Goodbye La Nina!

Climate models are ghey


Too you science is gay! It doesn't surprise me that you think this way either as you're jealous of people much more intelligent then you. lol

Short term climate models when dealing with the ENSO! Not perfect but hardly gay as they do get it right at times.






Computer models aren't science. They are science fiction. They are invented results of a computer that is loaded with biased algorithms. Please learn the difference.
 
The Global Warming Fruit Cakes need to sacrifice more animals on their alter to the Sun God to get the correct data............

Then the OCEANS will RISE............and every one will Sweat to death...........Fire and Brimestone...........and Solar panels will be seen EVERYWHERE ACROSS THE PLANET................to SAVE THE EARTH..........

They just don't see it............that so many think they are Fruit Cakes.


Humanity has already wiped out 80% of all land animals in the past 20,000 years...So it isn't just the fruit cakes as you call them. So because they use science and evidence based thinking to want to stop mass extinctions and to monitor the reality of our planet somehow it makes them fruitcakes? I guess the only ones that aint fruit cakes are the guys that live in single wides and enjoy killing everything they see. Frankly, educated people think the same thing about those kinds as you do about us.

The things you wackos are willing to say in an attempt to support your position never ceases to amaze me. You claim that humans have wiped out 80% of all land animals in the past 20,000 years. Could you possibly come up with a bigger pile of BS? At present, there are estimated to be about 6.5 million land dwelling species on earth. For your statement to be true, humans would have to have wiped out 26 MILLION species in the past 20,000 years. There are estimated to be about 6.5 million land species living today....can you provide any actual source stating that there were more than 32 million species alive 20,000 years ago? Any at all? And how do you suppose we managed to drive more than 1600 species a year extinct? Don't you think someone might have noticed?

You people simply aren't credible...you will say anything in an attempt to support your unsupportable positions.
 
Last edited:
The Global Warming Fruit Cakes need to sacrifice more animals on their alter to the Sun God to get the correct data............

Then the OCEANS will RISE............and every one will Sweat to death...........Fire and Brimestone...........and Solar panels will be seen EVERYWHERE ACROSS THE PLANET................to SAVE THE EARTH..........

They just don't see it............that so many think they are Fruit Cakes.


Humanity has already wiped out 80% of all land animals in the past 20,000 years...So it isn't just the fruit cakes as you call them. So because they use science and evidence based thinking to want to stop mass extinctions and to monitor the reality of our planet somehow it makes them fruitcakes? I guess the only ones that aint fruit cakes are the guys that live in single wides and enjoy killing everything they see. Frankly, educated people think the same thing about those kinds as you do about us.
Wow you been here a long time. You should leave the animals alone
 
LOL Good God, what are you blathering about now? Of course the El Nino results in a warmer atmosphere during it's duration. And a warmer ocean, warmed by a warmer atmosphere during both El Nino's and La Nina's, result in every major El Nino being warmer than the last major El Nino. And the warmer atmosphere results from the GHGs that we have put into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels.

Ha ha, your reply is so predictable and you misunderstood my question.

Atmosphere doesn't warm the oceans, the Sun does that.


The atmosphere and the visible light "rays" from the sun both warm the ocean. lol Consider this, would a 50f ocean and an 60f atmosphere at NIGHT transfer some of that warmth into the oceans? I believe the answer is yes. Maybe the colder ocean would try to moderate the atmosphere more so but the atmosphere would do the same at a smaller scale.
No...

Surface tension and evaporation will not allow it..
 
Let me get this straight Mr Atmospheric Physicst. You believe that SURFACE TENSION prevents the ocean from absorbing incident radiation?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA.... what a fucking M O R O N ! ! !
 
Climate models are ghey


Too you science is gay! It doesn't surprise me that you think this way either as you're jealous of people much more intelligent then you. lol

Short term climate models when dealing with the ENSO! Not perfect but hardly gay as they do get it right at times.






Computer models aren't science. They are science fiction. They are invented results of a computer that is loaded with biased algorithms. Please learn the difference.
Dumb fuck, the retreating glaciers all over the world are not computer models. The melting of the continental icecaps are not computer models. 60 inches of rain in Houston is not a computer model. About a million homes damaged or destroyed by flooding, hurricanes, and forest fires invading cities are not computer models. Try that kind of shit on your peers like Silly Billy.
 
Let me get this straight Mr Atmospheric Physicst. You believe that SURFACE TENSION prevents the ocean from absorbing incident radiation?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA.... what a fucking M O R O N ! ! !
Between Silly Billy and Mr. Westwall, this board has some far out morons.However, back to the dying La Nina;

gfs_nh-sat4_sstanom_1-day.png


Looks like we in the Northwest have our warm blob back again.
 
Climate models are ghey


Too you science is gay! It doesn't surprise me that you think this way either as you're jealous of people much more intelligent then you. lol

Short term climate models when dealing with the ENSO! Not perfect but hardly gay as they do get it right at times.






Computer models aren't science. They are science fiction. They are invented results of a computer that is loaded with biased algorithms. Please learn the difference.
Dumb fuck, the retreating glaciers all over the world are not computer models. The melting of the continental icecaps are not computer models. 60 inches of rain in Houston is not a computer model. About a million homes damaged or destroyed by flooding, hurricanes, and forest fires invading cities are not computer models. Try that kind of shit on your peers like Silly Billy.

Got anything that isn't just business as usual on planet earth? Anything?
 
Climate models are ghey


Too you science is gay! It doesn't surprise me that you think this way either as you're jealous of people much more intelligent then you. lol

Short term climate models when dealing with the ENSO! Not perfect but hardly gay as they do get it right at times.






Computer models aren't science. They are science fiction. They are invented results of a computer that is loaded with biased algorithms. Please learn the difference.
Dumb fuck, the retreating glaciers all over the world are not computer models. The melting of the continental icecaps are not computer models. 60 inches of rain in Houston is not a computer model. About a million homes damaged or destroyed by flooding, hurricanes, and forest fires invading cities are not computer models. Try that kind of shit on your peers like Silly Billy.

Got anything that isn't just business as usual on planet earth? Anything?
He thinks the earth had glaciers since forever and they always melt. It’s what they do when seasons change . He thinks the earth has one temperature, doesn’t spin or tilt
 
Let me get this straight Mr Atmospheric Physicst. You believe that SURFACE TENSION prevents the ocean from absorbing incident radiation?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA.... what a fucking M O R O N ! ! !


WOW...Crick's ignorance abounds...

Tell me, what occurs in the top ten microns of the sea surface?

Do You Know?

You tell us your an oceanographer yet you are totally ignorant of water and its molecular properties...

Before you use big red letters to show your ignorance you really should know the subject matter..
 
For those who don't know..

IN the first ten microns of water (sea water in this case) is a region where evaporation occurs and the area just below it it is COOLER than the surface, making it next to impossible for warming to occur from above it. Only solar radiation or water warming on land and then entering the ocean can cause small area warming..

But Crick is totally ignorant of these basic properties of water...
 
Last edited:
Water is warming big time in the eastern pacific just below the surface. +3c anomalies and pushing upwards and eastward. Good luck not having an nino later this year! lol

BpDF3db.gif
 
For those who don't know..

IN the first ten microns of water (sea water in this case) is a region where evaporation occurs and the area just below it it is COOLER than the surface, making it next to impossible for warming to occur from above it. Only solar radiation or water warming on land and then entering the ocean can cause small area warming..

But Crick is totally ignorant of these basic properties of water...

You say the surface is warmer than the water underneath, but insist that no heat transfer takes place. Or (since you write poorly) you are saying that the air above the ocean's surface is cooler than the water. That would make net conduction a little tough leaving virtually no way for the ocean to be heated. I guess the ocean is just a solid block of ice in Billy's world.

You are one fucking idiot.

"Much of the direct and diffuse solar short wave (less than 2 micros, mostly in the visible range) electromagnetic radiation that reaches the sea surface penetrates the ocean (the ocean has a low albedo, except when the sun is close to the horizon), heating the sea water down to about 100 to 200 meters, depending on the water clarity. It is within this thin sunlit surface layer of the ocean that the process of photosynthesis can occur. Solar heating of the ocean on a global average is 168 watts per square meter."
Ocean-Atmosphere Coupling

Billy Bob, you seem to be totally ignorant of these basic properties of water. Had you ever heard of photosynthesis?
 
Last edited:
For those who don't know..

IN the first ten microns of water (sea water in this case) is a region where evaporation occurs and the area just below it it is COOLER than the surface, making it next to impossible for warming to occur from above it. Only solar radiation or water warming on land and then entering the ocean can cause small area warming..

But Crick is totally ignorant of these basic properties of water...

You say the surface is warmer than the water underneath, but insist that no heat transfer takes place. Or (since you write poorly) you are saying that the air above the ocean's surface is cooler than the water. That would make net conduction a little tough leaving virtually no way for the ocean to be heated. I guess the ocean is just a solid block of ice in Billy's world.

You are one fucking idiot.

"Much of the direct and diffuse solar short wave (less than 2 micros, mostly in the visible range) electromagnetic radiation that reaches the sea surface penetrates the ocean (the ocean has a low albedo, except when the sun is close to the horizon), heating the sea water down to about 100 to 200 meters, depending on the water clarity. It is within this thin sunlit surface layer of the ocean that the process of photosynthesis can occur. Solar heating of the ocean on a global average is 168 watts per square meter."
Ocean-Atmosphere Coupling

Billy Bob, you seem to be totally ignorant of these basic properties of water. Had you ever heard of photosynthesis?

The stupid just never stops with you does it crick...the ocean is warmed by two primary sources...the sun, and undersea volcanic activity....on rare occasions, the air is warmer than the ocean and does transfer some miniscule amount of energy..energy moving from warm to cool and all...but the oceans warm the atmosphere...not the other way around...
 
So, have you abandoned your claim that the ocean cannot take in radiant energy from the sun due to evaporation and surface tension?
 
Real fucking dumb. That article does not state that the world's glaciers are melting. In fact, it states that one study states that Antarctica is gaining ice. And there are many other equally good studies that state that Antarctica is losing ice. And Principia Scientific International is a pay to publish rag, not at all a scientific journal.
 

Forum List

Back
Top