Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income

[ColonelAngus]

She is corrupt and should resign. Keep your standards, cult.

 

[Lesh]

She is corrupt and should resign. Keep your standards, cult.

If you think that you must be outraged by Alitto and Thomas

Gorsuch too by the way

 

[ColonelAngus]

NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW

Anyone calling for Thomas to resign must call for Brown to resign.

That stupid bitch does not know what a woman is. She cannot do her job. She might be retarded.

 

[pknopp]

The Supreme Court doesn't have the same ethics code the rest of the Government has.

It needs to be the strongest code in existence. We need a strong enforceable ethics code but sadly many aren't interested over their politics.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Closing time on Ketanji.

Corrupt judges must resign.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Will she have the shortest tenure of any SCOTUS judge ever?

She must resign. If you called for Thomas to resign, then Brown must resign.

DERP DERP DERP DERP

 

[Doc7505]

Get back to us when Clarence Thomas is being impeached.

Yet you claim Justice is to serve everyone equally.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Lets GO!

We finally get a black woman on the SCOTUS and she is CORRUPT?!!

WTF DEMS?

 

[WEATHER53]

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income​

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income

redstate.com

19 Dec 2023 ~~ By Jedd Charles

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is facing an ethics complaint over alleged failures to disclose details about her income. A conservative group filed the complaint, bringing these allegations to light.
Jackson’s complaint centers on her alleged failure to disclose her husband’s income.


The crux of the matter lies in the rules mandating that justice disclose any income exceeding $1,000 under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978. The group notes that while she disclosed two of her husband’s clients in 2011, subsequent filings did not include this information. During her 2020 nomination to the court, the justice acknowledged that some of her husband’s income had been “inadvertently omitted” in prior disclosures.
Adding to the matter are concerns about Jackson’s reporting of the source of funding for her 2022 Supreme Court investiture celebration, according to the Center for Renewing America.

This development draws parallels with other reports homing in on Justice Thomas, scrutinizing him for his relationship with a wealthy real estate tycoon. These reports have prompted calls for the judge’s resignation from Democrats. Of course, it is worth noting that the reports and subsequent criticisms coming from the left are clearly motivated by politics, and their decision to ignore the complaint against Jackson essentially proves it.
If the media were truly concerned about ethics among members of the Supreme Court, they would have focused on both stories and given equal attention to other justices regardless of their ideological leaning. But, since Jackson is a progressive, they can’t bother to examine her with the same microscope they apply to Thomas or any other conservative justice.


Commentary:
She is strictly an affirmative action hire. Additionally, Ketanji Brown Jackson is an in your face distortion of Justice foisted upon America's Supreme Court Jurisprudence. She doesn’t belong anywhere near any court as a decider of anything.
".husband's....income from medical malpractice consulting fees.
I'm betting, surely KBJ's husband as a consultant knows what a woman is.
Meanwhile, hits on Clarence Thomas abound. It’s pathetic. I long for the days of impartial journalism.
Lawfare has raised it's ugly head in the halls of the Supreme Court.

Like most AA she can do what she wants and anyone uncovering misdeeds is doing so because they are Racist

 

[Doc7505]

Like most AA she can do what she wants and anyone uncovering misdeeds is doing so because they are Racist

A similar instance is the president of Harvard Gay. She blatantly plagiarized her Doctorial thesis.

Harvard attempting to ‘redefine’ plagiarism to protect embattled President Claudine Gay, alleged victim says.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

If the SheJustice is acting like the ThomasJustice, she should be sanctioned, too.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income​

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income

redstate.com

19 Dec 2023 ~~ By Jedd Charles

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is facing an ethics complaint over alleged failures to disclose details about her income. A conservative group filed the complaint, bringing these allegations to light.
Jackson’s complaint centers on her alleged failure to disclose her husband’s income.


The crux of the matter lies in the rules mandating that justice disclose any income exceeding $1,000 under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978. The group notes that while she disclosed two of her husband’s clients in 2011, subsequent filings did not include this information. During her 2020 nomination to the court, the justice acknowledged that some of her husband’s income had been “inadvertently omitted” in prior disclosures.
Adding to the matter are concerns about Jackson’s reporting of the source of funding for her 2022 Supreme Court investiture celebration, according to the Center for Renewing America.

This development draws parallels with other reports homing in on Justice Thomas, scrutinizing him for his relationship with a wealthy real estate tycoon. These reports have prompted calls for the judge’s resignation from Democrats. Of course, it is worth noting that the reports and subsequent criticisms coming from the left are clearly motivated by politics, and their decision to ignore the complaint against Jackson essentially proves it.
If the media were truly concerned about ethics among members of the Supreme Court, they would have focused on both stories and given equal attention to other justices regardless of their ideological leaning. But, since Jackson is a progressive, they can’t bother to examine her with the same microscope they apply to Thomas or any other conservative justice.


Commentary:
She is strictly an affirmative action hire. Additionally, Ketanji Brown Jackson is an in your face distortion of Justice foisted upon America's Supreme Court Jurisprudence. She doesn’t belong anywhere near any court as a decider of anything.
".husband's....income from medical malpractice consulting fees.
I'm betting, surely KBJ's husband as a consultant knows what a woman is.
Meanwhile, hits on Clarence Thomas abound. It’s pathetic. I long for the days of impartial journalism.
Lawfare has raised it's ugly head in the halls of the Supreme Court.

Ah, the tactic of "We have two Supreme Court justices that are on the take, so... let's attack other justices and people will forget about our corruption"

 

[Dragonlady]

Brown might be among the least qualified justices in history. She and the softball player who doesn't like men.

Brown is, in fact, the most qualified justice, who has been appointed in my lifetime. But best of all she wasn’t bought and paid for by the federalist society, unlike all three of Trump’s appointments.


Amy Coney Barrett is the least qualified Justice in history. She’s never been a judge or a trial lawyer. She was a federalist society appointee, groomed from the time she was college for the court, because of her politics.

But thanks for showing us what a racist ignorant piece of shit you truly are. Not that we didn’t know it before.

 

[1miseryindex]

She "inadvertently" left out info?

Well, if the law says you have to report anything over $1000, you have to report anything over $1000

whether you "forgot" or not is irrelevant.

Otherwise ANYONE could get away with ANYTHING by saying... "Oh, I just forgot"

PLEASE

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Otherwise ANYONE could get away with ANYTHING by saying... "Oh, I just forgot"

Um.. they have. Don't you read the news at all?

 

[MinTrut]

Ah, the tactic of "We have two Supreme Court justices that are on the take, so... let's attack other justices and people will forget about our corruption"

Ah, the tactic of "Let me ignore corruption when my favored side engages in it."

 

[lantern2814]

Brown is, in fact, the most qualified justice, who has been appointed in my lifetime. But best of all she wasn’t bought and paid for by the federalist society, unlike all three of Trump’s appointments.


Amy Coney Barrett is the least qualified Justice in history. She’s never been a judge or a trial lawyer. She was a federalist society appointee, groomed from the time she was college for the court, because of her politics.

But thanks for showing us what a racist ignorant piece of shit you truly are. Not that we didn’t know it before.

Sorry stupid. KAGAN has never sat as a judge. On any kind of case anywhere. Never mind that Brown is an idiot who can’t determine what a woman is. Thanks for showing us what an ignorant, racist piece of shit you are. Not that we’re surprised. Keep your stupidity confined to your own country.

 

[justoffal]

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income​

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income

redstate.com

19 Dec 2023 ~~ By Jedd Charles

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is facing an ethics complaint over alleged failures to disclose details about her income. A conservative group filed the complaint, bringing these allegations to light.
Jackson’s complaint centers on her alleged failure to disclose her husband’s income.


The crux of the matter lies in the rules mandating that justice disclose any income exceeding $1,000 under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978. The group notes that while she disclosed two of her husband’s clients in 2011, subsequent filings did not include this information. During her 2020 nomination to the court, the justice acknowledged that some of her husband’s income had been “inadvertently omitted” in prior disclosures.
Adding to the matter are concerns about Jackson’s reporting of the source of funding for her 2022 Supreme Court investiture celebration, according to the Center for Renewing America.

This development draws parallels with other reports homing in on Justice Thomas, scrutinizing him for his relationship with a wealthy real estate tycoon. These reports have prompted calls for the judge’s resignation from Democrats. Of course, it is worth noting that the reports and subsequent criticisms coming from the left are clearly motivated by politics, and their decision to ignore the complaint against Jackson essentially proves it.
If the media were truly concerned about ethics among members of the Supreme Court, they would have focused on both stories and given equal attention to other justices regardless of their ideological leaning. But, since Jackson is a progressive, they can’t bother to examine her with the same microscope they apply to Thomas or any other conservative justice.


Commentary:
She is strictly an affirmative action hire. Additionally, Ketanji Brown Jackson is an in your face distortion of Justice foisted upon America's Supreme Court Jurisprudence. She doesn’t belong anywhere near any court as a decider of anything.
".husband's....income from medical malpractice consulting fees.
I'm betting, surely KBJ's husband as a consultant knows what a woman is.
Meanwhile, hits on Clarence Thomas abound. It’s pathetic. I long for the days of impartial journalism.
Lawfare has raised it's ugly head in the halls of the Supreme Court.

Lefty will never learn..... What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
They always wanted to be one-sided but it never is.

 

[Dragonlady]

Lefty will never learn..... What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
They always wanted to be one-sided but it never is.

So, you didn't read the link at all. There is a vast difference between KBJ's husband having a $100,000 consulting contract with a company which once had a case before the SC, and Justice Roberts wife receiving $10 million in "headhunter fees" from a law firm which regularly argues cases before the SC.

Or Justice Thomas failing to disclosre millions of dollars in "gifts" from billionaire "friends" he didn't know before joining the Court.

Republicans keep claiming Democrats do it too, but in reality, Democrats do NOT do it too.

 

[justoffal]

So, you didn't read the link at all. There is a vast difference between KBJ's husband having a $100,000 consulting contract with a company which once had a case before the SC, and Justice Roberts wife receiving $10 million in "headhunter fees" from a law firm which regularly argues cases before the SC.

Or Justice Thomas failing to disclosre millions of dollars in "gifts" from billionaire "friends" he didn't know before joining the Court.

Republicans keep claiming Democrats do it too, but in reality, Democrats do NOT do it too.

Blah blah blah blah....rationalize, cherry pick, parse, justify....blah blah blah....my evil is not as evil as your evil ....blah blah blah blah....