It took two weeks for Romney to call Benghazi a terrorist attack

[PredFan]

Are you serious?
Unplug yourself from the FOX and CNN propaganda machines, do some research for yourself, and try a little critical thinking. During my time as a 54B(Chemical Operations specialist) in the US Army. I was fortunate enough to travel on Uncle Sams dime for that lovely war. I got to see Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait. Not one chemical weapon, because he used them all before we got there. We sold them to him when he was fighting Iran for us, so we knew he had them. We also knew he used them on the Kurds, and we also knew he had none left after that. So in closing, he had no WMD's.

It would appear that you are the idiot.

Are you really that stupid or do you take classes?

There is a difference between "having" (present tense), and "had" (past tense). We knew he "HAD" WMD's. We also knew he no longer "HAS" WMD's. Yet we told the world and the US citizenry that he in fact "HAS" WMD's. A bold faced "LIE" on our part.

Whatever. you aren't smart enough for this discussion. try the Romper Room ====>

 

[SniperFire]

I suppose All you Mitt fans think Mitt would have increased funding for Embassy Security which His Party blocked in Congress.
I suppose you all believe Mitt would have seen the Video, Known about a planed attack on the Libian Embassy before September 11, 2012, and known this along with what was going to occur in Cairo, Yemen, Iran.
All this from a Mitt who says,"Well I dont remember what I said but I stand by whatever it was I said"

You Know...If Nitt-Mitt was a Dem youd be eating him alive.

But you gotta Win...no matter truth, reality, or tradgedy. MITT AND RYAN MADE THIS SITUATION POLITICAL

Nobody is making such claims.

We are only pointing out that this Administration systematically deceived the America people with half-truths and outright lies.


Vote responsibly next time.

 

[LilOlLady]

So if it took two weeks, what's all the hoopla about Romney Shooting first and aiming later?? Talk about liberal spin.

Your guy went in front of the UN and blamed it on a movie, he went on TV and blamed it on a movie, he stumped in several states and blamed it on a movie.

Your guy has no clue what he's doing. The DailyKos has again regurgitated a lie, no one believes them or the President anymore. We're so tired of the lies he spews!!

OMG. That is what Zimmerman did.

 

[PredFan]

What did I lie about. The President called it a terrorist attack on September 12th. If he were carrying out some grand scheme to hide the fact that it was a terrorist attack,

that wouldn't be very crafty initial move now would it?

Did I say lie? I said you weren't being honest. You are trying to spin us away from THE issue. The issue as YOU WELL KNOW is that the movie was not the reason the ambassador was killed and that obama knew that but lied to us about the reason in order to cover up his failures.

Romney was wrong to say that obama didn't call it a terrorist attack. Who gives a shit about that. The real scandal is obama's lie. You and the rest of the left are desperately trying to hide this fact. Romney's point was obama's clear failure at security and foreign policy and you know that as well as I do.

You are being dishonest.

What failure would he be covering up? Is it any big secret that there are organizations and groups and individuals who are Islamist extremists and anti-American throughout the Middle East, and even to an extent worldwide?

Who denies that?

Well, obama is known to crow about how his policies have led to the end of Al-Queda, and how his policies have put an end to the hatred and thus the terror attacks against us, but I doubt you'd listen. but that is beside the point. It's about the LIE. If it's as you say, and it's no big secret, then why lie?

 

[SniperFire]

So if it took two weeks, what's all the hoopla about Romney Shooting first and aiming later?? Talk about liberal spin.

Your guy went in front of the UN and blamed it on a movie, he went on TV and blamed it on a movie, he stumped in several states and blamed it on a movie.

Your guy has no clue what he's doing. The DailyKos has again regurgitated a lie, no one believes them or the President anymore. We're so tired of the lies he spews!!

OMG. That is what Zimmerman did.

Hard to ask questions when some young gangbanger is bouncing your head off the concrete.

 

[OODA_Loop]

So you admit the President did in fact call the Libya attack a terrorist attack? You're finally admitting you were full of shit before?

Was it a coordinated terrorist attack on the anniversary of 9/11 or a movie protest ?

I'm sorry, I didn't see where you confirmed that you were previously full of shit. Let's establish one fact at a time,

in order.

This answer makes me feel more satisfied than you actually trying to answer the question.

 

[PredFan]

I suppose All you Mitt fans think Mitt would have increased funding for Embassy Security which His Party blocked in Congress.
I suppose you all believe Mitt would have seen the Video, Known about a planed attack on the Libian Embassy before September 11, 2012, and known this along with what was going to occur in Cairo, Yemen, Iran.
All this from a Mitt who says,"Well I dont remember what I said but I stand by whatever it was I said"

I have no idea what Mitt would have done and Mitt isn't POTUS and Mitt wasn't the one who lied about the cause of the attack that killed the ambassador.

You Know...If Nitt-Mitt was a Dem youd be eating him alive.

No, you hack, Mitt isn't POTUS.

But you gotta Win...no matter truth, reality, or tradgedy. MITT AND RYAN MADE THIS SITUATION POLITICAL

Al-Queda plans out an attack on our embassy on the anniversary of 9-11, kills our ambassador and others, obama lies about the cause and you blame it on Paul Ryan?

Not only are you a left wing nutjob, but you are a thoughtless, ignorant moron.

 

[PredFan]

So if it took two weeks, what's all the hoopla about Romney Shooting first and aiming later?? Talk about liberal spin.

Your guy went in front of the UN and blamed it on a movie, he went on TV and blamed it on a movie, he stumped in several states and blamed it on a movie.

Your guy has no clue what he's doing. The DailyKos has again regurgitated a lie, no one believes them or the President anymore. We're so tired of the lies he spews!!

OMG. That is what Zimmerman did.

WTF are you talking about Zimmerman nailed the thug with one shot under duress, that's pretty good aim.

 

[sakinago]

It took two weeks for Romney to call Benghazi a terrorist attack
The funniest thing about Romney's debate blunder on Libya isn't that he was wrong about what Obama said, it's the hypocrisy of the charge to begin with, considering that there doesn't seem to be any evidence that Romney himself ever used the words "terror" or "terrorist" in relation to this attack until two weeks later, on September 25.
A summary of what was said and when below the fold, with special thanks to Zack Beauchamp at Think Progress for collecting most of this here.
Daily Kos: It took two weeks for Romney to call Benghazi a terrorist attack

Obama call the attack an attack of terrorism the day after the attack.
CNN Fact Check: A day after Libya attack, Obama described it as 'acts of terror' - CNN.com

What difference and who cares if it was planned or spontaneous or not?
Were was all the out rage when Bush ignored multiple warnings of 911 and 3,000 Americans died leading to a total of almost a million in Afghanistan and Iraq?
Why Bush Ignored So Many 9/11 Warnings - Business Insider

First off Obama never gave a description to what he was calling terror, and it sounded like to me and most everyone, the terror he was referring to was the previous terror attacks, which he was referring to at the time in his speech when he used the word terror. The word terror he used, was a very general description, he never said "this terrorist attack in benghazi," or something along those lines. Wouldn't someone make it very clear that this was a terrorist attack if thats what they wanted to american people to believe.

On top of that, he only talked about terror for maybe 30 secs in the 5 or so minute speech. The rest of the time he went on about the video and the protest. In contrast I could pull up pretty close to an hours worth of Obama and the rest of the administration trying to link benghazi to the video and the protests. I think its pretty clear where Obama was trying to lead the american people on this one. Its sad that in all of the talk that went on about the video, all Obama has is a 30 sec segment of him using the word terror.

 

[AmericanFirst]

It took two weeks for Romney to call Benghazi a terrorist attack
The funniest thing about Romney's debate blunder on Libya isn't that he was wrong about what Obama said, it's the hypocrisy of the charge to begin with, considering that there doesn't seem to be any evidence that Romney himself ever used the words "terror" or "terrorist" in relation to this attack until two weeks later, on September 25.
A summary of what was said and when below the fold, with special thanks to Zack Beauchamp at Think Progress for collecting most of this here.
Daily Kos: It took two weeks for Romney to call Benghazi a terrorist attack

Obama call the attack an attack of terrorism the day after the attack.
CNN Fact Check: A day after Libya attack, Obama described it as 'acts of terror' - CNN.com

What difference and who cares if it was planned or spontaneous or not?
Were was all the out rage when Bush ignored multiple warnings of 911 and 3,000 Americans died leading to a total of almost a million in Afghanistan and Iraq?
Why Bush Ignored So Many 9/11 Warnings - Business Insider

A fact check from CNN is like you telling the truth, doesn't happen. It was obamaturd that didn't call it an act of terror idiot.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Was it a coordinated terrorist attack on the anniversary of 9/11 or a movie protest ?

I'm sorry, I didn't see where you confirmed that you were previously full of shit. Let's establish one fact at a time,

in order.

This answer makes me feel more satisfied than you actually trying to answer the question.

That is because the idiot can't answer the question truthfully.

 

[PredFan]

It took two weeks for Romney to call Benghazi a terrorist attack
The funniest thing about Romney's debate blunder on Libya isn't that he was wrong about what Obama said, it's the hypocrisy of the charge to begin with, considering that there doesn't seem to be any evidence that Romney himself ever used the words "terror" or "terrorist" in relation to this attack until two weeks later, on September 25.
A summary of what was said and when below the fold, with special thanks to Zack Beauchamp at Think Progress for collecting most of this here.
Daily Kos: It took two weeks for Romney to call Benghazi a terrorist attack

Obama call the attack an attack of terrorism the day after the attack.
CNN Fact Check: A day after Libya attack, Obama described it as 'acts of terror' - CNN.com

What difference and who cares if it was planned or spontaneous or not?
Were was all the out rage when Bush ignored multiple warnings of 911 and 3,000 Americans died leading to a total of almost a million in Afghanistan and Iraq?
Why Bush Ignored So Many 9/11 Warnings - Business Insider

A fact check from CNN is like you telling the truth, doesn't happen. It was obamaturd that didn't call it an act of terror idiot.

I'm not an obama supporter by any means, but point in fact is that obama did call it an act of terror, not in so many words. The important point is that he lied about the blame for the attacks. Attacking our embassy because of a movie IS a terrorist attack.

Fact is that the attack was planned in advance before the movie was known and obama lied about that in order to maintain his BS story about him being strong on terror.

The important point is obama's lie, and arguing about what obama called it is falling into the left wing trap that disguises the lie.

 

[OODA_Loop]

I'm not an obama supporter by any means, but point in fact is that obama did call it an act of terror, not in so many words.

I could buy this if the subsequent administration directives and pronouncements didn't support the opposite.

 

[AmericanFirst]

It took two weeks for Romney to call Benghazi a terrorist attack
The funniest thing about Romney's debate blunder on Libya isn't that he was wrong about what Obama said, it's the hypocrisy of the charge to begin with, considering that there doesn't seem to be any evidence that Romney himself ever used the words "terror" or "terrorist" in relation to this attack until two weeks later, on September 25.
A summary of what was said and when below the fold, with special thanks to Zack Beauchamp at Think Progress for collecting most of this here.
Daily Kos: It took two weeks for Romney to call Benghazi a terrorist attack

A fact check from CNN is like you telling the truth, doesn't happen. It was obamaturd that didn't call it an act of terror idiot.

I'm not an obama supporter by any means, but point in fact is that obama did call it an act of terror, not in so many words. The important point is that he lied about the blame for the attacks. Attacking our embassy because of a movie IS a terrorist attack.

Fact is that the attack was planned in advance before the movie was known and obama lied about that in order to maintain his BS story about him being strong on terror.

The important point is obama's lie, and arguing about what obama called it is falling into the left wing trap that disguises the lie.

He did not call Benghazi an act of terror, he was generalizing.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Did I say lie? I said you weren't being honest. You are trying to spin us away from THE issue. The issue as YOU WELL KNOW is that the movie was not the reason the ambassador was killed and that obama knew that but lied to us about the reason in order to cover up his failures.

Romney was wrong to say that obama didn't call it a terrorist attack. Who gives a shit about that. The real scandal is obama's lie. You and the rest of the left are desperately trying to hide this fact. Romney's point was obama's clear failure at security and foreign policy and you know that as well as I do.

You are being dishonest.

What failure would he be covering up? Is it any big secret that there are organizations and groups and individuals who are Islamist extremists and anti-American throughout the Middle East, and even to an extent worldwide?

Who denies that?

Well, obama is known to crow about how his policies have led to the end of Al-Queda, and how his policies have put an end to the hatred and thus the terror attacks against us, but I doubt you'd listen. but that is beside the point. It's about the LIE. If it's as you say, and it's no big secret, then why lie?

So,

quote the President ever saying there is no more al qaeda, there is no more hatred, and there will never again be terror attacks against us.

 

[OODA_Loop]

So,

quote the President ever saying there is no more al qaeda, there is no more hatred, and there will never again be terror attacks against us.

see: Obama's Arab Spring

 

[NYcarbineer]

[He did not call Benghazi an act of terror, he was generalizing.

Stop lying.

"Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourned with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe.
No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done."

Stop. Now.

 

[blackhawk]

The left is saying that Obama called the Benghazi attacks terrorist attacks in his September 12th speech ok I don't really believe that but for the sake of argument let's say he did then why for several day's after that did Jay Carney, David Axelrod, and of course Susan Rice claim it was a spontaneous response to the youtube video? Either the President knew it was a terrorist attack and told his people to go out and lie about it or he never called it a terrorist attack and they were just following his lead.

 

[NYcarbineer]

So,

quote the President ever saying there is no more al qaeda, there is no more hatred, and there will never again be terror attacks against us.

see: Obama's Arab Spring

I want quotes of the president sayng there is no more al qaeda, there is no more hatred, and there will never again be terrorist attacks against us.

That is what the world's dumbest poster claimed. If you want to agree with him, and be the other world's dumbest poster,

go ahead.

 

[Zoom-boing]

The left is saying that Obama called the Benghazi attacks terrorist attacks in his September 12th speech ok I don't really believe that but for the sake of argument let's say he did then why for several day's after that did Jay Carney, David Axelrod, and of course Susan Rice claim it was a spontaneous response to the youtube video? Either the President knew it was a terrorist attack and told his people to go out and lie about it or he never called it a terrorist attack and they were just following his lead.

I've asked that very question several times now, only to have it ignored.

So ... is someone going to answer this?