CDZ I want to know something

[LoneLaugher]

Just how can you possibly compare President Trump to Hitler? Or any dictator or murderer? What motivates that? I'm plainly curious.

One can compare and contrast any two individuals. When looking at Trump's populist and nationalist approach to securing political power, one sees many similarities to Hitler's approach to doing so. Trump has yet to begin wantonly ordering the murder and incarceration of law abiding citizens. That much is so, but if the absence of pogroms be the bar by which one defines similarity/difference between the two men, I suggest that it is inward that one must look before concerning oneself with how alike or unalike be Hitler and Trump.

You are lucky this is in the CDZ....that post deserves a much stronger response.....

Whoa! He's so lucky!

 

[playtime]

well now- why don't you find that deflection & get back to me with a link to that 'discussion' . i don't think there is one.... why do i think that? because i barely remember interacting with you as it is & if it's in the FLAME ZONE - serious discussion & debate is not where you go. however, on this very thread i have back up & are willing to see what you got. however, i won't be holding my breath because i think you ain't got nuthin'.

lol....

No. Grow up. You have nothing. You simply repeat the same nothing.

because you can't, just as i thought. next time don't make stuff up.

You aren't worth the time.

translation: you got caught in a lie or you would have been more than happy to prove how right you were.

that's ok, i didn't expect much from you anyways.

No. You really aren't worth it. I have already seen your diatribe. I'm watching you lose again.

lol.. you accused me of something & can't provide anything in the way of proof. lol.............. says much about you.

 

[playtime]

i edited my post to include quotation marks. & expanded. re read it.

Okay, you appear to still think he's a fascist.

Thanks for your opinion.
.

lol... you can always show me & the other posters on this thread proof that he isn't, other than using the words ' who said so... you?' i'll be delighted to see you try.

So you want me to prove a negative. That would be like some crazed right winger asking me to prove that Obama isn't a Muslim.

I don't know why this bothers you so much. Your opinion is your opinion. That doesn't make it a "fact" or gospel, it just makes it your opinion.

If it's important for your self esteem to convince yourself that your opinion is fact, then great, run with it. That still doesn't make an opinion a fact.
.

lol... if you can't then you can't. & no, it doesn't bother me in anyway you think it might, so don't flatter yourself.
i gave facts. you can't see that. the problem lies with you.

There are facts and there are conclusions.

You are taking facts, leveraging them with bias, and drawing conclusions, and those are opinions.

Just like right wingers who "conclude" that Obama is a Muslim.

You and someone else may be standing in 80 degree heat. The 80 degrees is a fact. Your conclusion is that it's hot. Their conclusion is that it's just right. Opinion.

My goodness, I can't believe I actually had to explain that.
.

my- for someone who 'didn't' vote for him, you sure are defending the fact that he very well can turn into the next monster if left untethered. will he? that's to be determined. is the potential there? absolutely. that is what the OP asked for. only hitler can be hitler. same with mussolini & the others. can/should trump be compared to & why....

based on the tenets & factual proof of trump's words & deeds that can be directly attributed to those tenets i say yes.

i've seen thru your answers just what many people are doing--- that he is being normalized & that he has a different governing style. & that is the first step....

 

[Mac1958]

Okay, you appear to still think he's a fascist.

Thanks for your opinion.
.

lol... you can always show me & the other posters on this thread proof that he isn't, other than using the words ' who said so... you?' i'll be delighted to see you try.

So you want me to prove a negative. That would be like some crazed right winger asking me to prove that Obama isn't a Muslim.

I don't know why this bothers you so much. Your opinion is your opinion. That doesn't make it a "fact" or gospel, it just makes it your opinion.

If it's important for your self esteem to convince yourself that your opinion is fact, then great, run with it. That still doesn't make an opinion a fact.
.

lol... if you can't then you can't. & no, it doesn't bother me in anyway you think it might, so don't flatter yourself.
i gave facts. you can't see that. the problem lies with you.

There are facts and there are conclusions.

You are taking facts, leveraging them with bias, and drawing conclusions, and those are opinions.

Just like right wingers who "conclude" that Obama is a Muslim.

You and someone else may be standing in 80 degree heat. The 80 degrees is a fact. Your conclusion is that it's hot. Their conclusion is that it's just right. Opinion.

My goodness, I can't believe I actually had to explain that.
.

my- for someone who 'didn't' vote for him, you sure are defending the fact that he very well can turn into the next monster if left untethered. can he? that's to be determined. is the potential there? absolutely.

an opinion that i do have is i think i am right based on the tenets & proof of the words & deeds that can be directly attributed to him. but i pray that i am wrong.

i've seen thru your answers just what many people are doing--- that he is being normalized & that he has a different governing style. & that is the first step....

As someone who didn't vote for him (although I would say that "voted against him" is more accurate), it's my belief that no lasting progress can be made on any issue unless and until those in the conversation can drop the anger and the attacks and the ego and the hyperbole and communicate like adults.

And it's disappointing and troubling that I even have to say, too.
.

 

[playtime]

lol... you can always show me & the other posters on this thread proof that he isn't, other than using the words ' who said so... you?' i'll be delighted to see you try.

So you want me to prove a negative. That would be like some crazed right winger asking me to prove that Obama isn't a Muslim.

I don't know why this bothers you so much. Your opinion is your opinion. That doesn't make it a "fact" or gospel, it just makes it your opinion.

If it's important for your self esteem to convince yourself that your opinion is fact, then great, run with it. That still doesn't make an opinion a fact.
.

lol... if you can't then you can't. & no, it doesn't bother me in anyway you think it might, so don't flatter yourself.
i gave facts. you can't see that. the problem lies with you.

There are facts and there are conclusions.

You are taking facts, leveraging them with bias, and drawing conclusions, and those are opinions.

Just like right wingers who "conclude" that Obama is a Muslim.

You and someone else may be standing in 80 degree heat. The 80 degrees is a fact. Your conclusion is that it's hot. Their conclusion is that it's just right. Opinion.

My goodness, I can't believe I actually had to explain that.
.

my- for someone who 'didn't' vote for him, you sure are defending the fact that he very well can turn into the next monster if left untethered. can he? that's to be determined. is the potential there? absolutely.

an opinion that i do have is i think i am right based on the tenets & proof of the words & deeds that can be directly attributed to him. but i pray that i am wrong.

i've seen thru your answers just what many people are doing--- that he is being normalized & that he has a different governing style. & that is the first step....

As someone who didn't vote for him (although I would say that "voted against him" is more accurate), it's my belief that no lasting progress can be made on any issue unless and until those in the conversation can drop the anger and the attacks and the hyperbole and communicate like adults.

And it's disappointing and troubling that I even have to say, too.
.

where is the 'attacks'? you think i have attacked you?

 

[Mac1958]

So you want me to prove a negative. That would be like some crazed right winger asking me to prove that Obama isn't a Muslim.

I don't know why this bothers you so much. Your opinion is your opinion. That doesn't make it a "fact" or gospel, it just makes it your opinion.

If it's important for your self esteem to convince yourself that your opinion is fact, then great, run with it. That still doesn't make an opinion a fact.
.

lol... if you can't then you can't. & no, it doesn't bother me in anyway you think it might, so don't flatter yourself.
i gave facts. you can't see that. the problem lies with you.

There are facts and there are conclusions.

You are taking facts, leveraging them with bias, and drawing conclusions, and those are opinions.

Just like right wingers who "conclude" that Obama is a Muslim.

You and someone else may be standing in 80 degree heat. The 80 degrees is a fact. Your conclusion is that it's hot. Their conclusion is that it's just right. Opinion.

My goodness, I can't believe I actually had to explain that.
.

my- for someone who 'didn't' vote for him, you sure are defending the fact that he very well can turn into the next monster if left untethered. can he? that's to be determined. is the potential there? absolutely.

an opinion that i do have is i think i am right based on the tenets & proof of the words & deeds that can be directly attributed to him. but i pray that i am wrong.

i've seen thru your answers just what many people are doing--- that he is being normalized & that he has a different governing style. & that is the first step....

As someone who didn't vote for him (although I would say that "voted against him" is more accurate), it's my belief that no lasting progress can be made on any issue unless and until those in the conversation can drop the anger and the attacks and the hyperbole and communicate like adults.

And it's disappointing and troubling that I even have to say, too.
.

where is the 'attacks'? you think i have attacked you?

No. That wasn't my point.

Why is this so important to you?
.

 

[playtime]

lol... if you can't then you can't. & no, it doesn't bother me in anyway you think it might, so don't flatter yourself.
i gave facts. you can't see that. the problem lies with you.

There are facts and there are conclusions.

You are taking facts, leveraging them with bias, and drawing conclusions, and those are opinions.

Just like right wingers who "conclude" that Obama is a Muslim.

You and someone else may be standing in 80 degree heat. The 80 degrees is a fact. Your conclusion is that it's hot. Their conclusion is that it's just right. Opinion.

My goodness, I can't believe I actually had to explain that.
.

my- for someone who 'didn't' vote for him, you sure are defending the fact that he very well can turn into the next monster if left untethered. can he? that's to be determined. is the potential there? absolutely.

an opinion that i do have is i think i am right based on the tenets & proof of the words & deeds that can be directly attributed to him. but i pray that i am wrong.

i've seen thru your answers just what many people are doing--- that he is being normalized & that he has a different governing style. & that is the first step....

As someone who didn't vote for him (although I would say that "voted against him" is more accurate), it's my belief that no lasting progress can be made on any issue unless and until those in the conversation can drop the anger and the attacks and the hyperbole and communicate like adults.

And it's disappointing and troubling that I even have to say, too.
.

where is the 'attacks'? you think i have attacked you?

No. That wasn't my point.

Why is this so important to you?
.

i know that wasn't THE point. i was asking because i know i haven't but it seems--- in my opinion, like you were including me in that last reply.

'Why is this so important to you?'

not sure if you mean this thread or my last question about attacking. but i guess i can answer both... they aren't.

why do you think ----in your opinion, that either are?

 

[Mac1958]

There are facts and there are conclusions.

You are taking facts, leveraging them with bias, and drawing conclusions, and those are opinions.

Just like right wingers who "conclude" that Obama is a Muslim.

You and someone else may be standing in 80 degree heat. The 80 degrees is a fact. Your conclusion is that it's hot. Their conclusion is that it's just right. Opinion.

My goodness, I can't believe I actually had to explain that.
.

my- for someone who 'didn't' vote for him, you sure are defending the fact that he very well can turn into the next monster if left untethered. can he? that's to be determined. is the potential there? absolutely.

an opinion that i do have is i think i am right based on the tenets & proof of the words & deeds that can be directly attributed to him. but i pray that i am wrong.

i've seen thru your answers just what many people are doing--- that he is being normalized & that he has a different governing style. & that is the first step....

As someone who didn't vote for him (although I would say that "voted against him" is more accurate), it's my belief that no lasting progress can be made on any issue unless and until those in the conversation can drop the anger and the attacks and the hyperbole and communicate like adults.

And it's disappointing and troubling that I even have to say, too.
.

where is the 'attacks'? you think i have attacked you?

No. That wasn't my point.

Why is this so important to you?
.

i know that wasn't THE point. i was asking because i know i haven't but it seems--- in my opinion, like you were including me in that last reply.

'Why is this so important to you?'

not sure if you mean this thread or my last question about attacking. but i guess i can answer both... they aren't.

why do you think ----in your opinion, that either are?

Because you asked me a question.

I'm glad this is not important to you. Same here. Then there's no need to continue this conversation.
.

 

[playtime]

my- for someone who 'didn't' vote for him, you sure are defending the fact that he very well can turn into the next monster if left untethered. can he? that's to be determined. is the potential there? absolutely.

an opinion that i do have is i think i am right based on the tenets & proof of the words & deeds that can be directly attributed to him. but i pray that i am wrong.

i've seen thru your answers just what many people are doing--- that he is being normalized & that he has a different governing style. & that is the first step....

As someone who didn't vote for him (although I would say that "voted against him" is more accurate), it's my belief that no lasting progress can be made on any issue unless and until those in the conversation can drop the anger and the attacks and the hyperbole and communicate like adults.

And it's disappointing and troubling that I even have to say, too.
.

where is the 'attacks'? you think i have attacked you?

No. That wasn't my point.

Why is this so important to you?
.

i know that wasn't THE point. i was asking because i know i haven't but it seems--- in my opinion, like you were including me in that last reply.

'Why is this so important to you?'

not sure if you mean this thread or my last question about attacking. but i guess i can answer both... they aren't.

why do you think ----in your opinion, that either are?

Because you asked me a question.

I'm glad this is not important to you. Same here. Then there's no need to continue this conversation.
.

m'k mac... no hard feelings. there never was any from the start. see you around.

 

[rightwinger]

Studying the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia), and Pinochet (Chile), one finds they all have each of the 14 elements of fascism in common. Not one trait was absent or extant due only to creative interpretations of historic facts. Neither were there but one or two fleeting instances of any of them being manifest. The traits are:

1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism
   Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.
   
   
2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights
   Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.
   
   
3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
   The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.
   
   
4. Supremacy of the Military
   Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.
   
   
5. Rampant Sexism
   The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Opposition to abortion is high, as is homophobia and anti-gay legislation and national policy.
   
   
6. Controlled Mass Media
   Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.
   
   
7. Obsession with National Security
   Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.
   
   
8. Religion and Government are Intertwined
   Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.
   
   
9. Corporate Power is Protected
   The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.
   
   
10. Labor Power is Suppressed
    Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed .
    
    
11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts
    Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts is openly attacked, and governments often refuse to fund the arts.
    
    
12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment
    Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.
    
    
13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
    Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.
    
    
14. Fraudulent Elections
    Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.

Source​

Does that seem like Trump?

It looks like his playbook

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Does that seem like Trump?

It looks like his playbook

What it actually looks like is the latest e-mail pass along being shared by radical leftists, much as the Christian fundies do with theirs.

In reality, this "doctor" Britt is no doctor, is not accredited in the field of political science and wrote the piece specifically to target Dubya. It has simply been resurrected to apply to Trump.

Any person who is even reasonably intelligent and actually knows anything about fascism should be able to recognize the obvious way this list has been crafted for a modern audience in this novice man's point # 3.

can you spot it? Let's see if you can.

 

[usmbguest5318]

Studying the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia), and Pinochet (Chile), one finds they all have each of the 14 elements of fascism in common. Not one trait was absent or extant due only to creative interpretations of historic facts. Neither were there but one or two fleeting instances of any of them being manifest. The traits are:

1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism
   Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.
   
   
2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights
   Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.
   
   
3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
   The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.
   
   
4. Supremacy of the Military
   Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.
   
   
5. Rampant Sexism
   The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Opposition to abortion is high, as is homophobia and anti-gay legislation and national policy.
   
   
6. Controlled Mass Media
   Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.
   
   
7. Obsession with National Security
   Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.
   
   
8. Religion and Government are Intertwined
   Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.
   
   
9. Corporate Power is Protected
   The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.
   
   
10. Labor Power is Suppressed
    Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed .
    
    
11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts
    Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts is openly attacked, and governments often refuse to fund the arts.
    
    
12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment
    Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.
    
    
13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
    Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.
    
    
14. Fraudulent Elections
    Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.

Source​

Does that seem like Trump?

It looks like his playbook

Oh, yes. Immensely so.

 

[playtime]

fascism
noun

• 1[mass noun] An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.

1. 1.1 (in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practices:
   ‘this is yet another example of health fascism in action’

Origin
1920s: from Italian fascismo, from fascio bundle, political group, from Latin fascis (see fasces).

Pronunciation
fascism
/ˈfaʃɪz(ə)m/

fascism - definition of fascism in English | Oxford Dictionaries

Synonyms of fascism in English:

fascism

See definition of fascism

noun
1

SYNONYMS
authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism, autocracy, absolute rule, Nazism, rightism, militarism

nationalism, xenophobia, racism, anti-Semitism, chauvinism, jingoism, isolationism

neo-fascism, neo-Nazism

corporativism, corporatism

historical Hitlerism

historical Francoism, Falangism

ANTONYMS
democracy, liberalism

Synonyms of fascism | Oxford Dictionaries Thesaurus

^^^ trump has his cheeto dust all over it. ^^^

 

[rightwinger]

Does that seem like Trump?

It looks like his playbook

What it actually looks like is the latest e-mail pass along being shared by radical leftists, much as the Christian fundies do with theirs.

In reality, this "doctor" Britt is no doctor, is not accredited in the field of political science and wrote the piece specifically to target Dubya. It has simply been resurrected to apply to Trump.

Any person who is even reasonably intelligent and actually knows anything about fascism should be able to recognize the obvious way this list has been crafted for a modern audience in this novice man's point # 3.

can you spot it? Let's see if you can.

I see it now.....

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Does that seem like Trump?

It looks like his playbook

What it actually looks like is the latest e-mail pass along being shared by radical leftists, much as the Christian fundies do with theirs.

In reality, this "doctor" Britt is no doctor, is not accredited in the field of political science and wrote the piece specifically to target Dubya. It has simply been resurrected to apply to Trump.

Any person who is even reasonably intelligent and actually knows anything about fascism should be able to recognize the obvious way this list has been crafted for a modern audience in this novice man's point # 3.

can you spot it? Let's see if you can.

I see it now.....

No, that's not it, son.

People who know about the subject matter realize that the fascists of the 30s did not rail against terrorism, as that particular concept did not really become part of the modern lexicon until much later.

This was obviously tailored to fit the time this complete novice wrote it.

 

[rightwinger]

Does that seem like Trump?

It looks like his playbook

What it actually looks like is the latest e-mail pass along being shared by radical leftists, much as the Christian fundies do with theirs.

In reality, this "doctor" Britt is no doctor, is not accredited in the field of political science and wrote the piece specifically to target Dubya. It has simply been resurrected to apply to Trump.

Any person who is even reasonably intelligent and actually knows anything about fascism should be able to recognize the obvious way this list has been crafted for a modern audience in this novice man's point # 3.

can you spot it? Let's see if you can.

I see it now.....

No, that's not it, son.

People who know about the subject matter realize that the fascists of the 30s did not rail against terrorism, as that particular concept did not really become part of the modern lexicon until much later.

This was obviously tailored to fit the time this complete novice wrote it.

Step back and you will see it more clearly

 

[FA_Q2]

Just how can you possibly compare President Trump to Hitler? Or any dictator or murderer? What motivates that? I'm plainly curious.

One can compare and contrast any two individuals. When looking at Trump's populist and nationalist approach to securing political power, one sees many similarities to Hitler's approach to doing so. Trump has yet to begin wantonly ordering the murder and incarceration of law abiding citizens. That much is so, but if the absence of pogroms be the bar by which one defines similarity/difference between the two men, I suggest that it is inward that one must look before concerning oneself with how alike or unalike be Hitler and Trump.

The same can be said (and was said) of Obama. Contrasting some similarities does not make the comparison or constructive.

The comparison itself is asinine in the extreme. Virtually all politicians have some similarities to Hitler in their campaigning but they are all missing the cornerstones that make Hitler the figure that he was.

 

[FA_Q2]

These ridiculous comparisons to Hitler and the Nazis by BOTH ends are an insult to the millions who suffered and died.

But our wingers don't care.
.

i care very much & drumpf is more akin to mussolini but either way he is a certainly a dictator in the making. i gave a valid non biased link & many examples of what a dictator is & compared them to factual trump's words & deeds.....

No, you gave some specific similarities in a very generalized sense. Then ignored all of the blatant things that are not similar. Thus the comparison is asinine.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Does that seem like Trump?

It looks like his playbook

What it actually looks like is the latest e-mail pass along being shared by radical leftists, much as the Christian fundies do with theirs.

In reality, this "doctor" Britt is no doctor, is not accredited in the field of political science and wrote the piece specifically to target Dubya. It has simply been resurrected to apply to Trump.

Any person who is even reasonably intelligent and actually knows anything about fascism should be able to recognize the obvious way this list has been crafted for a modern audience in this novice man's point # 3.

can you spot it? Let's see if you can.

I see it now.....

No, that's not it, son.

People who know about the subject matter realize that the fascists of the 30s did not rail against terrorism, as that particular concept did not really become part of the modern lexicon until much later.

This was obviously tailored to fit the time this complete novice wrote it.

Step back and you will see it more clearly

I saw a silly, childish swastika, if that is what you meant.

Are you thinking that excuses your lack of knowledge of history and politics?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Does that seem like Trump?

It looks like his playbook

What it actually looks like is the latest e-mail pass along being shared by radical leftists, much as the Christian fundies do with theirs.

In reality, this "doctor" Britt is no doctor, is not accredited in the field of political science and wrote the piece specifically to target Dubya. It has simply been resurrected to apply to Trump.

Any person who is even reasonably intelligent and actually knows anything about fascism should be able to recognize the obvious way this list has been crafted for a modern audience in this novice man's point # 3.

can you spot it? Let's see if you can.

I see it now.....

No, that's not it, son.

People who know about the subject matter realize that the fascists of the 30s did not rail against terrorism, as that particular concept did not really become part of the modern lexicon until much later.

This was obviously tailored to fit the time this complete novice wrote it.

Step back and you will see it more clearly

I saw a silly, childish swastika, if that is what you meant.

Are you thinking that excuses your lack of knowledge of history and politics?

The University Is a Dogma Pound

What happened on September 12, 1683 made September 11 the turning point of the last jihad. If bin Laden had been there then instead of a greedy and irreligious Turkish general, Vienna would have been overrun long before King John Sobieski of Poland got there. Islam would have gone on to conquer Europe and with it, the world.

Linking to professionals just joins you to a chain. Our sheltered and compromised academic historians cannot connect the dots; they can only collect the dots. They have knowledge but not understanding.