Exactly Two Minutes

Clinton received 2.9 million more votes, but Trump campaigned where the EC votes were(.) He should not be hard to beat, though the economy is OK, he has yet to start a war.
Yeah. I've said many times that Clinton didn't want the presidency as badly as Trump did. She phoned it in. She took way too many blue states for granted, and didn't even make a single campaign stop in Wisconsin!

Too much time in the big states, left out the little ones; as you noted, took some for granted.
Well, like so many of us, including me, Clinton believed all the hype about her inevitability.

As much as I hate Trump, I have to admit he earned his victory.

He bought it, fair and square.
 
But I get the feeling Rand Paul is only a libertarian because he doesn't want to let his daddy down.
I get that very same feeling about him.

We need Penn Jillette to run.
:lol:
Uh, I know from personal experience that Penn likes young girls, too.

He's a pig.

And a very militant atheist. No Republican would ever vote for him. He'd be slaughtered in the primaries.
I did not know that.

We need a person politically like-minded, who is not a loon, to run.
 
Clinton received 2.9 million more votes, but Trump campaigned where the EC votes were(.) He should not be hard to beat, though the economy is OK, he has yet to start a war.
Yeah. I've said many times that Clinton didn't want the presidency as badly as Trump did. She phoned it in. She took way too many blue states for granted, and didn't even make a single campaign stop in Wisconsin!

Too much time in the big states, left out the little ones; as you noted, took some for granted.
Well, like so many of us, including me, Clinton believed all the hype about her inevitability.

As much as I hate Trump, I have to admit he earned his victory.

He bought it, fair and square.
Yep.
 
The United States taxed at 95% during the 50's and the economy was much more stable then.
Oh, another thing. Your claim the economy was more stable is utter horseshit.

The United States suffered two severe recessions in the 50s. There was a recession every three years from 1949 to 1960.

The economy overall grew by 37% during the 1950s. At the end of the decade, the median American family had 30% more purchasing power than at the beginning.
That had nothing to do with our high tax rate, and everything to do with the fact we had become the world's only superpower while the rest of the world was in cinders.

And yet, the high tax rate allowed us to build the Interstate Highway system, which was one of the largest public spending projects in the country's history while putting people to work. The high tax rate brought in enough money to fund the GI Bill, which gave military veterans affordable access to a college education and added a productive pool of highly-educated employees to the work force at a time American businesses were willing to pay handsomely for engineering and management skills.
Again, there were a lot of tax expenditures which made the real tax rate lower for rich people.

The whole reason a tax rate has to be so high is to pay for all those tax expenditures.

See, what I have been saying for years, and what I have in common with Ted Cruz and Rand Paul, is that we can have a lower tax rate if we eliminate all those tax expenditures.

You are being robbed, and begging Sanders to steal even more from you!

Don't get me wrong. The Republican Party is far more guilty of this particular kind of theft. One more reason on the pile I am leaving the party.

*sigh* The whole reason the tax rate was so high was to pay off the war bonds from WWII and then to keep the US's place in the new world. No one is STEALING from us, they are helping us have what we want/need by fully funding the government.
 
But I get the feeling Rand Paul is only a libertarian because he doesn't want to let his daddy down.
I get that very same feeling about him.

We need Penn Jillette to run.
:lol:
Uh, I know from personal experience that Penn likes young girls, too.

He's a pig.

And a very militant atheist. No Republican would ever vote for him. He'd be slaughtered in the primaries.
I did not know that.

We need a person politically like-minded, who is not a loon, to run.
What's funny and sad at the same time is that these fake evangelicals are okay with a man who chases young girls, but will not tolerate an atheist.
 
Oh, another thing. Your claim the economy was more stable is utter horseshit.

The United States suffered two severe recessions in the 50s. There was a recession every three years from 1949 to 1960.

The economy overall grew by 37% during the 1950s. At the end of the decade, the median American family had 30% more purchasing power than at the beginning.
That had nothing to do with our high tax rate, and everything to do with the fact we had become the world's only superpower while the rest of the world was in cinders.

And yet, the high tax rate allowed us to build the Interstate Highway system, which was one of the largest public spending projects in the country's history while putting people to work. The high tax rate brought in enough money to fund the GI Bill, which gave military veterans affordable access to a college education and added a productive pool of highly-educated employees to the work force at a time American businesses were willing to pay handsomely for engineering and management skills.
Again, there were a lot of tax expenditures which made the real tax rate lower for rich people.

The whole reason a tax rate has to be so high is to pay for all those tax expenditures.

See, what I have been saying for years, and what I have in common with Ted Cruz and Rand Paul, is that we can have a lower tax rate if we eliminate all those tax expenditures.

You are being robbed, and begging Sanders to steal even more from you!

Don't get me wrong. The Republican Party is far more guilty of this particular kind of theft. One more reason on the pile I am leaving the party.

*sigh* The whole reason the tax rate was so high was to pay off the war bonds from WWII and then to keep the US's place in the new world. No one is STEALING from us, they are helping us have what we want/need by fully funding the government.
The high war debt was indeed part of the reason taxes were so high.

I've often pointed out that in real dollars, our debt was the highest in history at the end of WWII up until Bush came along. I pointed that out to illustrate the point that the excessive defense spending of the Bush-Obama era was not justified since we are not in a world war.
 
But I get the feeling Rand Paul is only a libertarian because he doesn't want to let his daddy down.
I get that very same feeling about him.

We need Penn Jillette to run.
:lol:
Uh, I know from personal experience that Penn likes young girls, too.

He's a pig.

And a very militant atheist. No Republican would ever vote for him. He'd be slaughtered in the primaries.
I did not know that.

We need a person politically like-minded, who is not a loon, to run.
What's funny and sad at the same time is that these fake evangelicals are okay with a man who chases young girls, but will not tolerate an atheist.

Atheists can be agnostic, and human, Moore? I don't know.
 
But I get the feeling Rand Paul is only a libertarian because he doesn't want to let his daddy down.
I get that very same feeling about him.

We need Penn Jillette to run.
:lol:
Uh, I know from personal experience that Penn likes young girls, too.

He's a pig.

And a very militant atheist. No Republican would ever vote for him. He'd be slaughtered in the primaries.
I did not know that.

We need a person politically like-minded, who is not a loon, to run.
What's funny and sad at the same time is that these fake evangelicals are okay with a man who chases young girls, but will not tolerate an atheist.

Atheists can be agnostic, and human, Moore? I don't know.
Penn Jillette is very in-your-face about his atheism. Not a good fit for the red states.
 
I get that very same feeling about him.

We need Penn Jillette to run.
:lol:
Uh, I know from personal experience that Penn likes young girls, too.

He's a pig.

And a very militant atheist. No Republican would ever vote for him. He'd be slaughtered in the primaries.
I did not know that.

We need a person politically like-minded, who is not a loon, to run.
What's funny and sad at the same time is that these fake evangelicals are okay with a man who chases young girls, but will not tolerate an atheist.

Atheists can be agnostic, and human, Moore? I don't know.
Penn Jillette is very in-your-face about his atheism. Not a good fit for the red states.

An atheist that advocates is a contradiction; if one does not believe, what is there TO prove?
 
We're hearing a lot of whining this morning about the unfair tactics used against Roy Moore. This is hilarious, considering all the lies and false accusations the very same tards hurled against the Clintons and Obama.

I've been having a lot of fun the past two days exposing the hypocrites by dredging up their pedophilia accusations against the Clintons. Fucking schizo hypocrites.

This morning I was thinking about Senator-elect Jones and the fact his re-election campaign will coincide with Trump's re-election campaign in 2020.

The chances of Jones getting re-elected are directly correlated to how much the American people will turn out to kick Trump to the curb.

Of course, this depends on the Democratic party choosing a presidential candidate who won't snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

The rising tide of the Democratic presidential candidate will lift Jones's boat.

That then led to my pondering who the Democratic candidate will be. Right now, people assume Elizabeth Warren will be in the race.

Which then made me realize that exactly two minutes after a Democratic front runner emerges, the very same tards who are whining about unfair tactics this morning will return to their tried and true lies and false accusations propaganda generating machines to give them bullshit-laden memes to parrot.


Exactly two minutes. Watch and see. "Governor Blankety-blank was seen throwing puppies into rush hour traffic 25 years ago!"


Two minutes.

I'm being optimistic.

One of the only people who could lose to Trump is Warren. FFS ...

I might even vote for Trump over her.
 
Penn Jillette is very in-your-face about his atheism. Not a good fit for the red states.
He's is rather condescending and insulting about it, to be honest. At least I have the decency to live and let live, but I will make fun of it. I am not bound by blasphemy rules.
:lol:
 
We're hearing a lot of whining this morning about the unfair tactics used against Roy Moore. This is hilarious, considering all the lies and false accusations the very same tards hurled against the Clintons and Obama.

I've been having a lot of fun the past two days exposing the hypocrites by dredging up their pedophilia accusations against the Clintons. Fucking schizo hypocrites.

This morning I was thinking about Senator-elect Jones and the fact his re-election campaign will coincide with Trump's re-election campaign in 2020.

The chances of Jones getting re-elected are directly correlated to how much the American people will turn out to kick Trump to the curb.

Of course, this depends on the Democratic party choosing a presidential candidate who won't snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

The rising tide of the Democratic presidential candidate will lift Jones's boat.

That then lead to my pondering who the Democratic candidate will be. Right now, people assume Elizabeth Warren will be in the race.

Which then made me realize that exactly two minutes after a Democratic front runner emerges, the very same tards who are whining about unfair tactics this morning will return to their tried and true lies and false accusations propaganda generating machines to give them bullshit-laden memes to parrot.


Exactly two minutes. Watch and see. "Governor Blankety-blank was seen throwing puppies into rush hour traffic 25 years ago!"


Two minutes.

I'm being optimistic.
G, I don't believe Alabama has any intention of becoming a blue state. This was an extreme situation and they handled it well, but don't be hoping for Dem wins in red states just because of this.
I'm not hoping for any party at all. I'm out. Done. I've been a Republican since birth, and I am handing in my membership. Trump's endorsement of an accused child molester finally broke me. I have no reason any more to have an R after my name. I have NOTHING in common with today's Republican party.

Nothing.

My principles can no longer tolerate me being attached to that cesspool one minute longer.
I've been unaffiliated all my life and it suits me, but in this state I can't participate in the primaries.
I'm sorry the Grand Ole Party let you down. You are right, though, that they are truly killing their brand.
 
We're hearing a lot of whining this morning about the unfair tactics used against Roy Moore. This is hilarious, considering all the lies and false accusations the very same tards hurled against the Clintons and Obama.

I've been having a lot of fun the past two days exposing the hypocrites by dredging up their pedophilia accusations against the Clintons. Fucking schizo hypocrites.

This morning I was thinking about Senator-elect Jones and the fact his re-election campaign will coincide with Trump's re-election campaign in 2020.

The chances of Jones getting re-elected are directly correlated to how much the American people will turn out to kick Trump to the curb.

Of course, this depends on the Democratic party choosing a presidential candidate who won't snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

The rising tide of the Democratic presidential candidate will lift Jones's boat.

That then led to my pondering who the Democratic candidate will be. Right now, people assume Elizabeth Warren will be in the race.

Which then made me realize that exactly two minutes after a Democratic front runner emerges, the very same tards who are whining about unfair tactics this morning will return to their tried and true lies and false accusations propaganda generating machines to give them bullshit-laden memes to parrot.


Exactly two minutes. Watch and see. "Governor Blankety-blank was seen throwing puppies into rush hour traffic 25 years ago!"


Two minutes.

I'm being optimistic.

One of the only people who could lose to Trump is Warren. FFS ...

I might even vote for Trump over her.
Yes, Warren is a socialistic as Sanders.
 
And yet, the high tax rate allowed us to build the Interstate Highway system, which was one of the largest public spending projects in the country's history while putting people to work. The high tax rate brought in enough money to fund the GI Bill, which gave military veterans affordable access to a college education and added a productive pool of highly-educated employees to the work force at a time American businesses were willing to pay handsomely for engineering and management skills.
POWERFUL!!!
 
The Pseudocon Hate Machine won't make any arguments about the Democrat's policies.

It will be all personal slander.

Exactly two minutes. That's how long it will take these whining hypocrites to return to form.

Two minutes, because that's how long it takes them to read a headline on their propaganda site and then copy and paste it.
I have plenty of arguments against the Democrats’ policies.
 
There were no ‘unfair’ tactics used against Moore.

Only the facts were used against Moore: the fact that Moore is a bigot, an enemy of the Constitution, with nothing but contempt for the Constitution’s case law and the rule of law.

Moore lost the consequence of his hate and bigotry, because he ran a poor campaign, and because Democrats are energized and motivated to oppose the bigotry and hate propagated by Trump and far too many Republicans like Moore.
 
We're hearing a lot of whining this morning about the unfair tactics used against Roy Moore. This is hilarious, considering all the lies and false accusations the very same tards hurled against the Clintons and Obama.
No, they were all true. That's why I held my nose and voted against Hillary and her commie predecessor.
No, the accusations of pedophilia were bullshit.

How's that "voting for the lesser of two evils" shit working out for ya?

We keep getting more and more evil choices.

Now we're down to deciding about whether or not to elect an accused child molester who has an actual living, breathing accuser.

If you folks had wanted to break out of the "lesser of two evils" choices, you should have backed Bernie.
Bernie, the flip side of Trump.
 
I hope a few of them will try again--Kasich, Rubio, Graham. I was impressed by their decency more than their policies. I know that's a dumb reason to vote, but that's how I do.
I do NOT want to see that pathological Cruz's face again.
Kasich maybe, just tired of the show boaters
 
Clinton received 2.9 million more votes, but Trump campaigned where the EC votes were(.) He should not be hard to beat, though the economy is OK, he has yet to start a war.
Yeah. I've said many times that Clinton didn't want the presidency as badly as Trump did. She phoned it in. She took way too many blue states for granted, and didn't even make a single campaign stop in Wisconsin!

Too much time in the big states, left out the little ones; as you noted, took some for granted.
Well, like so many of us, including me, Clinton believed all the hype about her inevitability.

As much as I hate Trump, I have to admit he earned his victory.

He got by with a little help from his friends
 

Forum List

Back
Top