Sky Dancer
Rookie
- Jan 21, 2009
- 19,307
- 1,320
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #61
The term "natural" does not equate to "normal". Technically Arsenic is 100% natural, but I wouldn't want to put it on my cornflakes.
Biologically homosexuality is an abnormal condition. It results in no procreation, which is what is the overall intent of sex. Societies can accept certain behaviors that deviate the norm, but biologically it is still a defect, since it hinders the contiuation of a given persons genetic material.
If genetic, could homosexuality be a self limiting factor for our overall population? perhaps.
Normal adult sexuality, regardless of gender, includes many of the same sex practices. Such as oral and anal sex. It is natural and normal for adults who love each to freely enjoy many different sex practices. It doesn't make much difference biologically whose human mouth is on whose human genitals or whose penis is in whose anus. Those sexual practices are not the exclusive domain of gays and lesbians.
Sex for procreation only folks, are sad, to me. I knew a couple, parents of a dear friend, who only had sex to procreate. They had a very unhappy marriage.
Socially those can be acceptable sexual practices, I agree. All biology knows is that those other practices cannot result in a fertilized ovum, and hence continuation of the parental DNA.
Anything other than penile-vaginal sex, in an evolutionary sense, is a form of "ur doin it wrong"
My point has nothing to do with what society accepts, but with what biology wants, and biology wants opposite sex people to have penile-vaginal sex to procreate the species. Every other biological function regarding sexuality is regulated by that act. Any deviation from this is not normal, in a pure biological sense.
We no longer do just what biology, as you define it, does. We have contraception. People choose when to procreate.
We also procreate with vagina or penises.