Lonestar_logic
Republic of Texas
- May 13, 2009
- 24,539
- 2,233
- 205
There you have it. Even with video evidence....some refuse to see.The cops weren't suspecting shit, they caught the man violating the seat belt law. All he had to do was show ID get his ticket and be on his way. Damn you people are stupid.
Are you that fucking stupid? Oh I guess you are.
You do know that both were in violation of the law so that pretty much gives the police the right to ask for ID.
Apparently you are the stupid, half cocked ass here. The passenger was seat belted until the initial traffic stop and not the subject of a seat belt violation, further he attempted to explain that he had surrendered his license previously in another matter and was attempting to give them the court documents. They refused to look at them.
If the only alleged violation was the seat belt violation then no probable caused existed for a search.
But then why should you warm up your three brain cells just to post an informed opinion on an internet forum.
But Kurtz argued that there was no search or any evidence to suggest criminal activity, and Jones said he was wearing a seat belt when the car was stopped and police never told him about their intention to ticket him.
He said she said. I believe the cops.
The video doesn't show him wearing a seatbelt.
Well, duh. The police already noted that he and the children had their seatbelts on, otherwise, the police would have also cited him, and in the case of the children, both parents again.
DUH.
They did cite him. They also stunned his dumbass.