I don't have to love the races

[IM2]

I will say this, Pride and Poitier were accepted by whites. The ordinary back person, not so much. As a black man who lived during that time it is not about what someone feels when you get what was intended to belittle. After a couple hundred years of that, you kinda know. Now again as a black person who lived during that time it was laws and policies that ended the overt practice of racism. Now the end of segregation did a lot to increase understanding but that was no done because white men decided, it was because a supreme court decision made it illegal Still fir years after 1954 whites refused to recognize the supreme court decision. It took more federal government intervention, the Civil Rights Act, Equal Opportunity laws. And really as I read many of these posts, and the fact Trump is the president, it's kinda hard to agree with you about what made white men change.

Had the government simply done nothing about the races after the Civil War, there would be far less racial angst today. It was government, local, state and Federal that passed laws keeping the races apart. We wouldn't in the mess we are today had it not been for government. Now, the government has tried to "FIX" racism with more laws. How's that worked out?

Are you insane?

Facts are annoying aren't they?

If those were facts, I would not be asking you if you were insane.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

There is no requirement that, just by being born in the world, or being born in America, that I automatically must love all the races.

To be sure, that doesn't mean I have to hate them either. Just let me do what I want, and let others do what they want. Don't try to artifically mix or force things on people. That is when people react.

For example, when it comes to blacks, you have gone far beyond equality or civil rights. You are actually trying to force them onto us. If there is something that isn't black enough, you say, let's insert a black in here.

Funny, you don't say basketball or rap music or that inner city neighborhood is too black, and there must be affirmative action for whites, asians, and mexicans.

In fact, if whites try to move in, you say they are "gentrifying" or "expropriating". But if blacks move in to white areas or activities, you say they are "diversifying" or correcting some past wrong, or something.

We are on to your bullshit. It isn't working anymore.

No one says you do.

You’re at complete liberty to be the ignorant, frightened, hateful bigot and racist you clearly are – no one is going to attempt to tell you otherwise.

 

[TheParser]

Hello, Defens:

As I understand your post, you do NOT dislike non-Caucasian groups, but you feel that one particular group is being forced on everyone else, and that offends you.

Whether or not you are correct, you cannot do anything about it.

So the best advice, I feel, is for you to try your best to forget what you consider to be an injustice and try your best to have the happiest life possible.

I think that is what every other American is trying to do every day.



Best wishes!

 

[AKIP]

There is no requirement that, just by being born in the world, or being born in America, that I automatically must love all the races.

To be sure, that doesn't mean I have to hate them either. Just let me do what I want, and let others do what they want. Don't try to artifically mix or force things on people. That is when people react.

For example, when it comes to blacks, you have gone far beyond equality or civil rights. You are actually trying to force them onto us. If there is something that isn't black enough, you say, let's insert a black in here.

Funny, you don't say basketball or rap music or that inner city neighborhood is too black, and there must be affirmative action for whites, asians, and mexicans.

In fact, if whites try to move in, you say they are "gentrifying" or "expropriating". But if blacks move in to white areas or activities, you say they are "diversifying" or correcting some past wrong, or something.

We are on to your bullshit. It isn't working anymore.

Just another racist trying to justify being a racist.

 

[TNHarley]

Got it. Your definition of making America great again means bringing back segregation. At least you are honest. Stupid and racist, but honest.

Do you say that about the blacks that call for segregation?

 

[BULLDOG]

We made up country too but you wont see any Blacks saying there needs to be more country singers.

Don't go there man. Banjos are as racially mocking as watermelons.

And WTF you want? Cowboy Troy Darius Rucker and Charlie Pride are in the Grand Ole Opry hall of Fame and Charley did more to end racism than Congress or MLK did.. Stop it with the "we made up" everything gigue.

No banjos are not as racially mocking as watermelons. Charley Pride did nothing to end racism. King got laws changed. Charley sang and changed nothing.. And why can't we take credit for things? You guys are telling us how you created everything..

Yes, Charlie Pride did advance racial equality. Probably not as much as King, and certainly not in the same way. Sidney Poitier had a big effect too. I'm sure a black man is a better judge of what made him feel belittled, but a white man of that time knows more about what was intended to belittle blacks., and what made him or the people around him start to change.

I will say this, Pride and Poitier were accepted by whites. The ordinary back person, not so much. As a black man who lived during that time it is not about what someone feels when you get what was intended to belittle. After a couple hundred years of that, you kinda know. Now again as a black person who lived during that time it was laws and policies that ended the overt practice of racism. Now the end of segregation did a lot to increase understanding but that was no done because white men decided, it was because a supreme court decision made it illegal Still fir years after 1954 whites refused to recognize the supreme court decision. It took more federal government intervention, the Civil Rights Act, Equal Opportunity laws. And really as I read many of these posts, and the fact Trump is the president, it's kinda hard to agree with you about what made white men change.

There was no one thing that changed the thinking o the majority of the country. Some things had more effect than others, but I don't think we would have come as far as we have without all of those things.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I automatically must love all the races.

Loving or hating any person simply because of their race is lazy as well as stupid.

If you can't be bothered to get to know those people you hate on a case-by-case basis you've got no business hating them.

It's about proportionate differences within society, and retaining culture.

Not only does mass immigration permanently alter one's culture, if there are too many "Bad Apples" within a certain group, it will also negatively impact a society.

Obviously ignoring this, is in fact ignorance.

We should actually seek to improve society, and retain culture, I don't really quite grasp why anybody would disagree.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

We made up country too but you wont see any Blacks saying there needs to be more country singers.

Don't go there man. Banjos are as racially mocking as watermelons.

And WTF you want? Cowboy Troy Darius Rucker and Charlie Pride are in the Grand Ole Opry hall of Fame and Charley did more to end racism than Congress or MLK did.. Stop it with the "we made up" everything gigue.

No banjos are not as racially mocking as watermelons. Charley Pride did nothing to end racism. King got laws changed. Charley sang and changed nothing.. And why can't we take credit for things? You guys are telling us how you created everything..

They both aren't terribly mocking, as in comparison to dumb Polak jokes which dehumanize Polish people's intelligence.

 

[BULLDOG]

Got it. Your definition of making America great again means bringing back segregation. At least you are honest. Stupid and racist, but honest.

Do you say that about the blacks that call for segregation?

Yep.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Got it. Your definition of making America great again means bringing back segregation. At least you are honest. Stupid and racist, but honest.

Explain the benefits of having Blacks within a supposed "Very Racist" society of Whitey's control, as opposed to having an opportunity to have a nation of sovereignty of their own?

It seems giving Blacks nationhood out of America's territory is the best for all sides.

But, try telling that to Globalist scums obsessed with control, and profit motivations, they love having Blacks here, and have manipulated our less intelligent individuals to believe that Balkanized Multi-Culturalism will solve the "Racism problem"

 

[BULLDOG]

Got it. Your definition of making America great again means bringing back segregation. At least you are honest. Stupid and racist, but honest.

Explain the benefits of having Blacks within a supposed "Very Racist" society of Whitey's control, as opposed to having an opportunity to have a nation of sovereignty of their own?

It seems giving Blacks nationhood out of America's territory is the best for all sides.

But, try telling that to Globalist scums obsessed with control, and profit motivations, they love having Blacks here, and have manipulated our less intelligent individuals to believe that Balkanized Multi-Culturalism will solve the "Racism problem"

Sorry, but if you are dumb enough to ask that question, I'm not qualified to deal with you. Ask your therapist.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Got it. Your definition of making America great again means bringing back segregation. At least you are honest. Stupid and racist, but honest.

Explain the benefits of having Blacks within a supposed "Very Racist" society of Whitey's control, as opposed to having an opportunity to have a nation of sovereignty of their own?

It seems giving Blacks nationhood out of America's territory is the best for all sides.

But, try telling that to Globalist scums obsessed with control, and profit motivations, they love having Blacks here, and have manipulated our less intelligent individuals to believe that Balkanized Multi-Culturalism will solve the "Racism problem"

Sorry, but if you are dumb enough to ask that question, I'm not qualified to deal with you. Ask your therapist.

Explain how Balkanization solves racial strife, religious, or ethnic strife, we know the opposite is in fact true from historical conflicts.

 

[WinterBorn]

Got it. Your definition of making America great again means bringing back segregation. At least you are honest. Stupid and racist, but honest.

Do you say that about the blacks that call for segregation?

I would.

 

[Hellbilly]

There is no requirement that, just by being born in the world, or being born in America, that I automatically must love all the races.

To be sure, that doesn't mean I have to hate them either. Just let me do what I want, and let others do what they want. Don't try to artifically mix or force things on people. That is when people react.

For example, when it comes to blacks, you have gone far beyond equality or civil rights. You are actually trying to force them onto us. If there is something that isn't black enough, you say, let's insert a black in here.

Funny, you don't say basketball or rap music or that inner city neighborhood is too black, and there must be affirmative action for whites, asians, and mexicans.

In fact, if whites try to move in, you say they are "gentrifying" or "expropriating". But if blacks move in to white areas or activities, you say they are "diversifying" or correcting some past wrong, or something.

We are on to your bullshit. It isn't working anymore.

So don't. Nobody cares.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

 

[Asclepias]

We made up country too but you wont see any Blacks saying there needs to be more country singers.

Don't go there man. Banjos are as racially mocking as watermelons.

And WTF you want? Cowboy Troy Darius Rucker and Charlie Pride are in the Grand Ole Opry hall of Fame and Charley did more to end racism than Congress or MLK did.. Stop it with the "we made up" everything gigue.

Why would I stop when its true? However your deflection on a small point in my post is like the child that spots a tiny sliver of paper on a large carpet and attempts to eat it.

 

[Asclepias]

Basketball is probably the only level playing field in the US where talent and hard work is the true indicator of success.

Pick any professional sport. The level playing field for all.

Commission sales is another. I have been a Realtor for over 40 years. Produce or you're out, it's really that simple.

I disagree. Commission is based on people liking you. If you are already socially disliked thats a strike against you.

 

[flacaltenn]

Charley Pride did nothing to end racism.

THe HELL he didn't.. He's as significant to race relations as Jackie Robinson. Two shared loves helped to promote rapid racial healing in the South in the 60s. One was music -- the other was sports.. Charlie Pride was a country music god.. Changed the entire outlook on your black neighbors in the South.

Did you EVER study the history of Race Relations in the USA??? Apparently not...

 

[flacaltenn]

We made up country too but you wont see any Blacks saying there needs to be more country singers.

Don't go there man. Banjos are as racially mocking as watermelons.

And WTF you want? Cowboy Troy Darius Rucker and Charlie Pride are in the Grand Ole Opry hall of Fame and Charley did more to end racism than Congress or MLK did.. Stop it with the "we made up" everything gigue.

No banjos are not as racially mocking as watermelons. Charley Pride did nothing to end racism. King got laws changed. Charley sang and changed nothing.. And why can't we take credit for things? You guys are telling us how you created everything..

Yes, Charlie Pride did advance racial equality. Probably not as much as King, and certainly not in the same way. Sidney Poitier had a big effect too. I'm sure a black man is a better judge of what made him feel belittled, but a white man of that time knows more about what was intended to belittle blacks., and what made him or the people around him start to change.

I will say this, Pride and Poitier were accepted by whites. The ordinary back person, not so much. As a black man who lived during that time it is not about what someone feels when you get what was intended to belittle. After a couple hundred years of that, you kinda know. Now again as a black person who lived during that time it was laws and policies that ended the overt practice of racism. Now the end of segregation did a lot to increase understanding but that was no done because white men decided, it was because a supreme court decision made it illegal Still fir years after 1954 whites refused to recognize the supreme court decision. It took more federal government intervention, the Civil Rights Act, Equal Opportunity laws. And really as I read many of these posts, and the fact Trump is the president, it's kinda hard to agree with you about what made white men change.

There was no one thing that changed the thinking o the majority of the country. Some things had more effect than others, but I don't think we would have come as far as we have without all of those things.

In terms of REAL human contact -- nothing better than sports or a coliseum full of crackers watching a Charlie Pride concert. The shared love of music and sports and actually REGIONAL HERITAGE in South was more encouraging to Racial healing than the the total of any govt effort.

 

[IM2]

We made up country too but you wont see any Blacks saying there needs to be more country singers.

Don't go there man. Banjos are as racially mocking as watermelons.

And WTF you want? Cowboy Troy Darius Rucker and Charlie Pride are in the Grand Ole Opry hall of Fame and Charley did more to end racism than Congress or MLK did.. Stop it with the "we made up" everything gigue.

No banjos are not as racially mocking as watermelons. Charley Pride did nothing to end racism. King got laws changed. Charley sang and changed nothing.. And why can't we take credit for things? You guys are telling us how you created everything..

Yes, Charlie Pride did advance racial equality. Probably not as much as King, and certainly not in the same way. Sidney Poitier had a big effect too. I'm sure a black man is a better judge of what made him feel belittled, but a white man of that time knows more about what was intended to belittle blacks., and what made him or the people around him start to change.

I will say this, Pride and Poitier were accepted by whites. The ordinary back person, not so much. As a black man who lived during that time it is not about what someone feels when you get what was intended to belittle. After a couple hundred years of that, you kinda know. Now again as a black person who lived during that time it was laws and policies that ended the overt practice of racism. Now the end of segregation did a lot to increase understanding but that was no done because white men decided, it was because a supreme court decision made it illegal Still fir years after 1954 whites refused to recognize the supreme court decision. It took more federal government intervention, the Civil Rights Act, Equal Opportunity laws. And really as I read many of these posts, and the fact Trump is the president, it's kinda hard to agree with you about what made white men change.

There was no one thing that changed the thinking o the majority of the country. Some things had more effect than others, but I don't think we would have come as far as we have without all of those things.

I'm not too sure if the majority of the country has changed all that much. Blacks were singing and dancing in front of white audiences before the civil rights act was passed so I'm not so sure that anything would have changed without laws being passed. But since hose laws were passed you make a fair point.

 

[IM2]

Charley Pride did nothing to end racism.

THe HELL he didn't.. He's as significant to race relations as Jackie Robinson. Two shared loves helped to promote rapid racial healing in the South in the 60s. One was music -- the other was sports.. Charlie Pride was a country music god.. Changed the entire outlook on your black neighbors in the South.

Did you EVER study the history of Race Relations in the USA??? Apparently not...

I have not only studied it, I've lived it. So I think I can say Charley Pride did not do more than King and I can say that Jackie Robinson did not do more than King.