Loudoun County, who is at the fight for no trans and no CRT

[Coyote]

I knew you didn't have the ethics to admit it.

It’s ok honey, the CRT bogeyman is not under your bed

 

[Nostra]

It’s ok honey, the CRT bogeyman is not under your bed

I see you still can't bring any links to these laws you claim outlaw talking about racism.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

I asked for proof of that claim 24 hours ago. Still waiting for what will undoubtedly never come.
Lesh is a devious liar and strong supporter of leftist agitprop.

I guess it's safe to assume you have no intention of justifying your lie and no way of legitimizing it anyway.

You are sad and desperate.

 

[Papageorgio]

You're a big boy, you can Google it for yourself.

Can’t support your thoughts?

 

[Coyote]

Can’t support your thoughts?

Again Google it.

What you are demanding is a law that specifically states that when you know perfectly well that is not the case NOR is it necessary to achieve that result. AS YOU WELL KNOW all it takes is an overly broad, vaguely worded piece of legislation.

What is noteworthy is that out of some 28 (?) bills only 6 actually refer to CRT (not surprisingly as CRT is not typically taught in K12). Some of the bills include universities which has a chilling effect on academic freedom (talk about government indoctrination and political interference).

Here is one where teachers could be fined for allowing discussion of topics without providing an “alternative” point of view….what exactly does that mean? Nazis, white supremacists, eugenists etc must be given a voice?

Laws like these have ONE desired effect. Threatening teachers to the point where quit for fear of losing their jobs or cease allowing the discussion of anything remotely controversial, and it is the student who loses.

I have laugh except it is tragic. You laughed at the left for being snowflakes…with all the safe spaces, politics of inclusion, no hate, rainbows and unicorns…but what are YOU doing? The left didn’t use the force of legislation to do this. It was a reflection of the changing culture. The right is creating it’s own safe spaces and protected snowflakes, but it is using the authoritarian strength of it’s legislative arm to do so.

 

[Nostra]

Again Google it.

What you are demanding is a law that specifically states that when you know perfectly well that is not the case NOR is it necessary to achieve that result. AS YOU WELL KNOW all it takes is an overly broad, vaguely worded piece of legislation.

What is noteworthy is that out of some 28 (?) bills only 6 actually refer to CRT (not surprisingly as CRT is not typically taught in K12). Some of the bills include universities which has a chilling effect on academic freedom (talk about government indoctrination and political interference).

Here is one where teachers could be fined for allowing discussion of topics without providing an “alternative” point of view….what exactly does that mean? Nazis, white supremacists, eugenists etc must be given a voice?

Laws like these have ONE desired effect. Threatening teachers to the point where quit for fear of losing their jobs or cease allowing the discussion of anything remotely controversial, and it is the student who loses.

I have laugh except it is tragic. You laughed at the left for being snowflakes…with all the safe spaces, politics of inclusion, no hate, rainbows and unicorns…but what are YOU doing? The left didn’t use the force of legislation to do this. It was a reflection of the changing culture. The right is creating it’s own safe spaces and protected snowflakes, but it is using the authoritarian strength of it’s legislative arm to do so.

Um, you claimed there were laws making it illegal to discuss racism.

Wanna try again, liar?

 

[Papageorgio]

Again Google it.

What you are demanding is a law that specifically states that when you know perfectly well that is not the case NOR is it necessary to achieve that result. AS YOU WELL KNOW all it takes is an overly broad, vaguely worded piece of legislation.

What is noteworthy is that out of some 28 (?) bills only 6 actually refer to CRT (not surprisingly as CRT is not typically taught in K12). Some of the bills include universities which has a chilling effect on academic freedom (talk about government indoctrination and political interference).

Here is one where teachers could be fined for allowing discussion of topics without providing an “alternative” point of view….what exactly does that mean? Nazis, white supremacists, eugenists etc must be given a voice?

Laws like these have ONE desired effect. Threatening teachers to the point where quit for fear of losing their jobs or cease allowing the discussion of anything remotely controversial, and it is the student who loses.

I have laugh except it is tragic. You laughed at the left for being snowflakes…with all the safe spaces, politics of inclusion, no hate, rainbows and unicorns…but what are YOU doing? The left didn’t use the force of legislation to do this. It was a reflection of the changing culture. The right is creating it’s own safe spaces and protected snowflakes, but it is using the authoritarian strength of it’s legislative arm to do so.

So you have nothing but a silly opinion, thanks for admitting you got nothing but your. BS.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Then the parents can afford separate BR's, can't they??

I don't believe the girl or the father.

 

[FA_Q2]

It’s ok honey, the CRT bogeyman is not under your bed

Nor is the KKK under yours but you seem to support policies that demand they are.

 

[Coyote]

Um, you claimed there were laws making it illegal to discuss racism.

Wanna try again, liar?

Of course nuance escapes your little black and white mind, try applying that to gun control, then you’ll be screeching that they will confiscate your guns.

When you have a law forbidding topics that might make a student uncomfortable, you cannot discuss racism or many other topics. Ergo, it is illegal. You Republicans are emulating the Chinese…if you forbid discussion it will cease to exist in cultural memory like Tianamen Square.

 

[Coyote]

Nor is the KKK under yours but you seem to support policies that demand they are.

Like what policies do you think I support that indicates such?

 

[Coyote]

So you have nothing but a silly opinion, thanks for admitting you got nothing but your. BS.

Well that’s kind of funny since my “silly opinion” has already seen teachers and other personnel fired, suspended or fined.

 

[Lisa558]

So where did you learn this? The rapist claimed in court his wristwatch got caught on his skirt
and, whoops, he wound up sodomizing this girl.
The judge did not buy the story, not surprisingly. Peddle your bullshit elsewhere, dope.

I don’t understand. So his watch got caught in his skirt, and that meant his p***** forcibly and repeatedly “fell” into the girl’s a**……?

Next time I go out with a man, I will insist he take off his watch. It might get caught in his sleeve, and then you know what.

 

[Nostra]

Of course nuance escapes your little black and white mind, try applying that to gun control, then you’ll be screeching that they will confiscate your guns.

When you have a law forbidding topics that might make a student uncomfortable, you cannot discuss racism or many other topics. Ergo, it is illegal. You Republicans are emulating the Chinese…if you forbid discussion it will cease to exist in cultural memory like Tianamen Square.

WTF are you babbling about, Assflap? There was no "nuance" in your post. You claimed Republicans are passing laws that outlaws talking about racism.

You lied, because you are a lying sack of shit. Now you are feebly trying to worm your way out of your lie.

It isn't working, liar.

 

[Coyote]

WTF are you babbling about, Assflap? There was no "nuance" in your post. You claimed Republicans are passing laws that outlaws talking about racism.

You lied, because you are a lying sack of shit. Now you are feebly trying to worm your way out of your lie.

It isn't working, liar.

You should explain that to teachers who got suspended.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

And here ^^^ we have a leftist who doesn’t believe that a girl was raped, EVEN THOUGH HE WAS CONVICTED, and denigrates this poor child along with her father, She instead sides with the rapist.

That, in a nutshell, is the mindset of a radical leftist.

One thing that you can reliably count on is that those on the left wrong will consistently take the side of criminals, perverts, and other subhuman scum against that of actual human beings.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

The boy admitted to it and was convicted.

It'd probably help if you actually knew the facts before spouting off and looking stupid

Wouldn't help. Penelope is incapable of avoiding looking stupid.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

What happened to "believe all women"?

It only applies when it's a LIbEral woman accusing a conservative of sexual impropriety.

 

[Nostra]

You should explain that to teachers who got suspended.

You are really struggling here. Let's go back to your claim there are laws making it illegal to discuss racism to see if we can get you back on track.

Make discussion of it illegal through overly broad and vaguely worded laws that have the intended effect of preventing teachers from any discussion of racism for fear of losing their jobs.


Where are these laws making it illegal to discuss racism"

Focus, Dipshit.

 

[Coyote]

You are really struggling here. Let's go back to your claim there are laws making it illegal to discuss racism to see if we can get you back on track.

Make discussion of it illegal through overly broad and vaguely worded laws that have the intended effect of preventing teachers from any discussion of racism for fear of losing their jobs.


Where are these laws making it illegal to discuss racism"

Focus, Dipshit.

Think, dipshit. What happens when have a law that says you can’t discuss that might make a student uncomfortable.