Is Trump threatening his enemies, and should the former President be taken into custody?

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Trump is on his Truth Social apparently threatening all who oppose him. Is he breaking the constraints the Judges have already subjected him to with consequences if he fails to follow the rues? He stated that he will be "coming after" any who go after him. Legal experts are opining already he may be violating the rules the Judge put him under in the J6case.

I am certain that this will go to the Judge for action. My Carnac tells me that Trump will be severely cautioned. If he does it again, he will be remanded into custody. It won't be house arrest. He will be in a lockup.

MSN

'Deadly risks': Trump's latest Truth Social threat raises red flags for legal experts​

"Trump's threat was simple: "IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!"

It caused an uproar among legal analysts and media alike.

Andrew Feinberg, White House Correspondent for the Independent, specifically said it sounded like the type of threat which would concern his judges.

"This certainly sounds like a threat against prosecutors and/or witnesses," he wrote."

 

[Hellbilly]

Trump is on his Truth Social apparently threatening all who oppose him. Is he breaking the constraints the Judges have already subjected him to with consequences if he fails to follow the rues? He stated that he will be "coming after" any who go after him. Legal experts are opining already he may be violating the rules the Judge put him under in the J6case.

I am certain that this will go to the Judge for action. My Carnac tells me that Trump will be severely cautioned. If he does it again, he will be remanded into custody. It won't be house arrest. He will be in a lockup.

MSN

'Deadly risks': Trump's latest Truth Social threat raises red flags for legal experts​

"Trump's threat was simple: "IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!"

It caused an uproar among legal analysts and media alike.

Andrew Feinberg, White House Correspondent for the Independent, specifically said it sounded like the type of threat which would concern his judges.

"This certainly sounds like a threat against prosecutors and/or witnesses," he wrote."

Lock him up!!!

 

[luiza]

Great theatre . You have to be a real Gullible to believe a single word .

 

[rightwinger]

Trump has been ordered not to approach or threaten any witnesses in the case or his bail will be revoked.

Can he control himself?

 

[surada]

Lock him up!!!

Why wait for Trump to do it again?

MSN

 

[Oddball]

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Trump is on his Truth Social apparently threatening all who oppose him. Is he breaking the constraints the Judges have already subjected him to with consequences if he fails to follow the rues? He stated that he will be "coming after" any who go after him. Legal experts are opining already he may be violating the rules the Judge put him under in the J6case.

I am certain that this will go to the Judge for action. My Carnac tells me that Trump will be severely cautioned. If he does it again, he will be remanded into custody. It won't be house arrest. He will be in a lockup.

MSN

'Deadly risks': Trump's latest Truth Social threat raises red flags for legal experts​

"Trump's threat was simple: "IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!"

It caused an uproar among legal analysts and media alike.

Andrew Feinberg, White House Correspondent for the Independent, specifically said it sounded like the type of threat which would concern his judges.

"This certainly sounds like a threat against prosecutors and/or witnesses," he wrote."

Free speech. Protected in America.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Trump has been ordered not to approach or threaten any witnesses in the case or his bail will be revoked.

Can he control himself?

Link?

 

[BackAgain]

Trump is on his Truth Social apparently threatening all who oppose him. Is he breaking the constraints the Judges have already subjected him to with consequences if he fails to follow the rues? He stated that he will be "coming after" any who go after him. Legal experts are opining already he may be violating the rules the Judge put him under in the J6case.

I am certain that this will go to the Judge for action. My Carnac tells me that Trump will be severely cautioned. If he does it again, he will be remanded into custody. It won't be house arrest. He will be in a lockup.

MSN

'Deadly risks': Trump's latest Truth Social threat raises red flags for legal experts​

"Trump's threat was simple: "IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!"

It caused an uproar among legal analysts and media alike.

Andrew Feinberg, White House Correspondent for the Independent, specifically said it sounded like the type of threat which would concern his judges.

"This certainly sounds like a threat against prosecutors and/or witnesses," he wrote."

Your link is so absurd, it even quotes that scumbag Weismann.

 

[surada]

Free speech. Protected in America.

The judge already warned him.

 

[1srelluc]

OP....When just regular stupid won't do.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

The judge already warned him.

warned him he doesn’t have free speech? Interesting.

 

[BackAgain]

What goes around, comes around.

I’ll now perform the edit service Trump clearly would benefit from having:

“To all you swamp critters who have baselessly come after me, be advised that when I am back in Office, I will be going after you for all of your criminal shenanigans.”

 

[Hellbilly]

Why wait for Trump to do it again?

MSN

Check out the reply

Tell me this ain’t a cult

 

[surada]

warned him he doesn’t have free speech? Interesting.

Not to threaten anyone.

 

[surada]

warned him he doesn’t have free speech? Interesting.

You are incredibly stupid.

 

[rightwinger]

Link?

Judge warns Trump against bribing or influencing witnesses

The magistrate judge handling former President Trump’s arraignment on charges related to trying to overturn the 2020 election warned him Thursday against bribing or influencing witnesses. U.S. Magi…

thehill.com

 

[Zincwarrior]

Trump is on his Truth Social apparently threatening all who oppose him. Is he breaking the constraints the Judges have already subjected him to with consequences if he fails to follow the rues? He stated that he will be "coming after" any who go after him. Legal experts are opining already he may be violating the rules the Judge put him under in the J6case.

I am certain that this will go to the Judge for action. My Carnac tells me that Trump will be severely cautioned. If he does it again, he will be remanded into custody. It won't be house arrest. He will be in a lockup.

MSN

'Deadly risks': Trump's latest Truth Social threat raises red flags for legal experts​

"Trump's threat was simple: "IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!"

It caused an uproar among legal analysts and media alike.

Andrew Feinberg, White House Correspondent for the Independent, specifically said it sounded like the type of threat which would concern his judges.

"This certainly sounds like a threat against prosecutors and/or witnesses," he wrote."

Yes. If he were Joe blow and stole secret documents, he would never see daylight again.

 

[rightwinger]

warned him he doesn’t have free speech? Interesting.

Intimidating witnesses is not free speech

 

[excalibur]

Trump is on his Truth Social apparently threatening all who oppose him. Is he breaking the constraints the Judges have already subjected him to with consequences if he fails to follow the rues? He stated that he will be "coming after" any who go after him. Legal experts are opining already he may be violating the rules the Judge put him under in the J6case.

I am certain that this will go to the Judge for action. My Carnac tells me that Trump will be severely cautioned. If he does it again, he will be remanded into custody. It won't be house arrest. He will be in a lockup.

MSN

'Deadly risks': Trump's latest Truth Social threat raises red flags for legal experts​

"Trump's threat was simple: "IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!"

It caused an uproar among legal analysts and media alike.

Andrew Feinberg, White House Correspondent for the Independent, specifically said it sounded like the type of threat which would concern his judges.

"This certainly sounds like a threat against prosecutors and/or witnesses," he wrote."