Explain how a Trump could ever win the WH

[JimBowie1958]

The AFL-CIO, the largest U.S. federation of labor unions, will launch digital attack ads targeting Republican front-runner Donald Trump as part of a multi-pronged effort to derail the New York billionaire’s bid for the White House .
Exclusive: U.S. labor powerhouse to launch anti-Trump ad campaign

Yeah, that'll work just like all the other attack ads used against Trump has...NOT!

You libtards just dont get it; Trump is speaking to the root problem that everyone knows is the root problem; bad trade deals and black market labor.

And the people that understand that, about half the electorate stretching across BOTH parties and independents also, are not going to be dissuaded by stupid attack ads that everyone knows are LIES.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Seriously folks.....How could a Trump ever win the WH with a current 60-62 % unfavorable ratings?

Bear in mind that blacks don't like him and have actually given Clinton a huge advantage over Sanders....
Also, Latino/Hispanics actually hate Trump with a passion.
Finally, the progressives, LGBT community, and advocates for raising the minimum wage would never vote for Trump.

So, the question is simple (even if you disregard the current polls that have Sanders beating Trump by 16 points and Clinton beating Trump by 13 points) ........What makes ANYONE "think" that Trump has a snowball chance in Hell???

Trump has to win the Electoral College which mean he has to win certain states while winning the states with low minority population.

If Trump can win Ohio, Texas, and Florida then he can win the national election.

He need to take Kasich as his VP to win Ohio, and Florida could be his because of his business within the state, and he need to get enough of the White vote in Texas to offset the minority vote in Texas and hope some Hispanics will not vote, and then he will win.

Using a National Poll this early is not wise and you should do your studying on the state to state level instead.

 

[nat4900]

Trump has to win the Electoral College which mean he has to win certain states while winning the states with low minority population.

If Trump can win Ohio, Texas, and Florida then he can win the national election.

He need to take Kasich as his VP to win Ohio, and Florida could be his because of his business within the state, and he need to get enough of the White vote in Texas to offset the minority vote in Texas and hope some Hispanics will not vote, and then he will win.

Using a National Poll this early is not wise and you should do your studying on the state to state level instead.

Actually, you finally pose a sound argument....albeit, filled with an awful lot of "ifs"....The sobering part is that Trump has virtually alienated the Latino vote in TX....only about 12% would consider voting for him....AND, his silly attacks against Rubio have not helped him a bit with Floridians....Yes, were he to ask Kasich to join the ticket, he may carry OH but I seriously doubt that Kasich would agree.

 

[nat4900]

The reality, my right wing friends, is that when one peels off the bluster from Trump's statements on his policies, one would see that he is actually MORE to the left than Clinton and were he (unlikely) to sit in the oval office and promote these policies, the republican base would......once again.....feel even more betrayed and pissed off.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Trump has to win the Electoral College which mean he has to win certain states while winning the states with low minority population.

If Trump can win Ohio, Texas, and Florida then he can win the national election.

He need to take Kasich as his VP to win Ohio, and Florida could be his because of his business within the state, and he need to get enough of the White vote in Texas to offset the minority vote in Texas and hope some Hispanics will not vote, and then he will win.

Using a National Poll this early is not wise and you should do your studying on the state to state level instead.

Actually, you finally pose a sound argument....albeit, filled with an awful lot of "ifs"....The sobering part is that Trump has virtually alienated the Latino vote in TX....only about 12% would consider voting for him....AND, his silly attacks against Rubio have not helped him a bit with Floridians....Yes, were he to ask Kasich to join the ticket, he may carry OH but I seriously doubt that Kasich would agree.

Texas will be a uphill battle for Trump seeing his comments have more or less killed him with the Minority base within this state.

I wouldn't count Kasich out and if offered the VP I am willing to bet he take it and runs and it would give Trump Ohio and might also give him Pennsylvania and Virginia to boot.

Trump will win red states in the South and West.

Florida I believe is his to lose.

Now I do not see him winning New York, but he could win Illinois but will lose California.

So yeah I could see him winning " if " he does the right things and tones down his mouth...

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

The reality, my right wing friends, is that when one peels off the bluster from Trump's statements on his policies, one would see that he is actually MORE to the left than Clinton and were he (unlikely) to sit in the oval office and promote these policies, the republican base would......once again.....feel even more betrayed and pissed off.

I have written I believe Trump is to the left of Clinton, and slightly to the right of Sanders. Trump past words can not be ignored, and he has not just woken up and became a new version of Conservatism.

Trump is Progressive and that is why I write he is a New York " Conservative " which mean he is Liberal everywhere else except Chicago and San Fran...

 

[nat4900]

I have written I believe Trump is to the left of Clinton, and slightly to the right of Sanders. Trump past words can not be ignored, and he has not just woken up and became a new version of Conservatism.

Trump is Progressive and that is why I write he is a New York " Conservative " which mean he is Liberal everywhere else except Chicago and San Fran...

Indeed, Trump.....except for his acerbic statements....is the kind of New York "republican" a-la Nelson Rockefeller or John Lindsay.

 

[JoeB131]

In 2008 after Hillary lost to Obama 40 percent of Hillary supporters said they wouldn't vote for Obama yet when November rolled around the majority of them did. I suspect it will be the same with Trump.

When did they say that?

Did Obama accuse Hillary's father of killing JFK? Say she was ugly? Call the Democratic Party Corrupt? Do any of the things the Donald did to piss off the 60% who didn't vote for him?

Now, I'm sure that most of the Republican voters will line up behind Trump. Just not enough of them for him to win.

 

[blackhawk]

In 2008 after Hillary lost to Obama 40 percent of Hillary supporters said they wouldn't vote for Obama yet when November rolled around the majority of them did. I suspect it will be the same with Trump.

When did they say that?

Did Obama accuse Hillary's father of killing JFK? Say she was ugly? Call the Democratic Party Corrupt? Do any of the things the Donald did to piss off the 60% who didn't vote for him?

Now, I'm sure that most of the Republican voters will line up behind Trump. Just not enough of them for him to win.

It was in the polls after he got the nomination in case you forgot the primary fight between Obama and Hillary was hardly nice and polite. I'm not suggesting Trump will win I have said multiple times I don't think he will but when have an election year in which Trump is a nominee and self professed socialist is still in the race in May nothing would shock me.

 

[nat4900]

Here are some sobering thoughts regarding his candidacy.......He will NOT win the WH, but the damage to the current GOP "brand" has already been done by his nomination ......

[Trump's] nomination could signal the death of orthodox conservatism as one of the two main forces in American public policy, since he is running away with the nomination despite being exposed as a non-conservative.

Trump is the candidate who finally figured out how to exploit the fact that much of the Republican voter base does not share the policy preferences of the Republican donor class, and that it is therefore possible to win the nomination without being saddled with their unpopular policy preferences.

The crisis in the Republican Party is even worse than it looks

 

[jc456]

Seriously folks.....How could a Trump ever win the WH with a current 60-62 % unfavorable ratings?

Bear in mind that blacks don't like him and have actually given Clinton a huge advantage over Sanders....
Also, Latino/Hispanics actually hate Trump with a passion.
Finally, the progressives, LGBT community, and advocates for raising the minimum wage would never vote for Trump.

So, the question is simple (even if you disregard the current polls that have Sanders beating Trump by 16 points and Clinton beating Trump by 13 points) ........What makes ANYONE "think" that Trump has a snowball chance in Hell???

then you have nothing to worry about. Right?

 

[jc456]

Here are some sobering thoughts regarding his candidacy.......He will NOT win the WH, but the damage to the current GOP "brand" has already been done by his nomination ......

[Trump's] nomination could signal the death of orthodox conservatism as one of the two main forces in American public policy, since he is running away with the nomination despite being exposed as a non-conservative.

Trump is the candidate who finally figured out how to exploit the fact that much of the Republican voter base does not share the policy preferences of the Republican donor class, and that it is therefore possible to win the nomination without being saddled with their unpopular policy preferences.

The crisis in the Republican Party is even worse than it looks

And I still don't understand your issue.

 

[nat4900]

And I still don't understand your issue.

....and perhaps you never will.....But have another drink.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Here are some sobering thoughts regarding his candidacy.......He will NOT win the WH, but the damage to the current GOP "brand" has already been done by his nomination ......

[Trump's] nomination could signal the death of orthodox conservatism as one of the two main forces in American public policy, since he is running away with the nomination despite being exposed as a non-conservative.

Trump is the candidate who finally figured out how to exploit the fact that much of the Republican voter base does not share the policy preferences of the Republican donor class, and that it is therefore possible to win the nomination without being saddled with their unpopular policy preferences.

The crisis in the Republican Party is even worse than it looks

It's actually better.

True conservatives will now be able to define themselves instead of having the morons on the left try to do it.

 

[nat4900]

It's actually better.

True conservatives will now be able to define themselves instead of having the morons on the left try to do it.

Fools will always find solace even in their destruction.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Seriously folks.....How could a Trump ever win the WH with a current 60-62 % unfavorable ratings?

Bear in mind that blacks don't like him and have actually given Clinton a huge advantage over Sanders....
Also, Latino/Hispanics actually hate Trump with a passion.
Finally, the progressives, LGBT community, and advocates for raising the minimum wage would never vote for Trump.

So, the question is simple (even if you disregard the current polls that have Sanders beating Trump by 16 points and Clinton beating Trump by 13 points) ........What makes ANYONE "think" that Trump has a snowball chance in Hell???

Hillary voters;

 

[Uncensored2008]

And I still don't understand your issue.

....and perhaps you never will.....But have another drink.

Psst sploogy, Hillary has a 59% unpopularity rating...

 

[nat4900]

Psst sploogy, Hillary has a 59% unpopularity rating...

....and Trump has that same unpopularity ratings at about 67%...Actually I pray that Hillary gets indicted before the convention (unlikely) so that Sanders could have a better shot at Trump......Nonetheless, try to find some grownup to explain to you which is higher, 59 or 67......
(BTW, Clinton unpopularity ratings is NOT 59%0

 

[jc456]

And I still don't understand your issue.

....and perhaps you never will.....But have another drink.

cause that's all you got. desperation tactics aren't becoming.

 

[jc456]

Psst sploogy, Hillary has a 59% unpopularity rating...

....and Trump has that same unpopularity ratings at about 67%...Actually I pray that Hillary gets indicted before the convention (unlikely) so that Sanders could have a better shot at Trump......Nonetheless, try to find some grownup to explain to you which is higher, 59 or 67......
(BTW, Clinton unpopularity ratings is NOT 59%0

well in the environment forum, libturds tell us 58 is greater than 64 so with libturds anything is possible.