Not fair at all considering that these were not mail-in ballots AND the fact that every election date is known 2 and 4 years in advance.Their was a deadline. It was three days after the election. To allow for absentee ballots mailed on election day. That seems fair to me. Please tell me why that would be unfair?So, you don't see a reason for having a deadline for casting votes? Its okay with you that we just keep voting until one side is satisfied with the outcome, in this case, the Democrats?Can I ask what your problem is with having every vote cast counting? Isn't that the idea in a Democratic system? Why should people NOT be allowed to cast their vote?They changed the law to allow for voting after the election day. This means that they did not commit fraud. The law needs to be challenged to the SCOTUS and a blanket election rule that states no votes are to be accepted AFTER the election day....then we may as well just cash in our chips, declare an end to our Constitutional form of government, and allow the Democrats to set up a one party state like the Nazis, the fascists and the Communists.
So, the mail-in deadline needs to be earlier than the election day in order to meet a well known and well-publicized deadline.
These were ballots that were canvassed for, meaning that they went door to door and collected ballots from people who failed to meet the deadline. There is no proof that these people were not told that they could fill out the ballot right then and there.
Which means they were cast AFTER the deadline and should NOT be counted.
They should be counted as long as they are postmarked the day of the election. You are only interested in seeing votes NOT counted. You are a un-American pig.