It took two weeks for Romney to call Benghazi a terrorist attack

[NYcarbineer]

You got to love how the Right has now rewritten history to erase the fact that they were riots and protests all over the Muslim world because of that movie; now suddenly, there was no movie, there was no reaction to the movie.

Stunning.

Jesus flippin Christ, there were videos of what happened. This was a lie perpetrated by Obama to keep his "I killed bin Laden" rhetoric to show how good he was at foreign policy. The coverup is almost as bad as the death of four Americans.

They knew the movie had nothing to do with this, yet they wanted us to believe it did. Your guy got caught lying to save his own skin.

Since the President called it a terrorist attack the day after the terrorist attack happened, only a mental retard could conclude that he was trying to cover up the fact that it was a terrorist attack.

 

[PredFan]

You got to love how the Right has now rewritten history to erase the fact that they were riots and protests all over the Muslim world because of that movie; now suddenly, there was no movie, there was no reaction to the movie.

Stunning.

Jesus flippin Christ, there were videos of what happened. This was a lie perpetrated by Obama to keep his "I killed bin Laden" rhetoric to show how good he was at foreign policy. The coverup is almost as bad as the death of four Americans.

They knew the movie had nothing to do with this, yet they wanted us to believe it did. Your guy got caught lying to save his own skin.

Exactly.

 

[spectrumc01]

Cause the administration lied to the American people that it was the movie for two weeks.

Romney did not get intel briefs.

This suprises you?

They also lied about weapons of mass destruction. The difference is we went to war for many years over a lie. This one we didn't.

Also, this seems pretty petty. Arguing over the lable of terrorism. Weather an act of violence is terrorism matters not. Americans are dead no matter what you want to call it. But hey, if it makes the Republicans feel better....

We didn't go into a war because of a lie idiot. Saddam had WMDs. He used them against the Kurds.

Try thinking.

Are you serious?
Unplug yourself from the FOX and CNN propaganda machines, do some research for yourself, and try a little critical thinking. During my time as a 54B(Chemical Operations specialist) in the US Army. I was fortunate enough to travel on Uncle Sams dime for that lovely war. I got to see Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait. Not one chemical weapon, because he used them all before we got there. We sold them to him when he was fighting Iran for us, so we knew he had them. We also knew he used them on the Kurds, and we also knew he had none left after that. So in closing, he had no WMD's.

 

[PredFan]

You got to love how the Right has now rewritten history to erase the fact that they were riots and protests all over the Muslim world because of that movie; now suddenly, there was no movie, there was no reaction to the movie.

Stunning.

Jesus flippin Christ, there were videos of what happened. This was a lie perpetrated by Obama to keep his "I killed bin Laden" rhetoric to show how good he was at foreign policy. The coverup is almost as bad as the death of four Americans.

They knew the movie had nothing to do with this, yet they wanted us to believe it did. Your guy got caught lying to save his own skin.

Since the President called it a terrorist attack the day after the terrorist attack happened, only a mental retard could conclude that he was trying to cover up the fact that it was a terrorist attack.

Only a mental retard wouldn't be able to see through your dishonesty.

 

[NYcarbineer]

There were protests and violence going on all across the ME over the movie at the same time,

Proves the coordination and breadth of our terrorist adversaries.

Diametric to the pronouncements by the Obama administration.

Bin Laden is dead.

So is Henry Ford but Ford is still alive (without Obama bailout).

Rioting over a movie proves how strong al qaeda is??

 

[PredFan]

This suprises you?

They also lied about weapons of mass destruction. The difference is we went to war for many years over a lie. This one we didn't.

Also, this seems pretty petty. Arguing over the lable of terrorism. Weather an act of violence is terrorism matters not. Americans are dead no matter what you want to call it. But hey, if it makes the Republicans feel better....

We didn't go into a war because of a lie idiot. Saddam had WMDs. He used them against the Kurds.

Try thinking.

Are you serious?
Unplug yourself from the FOX and CNN propaganda machines, do some research for yourself, and try a little critical thinking. During my time as a 54B(Chemical Operations specialist) in the US Army. I was fortunate enough to travel on Uncle Sams dime for that lovely war. I got to see Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait. Not one chemical weapon, because he used them all before we got there. We sold them to him when he was fighting Iran for us, so we knew he had them. We also knew he used them on the Kurds, and we also knew he had none left after that. So in closing, he had no WMD's.

It would appear that you are the idiot.

 

[Zoom-boing]

Obama called it a terrorist attack the next day. Stop lying.

Ok, let's say that Obama did call it (Bengazi specifically,not a generalized statement referring to 9/11/01) a terrorist attack.

Why then did Obama and the admin never call it a terrorist attack again for another two weeks but instead referred to it as mob/protest reaction to the film?

Stevens sent 166 memos to the WH asking for increased security and informing them how bad the situation was getting ... yet the WH ignored this and went with "it's the film"?

??

 

[OODA_Loop]

Rioting over a movie proves how strong al qaeda is??

I thought the President said it was terror ?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Jesus flippin Christ, there were videos of what happened. This was a lie perpetrated by Obama to keep his "I killed bin Laden" rhetoric to show how good he was at foreign policy. The coverup is almost as bad as the death of four Americans.

They knew the movie had nothing to do with this, yet they wanted us to believe it did. Your guy got caught lying to save his own skin.

Since the President called it a terrorist attack the day after the terrorist attack happened, only a mental retard could conclude that he was trying to cover up the fact that it was a terrorist attack.

Only a mental retard wouldn't be able to see through your dishonesty.

What did I lie about. The President called it a terrorist attack on September 12th. If he were carrying out some grand scheme to hide the fact that it was a terrorist attack,

that wouldn't be very crafty initial move now would it?

 

[OODA_Loop]

What did I lie about. The President called it a terrorist attack on September 12th. If he were carrying out some grand scheme to hide the fact that it was a terrorist attack,

that wouldn't be very crafty initial move now would it?

About as crafty as sending out his vice president, senior officials and spokespeople for the next two weeks saying it was the movie and intel failure.

As crafty as holding back the FBI for three weeks from investigating.

 

[PredFan]

Since the President called it a terrorist attack the day after the terrorist attack happened, only a mental retard could conclude that he was trying to cover up the fact that it was a terrorist attack.

Only a mental retard wouldn't be able to see through your dishonesty.

What did I lie about. The President called it a terrorist attack on September 12th. If he were carrying out some grand scheme to hide the fact that it was a terrorist attack,

that wouldn't be very crafty initial move now would it?

Did I say lie? I said you weren't being honest. You are trying to spin us away from THE issue. The issue as YOU WELL KNOW is that the movie was not the reason the ambassador was killed and that obama knew that but lied to us about the reason in order to cover up his failures.

Romney was wrong to say that obama didn't call it a terrorist attack. Who gives a shit about that. The real scandal is obama's lie. You and the rest of the left are desperately trying to hide this fact. Romney's point was obama's clear failure at security and foreign policy and you know that as well as I do.

You are being dishonest.

 

[spectrumc01]

Americans are dead.

Does it matter what the hell it's called?

Private security contractors are not as good as the military, and they cost 100x's more. Some things the government can do better than the private sector.

To argue over somantics is petty.

Pretty poor attempt at spin pal.

It's about the obama administration's failures at foreign policy and security, and his lies to cover it up. Not semantics.

The so-called failures in foreign policy are just that "so-called". An attack like that can happen at any time over there, weather security is beefed up or not. If you don't believe that you are fooling yourself. Your "fanboy" partisanship is showing. By your definition, not calling it a "terrorist attack" is covering it up?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Rioting over a movie proves how strong al qaeda is??

I thought the President said it was terror ?

So you admit the President did in fact call the Libya attack a terrorist attack? You're finally admitting you were full of shit before?

 

[OODA_Loop]

Rioting over a movie proves how strong al qaeda is??

I thought the President said it was terror ?

So you admit the President did in fact call the Libya attack a terrorist attack? You're finally admitting you were full of shit before?

Was it a coordinated terrorist attack on the anniversary of 9/11 or a movie protest ?

 

[SniperFire]

Obama and his admin perpetuated a lie for weeks about the attack being a 'spontaneous mob reaction/protest to the film' (the admin later admitted there had been no protest) rather than it being a 'preplanned terrorist attack'. He knew this was a lie yet he, and his admin, continued to push it.

During his exchange with Stewart, Obama maintained that his administration has kept the American people informed based on the information it has.

"Every piece of information that we get, as we got it we laid it out to the American people," he said. "The picture eventually gets fully filled in."

Obama On Daily Show: President Defends Libya Response To Jon Stewart


166 memos from Stevens asking for increased security, repeatedly stating that Al-Q/islamic extremism was on the rise, stating ""The individual incidents have been organized," - NOTE: organized ... all ignored by this admin.

How anyone is defending Obama on this is beyond me.

Documents show Stevens worried about Libya security threats, Al Qaeda before consulate attack | Fox News

That is the clear fact here which indicates this Administration is lying to the American public, as evidenced by Biden's outrageous lie in the debates:



RADDATZ: And they wanted more security there.

BIDEN: Well, we weren’t told they wanted more security there. We did not know they wanted more security again.'

 

[spectrumc01]

We didn't go into a war because of a lie idiot. Saddam had WMDs. He used them against the Kurds.

Try thinking.

Are you serious?
Unplug yourself from the FOX and CNN propaganda machines, do some research for yourself, and try a little critical thinking. During my time as a 54B(Chemical Operations specialist) in the US Army. I was fortunate enough to travel on Uncle Sams dime for that lovely war. I got to see Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait. Not one chemical weapon, because he used them all before we got there. We sold them to him when he was fighting Iran for us, so we knew he had them. We also knew he used them on the Kurds, and we also knew he had none left after that. So in closing, he had no WMD's.

It would appear that you are the idiot.

Are you really that stupid or do you take classes?

There is a difference between "having" (present tense), and "had" (past tense). We knew he "HAD" WMD's. We also knew he no longer "HAS" WMD's. Yet we told the world and the US citizenry that he in fact "HAS" WMD's. A bold faced "LIE" on our part.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Only a mental retard wouldn't be able to see through your dishonesty.

What did I lie about. The President called it a terrorist attack on September 12th. If he were carrying out some grand scheme to hide the fact that it was a terrorist attack,

that wouldn't be very crafty initial move now would it?

Did I say lie? I said you weren't being honest. You are trying to spin us away from THE issue. The issue as YOU WELL KNOW is that the movie was not the reason the ambassador was killed and that obama knew that but lied to us about the reason in order to cover up his failures.

Romney was wrong to say that obama didn't call it a terrorist attack. Who gives a shit about that. The real scandal is obama's lie. You and the rest of the left are desperately trying to hide this fact. Romney's point was obama's clear failure at security and foreign policy and you know that as well as I do.

You are being dishonest.

What failure would he be covering up? Is it any big secret that there are organizations and groups and individuals who are Islamist extremists and anti-American throughout the Middle East, and even to an extent worldwide?

Who denies that?

 

[gkjpalmer]

I suppose All you Mitt fans think Mitt would have increased funding for Embassy Security which His Party blocked in Congress.
I suppose you all believe Mitt would have seen the Video, Known about a planed attack on the Libian Embassy before September 11, 2012, and known this along with what was going to occur in Cairo, Yemen, Iran.
All this from a Mitt who says,"Well I dont remember what I said but I stand by whatever it was I said"

You Know...If Nitt-Mitt was a Dem youd be eating him alive.

But you gotta Win...no matter truth, reality, or tradgedy. MITT AND RYAN MADE THIS SITUATION POLITICAL

 

[NYcarbineer]

I thought the President said it was terror ?

So you admit the President did in fact call the Libya attack a terrorist attack? You're finally admitting you were full of shit before?

Was it a coordinated terrorist attack on the anniversary of 9/11 or a movie protest ?

I'm sorry, I didn't see where you confirmed that you were previously full of shit. Let's establish one fact at a time,

in order.

 

[PredFan]

Americans are dead.

Does it matter what the hell it's called?

Private security contractors are not as good as the military, and they cost 100x's more. Some things the government can do better than the private sector.

To argue over somantics is petty.

Pretty poor attempt at spin pal.

It's about the obama administration's failures at foreign policy and security, and his lies to cover it up. Not semantics.

The so-called failures in foreign policy are just that "so-called". An attack like that can happen at any time over there, weather security is beefed up or not. If you don't believe that you are fooling yourself. Your "fanboy" partisanship is showing. By your definition, not calling it a "terrorist attack" is covering it up?

Again with the spin and dodge. Yes it can happen any time and any where. It's about the lie. I don't give two shits about what obama did or didn't call it. That is a smoke screen and won't work on me.