edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,883
- 1,830
Like I said, you can't be honest about anything.You can't be honest about anything.Mind reader? I never said I was a mind reader. I am taking him at his word.
I believe that is what he was speaking of. Perhaps it is because I believe that all politicians (regardless of party) are untrustworthy.
I don't bow down at your messiah's altar and beg to blow him as you do.
I am however, bringing up my fears and attempting to discuss with LWC and RW in a rational tone. I'd love it if you would join in, however, I've never noticed you discussing anything in a rational manner. You are a partisan troll, plain and simple. Not even worth the time it took to type this out.
Immie
HIS word was "universal" and you didn't take him at HIS word. YOUR word, or more accurately your MessiahRushie's word, was "nationalize" and that's the word YOU used because you rationalized that's what was in his mind when he said "universal."
And please don't project your sexual fantasies on me.
Thank you.
Welcome back Michael Savage.
His words were "Single Payer Health Care". Which means Nationalized Health Care.
You have just been proven a liar.
Immie
His words were "Single Payer Health Care" YOUR words were "Nationalized Health Care."
They do NOT mean the same thing. Single payer refers only to how it is paid for NOT how it is delivered. Nationalized health care refers to how it is delivered.
From the earlier Wikipedia link, so you have no excuse for your dishonesty:
Single-payer systems may contract for healthcare services from private organizations (as is the case in Canada) or may own and employ healthcare resources and personnel (as is the case in the United Kingdom). The term single-payer thus only describes the funding mechanismreferring to health care being paid for by a single public body from a single fundand does not specify the type of delivery, or for whom doctors work.