Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah yeah. Lindzen predicted nothing much would happen. Now he's revealed to be the idiot he is he's all butt hurt about it.You mean the 0.5deg change in your lifetime? What does that mean to a squirrel?
Nothing much IS happening historically speaking. The shouting is all about theories claiming the Earth will destroy itself if there is a 2deg temperature spike. If that was the case -- wouldn't be any squirrels around to ask..
sauce
I note as is usual for deniers you give no support for your instantly falsifiable assertions of fact, not to mention your straw men. Same ol' same ol'.
Prove that the Michael Mann, Raymond Bradley and Malcolm Hughes hockey stick is correct!
Fifth Assessment Report - Climate Change 2013
Read it and weep, asshhole.
Because NONE of the mudbug, tree ring, ice core studies could ever DETECT a 100 year blip.. Not even fully resolve a 500 year blip. But INDIVIDUAL proxy studies DO show comparable swings to ours.
funny stuff when you going to actually provide evidence, not suggestions. See, you all don't read the crap you post. None of it is evidence that supports your nonsense. You've been told that how many times now?
LOLOL.....I know what un-reasonable and very ignorant and very ideologically driven people do when the facts don't match their crackpot 'theories'....they go into deep denial of reality and latch onto insane conspiracy theories to explain away the fact that all of the scientific experts affirm just the opposite of the anti-science drivel they've been duped into believing.....I've been watching you demented denier cult retards do this for years...
In the real world...
No Pause in Global Warming
A new study suggests that global warming continues to steadily increase
Scientific American
June 4, 2015
(excerpts)
A revised analysis shows a slight recent uptick in the global average temperature. Credit: NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information
“There is no slowdown in global warming,” Russell Vose, the head of the climate science division at the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), said. “Or stated differently, the trend over the past decade and half is in line with the trend since 1950.”
Temperatures have warmed 1.6°F since the 1880s. Projections indicate the temperatures could rise as much as 11°F by century’s end if greenhouse gas emissions aren’t slowed and that the rate of warming could reach levels unseen in 1,000 years by 2030s.
that's you to the tee!!!!ding, ding, ding, wow you just called your own self out. Exactly, BTW, are you saying that climate data isn't biased? Come on now, let's see your words here.....You make all kinds of silly ass claims, and not one bit of supporting evidence.The IPCC was proven to be fraudulent several years ago, dumb ass.Prove that the Michael Mann, Raymond Bradley and Malcolm Hughes hockey stick is correct!
Fifth Assessment Report - Climate Change 2013
Read it and weep, asshhole.
Judith Curry doesn't reject our position? So you are 100% wrong.Because NONE of the mudbug, tree ring, ice core studies could ever DETECT a 100 year blip.. Not even fully resolve a 500 year blip. But INDIVIDUAL proxy studies DO show comparable swings to ours.
And no global average does. We're in new uncharted territory.
And you have to ignore that.
Rest assured, the real scientists don't. That's why they've rejected your nonsense.
And if you need a quick deflection now, the denier Tiljander proxies fairy tale is always a good one.
No Pause in Global Warming
A new study suggests that global warming continues to steadily increase
Scientific American
June 4, 2015
(excerpts)
A revised analysis shows a slight recent uptick in the global average temperature. Credit: NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information
“There is no slowdown in global warming,” Russell Vose, the head of the climate science division at the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), said. “Or stated differently, the trend over the past decade and half is in line with the trend since 1950.”
Temperatures have warmed 1.6°F since the 1880s. Projections indicate the temperatures could rise as much as 11°F by century’s end if greenhouse gas emissions aren’t slowed and that the rate of warming could reach levels unseen in 1,000 years by 2030s.
funny stuff when you going to actually provide evidence, not suggestions. See, you all don't read the crap you post. None of it is evidence that supports your nonsense. You've been told that how many times now?
Nasa and Noaa have both already admitted they use manufactured data sets, biased. Do you disagree with that? Come now let's see how foolish you really are. Say they don't bias the data. Come on pretty please?
The MIT dude is your worse nightmare and it bugs the ba-jesus out of you. You can tell from your posts. BTW, you post like some very angry fk. You should learn to relax and go with the flow more.
that's you to the tee!!!!ding, ding, ding, wow you just called your own self out. Exactly, BTW, are you saying that climate data isn't biased? Come on now, let's see your words here.....
Judith Curry doesn't reject our position? So you are 100% wrong.
And I don't have to ignore anything, I will believe based on presented evidence, and you have none.
Hey old socks and rollingblunder, where are your posts, is climate data biased or not? Are you two too chicken shit to offer up your answer?
No, wrong, nice deflection, but I asked if you think data sets are biased or not. You didn't answer. Why didn't you answer? Funny typical left response.No Pause in Global Warming
A new study suggests that global warming continues to steadily increase
Scientific American
June 4, 2015
(excerpts)
A revised analysis shows a slight recent uptick in the global average temperature. Credit: NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information
“There is no slowdown in global warming,” Russell Vose, the head of the climate science division at the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), said. “Or stated differently, the trend over the past decade and half is in line with the trend since 1950.”
Temperatures have warmed 1.6°F since the 1880s. Projections indicate the temperatures could rise as much as 11°F by century’s end if greenhouse gas emissions aren’t slowed and that the rate of warming could reach levels unseen in 1,000 years by 2030s.funny stuff when you going to actually provide evidence, not suggestions. See, you all don't read the crap you post. None of it is evidence that supports your nonsense. You've been told that how many times now?
Nasa and Noaa have both already admitted they use manufactured data sets, biased. Do you disagree with that? Come now let's see how foolish you really are. Say they don't bias the data. Come on pretty please?
The MIT dude is your worse nightmare and it bugs the ba-jesus out of you. You can tell from your posts. BTW, you post like some very angry fk. You should learn to relax and go with the flow more.that's you to the tee!!!!ding, ding, ding, wow you just called your own self out. Exactly, BTW, are you saying that climate data isn't biased? Come on now, let's see your words here.....Judith Curry doesn't reject our position? So you are 100% wrong.
And I don't have to ignore anything, I will believe based on presented evidence, and you have none.Hey old socks and rollingblunder, where are your posts, is climate data biased or not? Are you two too chicken shit to offer up your answer?
The hilariously delusional, evidence-free ravings of the anti-science denier cult troll, JustCrazy456, who displays all of the intellectual gifts and rigor of a brain damaged chipmunk. His denier cult paranoid conspiracy theory about the data gathered by tens of thousands of scientists all around the world, being somehow "biased" is another demented example of his basic insanity, gullibility, ignorance, and utter confusion. Very common among the bamboozled denier cult wackos.
So you don't say?
Climate change: Richard Lindzen and the 'cult' of global warming
An MIT professor of meteorology is dismissing global-warming alarmists as a discredited “cult” whose members are becoming more hysterical as emerging evidence continues to contradict their beliefs.
- Comments were made by professor of meteorology, Richard Lindzen
- 'Instead of saying, oh, we were wrong, they get more fanatical,' he said
- He says 70% of the Earth is ocean, and measuring its temperature tricky
- He has previously blasted the IPCC for blaming humans for a global warming trend - and then glossing over the warming slowdown
During an appearance on this writer’s radio show Monday, MIT Professor emeritus Richard Lindzen discussed the religious nature of the movement.
“As with any cult, once the mythology of the cult begins falling apart, instead of saying, oh, we were wrong, they get more and more fanatical. I think that’s what’s happening here. Think about it,” he said. “You’ve led an unpleasant life, you haven’t led a very virtuous life, but now you’re told, you get absolution if you watch your carbon footprint. It’s salvation!”
Lindzen, 74, has issued calm dismissals of warmist apocalypse, reducing his critics to sputtering rage
You make all kinds of silly ass claims, and not one bit of supporting evidence.The IPCC was proven to be fraudulent several years ago, dumb ass.Prove that the Michael Mann, Raymond Bradley and Malcolm Hughes hockey stick is correct!
Fifth Assessment Report - Climate Change 2013
Read it and weep, asshhole.
The IPCC was proven to be fraudulent several years ago, dumb ass.Read it and weep, asshhole.
Lindzen, whose prediction of nothing much happening has been made a mockery of by observed temperature records. The man has reason to be butt hurt.
No empirical evidence ? ! ? ! ? Are you a blithering idiot or an unmitigated liar? The IPCC's assessment reports, like the thousands of peer reviewed studies on which they're based, are FILLED with empirical evidence, as are the previous four.
You admit climate science is filled with instrumented data - measurements - but still claim it contains no empirical data. So you ARE a blithering idiot
No empirical evidence ? ! ? ! ? Are you a blithering idiot or an unmitigated liar? The IPCC's assessment reports, like the thousands of peer reviewed studies on which they're based, are FILLED with empirical evidence, as are the previous four.
