Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Originally posted by Hannitized
Holy shit! Now she's not even responsible if she gets pregnant?
Damn men should know how to control their sperm!! Bastards!
Originally posted by ajwps
Please be so kind as to point out in the US Constitution just where it says that women have no right to have abortions? That would be a real coup alright.
By the way, the Constitution does give the right to the Supreme Court to define the meanings in this document and to pass make decisions that affect all American's lives.
Originally posted by ajwps
Actually I did not portray fatherhood and/or child slavery in any way to be similar or fact.
But the fact is that abortion is probably as old as recorded history and no amount of mental gymnastics about who decides what and when is moot.
Originally posted by NewGuy
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by NewGuy
The supreme court has no authority over the Constitution.
Therefore, they are invalid in making such a decision.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In your usual fashion, you have tried to take a complex subtopic and derail the entire issue because you have no reality based answer to it.
I SAID the supreme court has no authority over the Constitution.
YOU want to have me prove something different when you cannot adress the issue instead. You like to introduce tangents to threads when you know you cannot deal with the discussion so people choose to not read because of your chaos.
Open another thread, or wait until this topic is over before introducing more.
Prove it.
The Constitution says it is the highest authority to the land and ALL judges and courts must submit to its authority.
That point right there makes yours stupid and invalid. Add the Amendment addition clause and you simply have a process to DEFINE the Constitution where no set rule has been determined.
IE: The Ammendments in the Bill of Rights were CLARIFICATION as to what power the CITIZENS had over the government. Since the COnstitution gave citizens the highest authority over government branches, the Bill of Rights defined those powers.
-YET IT HAD TO BE IN CONTEXT WITH THE CONSTITUTION or else it would be invalid.
Prove this is NOT the case, using only the Constitution, and you will have won the point.
Since that is a physical impossibility, I await your typical name calling and topic switching.
This makes anything the supreme court says regarding abortion, when the Constitution claims murder illegal, USELESS.
Am I needing to explain the birds and bees here?Originally posted by ajwps
Who carries the responsibility in the process of impregnation?
I'd say my husband had it pretty hard while I was pregnant, emotionally and physically. Then again, he's a responsible man. He had to work, take care of me, cook, clean, and get everything ready for the babies. I had heartburn and morning sickness. Yes, I had to give birth, the whole time he hovered over me worried I would die.There is an old saying, "men have the hard and painful part in the act of conception while the woman has the easy part in simply carrying and delivering the baby in torment!"
Originally posted by dilloduck
You made the comparison between a baby and a potential farm hand. Is this how you believe fathers view thier children?
The point is not moot simply because you say it is. Abortions will occur. The discussion is the ramifications of it's legality , who is responsible, whose rights should be considered,etc. You act as if pregnancy is something a man does TO a woman. Have you ever considered it is something he helps her achieve? If you are tired of the mental gymnastics, I suggest you stop posting on this thread.
Originally posted by dilloduck
You act as if pregnancy is something a man does TO a woman. Have you ever considered it is something he helps her achieve?
Originally posted by dilloduck
You act as if pregnancy is something a man does TO a woman. Have you ever considered it is something he helps her achieve? If you are tired of the mental gymnastics, I suggest you stop posting on this thread.
Originally posted by Hannitized
Mr. Shawn? I'm "Hannitized" not "Hannity". But thanks for the compliment. I need to keep MY thoughts straight? I was going off of YOUR post. One paragraph right after another.
I hope you were going off on my post in a moral way!
You even asked "is this what you wish to be responsible for during your lifetime?" meaning (and this is how it looks to me) that if abortion should be made illegal again, then women are going to go around having abortions with coat hangers and it would be the anti-abortionists fault. Is that not what you were saying? Why not blame the woman whose allowing a coat hanger to be shoved up in her?
Next line you want to let women be responsible for their own actions, well hell, if they're actions lead them to a coat hanger up their ass then shouldn't they be responsible for it?
It doesn't matter who guided the hanger, they allowed a hanger to be used. So first it's the anti-abortionists fault, then the lay people, and the responsiblility never falls on the women who did this? Way to "pass the buck". I'm glad I'm female, I don't have to take responsibility for shit. WooHoo!
I am really getting OFF on your thought processes here.
1) Yes if the anti-life (anti-abortionists) get the Wade vs Roe law reversed, women will just go back to back-room abortions and yes those who reverse these laws will ultimately be responsible for women's deaths. If you think abortion in the USA will stop because the law changes, you should as well believe in Tinkerbell.
2) Women are not concerned with what or who shoves anything 'up them' but simply for whatever reason drives a woman to an abortion will remain the same.
3) Everyone (men and women) take responsibilty every day for what they do and that includes undergoing abortion. And yes, as a woman, you are responsible for any actions that you take which harms other human beings. Its just that when it comes to abortion, no one knows if there is harm done as the forming fetus, according to Genesis 2:9 does not have a human life during its time in the womb.
Blame the fetus....
So, more women had abortions because they were illegal? Is this what you're saying?
Statistically that is correct.
Originally posted by ajwps
....Otherwise he should not have caused a woman to have to carry and incubate a possible human being.
Originally posted by ajwps
Originally posted by Hannitized
Mr. Shawn? I'm "Hannitized" not "Hannity". But thanks for the compliment. I need to keep MY thoughts straight? I was going off of YOUR post. One paragraph right after another.
I hope you were going off on my post in a moral way!
You even asked "is this what you wish to be responsible for during your lifetime?" meaning (and this is how it looks to me) that if abortion should be made illegal again, then women are going to go around having abortions with coat hangers and it would be the anti-abortionists fault. Is that not what you were saying? Why not blame the woman whose allowing a coat hanger to be shoved up in her?
Next line you want to let women be responsible for their own actions, well hell, if they're actions lead them to a coat hanger up their ass then shouldn't they be responsible for it?
It doesn't matter who guided the hanger, they allowed a hanger to be used. So first it's the anti-abortionists fault, then the lay people, and the responsiblility never falls on the women who did this? Way to "pass the buck". I'm glad I'm female, I don't have to take responsibility for shit. WooHoo!
I am really getting OFF on your thought processes here.
1) Yes if the anti-life (anti-abortionists) get the Wade vs Roe law reversed, women will just go back to back-room abortions and yes those who reverse these laws will ultimately be responsible for women's deaths. If you think abortion in the USA will stop because the law changes, you should as well believe in Tinkerbell.
2) Women are not concerned with what or who shoves anything 'up them' but simply for whatever reason drives a woman to an abortion will remain the same.
3) Everyone (men and women) take responsibilty every day for what they do and that includes undergoing abortion. And yes, as a woman, you are responsible for any actions that you take which harms other human beings. Its just that when it comes to abortion, no one knows if there is harm done as the forming fetus, according to Genesis 2:9 does not have a human life during its time in the womb.
Blame the fetus....
So, more women had abortions because they were illegal? Is this what you're saying?
Statistically that is correct.
NO ONE KNOWS IF HARM IS DONE TO THE FETUS??????
Originally posted by freeandfun1
In the last sex ed class I had several years ago, I understood that a woman had to spread her legs to get pregnant. So my point is, if the decision to have sex is a woman's, and then if the decision on whether or not to take a fetus to term is the woman's, then the responsibility for the child that results from HER decisions should also be the woman's.
So my question is clearly, why is there a double standard. Why does the woman have all the rights but yet the men have all the responsibilities. It is a very simple question.
I think that while the child/baby/fetus, what have you, is in the woman, it is her responsibility to see that it is carried to full term (unless she were to get an abortion) and also to have a healthy baby. Granted I understand that sometimes a baby is born with handicaps that have nothing to do with the mother being irresponsible in any way i.e. drinking, smoking, drugs, etc. I don't think the man can do much in that sense seeing as that the baby is developing inside the woman.
If the baby is born, it is now both the man and the woman's responsibility because the baby is now outside of the woman's body and now the man has access to be responsible over the future of the baby as well. Hence child support. But this is just my opinion.
Originally posted by NewGuy
[The Constitution says it is the highest authority to the land and ALL judges and courts must submit to its authority.
That point right there makes yours stupid and invalid. Add the Amendment addition clause and you simply have a process to DEFINE the Constitution where no set rule has been determined.
IE: The Ammendments in the Bill of Rights were CLARIFICATION as to what power the CITIZENS had over the government. Since the COnstitution gave citizens the highest authority over government branches, the Bill of Rights defined those powers.
-YET IT HAD TO BE IN CONTEXT WITH THE CONSTITUTION or else it would be invalid.
Prove this is NOT the case, using only the Constitution, and you will have won the point.
Since that is a physical impossibility, I await your typical name calling and topic switching.
This makes anything the supreme court says regarding abortion, when the Constitution claims murder illegal, USELESS. [/B]
Originally posted by brneyedgrl80
Here is something I wrote earlier in this thread that may help answer your question:
:Originally posted by NewGuy
The Constitution established the Supreme Court as the highest court in the United States. The authority of the Court originates from Article III of the U.S. Constitution and its jurisdiction is set out by statute in Title 28 of the U.S. Code.
One of the Supreme Courts most important responsibilities is to decide cases that raise questions of constitutional interpretation. The Court decides if a law or government action violates the Constitution. This is known as judicial review and enables the Court to invalidate both federal and state laws when they conflict with the Constitution. Since the Supreme Court stands as the ultimate authority in constitutional interpretation, its decisions can be changed only by another Supreme Court decision or by a constitutional amendment
Where ignorance is bliss, Tis folly to be wise.
ATTRIBUTION: Thomas Gray (17161771)
It still does not answer the double standard question. The guy has no say but responsibility, the womany has all the say but if she doesn't want it, she doesn't have to take responsibility. That is a double standard. Either both parties are equal in their responsibilities and their rights or they are not. Women want it both ways and that is wrong. It is a double standard.
Originally posted by freeandfun1
I am not sure how you don't see the double, triple or whatever, standard.
Decision 1 - Have sex or not.
Woman decides yes.
Man decides yes.
Woman: 1
Man: 1
Decision 2 - Take fetus to term or not
Woman decides yes.
Man decides. . . . no, no, no, the man has no say oops!
Woman: 2
Man: 1
Decision 3 - to keep the child or give up for adoption
Woman decides yes.
Man decides. . . . no, no, no, the man has no say oops!
Woman: 3
Man: 1
Decision 4 - Man in child's life or not
Woman decides yes.
Man decides yes or no
Woman: 4
Man: 2
Decision 5 - Man pays child support whether he decides to be in child's life or not
Woman decides yes.
Man decides. . . . no, no, no, the man has no say oops!
Woman: 5
Man: 2
Now there are five decisions the woman gets to make and only two for the man.
You focus on the 9 months but then you equate that to 18 or more years of child support the man has to pay. In my opinion, the man should take precautions not to get a woman pregnant. Especially one he does not plan to marry. But at the same time, I look at the above outline and I see five decions being made by the woman and only two by the man. If women are equal, then shouldn't the decisions have equal weight? If so, then it is obvious the woman's responsibility should be more than the man's. She is the one that was able to make the most decisions along the way. She is the one that is responsible for her body and what it brings forth.
Originally posted by NewGuy
By your new math, what happens when 3 guys rob a bank and two hold weapons?
Do you only charge 2 and say the third was "just along for the ride"?
Old Testament scripture does not bear you out on your version of justice.
