That article was from the extreme leftist NYT. They aren’t a real source.They aren’t numbers, they are human lives. That’s the problem with rightists. They just see numbers.
I’ll refer back to the article I quoted that you ignored.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That article was from the extreme leftist NYT. They aren’t a real source.They aren’t numbers, they are human lives. That’s the problem with rightists. They just see numbers.
I’ll refer back to the article I quoted that you ignored.
No it wasn’t. Baltimore Sun. Post 97.That article was from the extreme leftist NYT. They aren’t a real source.
You quoted something from thr NYT, was there a second article?No it wasn’t. Baltimore Sun. Post 97.
Yes, in post 97.You quoted something from thr NYT, was there a second article?
OK….checked it out. That was ONE woman’s opinion, and the polls show she’s wrong. The majority of Palestinians DO support HAMAS.Yes, in post 97.
No. It is based on a survey that was taken before Oct 7, not her opinion.OK….checked it out. That was ONE woman’s opinion, and the polls show she’s wrong. The majority of Palestinians DO support HAMAS.
Sure. I mean, it's a little vague, and understandably so, given that we are in the midst of the conflict and specifics are sensitive intelligence. But this cements my view that, while there can always be improvements to save lives, especially innocent lives, Israel is already doing all of these things. Could Israel do a little better? Sure. Probably. But this level of scrutiny - in the middle of the conflict - better be applied to every State, because this is an extremely high level of precision we are speaking about here.crap….
Here is an excerpt:
U.S. officials told the Israelis that they could reduce civilian casualties if they improved how they targeted Hamas leaders, gathered more intelligence on Hamas command and control networks before launching strikes, used smaller bombs to collapse the tunnel network and employed their ground forces to separate civilian population centers from where the militants are concentrated.
Oh I agree with you on genocide, it gets thrown way to lightly in this conflict. None of it is genocide.Sure. I mean, it's a little vague, and understandably so, given that we are in the midst of the conflict and specifics are sensitive intelligence. But this cements my view that, while there can always be improvements to save lives, especially innocent lives, Israel is already doing all of these things. Could Israel do a little better? Sure. Probably. But this level of scrutiny - in the middle of the conflict - better be applied to every State, because this is an extremely high level of precision we are speaking about here.
And, "Hey, maybe you could use a 500lb bomb to take out that particular stretch of tunnel, instead of a 2000lb bomb" is a far cry from all the demonization flying around about "genocides" and such.
So, I think I, sort of, agree with you that Israel can do EVEN better. And I think you agree with me that calling it a "genocide" in Gaza is disrespectful of the lengths Israel is actually going to save lives.