KJB does not believe in natural rights

"Natural rights" are a quaint philosophical construct not expressly guaranteed by law. Never has been. These supposedly inalienable rights are always bounded by laws that seek to preserve the social order. These days the term is bandied about by people who seem to have a dim view of collective rights.
Collective human rights are the rights, not of individual human beings, but of groups as groups. The doctrine of collective rights holds that a person's rights that are dependent on the group...
So you are pushing your socialist agenda. Individual rights have to be over riden for the "greater good"
 
"Natural rights" are a quaint philosophical construct not expressly guaranteed by law. Never has been. These supposedly inalienable rights are always bounded by laws that seek to preserve the social order. These days the term is bandied about by people who seem to have a dim view of collective rights.
Do you even consider yourself an individual human being, or do you believe you're nothing more than a cog in a machine?
 
Goodness, you leftists sure are violent.
I never figure you for one of the never spank your kids to teach them how to act, liberals. Go figure.
 

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, who will almost certainly be confirmed to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, said that she does not have a position on whether people have natural rights.

"I do not hold a position on whether individuals possess natural rights," the jurist wrote in response to a written question from Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas.

Jackson pointed to the Declaration of Independence when she was asked to, "explain, in your own words, the theory prevalent among members of the Founding Fathers’ generation that humans possess natural rights that are inherent or inalienable."

Jackson wrote that, "The theory that humans possess inherent or inalienable rights is reflected in the Declaration of Independence, which states: 'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.'"

Regarding Jackson's lack of a position about the issue of whether individuals have natural rights, GOP Rep. Mike Johnson of Louisiana tweeted, "Ketanji Brown Jackson denies the first, self-evident truth of America!"

Problem is, if we don't have natural rights, we basically don't have a Constitution.

All that matters to these people is the power of the state over the individual.
Anyone who does not believe in natural rights does not deserve any. Particularly the right to life.

Execute that fucking bitch.
 
This witch believes in turning America into a third world shithole where there's no rights.

Defeat her!!!!
 
A few different ones.

So, answer me this. If someone is living in the US and they are not a citizen, are they covered by the Constitution or not?
That's not what were talking about. It was about the slaughter of muslims in the mideast.
 
That's not what were talking about. It was about the slaughter of muslims in the mideast.

Then you should be more careful of your wording as you said one had to be a citizen to fall under the Constitution. And both you and I know that is not accurate.
 

Forum List

Back
Top