peacefan
Gold Member
Iran tipped to offer 700km-range 'surface to surface missiles' to destroy Ukraine assets
Local : 2022-10-18(Tuesday) 14 : 20 : 17
Remote : 2022-10-18(Tuesday) 14 : 20 : 17
Found via nicer.app web apps framework
i think we should realisticly threaten to get a lot tougher on the Iranians.
regime change missions to end endless wars elsewhere (Ukraine in this case).
and we should lure the Chinese (with troops standing by) into a trap; they attack Taiwan, we slaughter that South China Sea fleet of theirs, and all coastal batteries that can reach Taiwan. (and then we get the hell out of there).
it was done in WW1 and WW2, and now, well, thanks to Trump solidifying the Chinese-Muslim-Russian alliance with long repeated anti-China rethoric that seems to have inspired the entire set of ruling political classes in the US, and thus all future US Presidentital candidate communities, we seem to face a similar situation as in the Vietnam war. a regional war in Ukraine, two more brewing in Iran and Taiwan.
the only differences are now-frequent long distance tourism and that nuclear umbrella. the MAD principle.
the EU is against that warmongering.
personally, i don't know what to think of this situation anymore.
the war on terror, and the repercussions of hostile military actions against Muslim terror targets (on online forums, the breeding ground for the next generations these days), is *simple* compared to this stuff. against the Muslims, we were right. down to the religious details. i checked. and advertised that stance for years. won nearly each argument with 'm, too.
Putin 'Willing To Do Anything' To Avoid Defeat in Ukraine - Newsweek
Local : 2022-10-18(Tuesday) 14 : 45 : 16
Remote : 2022-10-18(Tuesday) 14 : 45 : 16
Found via nicer.app web apps framework
ok, so the other sides : the Russians, the Chinese, the Muslim fundamentalists and their terrorist armies plus civilian support staff,
they don't want to back down. indicate they think us fools right to our face (a complete renegotiation of the Iran nuclear deal
arranged by the Iranians, *with* a new wishlist of terms for a deal). that they can overpowerus via immigration and superior numbers
by having a much higher birthrate than we do. they'll reverse engineer all of our drone and other military tech too.
so we can let things smoulder, try to avoid all wars, but that'll give the other side time to prepare superior numbers of trained military personell and the civilian war support economy that it would need for a much larger army (China, Iran).
or we can go on the offensive, go pre-emptive, but in a veiled way so that little kids don't start nagging their parents about just how evil they find the west, and decide to become <whatever>-fundamentalist/nationalist themselves too.
the Chinese are already into this with them supplying COVID to the world and fentanyl to the US.
the US & UK & the EU, multiple generations of top leaders, chose via the will of the western homelands' populations, to divide the world into a still-growing alliance of countries.
i think that the fact that this alliance still keeps growing is however largely the will of the politicians and the populations of the new additions to these various western Alliances.
and i also think that it's a big risk factor for the future stability of these Alliances.
the defense-industry should stick to defense, but prune the both the will, the morale, the personell, the equipment, of their opponents with similar growth ambitions (admitted or hidden), regularly.
appeasement breeds misery, pre-emptive striking and continious guidance of the enemy by friendly forces, is what teaches the enemy the virtues of a peaceful lifestyle
(21 years of experience went into this post)..
 Major General Chip Chapman said the latest intelligence reports have been suggesting Iran will ramp up its supplies to Russia and offer up Moscow's forces "surface-to-surface missiles." |
Local : 2022-10-18(Tuesday) 14 : 20 : 17
Remote : 2022-10-18(Tuesday) 14 : 20 : 17
Found via nicer.app web apps framework
i think we should realisticly threaten to get a lot tougher on the Iranians.
regime change missions to end endless wars elsewhere (Ukraine in this case).
and we should lure the Chinese (with troops standing by) into a trap; they attack Taiwan, we slaughter that South China Sea fleet of theirs, and all coastal batteries that can reach Taiwan. (and then we get the hell out of there).
it was done in WW1 and WW2, and now, well, thanks to Trump solidifying the Chinese-Muslim-Russian alliance with long repeated anti-China rethoric that seems to have inspired the entire set of ruling political classes in the US, and thus all future US Presidentital candidate communities, we seem to face a similar situation as in the Vietnam war. a regional war in Ukraine, two more brewing in Iran and Taiwan.
the only differences are now-frequent long distance tourism and that nuclear umbrella. the MAD principle.
the EU is against that warmongering.
personally, i don't know what to think of this situation anymore.
the war on terror, and the repercussions of hostile military actions against Muslim terror targets (on online forums, the breeding ground for the next generations these days), is *simple* compared to this stuff. against the Muslims, we were right. down to the religious details. i checked. and advertised that stance for years. won nearly each argument with 'm, too.
Putin 'Willing To Do Anything' To Avoid Defeat in Ukraine - Newsweek
Local : 2022-10-18(Tuesday) 14 : 45 : 16
Remote : 2022-10-18(Tuesday) 14 : 45 : 16
Found via nicer.app web apps framework
ok, so the other sides : the Russians, the Chinese, the Muslim fundamentalists and their terrorist armies plus civilian support staff,
they don't want to back down. indicate they think us fools right to our face (a complete renegotiation of the Iran nuclear deal
arranged by the Iranians, *with* a new wishlist of terms for a deal). that they can overpowerus via immigration and superior numbers
by having a much higher birthrate than we do. they'll reverse engineer all of our drone and other military tech too.
so we can let things smoulder, try to avoid all wars, but that'll give the other side time to prepare superior numbers of trained military personell and the civilian war support economy that it would need for a much larger army (China, Iran).
or we can go on the offensive, go pre-emptive, but in a veiled way so that little kids don't start nagging their parents about just how evil they find the west, and decide to become <whatever>-fundamentalist/nationalist themselves too.
the Chinese are already into this with them supplying COVID to the world and fentanyl to the US.
the US & UK & the EU, multiple generations of top leaders, chose via the will of the western homelands' populations, to divide the world into a still-growing alliance of countries.
i think that the fact that this alliance still keeps growing is however largely the will of the politicians and the populations of the new additions to these various western Alliances.
and i also think that it's a big risk factor for the future stability of these Alliances.
the defense-industry should stick to defense, but prune the both the will, the morale, the personell, the equipment, of their opponents with similar growth ambitions (admitted or hidden), regularly.
appeasement breeds misery, pre-emptive striking and continious guidance of the enemy by friendly forces, is what teaches the enemy the virtues of a peaceful lifestyle
(21 years of experience went into this post)..
Last edited:
