Discussion in 'Current Events' started by MindWars, Mar 4, 2018.
I’m going to stop because I have much better things to do
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I hope it doesn't involve someone else's children.
Fuck you moron !!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Doesn’t sound at all as though you prioritised the welfare of the children.
You represent everything that’s wrong with child services and the politicising of it.
'In a few sentences Marx, who is nonetheless so miserly and reticent where sexuality is concerned, exploded something that will hold Freud and all of psychoanalysis forever captive: (the anthropomorphic representation of sex! [italics]). What we call anthropomorphic representation is just as much the idea that there are two sexes as the idea that there is only one. We know how Freudianism is permeated by this bizarre notion that there is finally only one sex, the masculine, in relation to which the woman, the feminine is defined as a lack, an absence. It could be thought at first that such a hypothesis founds the omnipotence of a male homosexuality. Yet this is not at all the case; what is founded here is rather the statistical aggregate of intersexual loves. For if the woman is defined as a lack in relation to the man, that man in his turn lacks what is lacking in the woman, simply in another fashion: the idea of a single sex necessarily leads to the erection of a phallus as an object on high, which distributes lack as two nonsuperimposable sides and makes the two sexes communicate in a common absence -- castration.
Women, as psychoanalysts or psychoanalyzed, can then rejoice in showing man the way, and in recuperating equality in difference. Whence the irresistably comical nature of the formulas according to which one gains access to desire through castration. But the idea that there are two sexes, after all, is no better. This time, like Melanie Klein , one attempts to define the female sex by means of positive characteristics, even if they be terrifying. At least in this way one avoids phallocentrism, if not anthropomorphism. But this time, far from founding the communication between the two sexes, one founds instead their separation into two homosexual series that remain statistical. And one does not by any means escape castration. It is simply that castration, instead of being the principle of sex conceived as the masculine sex (the great castrated soaring Phallus), becomes the result of sex conceived as the feminine sex (the little hidden absorbed penis). We maintain therefore that castration ( is the basis for the anthropomorphic and molar representation of sexuality [italics]).'
So you're judging others lives as you live your life 100% by the man's written Bible's under fake gods..
The Bible is dated to lies, to control weak-minded gullible then 2500 years ago and more now.
And losing Flock growth of followers to the BS of gods. Most people claiming a lord'/god are not 100% devotees.
Break the rules every day. Only 18% are true believers in gods'.
Really!, most are playing along with Loopholes. LOL!
And BTW. Our Kids forced to follow these BS lies are expanding there Sex Lives in other ways.
What is obscene is your disgusting belief that protecting the innocence and virginity OF CHILDREN is obscene. That stated belief alone should be enough to get a person listed as a predator and barred from places where children congregate.
Girls are not toys. If "innocence and virginity" is somehow required by the Supreme Being and must be "protected," this would be true for both sexes. People have always ignored the male's status and used the female's "innocence and virginity" as trade goods. I have only heard the term "damaged goods" applied to females. Why have females been considered to be "goods" and males not? I would speculate that people like trump, gingrich, and moore were "damaged goods" long before their first wedding nights.
Is English your first language?
Separate names with a comma.