Youwerecreated
VIP Member
- Nov 29, 2010
- 13,273
- 165
- 83
- Thread starter
- #821
Yes he is!!! You can't say he is right about the 5,000 years, which he actually said was closer to 2,000 years, and he is all wet about the 100,000 years. If he's wrong about the 100,000 years and the 2,000 years then he's wrong about the 5,000 years and everything else. The other sources in your article gave a few thousand years, 3,000 years, and 3,500 years so no one else supports the 5,000 years and the person who gave the2,000 to 5,000 years said it was PROBABLY closer to 2,000 years.If the guy was accurate with the 5,000 year crap, and he actually gave it as closer to 2,000, then he is accurate with the 100,000 year crap, it's the SAME guy!!!
No he is not and there is no way to know a number 100,000 years ago.
The worlds population was only 200 million 2,000 years ago roughly.
It took 3,000 years to grow the population to 200 million.
So by going by those numbers that would put the population at the time of the flood around 70 million.
Half that number roughly would be female so how many of them were pregnant ?
Let me try and explain something to you. You're are agreeing that the global flood took place 5,000 years ago right ?
Well the bible say's the earth was repopulated by noah and his sons which is pretty close to the number we see today.
The chronology of the bible say's man has been on the earth 6,000 years. Why do you accept the 5,000 years and not the 6,000 year claim ?
I don't know how many people populated the earth before the flood it's nothing but speculation.
But the bible was pretty close in the 5,000 year population.
Idolphin ran the numbers to and came pretty close to the worlds total population of today.
But 100,000 years ago you have no clue how many people were on the earth. That number is built on pure speculation. The bible does tell us how many was on the earth both at 6,000 years and 5,000 years.
For a further look here ya go.
www.god-truth.com/PDF/FLOODFACTS.pdf