Fact checking the Fox debate


Somehow I kew it wouldn't be TDM doing the actual "fact-checking".
Instead she relied on a rag like the Post
:lol:


You're dismissed, fool.

Upon a second look at your post I think you're trying to say that it isnt a Post link because it has the words "FoxNews" and "WSJ" in it.

That makes you triple-stupid.
It's not only a Post link, it's a Post BLOG link.

Make that quadruple
:lol:



oh....


and, :fu:
 
“The fact is that more people have been put on food stamps by Barack Obama than any president in American history.” — Gingrich
We have examined this issue before, giving Gingrich a Pinocchio for this statement.
This is an example of taking a fact — an all-time high for food stamp recipients — and taking it out of context. The president is struggling with the aftermath of an economic situation he inherited, while building on food stamp changes that preceded his tenure.

Just cut to the chase and blame Boosh :eusa_eh:
 
“The fact is that more people have been put on food stamps by Barack Obama than any president in American history.” — Gingrich
We have examined this issue before, giving Gingrich a Pinocchio for this statement.
This is an example of taking a fact — an all-time high for food stamp recipients — and taking it out of context. The president is struggling with the aftermath of an economic situation he inherited, while building on food stamp changes that preceded his tenure.
Inherited? How about invented. Before he could print paper into money with ink and print more food stamps, he first had to have a scapegoat. By threatening businesses and business owners with higher taxes tailored specifically to their gross income, he made the business sector very, very nervous before he took office.

He wanted chaos and nothing but, in what was left of the financial sector after al Qaeda sent airplanes into the World Trade Center--and he got it.

He took over banks, to let them know he was in full control of them, and since it was just a throw money away deal to pals, he ignored the fact that they gave themselves nice fat bonuses with the tax cash Obama forced American taxpayers to give up.

He wanted to finish off America to butter up the Muslims--and he almost got it, except he couldn't wangle his way out of the war with the military breathing down his neck, so he threatened and rearranged their ranks to get their obedience to his whim--and he got it.

To show the world how he could crush America, he invented a story called "Mean, evil, racist, and bad business America," and apologized for its wrongs in Europe before his hundred days were up, and he farted all over the Queen of England by hurting her feelings over a gift after she treated him like royalty in her own home. Why didn't he just Joe Palooka her in public like he wanted to before he got there, prejudicial agenda to take her down a few pegs up his sleeve?

He wanted chaos for America internationally--and he got it.

When somebody doesn't want to pay something who's on his goody-goody list, he cancels their debt, leaving the American taxpayer holding the tab and the interest it accrued when his party granted moneys that were absent in the Treasury but not absent at the printing presses.

Sheeze, Synth, I'd like to sympathize with your devoted politics, but I'm sitting out here in America wondering how people get through the day with no one to look up to, with America being among the president's damned to hell on account of events that took place over 200 years ago, and in some cases, 350 years ago by people who weren't even colonials.

Obama's game was "blame the other guy." Now 3 years have passed, and he's into his 4th. But not to worry. His blame-game shell game always has a peanut under the shell. The new salvo will be blaming Republicans again, and he will go for his old standby Nancy Pelosi to puke niceties to the American people while she rewards her piggy friends while he points his finger at Republicans to take blame for his failure to treat America like anything but his personal fiefdom.


:clap2:
 
Dittohead Pub dupe circle jerk? There was no Booosh Depression? LOL!


If that's all you got out of this entire thread, or last night's debate for that matter, give me back my oxygen because you're not worth it.

:cuckoo:


I care deeply about your brainwashed personal insult. LOL!

Please note that even now, some Dems always vote with Puubs, while Nazi style bought off Pubs always vote lockstep. Bring back a real filibuster. This pubcrappe is ruining the country.

The "jobs bills" Reid blocks all just roll back consumer and environmental protections, and are just politicking and electioneering for the dupes, and the Pubs knew they never had a chance, and wouldn't have produced any jobs for years...just by polluting and screwing people.
 
Dittohead Pub dupe circle jerk? There was no Booosh Depression? LOL!


If that's all you got out of this entire thread, or last night's debate for that matter, give me back my oxygen because you're not worth it.

:cuckoo:


I care deeply about your brainwashed personal insult. LOL!

Please note that even now, some Dems always vote with Puubs, while Nazi style bought off Pubs always vote lockstep. Bring back a real filibuster. This pubcrappe is ruining the country.

The "jobs bills" Reid blocks all just roll back consumer and environmental protections, and are just politicking and electioneering for the dupes, and the Pubs knew they never had a chance, and wouldn't have produced any jobs for years...just by polluting and screwing people.

First paragraph can be switched around to fit both parties, depending on the circumstances.

2nd paragraph: Why not pass something and see?
:eusa_eh:
 
You need to do a little fact checking of your own.

Harry Reid | Jobs Bill Blocked | Mitch McConnell | The Daily Caller


"For all of President Obama’s insistence that Congress must “pass this bill now,” and Democrats’ assurances that they have the votes necessary to pass it, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was in no mood to vote on the president’s jobs-creation bill Tuesday afternoon.

Reid blocked a vote on Obama’s jobs bill after Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell made a motion to add it as an amendment to a bill being heard on the floor. That bill was an effort to put pressure on China to allow its currency to appreciate.

McConnell said earlier that given Obama’s insistence on passing his jobs bill quickly, he wanted to put the Senate on the record.

“Twelve times the president has asked us over the last few weeks to vote on what he calls his jobs bill now,” McConnell said. “I don’t think the president is saying here he wants an extensive debate on it. I think he’s saying he wants a vote on it. And I want to disabuse him of the notion that we’re not willing to vote on it.”


An early vote on the $447 billion jobs bill would have likely ended in embarrassment for the White House. Republicans are sure to oppose it as a whole, and Senate Democrats want to take a closer look at the bill, possibly proposing alternate payment methods.

Reid called the motion a “charade” and “ridiculous on its face,” adding the Senate will have a full debate on the jobs bill later. Reid has indicated that the president’s jobs bill will be brought before the Senate sometime this month."

Note that "this month" was October 2011. Has Harry brought his party's president's jobs bill up for a vote yet?

From "The Hill":
Senate blocks new Obama jobs bill


By Alexander Bolton and Josiah Ryan - 10/20/11 09:28 PM ET


For the second time in two weeks, Senate Republicans voted in unison to block “jobs” legislation, which the Obama administration and Senate Democratic leaders have made central to their agenda.

Hey moron, did you just read the headline or did you actually read the article. You're really not very good at this are you? You missed some great quotes like:

"The majority of Democrats then blocked a second "jobs" measure offered by Republicans."


We were arguing whether Obama put forth a jobs bill, and whether Senate Republicans blocked a vote on it.

Pay attention!
 
From "The Hill":
Senate blocks new Obama jobs bill


By Alexander Bolton and Josiah Ryan - 10/20/11 09:28 PM ET


For the second time in two weeks, Senate Republicans voted in unison to block “jobs” legislation, which the Obama administration and Senate Democratic leaders have made central to their agenda.

Key word: 'Voted' to block.

Harry Reid won't even let anything make it to the floor.
:eusa_shhh:
No, Harry Reid is not going to bring to a vote any bill where Mitch McConnell has informed him that he will filibuster, therefore needing 60 votes.

Why would Reid bring those bills forward? All it gets is a headline that Obama's Jobs bill was defeated.
 
Somehow I kew it wouldn't be TDM doing the actual "fact-checking".
Instead she relied on a rag like the Post
:lol:


You're dismissed, fool.


I left out a single letter "n".

You neglected to read an entire fucking article before clinging to the headline like a Lemming.
:fu:
If you are too much of a whackjob to recognize the Washington Post as a credible, first rate news source, then you are too much of a whackjob.

True statement.
 
“The fact is that more people have been put on food stamps by Barack Obama than any president in American history.” — Gingrich
We have examined this issue before, giving Gingrich a Pinocchio for this statement.
This is an example of taking a fact — an all-time high for food stamp recipients — and taking it out of context. The president is struggling with the aftermath of an economic situation he inherited, while building on food stamp changes that preceded his tenure.

Just cut to the chase and blame Boosh :eusa_eh:
Is Boooosh blameless now?
 
You're dismissed, fool.


I left out a single letter "n".

You neglected to read an entire fucking article before clinging to the headline like a Lemming.
:fu:
If you are too much of a whackjob to recognize the Washington Post as a credible, first rate news source, then you are too much of a whackjob.

True statement.

The Post is a rag, but we're talking about a Blog in the Post's 'Opinion' section that calls a fact a "Pinocchio" lie.
:eusa_liar:
 

Forum List

Back
Top