Freedom from ME oil.

I truely beleive that we can overcome our need for energy if we engage in GOOD FAITH debate and work to find areas to compromise. I think nuclear is one of those areas, with reprocessing spent fuel we could eliminate 90% of the waste and have a "green" powersource that is both tested and reliable.
 
Lets just get the fuck off enemy oil by NOT buying it anymore! Let's do that NOW. The free marketplace will come up with viable, economic alternatives real fast, and we'll bankrupt our enemies instead of financing them.

We need "country of origin" labels on the gas pumps, like we have for food, for starters. Let us vote with our dollars!

But more broadly, without government subsidies most alternatives aren't viable, and most ALL of them are actually worse for the environment than evil fossil fuels!

NO ONE wants a polluted planet. That fallacy is an ad-hom card the EnviroNazis love to play. If you're against AGW, you're a "denier" and like pollution. You don't care about the planet. All that rot. It's just typical attempts to quash debate. To squelch observations and even data. NONE of that is part of science, or the quest for knowledge.

The truth is, we do not know nor can we ever know all the effects of pollution. The ecosystem is so complex, our understanding of it is still in its infancy.

Currently the focus of the AGW theories is on CO2 emissions. Well, that's certainly a convenient devil, it's at least what, 18th on the list of greenhouse gases? Far behind the thousands of times more potent and dangerous NF3? But CO2 IS the one which is emitted by combustion of fossil fuels -- that evil oil and gas stuff.

Well, if the science is settled and there's no room for debate, let's get serious about it! Let's immediately ban ALL manufacture and use of CO2 for entertainment purposes -- fake "smoke" at rock concerts, sporting events, wrestling events, Hollywood special effects... Soda pop carbonation, paint ball guns, any and all toys... also for uses where it's been superseded, such as water treatment, fire fighting.... If it's REALLY so bad these are the cheapest, easiest and fastest ways to stop millions of tons of it from going into the atmosphere every year.

Also while we're at it, let's get that NF3 stopped by redesigning manufacturing processes so they don't produce and emit this highly dangerous for the environment gas. NF3 -- nitrogen trifluoride -- is a compound used in manufacture of flat panel televisions, computer displays, microcircuits, solar panels and is 17,000 times more potent greenhouse gas than CO2. Also stays in the atmosphere 800 times longer than CO2, yet you never hear anything about it, because it's not a product of fossil fuels combustion.

THESE are things they would do, and be calling for, if they really truly themselves believed in their own cause. But they don't, the cause is simply an excuse to gain more control over people's lives and line the pockets of special interests such as GE.

The "science was settled" that the Jews were inferior and had to go, too. What a convenient devil they were to Nazi Germany! Those who fail to learn the hard lessons of history are doomed to repeat them.

By far the most towering idiocy of environmentalism is the harm to the environment most all "alternatives" do:

Lighting's dirty little secret: The swirly florescent bulbs that will by law be required, as incandescent bulbs are banned? Mercury. Where's it all gonna go, from the billions of these discarded? Into the groundwater! Love it!

Wind power's dirty little secret: It takes 4 barrels of oil per year, per wind turbine, for the gearbox. And another five barrels for the transformer below each turbine. And these turbines leak and sling this oil. Great for the groundwater!

Multiply those figures times a million, two million wind turbines planned -- and you see why oil magnates like Pickens are pushing this. They stand to sell millions of barrels of oil!

Dirty little secret of solar: The production of solar panels involves nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) emissions be released. NF3 is about 17,000 times more potent a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. The concentration of it in the atmosphere has increased 20 fold during the last two decades by its use in manufacturing processes. The level is increasing 11 percent per year.

The weaker CO2 stays in the atmosphere up to 100 years. NF3 stays in the atmosphere for 700 years or more.

Dirty little secret of Hydrogen: Water Vapor is the product of combustion. Sounds great, right? But -- Water vapor is far and away the #1 greenhouse gas. This according to the IPCC and every other scientist on both sides of the issue. It's the one thing they do ALL agree on. Hmmm...

Dirty little secrets of Ethanol: Yeah, it's "cleaner" if you believe CO2 is really really bad, because it does produce less when combusted. But it also produces the definite pollutant and definite poison to all living things -- CO (Carbon Monoxide) 100 times more than gasoline! Also, it takes 1,200 gallons of water to make a gallon of this crap!

Cleaner little secret of gasoline powered internal combustion: Today's engines put out 95% fewer emissions than their 1970 counterparts!

It's what they DON'T tell us that really winds up hurting the environment in the long haul.

9 barrels a YEAR? That's nothing.

No one talks about Hyperion nuclear batteries. They been used for decades. They can't "melt down" because if they over heat, they shut off.

Hyperion Power Generation
 
That would be nice, but the liberals (in name only, of course) keep us dependent on foreign oil. Here are a few examples:

1. Coal - too dirty
2. Nuclear - too dangerous
3. Hydroelectric - harms environment
4. Solar - Environmentalists Against the Mojave Desert Solar Plant
5. Wind - Ted out to blow down windmills

I stopped reading right here... The bulk of foriegn oil used in the United States is used for transportation... so cars, trucks, etc. How many of those sources you listed can we readily use to alieviate our current demand for oil to power these cars and trucks? I mean can nuclear, hydroclectic, solar, and wind power a combustion engine? However, both nuclear energy and coal are great for electricity but until we have more electric cars we're stuck using oil. I'll blame republicans, democrats, oil companies, car companies, the government in general, and the free market for our dependence on fossil fuels.
 
Last edited:
That would be nice, but the liberals (in name only, of course) keep us dependent on foreign oil. Here are a few examples:

1. Coal - too dirty
2. Nuclear - too dangerous
3. Hydroelectric - harms environment
4. Solar - Environmentalists Against the Mojave Desert Solar Plant
5. Wind - Ted out to blow down windmills

I stopped reading right here... The bulk of foriegn oil used in the United States is used for transportation... so cars, trucks, etc. How many of those sources you listed can we readily use to alieviate our current demand for oil to power these cars and trucks? I mean can nuclear, hydroclectic, solar, and wind power a combustion engine? However, both nuclear energy and coal are great for electricity but until we have more electric cars we're stuck using oil. I'll blame republicans, democrats, oil companies, car companies, the government in general, and the free market for our dependence on fossil fuels.





New nuke power plants actually produce HYDROGEN as a BY-PRODUCT! How cool is that?
 
Lets just get the fuck off enemy oil by NOT buying it anymore! Let's do that NOW. The free marketplace will come up with viable, economic alternatives real fast, and we'll bankrupt our enemies instead of financing them.

We need "country of origin" labels on the gas pumps, like we have for food, for starters. Let us vote with our dollars!

But more broadly, without government subsidies most alternatives aren't viable, and most ALL of them are actually worse for the environment than evil fossil fuels!

NO ONE wants a polluted planet. That fallacy is an ad-hom card the EnviroNazis love to play. If you're against AGW, you're a "denier" and like pollution. You don't care about the planet. All that rot. It's just typical attempts to quash debate. To squelch observations and even data. NONE of that is part of science, or the quest for knowledge.

The truth is, we do not know nor can we ever know all the effects of pollution. The ecosystem is so complex, our understanding of it is still in its infancy.

Currently the focus of the AGW theories is on CO2 emissions. Well, that's certainly a convenient devil, it's at least what, 18th on the list of greenhouse gases? Far behind the thousands of times more potent and dangerous NF3? But CO2 IS the one which is emitted by combustion of fossil fuels -- that evil oil and gas stuff.

Well, if the science is settled and there's no room for debate, let's get serious about it! Let's immediately ban ALL manufacture and use of CO2 for entertainment purposes -- fake "smoke" at rock concerts, sporting events, wrestling events, Hollywood special effects... Soda pop carbonation, paint ball guns, any and all toys... also for uses where it's been superseded, such as water treatment, fire fighting.... If it's REALLY so bad these are the cheapest, easiest and fastest ways to stop millions of tons of it from going into the atmosphere every year.

Also while we're at it, let's get that NF3 stopped by redesigning manufacturing processes so they don't produce and emit this highly dangerous for the environment gas. NF3 -- nitrogen trifluoride -- is a compound used in manufacture of flat panel televisions, computer displays, microcircuits, solar panels and is 17,000 times more potent greenhouse gas than CO2. Also stays in the atmosphere 800 times longer than CO2, yet you never hear anything about it, because it's not a product of fossil fuels combustion.

THESE are things they would do, and be calling for, if they really truly themselves believed in their own cause. But they don't, the cause is simply an excuse to gain more control over people's lives and line the pockets of special interests such as GE.

The "science was settled" that the Jews were inferior and had to go, too. What a convenient devil they were to Nazi Germany! Those who fail to learn the hard lessons of history are doomed to repeat them.

By far the most towering idiocy of environmentalism is the harm to the environment most all "alternatives" do:

Lighting's dirty little secret: The swirly florescent bulbs that will by law be required, as incandescent bulbs are banned? Mercury. Where's it all gonna go, from the billions of these discarded? Into the groundwater! Love it!

Wind power's dirty little secret: It takes 4 barrels of oil per year, per wind turbine, for the gearbox. And another five barrels for the transformer below each turbine. And these turbines leak and sling this oil. Great for the groundwater!

Multiply those figures times a million, two million wind turbines planned -- and you see why oil magnates like Pickens are pushing this. They stand to sell millions of barrels of oil!

Dirty little secret of solar: The production of solar panels involves nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) emissions be released. NF3 is about 17,000 times more potent a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. The concentration of it in the atmosphere has increased 20 fold during the last two decades by its use in manufacturing processes. The level is increasing 11 percent per year.

The weaker CO2 stays in the atmosphere up to 100 years. NF3 stays in the atmosphere for 700 years or more.

Dirty little secret of Hydrogen: Water Vapor is the product of combustion. Sounds great, right? But -- Water vapor is far and away the #1 greenhouse gas. This according to the IPCC and every other scientist on both sides of the issue. It's the one thing they do ALL agree on. Hmmm...

Dirty little secrets of Ethanol: Yeah, it's "cleaner" if you believe CO2 is really really bad, because it does produce less when combusted. But it also produces the definite pollutant and definite poison to all living things -- CO (Carbon Monoxide) 100 times more than gasoline! Also, it takes 1,200 gallons of water to make a gallon of this crap!

Cleaner little secret of gasoline powered internal combustion: Today's engines put out 95% fewer emissions than their 1970 counterparts!

It's what they DON'T tell us that really winds up hurting the environment in the long haul.

9 barrels a YEAR? That's nothing.

No one talks about Hyperion nuclear batteries. They been used for decades. They can't "melt down" because if they over heat, they shut off.

Hyperion Power Generation





Don't know about the Hyperion unless it is that thing thats about the size of a large shed. I don't quite get how it works.
 
That would be nice, but the liberals (in name only, of course) keep us dependent on foreign oil. Here are a few examples:

1. Coal - too dirty
2. Nuclear - too dangerous
3. Hydroelectric - harms environment
4. Solar - Environmentalists Against the Mojave Desert Solar Plant
5. Wind - Ted out to blow down windmills

I stopped reading right here... The bulk of foriegn oil used in the United States is used for transportation... so cars, trucks, etc. How many of those sources you listed can we readily use to alieviate our current demand for oil to power these cars and trucks? I mean can nuclear, hydroclectic, solar, and wind power a combustion engine? However, both nuclear energy and coal are great for electricity but until we have more electric cars we're stuck using oil. I'll blame republicans, democrats, oil companies, car companies, the government in general, and the free market for our dependence on fossil fuels.





New nuke power plants actually produce HYDROGEN as a BY-PRODUCT! How cool is that?

There's no way the environuts would allow us to use something so wonderful as nuclear power, it's too dangerous remember? Forget that it could solve a lot of our energy problems.
 
I stopped reading right here... The bulk of foriegn oil used in the United States is used for transportation... so cars, trucks, etc. How many of those sources you listed can we readily use to alieviate our current demand for oil to power these cars and trucks? I mean can nuclear, hydroclectic, solar, and wind power a combustion engine? However, both nuclear energy and coal are great for electricity but until we have more electric cars we're stuck using oil. I'll blame republicans, democrats, oil companies, car companies, the government in general, and the free market for our dependence on fossil fuels.





New nuke power plants actually produce HYDROGEN as a BY-PRODUCT! How cool is that?

There's no way the environuts would allow us to use something so wonderful as nuclear power, it's too dangerous remember? Forget that it could solve a lot of our energy problems.
a power plant that creates hydrogen as a byproduct would be SO cool
power the cars with hydrogen and the homes and business with the electricity
 
New nuke power plants actually produce HYDROGEN as a BY-PRODUCT! How cool is that?

There's no way the environuts would allow us to use something so wonderful as nuclear power, it's too dangerous remember? Forget that it could solve a lot of our energy problems.
a power plant that creates hydrogen as a byproduct would be SO cool
power the cars with hydrogen and the homes and business with the electricity

Yep ... but then they'd claim that hydrogen is what's destroying the environment and that we are all going to be mutants in 5 years.
 
There's no way the environuts would allow us to use something so wonderful as nuclear power, it's too dangerous remember? Forget that it could solve a lot of our energy problems.
a power plant that creates hydrogen as a byproduct would be SO cool
power the cars with hydrogen and the homes and business with the electricity

Yep ... but then they'd claim that hydrogen is what's destroying the environment and that we are all going to be mutants in 5 years.
oh, no doubt
they arent for saving the enviroment so much as they want to destroy our economy
 
Lets just get the fuck off enemy oil by NOT buying it anymore! Let's do that NOW. The free marketplace will come up with viable, economic alternatives real fast, and we'll bankrupt our enemies instead of financing them.

We need "country of origin" labels on the gas pumps, like we have for food, for starters. Let us vote with our dollars!

But more broadly, without government subsidies most alternatives aren't viable, and most ALL of them are actually worse for the environment than evil fossil fuels!

NO ONE wants a polluted planet. That fallacy is an ad-hom card the EnviroNazis love to play. If you're against AGW, you're a "denier" and like pollution. You don't care about the planet. All that rot. It's just typical attempts to quash debate. To squelch observations and even data. NONE of that is part of science, or the quest for knowledge.

The truth is, we do not know nor can we ever know all the effects of pollution. The ecosystem is so complex, our understanding of it is still in its infancy.

Currently the focus of the AGW theories is on CO2 emissions. Well, that's certainly a convenient devil, it's at least what, 18th on the list of greenhouse gases? Far behind the thousands of times more potent and dangerous NF3? But CO2 IS the one which is emitted by combustion of fossil fuels -- that evil oil and gas stuff.

Well, if the science is settled and there's no room for debate, let's get serious about it! Let's immediately ban ALL manufacture and use of CO2 for entertainment purposes -- fake "smoke" at rock concerts, sporting events, wrestling events, Hollywood special effects... Soda pop carbonation, paint ball guns, any and all toys... also for uses where it's been superseded, such as water treatment, fire fighting.... If it's REALLY so bad these are the cheapest, easiest and fastest ways to stop millions of tons of it from going into the atmosphere every year.

Also while we're at it, let's get that NF3 stopped by redesigning manufacturing processes so they don't produce and emit this highly dangerous for the environment gas. NF3 -- nitrogen trifluoride -- is a compound used in manufacture of flat panel televisions, computer displays, microcircuits, solar panels and is 17,000 times more potent greenhouse gas than CO2. Also stays in the atmosphere 800 times longer than CO2, yet you never hear anything about it, because it's not a product of fossil fuels combustion.

THESE are things they would do, and be calling for, if they really truly themselves believed in their own cause. But they don't, the cause is simply an excuse to gain more control over people's lives and line the pockets of special interests such as GE.

The "science was settled" that the Jews were inferior and had to go, too. What a convenient devil they were to Nazi Germany! Those who fail to learn the hard lessons of history are doomed to repeat them.

By far the most towering idiocy of environmentalism is the harm to the environment most all "alternatives" do:

Lighting's dirty little secret: The swirly florescent bulbs that will by law be required, as incandescent bulbs are banned? Mercury. Where's it all gonna go, from the billions of these discarded? Into the groundwater! Love it!

Wind power's dirty little secret: It takes 4 barrels of oil per year, per wind turbine, for the gearbox. And another five barrels for the transformer below each turbine. And these turbines leak and sling this oil. Great for the groundwater!

Multiply those figures times a million, two million wind turbines planned -- and you see why oil magnates like Pickens are pushing this. They stand to sell millions of barrels of oil!

Dirty little secret of solar: The production of solar panels involves nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) emissions be released. NF3 is about 17,000 times more potent a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. The concentration of it in the atmosphere has increased 20 fold during the last two decades by its use in manufacturing processes. The level is increasing 11 percent per year.

The weaker CO2 stays in the atmosphere up to 100 years. NF3 stays in the atmosphere for 700 years or more.

Dirty little secret of Hydrogen: Water Vapor is the product of combustion. Sounds great, right? But -- Water vapor is far and away the #1 greenhouse gas. This according to the IPCC and every other scientist on both sides of the issue. It's the one thing they do ALL agree on. Hmmm...

Dirty little secrets of Ethanol: Yeah, it's "cleaner" if you believe CO2 is really really bad, because it does produce less when combusted. But it also produces the definite pollutant and definite poison to all living things -- CO (Carbon Monoxide) 100 times more than gasoline! Also, it takes 1,200 gallons of water to make a gallon of this crap!

Cleaner little secret of gasoline powered internal combustion: Today's engines put out 95% fewer emissions than their 1970 counterparts!

It's what they DON'T tell us that really winds up hurting the environment in the long haul.

We need "country of origin" labels on the gas pumps, like we have for food, for starters. Let us vote with our dollars!


The sad truth is that even most gas station managers do not know where thier product comes from.

There is ONE refinery that supplies all of western and most of eastern Washington. It is located in Anacortes near the canadian border. There is almost NO difference is gasoline..no matter what anyone tells you. Some companies add microscopic amounts of this or that at the refinery but it would take a nuclear physisist to detect the difference.

Most of the oil headed for refineries is sold as credits that are traded back and forth. I wonder how many people know that the north slope oil never(almost) makes it down to the lower 48. So much for OUR oil.:cuckoo:
 
Like I said even though I am pretty liberal I recognize how important abundant cheap energy is so I can get on board even for drilling more even though I was against it in the past. I think if we allow more drilling then the oil cos have to increase refinery capacity. They may also have to build one that can handle oil with a high sulfer content like a lot of Alaskan oil.
 
Lets just get the fuck off enemy oil by NOT buying it anymore! Let's do that NOW. The free marketplace will come up with viable, economic alternatives real fast, and we'll bankrupt our enemies instead of financing them.

We need "country of origin" labels on the gas pumps, like we have for food, for starters. Let us vote with our dollars!

But more broadly, without government subsidies most alternatives aren't viable, and most ALL of them are actually worse for the environment than evil fossil fuels!

NO ONE wants a polluted planet. That fallacy is an ad-hom card the EnviroNazis love to play. If you're against AGW, you're a "denier" and like pollution. You don't care about the planet. All that rot. It's just typical attempts to quash debate. To squelch observations and even data. NONE of that is part of science, or the quest for knowledge.

The truth is, we do not know nor can we ever know all the effects of pollution. The ecosystem is so complex, our understanding of it is still in its infancy.

Currently the focus of the AGW theories is on CO2 emissions. Well, that's certainly a convenient devil, it's at least what, 18th on the list of greenhouse gases? Far behind the thousands of times more potent and dangerous NF3? But CO2 IS the one which is emitted by combustion of fossil fuels -- that evil oil and gas stuff.

Well, if the science is settled and there's no room for debate, let's get serious about it! Let's immediately ban ALL manufacture and use of CO2 for entertainment purposes -- fake "smoke" at rock concerts, sporting events, wrestling events, Hollywood special effects... Soda pop carbonation, paint ball guns, any and all toys... also for uses where it's been superseded, such as water treatment, fire fighting.... If it's REALLY so bad these are the cheapest, easiest and fastest ways to stop millions of tons of it from going into the atmosphere every year.

Also while we're at it, let's get that NF3 stopped by redesigning manufacturing processes so they don't produce and emit this highly dangerous for the environment gas. NF3 -- nitrogen trifluoride -- is a compound used in manufacture of flat panel televisions, computer displays, microcircuits, solar panels and is 17,000 times more potent greenhouse gas than CO2. Also stays in the atmosphere 800 times longer than CO2, yet you never hear anything about it, because it's not a product of fossil fuels combustion.

THESE are things they would do, and be calling for, if they really truly themselves believed in their own cause. But they don't, the cause is simply an excuse to gain more control over people's lives and line the pockets of special interests such as GE.

The "science was settled" that the Jews were inferior and had to go, too. What a convenient devil they were to Nazi Germany! Those who fail to learn the hard lessons of history are doomed to repeat them.

By far the most towering idiocy of environmentalism is the harm to the environment most all "alternatives" do:

Lighting's dirty little secret: The swirly florescent bulbs that will by law be required, as incandescent bulbs are banned? Mercury. Where's it all gonna go, from the billions of these discarded? Into the groundwater! Love it!

Wind power's dirty little secret: It takes 4 barrels of oil per year, per wind turbine, for the gearbox. And another five barrels for the transformer below each turbine. And these turbines leak and sling this oil. Great for the groundwater!

Multiply those figures times a million, two million wind turbines planned -- and you see why oil magnates like Pickens are pushing this. They stand to sell millions of barrels of oil!

Dirty little secret of solar: The production of solar panels involves nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) emissions be released. NF3 is about 17,000 times more potent a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. The concentration of it in the atmosphere has increased 20 fold during the last two decades by its use in manufacturing processes. The level is increasing 11 percent per year.

The weaker CO2 stays in the atmosphere up to 100 years. NF3 stays in the atmosphere for 700 years or more.

Dirty little secret of Hydrogen: Water Vapor is the product of combustion. Sounds great, right? But -- Water vapor is far and away the #1 greenhouse gas. This according to the IPCC and every other scientist on both sides of the issue. It's the one thing they do ALL agree on. Hmmm...

Dirty little secrets of Ethanol: Yeah, it's "cleaner" if you believe CO2 is really really bad, because it does produce less when combusted. But it also produces the definite pollutant and definite poison to all living things -- CO (Carbon Monoxide) 100 times more than gasoline! Also, it takes 1,200 gallons of water to make a gallon of this crap!

Cleaner little secret of gasoline powered internal combustion: Today's engines put out 95% fewer emissions than their 1970 counterparts!

It's what they DON'T tell us that really winds up hurting the environment in the long haul.

9 barrels a YEAR? That's nothing.

No one talks about Hyperion nuclear batteries. They been used for decades. They can't "melt down" because if they over heat, they shut off.

Hyperion Power Generation





Don't know about the Hyperion unless it is that thing thats about the size of a large shed. I don't quite get how it works.

Hyperion Power Generation

They currently have a three year back order. One reactor can provide electric power to 20 to 30 thousand homes at a cost of about 200 dollars per year. Also, there is three to five times more oil in Canada and the Western United States than all of the middle east combined. The difference is oil formed into easy to get at discrete pools in the middle east. Here, it has to be "extracted".

Also,

the primary initial application which would be providing cheaper and more effective heat for oil-sand and oil shale oil extraction. Over 2 trillion barrels of oil is available in Canada and the United states in the form of oilshale or oilsand.

Hyperion uranium hydride nuclear battery update

Love those scientists. Don't understand why American Christians keep calling them names.
 
Wind power's dirty little secret: It takes 4 barrels of oil per year, per wind turbine, for the gearbox. And another five barrels for the transformer below each turbine. And these turbines leak and sling this oil. Great for the groundwater!

Multiply those figures times a million, two million wind turbines planned -- and you see why oil magnates like Pickens are pushing this. They stand to sell millions of barrels of oil!


Millions of wind turbines? Millions?
 
Wind power's dirty little secret: It takes 4 barrels of oil per year, per wind turbine, for the gearbox. And another five barrels for the transformer below each turbine. And these turbines leak and sling this oil. Great for the groundwater!

Multiply those figures times a million, two million wind turbines planned -- and you see why oil magnates like Pickens are pushing this. They stand to sell millions of barrels of oil!


Millions of wind turbines? Millions?

You do not know much about machinery. All seals fail eventually. With proper maintanance and inspections the leakage can be reduced to near zero.

You concern is false.
 
Like I said before I have even softened my stance on new drilling........That's a big change for me but I fell like it HAS to be done but OTHER things MUST also be done. We need to build wind farms, we need to build solar panels, we need to use hydro and tidal power plants, and we NEED our gov't to fund research to the logical conclusion of getting off of petrolium based fuels.
 
Like I said before I have even softened my stance on new drilling........That's a big change for me but I fell like it HAS to be done but OTHER things MUST also be done. We need to build wind farms, we need to build solar panels, we need to use hydro and tidal power plants, and we NEED our gov't to fund research to the logical conclusion of getting off of petrolium based fuels.
yup and they can build hydro plants without even needing to build a dam
they can place the turbines in the river and the flow of the river will turn it
not at the speed of a damn, but enough to produce electricity
 

Forum List

Back
Top