Goodbye La Nina!

LOL Good God, what are you blathering about now? Of course the El Nino results in a warmer atmosphere during it's duration. And a warmer ocean, warmed by a warmer atmosphere during both El Nino's and La Nina's, result in every major El Nino being warmer than the last major El Nino. And the warmer atmosphere results from the GHGs that we have put into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels.

Ha ha, your reply is so predictable and you misunderstood my question.

Atmosphere doesn't warm the oceans, the Sun does that.
 
LOL Good God, what are you blathering about now? Of course the El Nino results in a warmer atmosphere during it's duration. And a warmer ocean, warmed by a warmer atmosphere during both El Nino's and La Nina's, result in every major El Nino being warmer than the last major El Nino. And the warmer atmosphere results from the GHGs that we have put into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels.

Ha ha, your reply is so predictable and you misunderstood my question.

Atmosphere doesn't warm the oceans, the Sun does that.

Not to these guys dude....the sun has zero effect on the climate. They cant go there.... it fucks with the narrative.
 
LOL Good God, what are you blathering about now? Of course the El Nino results in a warmer atmosphere during it's duration. And a warmer ocean, warmed by a warmer atmosphere during both El Nino's and La Nina's, result in every major El Nino being warmer than the last major El Nino. And the warmer atmosphere results from the GHGs that we have put into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels.

Ha ha, your reply is so predictable and you misunderstood my question.

Atmosphere doesn't warm the oceans, the Sun does that.

Not to these guys dude....the sun has zero effect on the climate. They cant go there.... it fucks with the narrative.

It takes Galaxy class level of stupidity to say the Sun doesn't warm the ocean waters, and at the same time say the atmosphere is heating the oceans.
 
LOL Good God, what are you blathering about now? Of course the El Nino results in a warmer atmosphere during it's duration. And a warmer ocean, warmed by a warmer atmosphere during both El Nino's and La Nina's, result in every major El Nino being warmer than the last major El Nino. And the warmer atmosphere results from the GHGs that we have put into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels.

Ha ha, your reply is so predictable and you misunderstood my question.

Atmosphere doesn't warm the oceans, the Sun does that.

Not to these guys dude....the sun has zero effect on the climate. They cant go there.... it fucks with the narrative.

It takes Galaxy class level of stupidity to say the Sun doesn't warm the ocean waters, and at the same time say the atmosphere is heating the oceans.

That's the established narrative and they'll be sticking to it. But hysterical if you think about it....they stay with this obviously radical thinking, which one could understand if they were swaying the public, but they're not.
 
LOL Good God, what are you blathering about now? Of course the El Nino results in a warmer atmosphere during it's duration. And a warmer ocean, warmed by a warmer atmosphere during both El Nino's and La Nina's, result in every major El Nino being warmer than the last major El Nino. And the warmer atmosphere results from the GHGs that we have put into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels.

Ha ha, your reply is so predictable and you misunderstood my question.

Atmosphere doesn't warm the oceans, the Sun does that.


The atmosphere and the visible light "rays" from the sun both warm the ocean. lol Consider this, would a 50f ocean and an 60f atmosphere at NIGHT transfer some of that warmth into the oceans? I believe the answer is yes. Maybe the colder ocean would try to moderate the atmosphere more so but the atmosphere would do the same at a smaller scale.
 
LOL Good God, what are you blathering about now? Of course the El Nino results in a warmer atmosphere during it's duration. And a warmer ocean, warmed by a warmer atmosphere during both El Nino's and La Nina's, result in every major El Nino being warmer than the last major El Nino. And the warmer atmosphere results from the GHGs that we have put into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels.

Ha ha, your reply is so predictable and you misunderstood my question.

Atmosphere doesn't warm the oceans, the Sun does that.

Not to these guys dude....the sun has zero effect on the climate. They cant go there.... it fucks with the narrative.

It takes Galaxy class level of stupidity to say the Sun doesn't warm the ocean waters, and at the same time say the atmosphere is heating the oceans.
It takes your level of stupidity to claim that I said that. However, you and the other sad sack denialists have been claiming we are heading into a Maunder Minimum because that sun has had a minor decline in TSI for the last couple of sunspot cycles. So, if the TSI is less, and the ocean is warmed only by the sun, why is the ocean still gaining heat? It couldn't be because with more GHGs in the atmosphere, more photons get returned to the surface, now could it? And, yes, an warmer atmosphere will transfer some of that heat to the ocean.
 
LOL Good God, what are you blathering about now? Of course the El Nino results in a warmer atmosphere during it's duration. And a warmer ocean, warmed by a warmer atmosphere during both El Nino's and La Nina's, result in every major El Nino being warmer than the last major El Nino. And the warmer atmosphere results from the GHGs that we have put into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels.

Ha ha, your reply is so predictable and you misunderstood my question.

Atmosphere doesn't warm the oceans, the Sun does that.

Not to these guys dude....the sun has zero effect on the climate. They cant go there.... it fucks with the narrative.

It takes Galaxy class level of stupidity to say the Sun doesn't warm the ocean waters, and at the same time say the atmosphere is heating the oceans.
It takes your level of stupidity to claim that I said that. However, you and the other sad sack denialists have been claiming we are heading into a Maunder Minimum because that sun has had a minor decline in TSI for the last couple of sunspot cycles. So, if the TSI is less, and the ocean is warmed only by the sun, why is the ocean still gaining heat? It couldn't be because with more GHGs in the atmosphere, more photons get returned to the surface, now could it? And, yes, an warmer atmosphere will transfer some of that heat to the ocean.

Yeah but the point is, the religion claims CO2 is the sole force with any warming and the sun plays no role.

Silly :backpedal:

Most importantly though is that only the little climate science club embraces the silliness....a relatively very small group while a billion other scientists KNOW the CO2 narrative is, well......silly.
All over the world, the decision makers who decide our energy policies clearly embrace the science being postulated by the very large group of scientists who are now known as "luke-warmists". Yes a gigantic thorn in the sides of members of the religion but, tough shit on them! The wallets of the masses all over the world are very appreciative!!:deal::fingerscrossed::fingerscrossed:

Indeed, the "sad sack denialists" might appear to some to not get it ( primarily only on internet message boards populated by the uninformed and hopelessly duped) but in the real world, the sad sacks chalk up win after win after win, year after year after year!! Would be happy to post up a ton of bullets providing evidence of that by request!:flirtysmile4:
 
Last edited:
And that is a lie. Not a single scientist claims the sun has no role in warming the Earth. But a scientist established in 1828 that just the sun's input would have the oceans ice covered clear down to the equator. He said that there had to something in the atmosphere that retained the heat that would normally been radiated into space. In 1858, another scientist did an experiment and found that CO2, CH4, water vapor, and NOx were GHGs. The vast majority scientists have stated that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. There is not a single scientific society that claims that CO2 is not a GHG.
 
And that is a lie. Not a single scientist claims the sun has no role in warming the Earth. But a scientist established in 1828 that just the sun's input would have the oceans ice covered clear down to the equator. He said that there had to something in the atmosphere that retained the heat that would normally been radiated into space. In 1858, another scientist did an experiment and found that CO2, CH4, water vapor, and NOx were GHGs. The vast majority scientists have stated that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. There is not a single scientific society that claims that CO2 is not a GHG.

Semantic fakery. Scientists from the Industry of Climate Scientists are very clear: that human activity causes global warming >>>

Scientists Agree: Global Warming is Happening and Humans are the Primary Cause

Causes of climate change - Climate Action - European Commission

Im lying, huh??:abgg2q.jpg:

Too, you and every other climate alarmist in this forum completely and forcefully reject climate scientists like Dr. Judith Curry who's research concludes there are many factors that influence the climate. Thousands of PhD scientists concur.

Twisting words and spinning the whats already well documented is the height of being fake. The only way alarmists survive is by shoveling shit..... and they know it too.

Fake
 
Last edited:
LOL Good God, what are you blathering about now? Of course the El Nino results in a warmer atmosphere during it's duration. And a warmer ocean, warmed by a warmer atmosphere during both El Nino's and La Nina's, result in every major El Nino being warmer than the last major El Nino. And the warmer atmosphere results from the GHGs that we have put into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels.
Nice contradiction post! Which is it? El Niño or GHGs?
 
Climate models are ghey


Too you science is gay! It doesn't surprise me that you think this way either as you're jealous of people much more intelligent then you. lol

Short term climate models when dealing with the ENSO! Not perfect but hardly gay as they do get it right at times.

But all the intelligent people are losing, honey! Personally, i prefer to be a winning dummy! The entire world has been hearing about the consensus science for 20 years, but the public is still not giving a shit. All that intelligence has not impressed the public policy makers one iota = who's not winning?:113::cul2::cul2:.

Please do show us where the science is mattering in the real world? Provide links please sweetie :hello77:
When you posted your nonsense, which you did with a computer on the internet, you just demonstrated in no uncertain manner where science is mattering in the real world.
Huh?
 
Climate models are ghey


Too you science is gay! It doesn't surprise me that you think this way either as you're jealous of people much more intelligent then you. lol

Short term climate models when dealing with the ENSO! Not perfect but hardly gay as they do get it right at times.
Hey, lighten the fuc up.
 
Old crock is going to very disappointed..


wkteq_xz.gif
He is ALWAYS disappointed, but never learns from it. He believes.
 
Climate models are ghey


Too you science is gay! It doesn't surprise me that you think this way either as you're jealous of people much more intelligent then you. lol

Short term climate models when dealing with the ENSO! Not perfect but hardly gay as they do get it right at times.
Hey, lighten the fuc up.

Hey man no worries.....she is one of those hopelessly duped who automatically knee jerks to EVERYTHING that is PC. Looks at every issue through a cardboard paper towel tube and has the political IQ of a small soap dish.

These people continue to think that it is all about the science while nothing could be further from the truth. Anywhere you look the people who make public policy can't run fast enough from the "consensus" science.
 
Old crock is going to very disappointed..


wkteq_xz.gif
He is ALWAYS disappointed, but never learns from it. He believes.

Got to give Old Rocks an A for effort though. His stuff can be very convincing to low information members who wander into this forum. But after 10 years of knocking himself out trying to garner support, this forum continues to have only two or three regular members on the alarmist side. Skeptics continue to dominate the ENVIRONMENT forum!
 
The Global Warming Fruit Cakes need to sacrifice more animals on their alter to the Sun God to get the correct data............

Then the OCEANS will RISE............and every one will Sweat to death...........Fire and Brimestone...........and Solar panels will be seen EVERYWHERE ACROSS THE PLANET................to SAVE THE EARTH..........

They just don't see it............that so many think they are Fruit Cakes.
 
The Global Warming Fruit Cakes need to sacrifice more animals on their alter to the Sun God to get the correct data............

Then the OCEANS will RISE............and every one will Sweat to death...........Fire and Brimestone...........and Solar panels will be seen EVERYWHERE ACROSS THE PLANET................to SAVE THE EARTH..........

They just don't see it............that so many think they are Fruit Cakes.


Humanity has already wiped out 80% of all land animals in the past 20,000 years...So it isn't just the fruit cakes as you call them. So because they use science and evidence based thinking to want to stop mass extinctions and to monitor the reality of our planet somehow it makes them fruitcakes? I guess the only ones that aint fruit cakes are the guys that live in single wides and enjoy killing everything they see. Frankly, educated people think the same thing about those kinds as you do about us.
 
The Global Warming Fruit Cakes need to sacrifice more animals on their alter to the Sun God to get the correct data............

Then the OCEANS will RISE............and every one will Sweat to death...........Fire and Brimestone...........and Solar panels will be seen EVERYWHERE ACROSS THE PLANET................to SAVE THE EARTH..........

They just don't see it............that so many think they are Fruit Cakes.


Humanity has already wiped out 80% of all land animals in the past 20,000 years...So it isn't just the fruit cakes as you call them. So because they use science and evidence based thinking to want to stop mass extinctions and to monitor the reality of our planet somehow it makes them fruitcakes? I guess the only ones that aint fruit cakes are the guys that live in single wides and enjoy killing everything they see. Frankly, educated people think the same thing about those kinds as you do about us.
You are saviors to the world.............in your own mind.

Go kneel and pray to your sun god and install a solar panel.
 
Old crock is going to very disappointed..


wkteq_xz.gif
He is ALWAYS disappointed, but never learns from it. He believes.

What's to learn? It seems to me that you're the one that would be better off learning to read the "graphical" display of sea surface temperatures. You can't see the +1 to +3 anamalies at 100-200 meters beneath the surface of the ocean?? Do you realize that is slowly creeping upwards and eastwards and when it moves to the surface we'll have our el nino? If you can't do that then who are you to talk about someone else needing to learn...We don't only believe but we freaking know.
 

Forum List

Back
Top