Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
no one is going to take my guns awayyour second link is just leftist non-sense, shit we all know but, dun dun dun, scary scary, take away our rights and we will all be safeGuns Save 2,191 Lives Each Day In The US: FBI ~ 32 Guns Purchased Every Minute In The United States.Yeah right........like at Fort Hood? Most of them just kill themselves, or are killed after they have massacred many, never has a "responsible gun owner" come to the rescue and saved anyone. You're dreaming.
Prosecution rests in Fort Hood mass murder trial
Texas mass murder suspect collapses in court as crime recounted
Fort Hood soldier kills himself and three others:cops
1. Oct. 16, 1991: A deadly shooting rampage took place in Killeen, Texas, as George Hennard opened fire at a Luby’s Cafeteria, killing 23 people before taking his own life. 20 others were wounded in the attack.
2 .Aug. 1, 1966: Charles Whitman opened fire from the clock tower at the University of Texas at Austin, killing 16 people and wounding 31.
3. Nov. 5, 2009: Thirteen soldiers and civilians were killed and more than two dozen wounded when a gunman walked into the Soldier Readiness Processing Center at Fort Hood, Texas, and opened fire. Army psychiatrist Maj. Nidal Hasan is charged with 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder.
4. Sept. 15, 1999: Seven people were killed and seven others injured when a gunman opened fire inside a crowded chapel at Fort Worth’s Wedgewood Baptist Church. Some worshipers believed that Larry Gene Ashbrook was pulling a prank and continued singing after the shooting began. The murderer killed himself.
The List: The deadliest mass shootings in Texas history
White House Study Finds Guns Save Lives: “Consistently Lower Injury Rates Among Gun Using Crime Victims”
BS....
Gun deaths are poised to surpass automobile deaths in the United States this year.
America's Top Killing Machine
Guns Kill More Americans Than Terrorists Do
Don't be an idiot....nobody is going to take your guns away, unless you're mental, like the ones that are doing the shootings.....but anyone with any sense realizes that background checks are necessary on everyone and there should be no sale of a gun until that person is cleared....and assault weapons are not necessary for defending yourself or for hunting or any other shit you all might want to do with them.
One can safely say that those opposing stricter control are mental.
that's what you said you lying fucking ****
b/c right after that you tell me I should not be allowed to own and AR
do you eve grasp the FACT that you hate the Constitution?
That you stand against it?
no, you don't
you are that fucking dumb
Global warming and unemployment cause terrorismI'll channel my inner rightwinger and state the fact that your first link is a hack siteGuns Save 2,191 Lives Each Day In The US: FBI ~ 32 Guns Purchased Every Minute In The United States.Yeah right........like at Fort Hood? Most of them just kill themselves, or are killed after they have massacred many, never has a "responsible gun owner" come to the rescue and saved anyone. You're dreaming.
Prosecution rests in Fort Hood mass murder trial
Texas mass murder suspect collapses in court as crime recounted
Fort Hood soldier kills himself and three others:cops
1. Oct. 16, 1991: A deadly shooting rampage took place in Killeen, Texas, as George Hennard opened fire at a Luby’s Cafeteria, killing 23 people before taking his own life. 20 others were wounded in the attack.
2 .Aug. 1, 1966: Charles Whitman opened fire from the clock tower at the University of Texas at Austin, killing 16 people and wounding 31.
3. Nov. 5, 2009: Thirteen soldiers and civilians were killed and more than two dozen wounded when a gunman walked into the Soldier Readiness Processing Center at Fort Hood, Texas, and opened fire. Army psychiatrist Maj. Nidal Hasan is charged with 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder.
4. Sept. 15, 1999: Seven people were killed and seven others injured when a gunman opened fire inside a crowded chapel at Fort Worth’s Wedgewood Baptist Church. Some worshipers believed that Larry Gene Ashbrook was pulling a prank and continued singing after the shooting began. The murderer killed himself.
The List: The deadliest mass shootings in Texas history
White House Study Finds Guns Save Lives: “Consistently Lower Injury Rates Among Gun Using Crime Victims”
BS....
Gun deaths are poised to surpass automobile deaths in the United States this year.
America's Top Killing Machine
Guns Kill More Americans Than Terrorists Do
But this year gun deaths are expected to surpass car deaths. That's according to a Center for American Progress report, which cites CDC data that shows guns will kill more Americans under 25 than cars in 2015. Already more than a quarter of the teenagers—15 years old and up—who die of injuries in the United States are killed in gun-related incidents, according to the American Academy of PediatricsBut this year gun deaths are expected to surpass car deaths. That's according to a Center for American Progress report, which cites CDC data that shows guns will kill more Americans under 25 than cars in 2015. Already more than a quarter of the teenagers—15 years old and up—who die of injuries in the United States are killed in gun-related incidents, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics.
The CAP fucking hates America, so anything they put out is bullshit.
Yeah, right. The only ones that love America are the gun loving idiots, that's why they don't give a shit how many people die and don't want any mental retard to be kept from buying a gun. You're such a patriot.
So save the innocent and save the world, kill yourself
one less 'person' spewing co2 and we can give your job to a killer
No because then your government can decide to go communist and take away everything you have, and you will not be able to defend yourself. This is a foundation of the 2nd Amendment. Also, criminals and government officials will always have guns, whether you have any or not.There is NO such thing as GUN free zones. I can guarantee, if there WAS, no mass shootings. No dah. But gun huggers, they live in a alternate world. They love their guns more than their children or the lives of others or common sense. I am like...Enough.
No because then your government can decide to go communist and take away everything you have, and you will not be able to defend yourself. This is a foundation of the 2nd Amendment. Also, criminals and government officials will always have guns, whether you have any or not.There is NO such thing as GUN free zones. I can guarantee, if there WAS, no mass shootings. No dah. But gun huggers, they live in a alternate world. They love their guns more than their children or the lives of others or common sense. I am like...Enough.
[
You all are allowed t have all the guns you want and you have not made it safer.....there is more gun shooting deaths in the US than any other country where they have better gun control. The nuts have control of the gun environment and are responsible for every death caused by guns.
I never said and AR15 wasn't an assault weapon, that's in your head.no one is going to take my guns awayyour second link is just leftist non-sense, shit we all know but, dun dun dun, scary scary, take away our rights and we will all be safe
BS....
Gun deaths are poised to surpass automobile deaths in the United States this year.
America's Top Killing Machine
Guns Kill More Americans Than Terrorists Do
Don't be an idiot....nobody is going to take your guns away, unless you're mental, like the ones that are doing the shootings.....but anyone with any sense realizes that background checks are necessary on everyone and there should be no sale of a gun until that person is cleared....and assault weapons are not necessary for defending yourself or for hunting or any other shit you all might want to do with them.
One can safely say that those opposing stricter control are mental.
that's what you said you lying fucking ****
b/c right after that you tell me I should not be allowed to own and AR
do you eve grasp the FACT that you hate the Constitution?
That you stand against it?
no, you don't
you are that fucking dumb
Look, retard....an AR 15 is an assault weapon. Of course, you are one of the mental that thinks you should have one. And, you're the fucking retard that doesn't understand, the Constitution doesn't mention assault weapons. I suppose you believe you should be able to buy a tank and bazookas because you're such a wimp you need something like that to defend your sorry ass, retard.
You voted for an unqualified man to be Pres, therefore there are no qualifications needed to fill your job.Global warming and unemployment cause terrorismI'll channel my inner rightwinger and state the fact that your first link is a hack site
BS....
Gun deaths are poised to surpass automobile deaths in the United States this year.
America's Top Killing Machine
Guns Kill More Americans Than Terrorists Do
But this year gun deaths are expected to surpass car deaths. That's according to a Center for American Progress report, which cites CDC data that shows guns will kill more Americans under 25 than cars in 2015. Already more than a quarter of the teenagers—15 years old and up—who die of injuries in the United States are killed in gun-related incidents, according to the American Academy of PediatricsBut this year gun deaths are expected to surpass car deaths. That's according to a Center for American Progress report, which cites CDC data that shows guns will kill more Americans under 25 than cars in 2015. Already more than a quarter of the teenagers—15 years old and up—who die of injuries in the United States are killed in gun-related incidents, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics.
The CAP fucking hates America, so anything they put out is bullshit.
Yeah, right. The only ones that love America are the gun loving idiots, that's why they don't give a shit how many people die and don't want any mental retard to be kept from buying a gun. You're such a patriot.
So save the innocent and save the world, kill yourself
one less 'person' spewing co2 and we can give your job to a killer
That sounds like something that a depraved "terrorist" would spew.....but, retard, you wouldn't be able to do most jobs....stick to cleaning toilets, that's probably the height of your mental ability.
you should support the government telling you what to do, since you support it telling others what to do....sounds like the OP would make my right to ban guns on my own private property illegal.
But this is how the totalitarianism begins. First you don't need this, then you don't need that either, and so on. When a government begins to tell you what you need or don't need, it is socialism / communism. That is exactly why you need your guns, and no assault rifle is big enough when the communist come to educate you.No because then your government can decide to go communist and take away everything you have, and you will not be able to defend yourself. This is a foundation of the 2nd Amendment. Also, criminals and government officials will always have guns, whether you have any or not.There is NO such thing as GUN free zones. I can guarantee, if there WAS, no mass shootings. No dah. But gun huggers, they live in a alternate world. They love their guns more than their children or the lives of others or common sense. I am like...Enough.
You all live in a bubble. Nobody is taking away "all" your guns, but some mentals don't need to have assault weapons, no matter how scared you are that someone is going to come and break into your house.
But this is how the totalitarianism begins. First you don't need this, then you don't need that either, and so on. When a government begins to tell you what you need or don't need, it is socialism / communism. That is exactly why you need your guns, and no assault rifle is big enough when the communist come to educate you.No because then your government can decide to go communist and take away everything you have, and you will not be able to defend yourself. This is a foundation of the 2nd Amendment. Also, criminals and government officials will always have guns, whether you have any or not.There is NO such thing as GUN free zones. I can guarantee, if there WAS, no mass shootings. No dah. But gun huggers, they live in a alternate world. They love their guns more than their children or the lives of others or common sense. I am like...Enough.
You all live in a bubble. Nobody is taking away "all" your guns, but some mentals don't need to have assault weapons, no matter how scared you are that someone is going to come and break into your house.
But this is how the totalitarianism begins. First you don't need this, then you don't need that either, and so on. When a government begins to tell you what you need or don't need, it is socialism / communism. That is exactly why you need your guns, and no assault rifle is big enough when the communist come to educate you.No because then your government can decide to go communist and take away everything you have, and you will not be able to defend yourself. This is a foundation of the 2nd Amendment. Also, criminals and government officials will always have guns, whether you have any or not.There is NO such thing as GUN free zones. I can guarantee, if there WAS, no mass shootings. No dah. But gun huggers, they live in a alternate world. They love their guns more than their children or the lives of others or common sense. I am like...Enough.
You all live in a bubble. Nobody is taking away "all" your guns, but some mentals don't need to have assault weapons, no matter how scared you are that someone is going to come and break into your house.
We have already started sliding down the slippery slope. They have already taken our hand grenades.
According to Crime Research Prevention Center, 92% of all mass shootings that have happened between January 2009 and July 2014 have occurred in gun-free zones. Yesterday afternoon 14 people were murdered and 21 people were wounded during a mass shooting at California Inland Regional Center – a gun-free zone - in San Bernardino, California. The shooters who were dressed in camouflage and body armor were brandishing rifles.
Law enforcement have confirmed that the shooters had 4500 rounds of ammo and 12 pipe bombs. This was clearly not a case of work place violence but rather a deadly Islamic Terrorist attack. These Muslim terrorists were armed to the teeth and planning mass murder on a grand scale.
Once again, we are seeing the evidence that gun-free zones are an open invitation for mass shootings and terrorist attacks.
Are gun-free zones unconstitutional? What about our 2nd amendment rights? How could we possibly disarm our own military on US military bases and reconcile such an action with upholding the Constitution? Who came up with the idea of gun free zones? There is a controversy as to who is responsible. Some say it was George Bush Sr.. Others have claimed that while DOD issued the directive under his watch, gun-free zones on military bases were first implemented by President Bill Clinton.
This directive from the Department of Defense was issued in 1992: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a272176.pdf
Donald J. Atwood was the deputy secretary of defense that served under George Bush Sr.'s administration in 1992. According to an editorial some years ago, the claim was that Bill Clinton was the first to demand that all soldiers on military bases be disarmed. The report noted that it was Bill Clinton, whose actions led to Army regulations enforcement-forbidding US soldiers to carry firearms on base.
http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r190_14.pdf
While private citizens are permitted to exercise their 2nd amendment rights, soldiers sworn to defend our country on foreign soil are not permitted to exercise their 2nd amendment rights on military bases inside the United States.
One soldier who served in Iraq and Afghanistan said, “Everyone carried weapons on the bases (inside Iraq), not just NCO's.” Another soldier commented, “We are trained to handle weapons and know them intimately, if a bad guy, military or not, wants to attack - this gives the good guy a chance!”
That makes sense.
So why the double standard? Our soldiers should be armed on US bases as well as in foreign countries. What works for our soldiers in foreign countries should work for them here on US military bases.
Bill Clinton's name comes up again in the matter of schools and gun-free zones. President Bill Clinton is reported to have signed the Gun-free Schools Act of 1994 into law on on March 31st, 1994.
Gun-Free Schools Act of 1994 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gun-free zones are turning America's students, civilians and soldiers into easy targets. There is a reason that 92% of all mass shootings have taken place in gun free zones. The enemy is being given a golden opportunity to inflict maximum damage with minimal resistance.
President Obama, the media and all those who are demanding stricter gun laws have it backwards. Anyone using gun-free zones as an excuse to disarm Americans should be told that gun-free zones are the evidence that disarming citizens creates the perfect environment for mass shootings and terrorist attacks.
Americans have seen time and again that gun-free zones are a breeding ground for mass shootings and terrorist attacks. Imagine a gun-free America and the lawlessness that would permeate our land! While criminals will always find a way to obtain weapons and ammo, the American citizen would be left utterly helpless. Disarming Americans is not the solution. It's the problem!
There is a logical answer for putting an end to these mass shootings. End gun-free zones now.
I don't think granades are illegal. It is too easy to make your own Molotov cocktail.But this is how the totalitarianism begins. First you don't need this, then you don't need that either, and so on. When a government begins to tell you what you need or don't need, it is socialism / communism. That is exactly why you need your guns, and no assault rifle is big enough when the communist come to educate you.No because then your government can decide to go communist and take away everything you have, and you will not be able to defend yourself. This is a foundation of the 2nd Amendment. Also, criminals and government officials will always have guns, whether you have any or not.There is NO such thing as GUN free zones. I can guarantee, if there WAS, no mass shootings. No dah. But gun huggers, they live in a alternate world. They love their guns more than their children or the lives of others or common sense. I am like...Enough.
You all live in a bubble. Nobody is taking away "all" your guns, but some mentals don't need to have assault weapons, no matter how scared you are that someone is going to come and break into your house.
We have already started sliding down the slippery slope. They have already taken our hand grenades.
They should take your meds away since you must clearly be abusing them
-Geaux
And this is scary. It was only the USA that stood in the way of the sovietization of the entire world. Now that it has been arranged that communist China is the guarantor of US debt, the US will socialize, like you have said. We need a new planet.But this is how the totalitarianism begins. First you don't need this, then you don't need that either, and so on. When a government begins to tell you what you need or don't need, it is socialism / communism. That is exactly why you need your guns, and no assault rifle is big enough when the communist come to educate you.No because then your government can decide to go communist and take away everything you have, and you will not be able to defend yourself. This is a foundation of the 2nd Amendment. Also, criminals and government officials will always have guns, whether you have any or not.There is NO such thing as GUN free zones. I can guarantee, if there WAS, no mass shootings. No dah. But gun huggers, they live in a alternate world. They love their guns more than their children or the lives of others or common sense. I am like...Enough.
You all live in a bubble. Nobody is taking away "all" your guns, but some mentals don't need to have assault weapons, no matter how scared you are that someone is going to come and break into your house.
We have already started sliding down the slippery slope. They have already taken our hand grenades.
According to Crime Research Prevention Center, 92% of all mass shootings that have happened between January 2009 and July 2014 have occurred in gun-free zones. Yesterday afternoon 14 people were murdered and 21 people were wounded during a mass shooting at California Inland Regional Center – a gun-free zone - in San Bernardino, California. The shooters who were dressed in camouflage and body armor were brandishing rifles.
Law enforcement have confirmed that the shooters had 4500 rounds of ammo and 12 pipe bombs. This was clearly not a case of work place violence but rather a deadly Islamic Terrorist attack. These Muslim terrorists were armed to the teeth and planning mass murder on a grand scale.
Once again, we are seeing the evidence that gun-free zones are an open invitation for mass shootings and terrorist attacks.
Are gun-free zones unconstitutional? What about our 2nd amendment rights? How could we possibly disarm our own military on US military bases and reconcile such an action with upholding the Constitution? Who came up with the idea of gun free zones? There is a controversy as to who is responsible. Some say it was George Bush Sr.. Others have claimed that while DOD issued the directive under his watch, gun-free zones on military bases were first implemented by President Bill Clinton.
This directive from the Department of Defense was issued in 1992: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a272176.pdf
Donald J. Atwood was the deputy secretary of defense that served under George Bush Sr.'s administration in 1992. According to an editorial some years ago, the claim was that Bill Clinton was the first to demand that all soldiers on military bases be disarmed. The report noted that it was Bill Clinton, whose actions led to Army regulations enforcement-forbidding US soldiers to carry firearms on base.
http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r190_14.pdf
While private citizens are permitted to exercise their 2nd amendment rights, soldiers sworn to defend our country on foreign soil are not permitted to exercise their 2nd amendment rights on military bases inside the United States.
One soldier who served in Iraq and Afghanistan said, “Everyone carried weapons on the bases (inside Iraq), not just NCO's.” Another soldier commented, “We are trained to handle weapons and know them intimately, if a bad guy, military or not, wants to attack - this gives the good guy a chance!”
That makes sense.
So why the double standard? Our soldiers should be armed on US bases as well as in foreign countries. What works for our soldiers in foreign countries should work for them here on US military bases.
Bill Clinton's name comes up again in the matter of schools and gun-free zones. President Bill Clinton is reported to have signed the Gun-free Schools Act of 1994 into law on on March 31st, 1994.
Gun-Free Schools Act of 1994 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gun-free zones are turning America's students, civilians and soldiers into easy targets. There is a reason that 92% of all mass shootings have taken place in gun free zones. The enemy is being given a golden opportunity to inflict maximum damage with minimal resistance.
President Obama, the media and all those who are demanding stricter gun laws have it backwards. Anyone using gun-free zones as an excuse to disarm Americans should be told that gun-free zones are the evidence that disarming citizens creates the perfect environment for mass shootings and terrorist attacks.
Americans have seen time and again that gun-free zones are a breeding ground for mass shootings and terrorist attacks. Imagine a gun-free America and the lawlessness that would permeate our land! While criminals will always find a way to obtain weapons and ammo, the American citizen would be left utterly helpless. Disarming Americans is not the solution. It's the problem!
There is a logical answer for putting an end to these mass shootings. End gun-free zones now.
Those figures are conveniently skewed to exclude mass shootings that occur in private residences,
where guns are allowed.
The real number:
Analysis of Mass Shootings
According to Crime Research Prevention Center, 92% of all mass shootings that have happened between January 2009 and July 2014 have occurred in gun-free zones. Yesterday afternoon 14 people were murdered and 21 people were wounded during a mass shooting at California Inland Regional Center – a gun-free zone - in San Bernardino, California. The shooters who were dressed in camouflage and body armor were brandishing rifles.
Law enforcement have confirmed that the shooters had 4500 rounds of ammo and 12 pipe bombs. This was clearly not a case of work place violence but rather a deadly Islamic Terrorist attack. These Muslim terrorists were armed to the teeth and planning mass murder on a grand scale.
Once again, we are seeing the evidence that gun-free zones are an open invitation for mass shootings and terrorist attacks.
Are gun-free zones unconstitutional? What about our 2nd amendment rights? How could we possibly disarm our own military on US military bases and reconcile such an action with upholding the Constitution? Who came up with the idea of gun free zones? There is a controversy as to who is responsible. Some say it was George Bush Sr.. Others have claimed that while DOD issued the directive under his watch, gun-free zones on military bases were first implemented by President Bill Clinton.
This directive from the Department of Defense was issued in 1992: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a272176.pdf
Donald J. Atwood was the deputy secretary of defense that served under George Bush Sr.'s administration in 1992. According to an editorial some years ago, the claim was that Bill Clinton was the first to demand that all soldiers on military bases be disarmed. The report noted that it was Bill Clinton, whose actions led to Army regulations enforcement-forbidding US soldiers to carry firearms on base.
http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r190_14.pdf
While private citizens are permitted to exercise their 2nd amendment rights, soldiers sworn to defend our country on foreign soil are not permitted to exercise their 2nd amendment rights on military bases inside the United States.
One soldier who served in Iraq and Afghanistan said, “Everyone carried weapons on the bases (inside Iraq), not just NCO's.” Another soldier commented, “We are trained to handle weapons and know them intimately, if a bad guy, military or not, wants to attack - this gives the good guy a chance!”
That makes sense.
So why the double standard? Our soldiers should be armed on US bases as well as in foreign countries. What works for our soldiers in foreign countries should work for them here on US military bases.
Bill Clinton's name comes up again in the matter of schools and gun-free zones. President Bill Clinton is reported to have signed the Gun-free Schools Act of 1994 into law on on March 31st, 1994.
Gun-Free Schools Act of 1994 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gun-free zones are turning America's students, civilians and soldiers into easy targets. There is a reason that 92% of all mass shootings have taken place in gun free zones. The enemy is being given a golden opportunity to inflict maximum damage with minimal resistance.
President Obama, the media and all those who are demanding stricter gun laws have it backwards. Anyone using gun-free zones as an excuse to disarm Americans should be told that gun-free zones are the evidence that disarming citizens creates the perfect environment for mass shootings and terrorist attacks.
Americans have seen time and again that gun-free zones are a breeding ground for mass shootings and terrorist attacks. Imagine a gun-free America and the lawlessness that would permeate our land! While criminals will always find a way to obtain weapons and ammo, the American citizen would be left utterly helpless. Disarming Americans is not the solution. It's the problem!
There is a logical answer for putting an end to these mass shootings. End gun-free zones now.
Those figures are conveniently skewed to exclude mass shootings that occur in private residences,
where guns are allowed.
The real number:
Analysis of Mass Shootings
dishonesty alert. mass shootings in public places involve victims the shooters don't know. home invasion shootings are generally domestic murder/suicide shootings
very different animals
You have no credibility and even less facts to substantiate your baseless claims and projections. Nonetheless, people like me have a better chance saving your life than trained law enforcement. People like me have more training AND practice more with our firearms than a typical LEO
According to Crime Research Prevention Center, 92% of all mass shootings that have happened between January 2009 and July 2014 have occurred in gun-free zones. Yesterday afternoon 14 people were murdered and 21 people were wounded during a mass shooting at California Inland Regional Center – a gun-free zone - in San Bernardino, California. The shooters who were dressed in camouflage and body armor were brandishing rifles.
Law enforcement have confirmed that the shooters had 4500 rounds of ammo and 12 pipe bombs. This was clearly not a case of work place violence but rather a deadly Islamic Terrorist attack. These Muslim terrorists were armed to the teeth and planning mass murder on a grand scale.
Once again, we are seeing the evidence that gun-free zones are an open invitation for mass shootings and terrorist attacks.
Are gun-free zones unconstitutional? What about our 2nd amendment rights? How could we possibly disarm our own military on US military bases and reconcile such an action with upholding the Constitution? Who came up with the idea of gun free zones? There is a controversy as to who is responsible. Some say it was George Bush Sr.. Others have claimed that while DOD issued the directive under his watch, gun-free zones on military bases were first implemented by President Bill Clinton.
This directive from the Department of Defense was issued in 1992: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a272176.pdf
Donald J. Atwood was the deputy secretary of defense that served under George Bush Sr.'s administration in 1992. According to an editorial some years ago, the claim was that Bill Clinton was the first to demand that all soldiers on military bases be disarmed. The report noted that it was Bill Clinton, whose actions led to Army regulations enforcement-forbidding US soldiers to carry firearms on base.
http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r190_14.pdf
While private citizens are permitted to exercise their 2nd amendment rights, soldiers sworn to defend our country on foreign soil are not permitted to exercise their 2nd amendment rights on military bases inside the United States.
One soldier who served in Iraq and Afghanistan said, “Everyone carried weapons on the bases (inside Iraq), not just NCO's.” Another soldier commented, “We are trained to handle weapons and know them intimately, if a bad guy, military or not, wants to attack - this gives the good guy a chance!”
That makes sense.
So why the double standard? Our soldiers should be armed on US bases as well as in foreign countries. What works for our soldiers in foreign countries should work for them here on US military bases.
Bill Clinton's name comes up again in the matter of schools and gun-free zones. President Bill Clinton is reported to have signed the Gun-free Schools Act of 1994 into law on on March 31st, 1994.
Gun-Free Schools Act of 1994 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gun-free zones are turning America's students, civilians and soldiers into easy targets. There is a reason that 92% of all mass shootings have taken place in gun free zones. The enemy is being given a golden opportunity to inflict maximum damage with minimal resistance.
President Obama, the media and all those who are demanding stricter gun laws have it backwards. Anyone using gun-free zones as an excuse to disarm Americans should be told that gun-free zones are the evidence that disarming citizens creates the perfect environment for mass shootings and terrorist attacks.
Americans have seen time and again that gun-free zones are a breeding ground for mass shootings and terrorist attacks. Imagine a gun-free America and the lawlessness that would permeate our land! While criminals will always find a way to obtain weapons and ammo, the American citizen would be left utterly helpless. Disarming Americans is not the solution. It's the problem!
There is a logical answer for putting an end to these mass shootings. End gun-free zones now.
Those figures are conveniently skewed to exclude mass shootings that occur in private residences,
where guns are allowed.
The real number:
Analysis of Mass Shootings
dishonesty alert. mass shootings in public places involve victims the shooters don't know. home invasion shootings are generally domestic murder/suicide shootings
very different animals
Oh of course there's always some trick to eliminate the portion of the statistics that don't fit your agenda.
[ur agenda.
You have no credibility and even less facts to substantiate your baseless claims and projections. Nonetheless, people like me have a better chance saving your life than trained law enforcement. People like me have more training AND practice more with our firearms than a typical LEO
-Geaux
