Iran president says 'no sense' in renegotiating nuclear deal

[easyt65]

iran deal was 5+1. it wasnt between iran and usa
iran and europe and usa

Keep up - it was reported that all the other nations / negotiators walked out, leaving Kerry and the US negotiating team still sitting there.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

iran deal was 5+1. it wasnt between iran and usa
iran and europe and usa

Keep up - it was reported that all the other nations / negotiators walked out, leaving Kerry and the US negotiating team still sitting there.

Lots of bullshit has been "reported". It's not our problem that you believed it.

The deal isn't going anywhere.

 

[easyt65]

Lots of bullshit has been "reported". It's not our problem that you believed it.

The UK reported its own team pulled out, dumbass. Pull your head out of your partisan ass and educate yourself.

What ignorant, DESPERATE MoFo remains at the negotiating table while the enemy across from the table is mocking you in the media, their military is practicing bombing your aircraft carriers, the nation's leader is leading chants of 'Death to America, and their military leaders are publicly declaring you want this deal so badly as party of your legacy that you will agree to almost anything?

Oh yeah - Obama!

The 'deal' has already caused harm.

 

[Doc1]

iran deal was 5+1. it wasnt between iran and usa
iran and europe and usa

Keep up - it was reported that all the other nations / negotiators walked out, leaving Kerry and the US negotiating team still sitting there.

Lots of bullshit has been "reported". It's not our problem that you believed it.

The deal isn't going anywhere.

Sorry, it's non-binding, it doesn't need to go anywhere, it can and will just be ignored. Iran got what they wanted, their money.

 

[Preacher]

Lots of bullshit has been "reported". It's not our problem that you believed it.

The UK reported its own team pulled out, dumbass. Pull your head out of your partisan ass and educate yourself.

The 'deal' has already caused harm.

Lol to who!?

 

[Doc1]

Lots of bullshit has been "reported". It's not our problem that you believed it.

The UK reported its own team pulled out, dumbass. Pull your head out of your partisan ass and educate yourself.

The 'deal' has already caused harm.

Lol to who!?

So you don't think they are using that money for terrorist activities?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Lots of bullshit has been "reported". It's not our problem that you believed it.

The UK reported its own team pulled out, dumbass. Pull your head out of your partisan ass and educate yourself.

What ignorant, DESPERATE MoFo remains at the negotiating table while the enemy across from the table is mocking you in the media, their military is practicing bombing your aircraft carriers, the nation's leader is leading chants of 'Death to America, and their military leaders are publicly declaring you want this deal so badly as party of your legacy that you will agree to almost anything?

Oh yeah - Obama!

The 'deal' has already caused harm.

No, "the UK" didn't "pull out" of the deal. They've already ended their sanctions - and they've made it clear that they won't put them back into place.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

iran deal was 5+1. it wasnt between iran and usa
iran and europe and usa

Keep up - it was reported that all the other nations / negotiators walked out, leaving Kerry and the US negotiating team still sitting there.

Lots of bullshit has been "reported". It's not our problem that you believed it.

The deal isn't going anywhere.

Sorry, it's non-binding, it doesn't need to go anywhere, it can and will just be ignored. Iran got what they wanted, their money.

Ignored how?

Do you understand what the deal entails?

 

[easyt65]

The 'deal' has already caused harm.

Lol to who!?

You really should pay more attention.

As a result of the end of the Iranian sanctions thanks to Barry's un-Constitutional Treaty Iran was allowed to buy extremely advanced weapons systems (from Russia and China), which they are using to defend their nuclear and other strategic sites. If, as everyone suspects, Iran violates the deal and eventually acquires nuclear weapons capability, the end of the sanctions and their ability to acquire such weapons systems just made / will make any country having to go into Iran to strike those sited damn-near impossible.

 

[Doc1]

iran deal was 5+1. it wasnt between iran and usa
iran and europe and usa

Keep up - it was reported that all the other nations / negotiators walked out, leaving Kerry and the US negotiating team still sitting there.

Lots of bullshit has been "reported". It's not our problem that you believed it.

The deal isn't going anywhere.

Sorry, it's non-binding, it doesn't need to go anywhere, it can and will just be ignored. Iran got what they wanted, their money.

Ignored how?

Do you understand what the deal entails?

It is not a "treaty", it is an "executive action". As such it is non-binding. It's really not that hard to comprehend. Besides, like I said Iran already got their money, that's all they really wanted.

 

[easyt65]

No, "the UK" didn't "pull out" of the deal. They've already ended their sanctions - and they've made it clear that they won't put them back into place.

The sanctions ended as part of the Obama-Iran deal....and yes they did say after they have been taken down they will not put them back on.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

iran deal was 5+1. it wasnt between iran and usa
iran and europe and usa

Keep up - it was reported that all the other nations / negotiators walked out, leaving Kerry and the US negotiating team still sitting there.

Lots of bullshit has been "reported". It's not our problem that you believed it.

The deal isn't going anywhere.

Sorry, it's non-binding, it doesn't need to go anywhere, it can and will just be ignored. Iran got what they wanted, their money.

Ignored how?

Do you understand what the deal entails?

It is not a "treaty", it is an "executive action". As such it is non-binding. It's really not that hard to comprehend. Besides, like I said Iran already got their money, that's all they really wanted.

Apparently it is pretty hard for you to comprehend.

The US could pass a law to reinstate sanctions against Iran - but the rest of the world isn't going to - and US sanctions alone will have almost no punitive result against Iran.

Needless to say, that's not going to happen either, because there are already plenty of US companies making a mint selling to Iran.

 

[easyt65]

It is not a "treaty", it is an "executive action".

You are playing the Bill Clinton definition of the word 'is' game. A deal was negotiated with another country in which concessions and agreements were made by all parties - it was a TREATY. Again, you can call it anything you want, but it still doesn't change the fact that it was a 'TREATY'.

Obama also wanted to keep this TREATY secret from Congress and the American people. After it was done he took it straight to the UN for ratification BEFORE our own government got a chance to see what Obama had negotiated / agreed to in the name of the United States - which he did NOT have the Constitutional Authority to do!

 

[Edgetho]

It is not a "treaty", it is an "executive action".

You are playing the Bill Clinton definition of the word 'is' game. A deal was negotiated with another country in which concessions and agreements were made by all parties - it was a TREATY. Again, you can call it anything you want, but it still doesn't change the fact that it was a 'TREATY'.

Obama also wanted to keep this TREATY secret from Congress and the American people. After it was done he took it straight to the UN for ratification BEFORE our own government got a chance to see what Obama had negotiated / agreed to in the name of the United States - which he did NOT have the Constitutional Authority to do!

It's not a Treaty. Treaties have to be ratified by the Senate. It is an Executive Agreement.

And they can be changed at the whim of the Chief Executive.

Whoever that might be.

 

[Doc1]

Keep up - it was reported that all the other nations / negotiators walked out, leaving Kerry and the US negotiating team still sitting there.

Lots of bullshit has been "reported". It's not our problem that you believed it.

The deal isn't going anywhere.

Sorry, it's non-binding, it doesn't need to go anywhere, it can and will just be ignored. Iran got what they wanted, their money.

Ignored how?

Do you understand what the deal entails?

It is not a "treaty", it is an "executive action". As such it is non-binding. It's really not that hard to comprehend. Besides, like I said Iran already got their money, that's all they really wanted.

Apparently it is pretty hard for you to comprehend.

The US could pass a law to reinstate sanctions against Iran - but the rest of the world isn't going to - and US sanctions alone will have almost no punitive result against Iran.

Needless to say, that's not going to happen either, because there are already plenty of US companies making a mint selling to Iran.

LOL, why is it so hard for you to comprehend that it ISN'T a treaty and it is non-binding. Don't think I haven't noticed your failure to deal with that. Why is it Libs always need the "approval" of others? A man's, or a Nation's for that matter, integrity depends on no one but themselves. Who cares what anyone else does, were you worried about what everyone thought in High School too?
Again....it is NOT a treaty, it is an Executive Agreement. We are not bound by anything in it.

 

[Preacher]

Lots of bullshit has been "reported". It's not our problem that you believed it.

The UK reported its own team pulled out, dumbass. Pull your head out of your partisan ass and educate yourself.

The 'deal' has already caused harm.

Lol to who!?

So you don't think they are using that money for terrorist activities?

If they are its in response to the us and israel doing the exact same thing so no I dont care if they are

The 'deal' has already caused harm.

Lol to who!?

You really should pay more attention.

As a result of the end of the Iranian sanctions thanks to Barry's un-Constitutional Treaty Iran was allowed to buy extremely advanced weapons systems (from Russia and China), which they are using to defend their nuclear and other strategic sites. If, as everyone suspects, Iran violates the deal and eventually acquires nuclear weapons capability, the end of the sanctions and their ability to acquire such weapons systems just made / will make any country having to go into Iran to strike those sited damn-near impossible.

Ah so Iran will now have defensive weapons to fight back against american and israeli aggression. Sounds good to me

 

[Doc1]

It is not a "treaty", it is an "executive action".

You are playing the Bill Clinton definition of the word 'is' game. A deal was negotiated with another country in which concessions and agreements were made by all parties - it was a TREATY. Again, you can call it anything you want, but it still doesn't change the fact that it was a 'TREATY'.

Obama also wanted to keep this TREATY secret from Congress and the American people. After it was done he took it straight to the UN for ratification BEFORE our own government got a chance to see what Obama had negotiated / agreed to in the name of the United States - which he did NOT have the Constitutional Authority to do!

You do know that the Constitution disagrees with you, right?

 

[yiostheoy]

President Hassan Rouhani said Tuesday there was no chance of Iran renegotiating the nuclear deal with world powers if US President-elect Donald Trump demands it.

"The nuclear deal is finished, it has been approved by the UN Security Council and has become an international document. It is a multilateral accord and there is no sense in renegotiating it," said Rouhani at a news conference a year on from the deal coming into force.

Trump frequently criticised the nuclear deal during campaigning and called for fresh negotiations, but has refused to be drawn on his plans since being elected.

His nominee for secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, has called for a "full review" of the deal.

"Mr Trump, the president-elect, has made various statements that the nuclear deal does not satisfy him, that it was not a good deal or even that it was the worst deal ever," said Rouhani.

"These are mostly slogans, and I don't think that when he enters the White House, something will happen. It is not a bilateral deal that he can decide he likes or doesn't like," the president added.

The deal was signed between Iran, the US, Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia.

EU and British officials have this week said they would not support any renegotiation of the deal, which places strict curbs on Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for a lifting of international sanctions.

Trump is more likely to (1) ignore it and (2) give the IDF the green light to bomb Iran's uranium plants into rubble.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Lots of bullshit has been "reported". It's not our problem that you believed it.

The deal isn't going anywhere.

Sorry, it's non-binding, it doesn't need to go anywhere, it can and will just be ignored. Iran got what they wanted, their money.

Ignored how?

Do you understand what the deal entails?

It is not a "treaty", it is an "executive action". As such it is non-binding. It's really not that hard to comprehend. Besides, like I said Iran already got their money, that's all they really wanted.

Apparently it is pretty hard for you to comprehend.

The US could pass a law to reinstate sanctions against Iran - but the rest of the world isn't going to - and US sanctions alone will have almost no punitive result against Iran.

Needless to say, that's not going to happen either, because there are already plenty of US companies making a mint selling to Iran.

LOL, why is it so hard for you to comprehend that it ISN'T a treaty and it is non-binding. Don't think I haven't noticed your failure to deal with that. Why is it Libs always need the "approval" of others? A man's, or a Nation's for that matter, integrity depends on no one but themselves. Who cares what anyone else does, were you worried about what everyone thought in High School too?
Again....it is NOT a treaty, it is an Executive Agreement. We are not bound by anything in it.

I think you might want to go back and read my post again. I think you missed the point.

 

[Edgetho]

LOL, why is it so hard for you to comprehend that it ISN'T a treaty and it is non-binding. Don't think I haven't noticed your failure to deal with that. Why is it Libs always need the "approval" of others? A man's, or a Nation's for that matter, integrity depends on no one but themselves. Who cares what anyone else does, were you worried about what everyone thought in High School too?
Again....it is NOT a treaty, it is an Executive Agreement. We are not bound by anything in it.

I don't see the disagreement......

It's not a Treaty. Doctor isn't saying it is that I can see.