in WASP/EPISCOPALIAN
land. The town was founded pre-colonial and harbored lots of persons descended from the
original British "farmer" settlers. The anti-jewish propaganda was ALL OVER THE PLACE
in little seedy pamphlets with information that the local yokels actually believed. Significant
amounts of it were writtten by escapees from the Nuremburg trials that made their lives
in Syria and Egypt. It was REMARKABLY "islamo-nazi" and you, clearly, know the material,
chapter and verse. Muslims of today------I have worked and socialized with HUNDREDS ---
know "JESUS" from catholic missionaries and BRITISH COLONIZERS. The propaganda
was written for the "arab/muslim/christian" cause was VERY ISLAM FRIENDLY and ACCOMODATING and very hostile to----GUESS WHO.

I was NEVER subjected to any anti-Jewish propaganda of any kind growing up. I didn't live in that kind of town or around that kind of people. I never knew a Christian who hated the Pharisees.

Wasn't Josephus a Roman citizen and in their employ?

Josephus was granted Roman citizenship and employment by Rome as a Jewish historian.
Josephus – Pharisee Turned Roman Jewish Historian | The Odds
theodds.website/josephus-pharisee-turned-roman-jewish-historian/

Josephus – Pharisee Turned Roman Jewish Historian | The Odds

Josephus, a Jewish Pharisee turned Roman citizen, became Caesar's historian of the Jews. Were his historical references to Jesus of Nazareth as the Christ, true?

theodds.website

gee----you don't know. Josephus was enslaved as a CAPTIVE OF WAR by the Romans.
The Romans were VERY IMPRESSED with anyone actually SCHOLARLY and LEARNED----
as was Josephus ----so much so that they used ENSLAVED SCHOLARS as teachers----
both Greeks (whom they admired just for language) and Jews-----Josephus rose up as
a recognized scholar while a slave in the house of FLAVIUS-----and was eventually granted
Roman citizenship. There were Greeks who also managed to "SUCCEED" Gee Surada---
I thought everyone knew that. His life's work was HISTORY OF THE JEWISH WARS----very
well done stuff but the works rankled christians because Josephus evaluated PHARISEES
very positively-----the Vatican got their grubby paws on the original manuscripts and the
rest is history

LOLOL. Christians don't have anything negative to say about Josephus or the Pharisees.. You are looking for something to rave about.. Some new reason to feel persecuted .....

^^^^^^ statement by Surada is a GROSS LIE and even a perversion of what I posted.
In fact I did not say that christians have something negative to say about Josephus. I cited
a FORWARD to a copy of the works of Josephus in which a MODERN CHRISTIAN SCHOLAR
was critical of the admiration that Josephus expressed of Pharisees. In fact he (ludicrously)
referred to the opinion of Josephus as "MISTAKE" As to "PHARISEES"
christian scholars SPIT RANCOR on them and equate them with all sorts of evil. In english---
the term PHARISEE is an EPITHET ----as per the idiot preachers in the church and the vulgar
sunday school whores. Surada seems tp PRETEND that he has missed that fact all his life.
I spent time in church and sunday school and in the homes of christians---mostly protestant..
Most of THEM never heard of Josephus and absolutely knew nothing about him. \
surada's ".....looking for ...some new reason to feel persecuted..." is typical of his/her/its
DISGUSTING VULGARITY

 

[surada]

Why Jesus Kicked People Out Of The Temple

www.wordsofhakim.com

Again Surada presents the ISLAMO-NAZI version of Jesus. Hakim..com is a
MUSLIM site. Not news to me----for more of this BS visit a mosque in which
english is spoken. That which is left out is FACT-----that it was the PHARISEES
who despised the ROMAN INSTALLED PRIESTS and the Pharisees (like Jesus)
who were the talmudists and who mediated Judaism SINCE the time of the
ROMAN OPPRESSIONS. When it suits islam------muslims kiss the asses of
the ROMANS-----includiing the Third Holy Roman Empire-----the Third Reich.
The BS about bankers and licenses is----just that BS. There are no such
law in Judaism. The oppression was ROMAN TAXATION. As to
OBLIGATORY SACRIFICES OF LAMBS-----by the poor-----more BS----
never happened. There is so much correct information in the NT that
islamo nazis MUST PERVERT IT

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

Why did jesus call the pharisees hypocrites

ccaugusta.org

Did Jesus call the Pharisees hypocrites? For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees , you hypocrites ! Did Jesus call the Pharisees vipers? Pharisees and Sadducees come. to his baptism, he said unto. them, O generation of vipers , who hath warned you to flee.

easy-----Jesus was a pharisee and did not castigate the pharisees. The ROMAN NICEAN council did

According the scripture Jesus did castigate the Pharisees. I have posted several links for you.

Jesus considered them hypocrites.

Jesus SOMEHOW failed to write anything. The only evidence available suggest that
he was literate----but SOMEHOW failed to write anything. Matthew---if one wishes to
believe that he authored the Book of Matthew-----wrote his stuff decades after Jesus
died and there is no real evidence that either he or his close collaborators-----like LUKE
ever REALLY met Jesus. Matthew was a Roman employee------aka SHILL

Nobody is saying Jesus wrote the Book of Matthew or any of the Gospels. It appears from the scripture that Jesus was a Pharisee without approving of them.

Your claim has zero evidence.

Why Did the Pharisees Hate Jesus So Much?

Why Did the Pharisees Hate Jesus So Much?

When you talk to people who are non-Christians today, they are usually very complimentary of Jesus. They’ll say: “I don’t believe that He was the Messiah, and I don’t believe that He was the Son of God, but Jesus was certainly a great person. He was a great teacher. Maybe He was prophet.”

www.ligonier.org

The people loved Jesus, and they received Him gladly, but what they felt from the Pharisees was judgment. The only thing the Pharisees looked at was the people’s sin, and so they had a certain contempt for the common people. They saw Jesus associating with the common people and saw them cheering Him, loving Him.

Bullshit ^^^^ The pharisees were generally not only literate but prolific writers.
The only "EVIDENCE" that "THE CHURCH" could conjure up that "the pharisees hated
Jesus are forgeries and convoluted misinterpretations of lines in the Talmud. There is
AMPLE evidence that the Pharisees hated CAIAPHAS and ----HEROD-----but somehow the
writings of the new testament ----SKIP THAT STUFF. The statement that Pharisees were
THE ELITES is a kind of libel------interestingly there are lots of idiots using the term ELITE
today to describe powerful sociopathic politicians. The usages are SO HILLBILLY-----that
I am reminded of EASTERBUNNY sunday school of my childhood, The Pharisees in Roman
controlled Judea had no power at all except for short episodes when they manage to
successfully rebel against them-------they were the ones being crucified. People
EMPLOYED by the Romans----like Caiaphas and Matthew had POWER and were despised by
Pharisees and the beloved pets of Rome------even invited to ENJOY the gladiator
monstrosities

The Leaven of the Pharisees and the Leaven of Herod ...

The Leaven of the Pharisees and the Leaven of Herod

Yeast is the secret to making bread rise. When added to a lump of bread dough, the yeast ferments the starches in the dough and causes the dough to increase in size. Without yeast to ...

www.ligonier.org

Christ may be referring to Herod and the Pharisees’ contentment with Roman rule. Herod enjoyed political power because of Rome, and though many Jews wanted Rome overthrown, the Pharisees were basically fine with the Romans as long as Caesar allowed them to study the law in peace.

IDIOT ALERT-----it was the PHARISEES that hated Roman rule and rebelled against the filth
that LATTER christians licked. The pharisees were the victims of crucifixions. As for the commentator you cited-------warn him not to quit his day job. Leaven as a symbol
of evil (actually something like death) is actually a PHARISEE CONCEPT ------that precedes Jesus and Mark etc by centuries -----sheeeeeesh

Under Herod (37 b.c.-4 b.c.) the Pharisees were influential, but carefully controlled by the king. Some individual Pharisees did oppose Herod on occasion. Josephus gives almost no information about the Pharisees from the death of Herod until the outset of the revolt against Rome (about a.d. 66).
Who Were the Pharisees? Bible Definition and Meaning
www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/pharisees/
www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/pharisees/

Long ago-----I was a very young------"intern' health care trainee. A patient sporting a large
cross left the book he had been reading------"Works of Josephus Flavius" Well---I kinda
had already read a bit of Josephus-----but this book had a forward written by an INDIGNANT
christian "? scholar" He praised the book but SHARPLY criticized it because ........
JOSEPHUS WROTE ADMIRINGLY ABOUT THE PHARISEES who were "as will all know-----
evil etc etc etc" For those who do not know-----Josephus is a mildly controversial figure
amongst jews. He was part of the REBELLION against Rome but he also counselled a kind of "conciliation" with the Romans to limit bloodshed------like a treaty. In background he is
a "COHEN" that is a person of the Tribe of Levi and descended from Aaron and a pharisee.
THUS there were jews who politically hated his guts at the time. Surada's citation is just about
as SOPHISTICALLY IDIOTIC as was that forward in the book left by the christian with the big cross. For clarification------PHARISEE HISTORY----well documented, actually reveals no
animosity to a person named "JESUS" or anyone like Jesus. But the Pharisees in the
tradition of EZRA are the main formers of DIASPORA JUDAISM (ie the AD STUFF)---and
they rejected Christianity-------so christians HATE THEIR GUTS ------the the saga marches on

One book left behind decades ago is your sole source?

irosie91

Trust me.. Islam has NOTHING to do with what is written in the Gospels inspite of your stupid accusations and insults.
.................................................

.............................................

rosie says-------where did I mention Islam?

A few posts back you were raving about "Islamo Nazis". I'm a WASP, you idiot and an Episcopalian.

Where did I suggest that YOU are a Muslim? I grew up in WASP/EPISCOPALIAN
land. The town was founded pre-colonial and harbored lots of persons descended from the
original British "farmer" settlers. The anti-jewish propaganda was ALL OVER THE PLACE
in little seedy pamphlets with information that the local yokels actually believed. Significant
amounts of it were writtten by escapees from the Nuremburg trials that made their lives
in Syria and Egypt. It was REMARKABLY "islamo-nazi" and you, clearly, know the material,
chapter and verse. Muslims of today------I have worked and socialized with HUNDREDS ---
know "JESUS" from catholic missionaries and BRITISH COLONIZERS. The propaganda
was written for the "arab/muslim/christian" cause was VERY ISLAM FRIENDLY and ACCOMODATING and very hostile to----GUESS WHO.

I was NEVER subjected to any anti-Jewish propaganda of any kind growing up. I didn't live in that kind of town or around that kind of people. I never knew a Christian who hated the Pharisees.

Wasn't Josephus a Roman citizen and in their employ?

Josephus was granted Roman citizenship and employment by Rome as a Jewish historian.
Josephus – Pharisee Turned Roman Jewish Historian | The Odds
theodds.website/josephus-pharisee-turned-roman-jewish-historian/

Josephus – Pharisee Turned Roman Jewish Historian | The Odds

Josephus, a Jewish Pharisee turned Roman citizen, became Caesar's historian of the Jews. Were his historical references to Jesus of Nazareth as the Christ, true?

theodds.website

gee----you don't know. Josephus was enslaved as a CAPTIVE OF WAR by the Romans.
The Romans were VERY IMPRESSED with anyone actually SCHOLARLY and LEARNED----
as was Josephus ----so much so that they used ENSLAVED SCHOLARS as teachers----
both Greeks (whom they admired just for language) and Jews-----Josephus rose up as
a recognized scholar while a slave in the house of FLAVIUS-----and was eventually granted
Roman citizenship. There were Greeks who also managed to "SUCCEED" Gee Surada---
I thought everyone knew that. His life's work was HISTORY OF THE JEWISH WARS----very
well done stuff but the works rankled christians because Josephus evaluated PHARISEES
very positively-----the Vatican got their grubby paws on the original manuscripts and the
rest is history

LOLOL. Christians don't have anything negative to say about Josephus or the Pharisees.. You are looking for something to rave about.. Some new reason to feel persecuted .....

^^^^^^ statement by Surada is a GROSS LIE and even a perversion of what I posted.
In fact I did not say that christians have something negative to say about Josephus. I cited
a FORWARD to a copy of the works of Josephus in which a MODERN CHRISTIAN SCHOLAR
was critical of the admiration that Josephus expressed of Pharisees. In fact he (ludicrously)
referred to the opinion of Josephus as "MISTAKE" As to "PHARISEES"
christian scholars SPIT RANCOR on them and equate them with all sorts of evil. In english---
the term PHARISEE is an EPITHET ----as per the idiot preachers in the church and the vulgar
sunday school whores. Surada seems tp PRETEND that he has missed that fact all his life.
I spent time in church and sunday school and in the homes of christians---mostly protestant..
Most of THEM never heard of Josephus and absolutely knew nothing about him. \
surada's ".....looking for ...some new reason to feel persecuted..." is typical of his/her/its
DISGUSTING VULGARITY

No question there are many idiot preachers with little education .. I have NEVER been persecuted a single day in my life.

That didn't use to be the case in mainline churches. Most of these offbrand protestants..
Fundamentalists, Dominionists , Dispensationalists follow Scofield who was hired by Samuel Untermyer to promote Christian Zionism.

Why do you persist in referring to me as "he"? Surada is a feminine name.

 

[foggedinn]

Moses was a murder-er multiple times.,.,.,.

By,.,.,.,.,.,. no longer believing this—

Exo 12:21 KJV) Then Moses called for all the elders of Israel, and said unto them, Draw out and take you a lamb according to your families, and kill the passover.

When later, Moses gives us the Ten Commandments.,./\.,./\.,. /\.,./\.,./\.,./\.,./\.,./\.,./\;.,/\
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Out of the “Ten Commandment’s”; which do you believe they truly follow today-?

Ten Commandments

1. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.

3. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.

4. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.

5. Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.

6. Thou shalt not kill. (murder)

7. Thou shalt not commit adultery.

8. Thou shalt not steal.

9. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.

10. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.

7/10’s (70%) of the Ten commandments have been put into public “law” in every recognized country member in the United Nations.

Can you guess which one’s-?

Or just speak your mind one way or another
-

Not rhetorical...
State the difference between killing and murder.

It’s not “covet”, it’s “plan”.

Scripture give the example of two men working together and one mans axe head fly's off the handle and kills his friend accidently. This is not a capital offense.
If one man lays in wait to kill another, this is a capital offense.