Global Warming Fraud-Journalist James Delingpole

[westwall]

Really? Do tell! With links please....

The whole article at the link.


Pubs.GISS: Hansen et al. 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide

Hansen et al. 1981

Hansen, J., D. Johnson, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, P. Lee, D. Rind, and G. Russell, 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 213, 957-966, doi:10.1126/science.213.4511.957.

The global temperature rose 0.2°C between the middle 1960s and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980s. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage

Blah, blah, blah.

Based on his scenarios, he committed to a specific change in temperature. He was wrong. Not just a little. He was wrong big time. Why do you continue to defend this? By the conditions he set and the predictions he made compared to the reality of what happened, he was wrong.

There is simply no way to deny this.

If you are trying to say that you are pursuing the science of this, you need to go where the science leads. Instead, you stubbornly stick to the dogmatic conclusions proffered by politicians.

If you are a scientist as you claim, then this must be a deliberate deception on your part. If you are a politician claiming to be a scientist, your position makes sense. Not your conclusions, but your position.

olfraud has never claimed to be a scientist. He does claim to have three years of college level geology behind him but that is highly questionable. I do find it amusing that he made it through the first two years (the easy stuff) then when it starts to get hard he bails. That is the point where most students change their major from geology to geography, the math gets VERY hard at that transition level. The chemistry and physics you have to know to get into a graduate level program is substantial as well.

Curiously, the climatologists that these people revere, at most have a Bacelors in geography, none have a bachelors in geology

 

[Vidi]

Developer is somebody who wants to build a house in the woods.
An environmentalist is somebody who already owns house in the woods.

Which has to do with what?

My bad...I was using a shorthand, based on assuming that you would understand the world to an extent greater than you do...

You see, 'global warming' is based less on science than it is on human nature.

Now...watch carefully:

1. Politicians control vast amounts of taxpayer funds, which they have no compunction in doling out to purchase....

2. ...power.

3. If pols can convince folks that there is a crisis....power to control behavior and the economy ensues.

a. The ancient Chinese symbol for “crisis” is made up of two characters, one denoting “danger” and the other “opportunity.”

4. OK...here is the crux: 'scientists,' for the enormous most part are merely human beings, good at math and memorization...who have families to feed.

...see where this is going?

5. So, if 'scientists' go along with the politicians, they get grant$....(an allowance,sort of).

Summary:
Perspective and opinion usually depends on whose ox is being fed...human nature....so if it is be to your advantage to support the scam....

voilà! Global warming data via East Anglia!!!

Wow. Even if what you're saying is true, your "roadmap" to understanding is really really stretching.

First off drop the Chinese part, it's irrelevant. Interesting but irrelevant.


Now, this next is just hypothetical, just a question not a challenge.

Your roadmap is based on greed and power, but which is more likely? That thousands of scientists are commuting fraud on a global scale or corporations are buying off a few scientists to keep their profits from being effected by regulations?

Personally, the idea that it's an international conspiracy to commit fraud is about as realistic as any other whack job conspiracy theory.

I mean that's what we're talking about here, isn't it? A big giant conspiracy theory?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Which has to do with what?

My bad...I was using a shorthand, based on assuming that you would understand the world to an extent greater than you do...

You see, 'global warming' is based less on science than it is on human nature.

Now...watch carefully:

1. Politicians control vast amounts of taxpayer funds, which they have no compunction in doling out to purchase....

2. ...power.

3. If pols can convince folks that there is a crisis....power to control behavior and the economy ensues.

a. The ancient Chinese symbol for “crisis” is made up of two characters, one denoting “danger” and the other “opportunity.”

4. OK...here is the crux: 'scientists,' for the enormous most part are merely human beings, good at math and memorization...who have families to feed.

...see where this is going?

5. So, if 'scientists' go along with the politicians, they get grant$....(an allowance,sort of).

Summary:
Perspective and opinion usually depends on whose ox is being fed...human nature....so if it is be to your advantage to support the scam....

voilà! Global warming data via East Anglia!!!

Wow. Even if what you're saying is true, your "roadmap" to understanding is really really stretching.

First off drop the Chinese part, it's irrelevant. Interesting but irrelevant.


Now, this next is just hypothetical, just a question not a challenge.

Your roadmap is based on greed and power, but which is more likely? That thousands of scientists are commuting fraud on a global scale or corporations are buying off a few scientists to keep their profits from being effected by regulations?

Personally, the idea that it's an international conspiracy to commit fraud is about as realistic as any other whack job conspiracy theory.

I mean that's what we're talking about here, isn't it? A big giant conspiracy theory?

"In 2011, your federal government will spend $10.6 million a day on climate change. Annual expenditures will be about $4 billion on global warming research—now called climate change–despite the fact that there has been no global warming since 1998, says the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), a British educational think tank.

Billions have been wasted so far, although periods of cooling and warming have occurred naturally throughout history. Fossil fuels—Petroleum, natural gas and coal are the assigned “villains.” Yet, “no conclusive evidence shows that fossil fuels to produce energy have had any significant effect on the earth’s temperature,” GWPF concludes. In December 2010, more than 1,000 international scientists challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)."
The Black Hole of Global Warming Spending | FrontPage Magazine


The ancient Chinese symbol for “crisis” is made up of two characters, one denoting “danger” and the other “opportunity.”


vici

 

[westwall]

I also note the peak of 2010 is not in the graph.

What peak? The artificial one created by Hansens shenanigans with the temp record?

 

[westwall]

Which has to do with what?

My bad...I was using a shorthand, based on assuming that you would understand the world to an extent greater than you do...

You see, 'global warming' is based less on science than it is on human nature.

Now...watch carefully:

1. Politicians control vast amounts of taxpayer funds, which they have no compunction in doling out to purchase....

2. ...power.

3. If pols can convince folks that there is a crisis....power to control behavior and the economy ensues.

a. The ancient Chinese symbol for “crisis” is made up of two characters, one denoting “danger” and the other “opportunity.”

4. OK...here is the crux: 'scientists,' for the enormous most part are merely human beings, good at math and memorization...who have families to feed.

...see where this is going?

5. So, if 'scientists' go along with the politicians, they get grant$....(an allowance,sort of).

Summary:
Perspective and opinion usually depends on whose ox is being fed...human nature....so if it is be to your advantage to support the scam....

voilà! Global warming data via East Anglia!!!

Wow. Even if what you're saying is true, your "roadmap" to understanding is really really stretching.

First off drop the Chinese part, it's irrelevant. Interesting but irrelevant.


Now, this next is just hypothetical, just a question not a challenge.

Your roadmap is based on greed and power, but which is more likely? That thousands of scientists are commuting fraud on a global scale or corporations are buying off a few scientists to keep their profits from being effected by regulations?

Personally, the idea that it's an international conspiracy to commit fraud is about as realistic as any other whack job conspiracy theory.

I mean that's what we're talking about here, isn't it? A big giant conspiracy theory?

I suggest you take a real look at who is getting the most money to perpetrate the fraud. Look at as many sites as you can find and you will see the warmists get orders of magnitude more money than the sceptics who for the most part are volunteers making NOTHING. All the scientists and scientific organisations are DEPENDANT on the taxpayer monies to keep rolling in. To the tune of 100 billion dollars over the last 20 years.

And oil companies jumped on the "green" bandwagon long ago. ENRON (you remember them right?) was a MAJOR player in the Kyoto accords. You see they figured out that they could make loads of cash for simply shuffling paper around...far better than actually having to produce something.

If anyone is shilling for the oil companies it is the likes of Chris, olfraud and all the other warmists out there. The oil companies and companies like Goldman Sachs, stand to make trillions of dollars for doing nothing more than shuffling paper and making the taxpayers pay through the nose for something that should be cheap as hell.

Yes, it is a big fraud. And the oil companies want it to happen. YOU need to wake up and see what the hell is going on around you.