Do the olympic games prove Africans are physically superior?

[JimBowie1958]

On a 'individual' basis blacks are more gifted on the average in a 'physical semse', ---however you could take a football team made up of the highest rated black players and coached by the highest rated black coach vs. a team made up of the highest rated white players coached by the highest rated white coach and the whites would win more times than not....simply because white players are smarter...do not make the dumbass mistakes made by black players and would not get near the penalties the blacks do which often are game changers....not to mention the whites are 'team players' but the blacks look for individual glory hence all the celebrating one does when he scores a t.d. or whatever.

You are correct .....it is not a cultural factor at play that results in more blacks in the NFL...they simply perform better on a individual level...hence they make the cut...whereas the white guys do not.

I know that that is the image the media gives us, but it i simply not true.

Whites dont have the incentive to risk a sports career and so they forego it more often.

And many blacks are just as smart as any white person is. Some of the most brilliant people have been black folks.

Dont buy the medias bullshit.

 

[Muhammed]

Primates are indeed more athletic than white people.

Are you implying that white people are not primates?

 

[dannyboys]

Primates are indeed more athletic than white people. They run faster, jump higher, and are more violent and aggressive.

So what?

White people (humans) are primates, too.

Far more evolved. Negroes are barely literate, low in intelligence, and less able to control their primordial aggression. They are closer to being apes, which is why they have failed to assimilate to Western culture even after 300 years. They should be returned to their natural habitat to resume their evolution at their own, much slower pace.

That essentially what judge Alito said.
"If you put negroes into academic competition with whites the negroes will generally fail. It's not fair to the negroes. They ought to have places where they can succeed academically competing with each other."

 

[dannyboys]

On a 'individual' basis blacks are more gifted on the average in a 'physical semse', ---however you could take a football team made up of the highest rated black players and coached by the highest rated black coach vs. a team made up of the highest rated white players coached by the highest rated white coach and the whites would win more times than not....simply because white players are smarter...do not make the dumbass mistakes made by black players and would not get near the penalties the blacks do which often are game changers....not to mention the whites are 'team players' but the blacks look for individual glory hence all the celebrating one does when he scores a t.d. or whatever.

You are correct .....it is not a cultural factor at play that results in more blacks in the NFL...they simply perform better on a individual level...hence they make the cut...whereas the white guys do not.

I know that that is the image the media gives us, but it i simply not true.

Whites dont have the incentive to risk a sports career and so they forego it more often.

And many blacks are just as smart as any white person is. Some of the most brilliant people have been black folks.

Dont buy the medias bullshit.

"many" and "some" being the operative word.
List how many negroes have been awarded a Nobel Prize.
The list the 'field' they were awarded that prize.
I'll do it for you shall I?
Since 1901 fifteen negroes have been awarded the Prize.
Eleven for "Peace" whatever the fuck that means.
Three for 'Literature'.
One for 'economics'.
Ya. "many" and "some".

 

[reconmark]

On a 'individual' basis blacks are more gifted on the average in a 'physical semse', ---however you could take a football team made up of the highest rated black players and coached by the highest rated black coach vs. a team made up of the highest rated white players coached by the highest rated white coach and the whites would win more times than not....simply because white players are smarter...do not make the dumbass mistakes made by black players and would not get near the penalties the blacks do which often are game changers....not to mention the whites are 'team players' but the blacks look for individual glory hence all the celebrating one does when he scores a t.d. or whatever.

You are correct .....it is not a cultural factor at play that results in more blacks in the NFL...they simply perform better on a individual level...hence they make the cut...whereas the white guys do not.

I know that that is the image the media gives us, but it i simply not true.

Whites dont have the incentive to risk a sports career and so they forego it more often.

And many blacks are just as smart as any white person is. Some of the most brilliant people have been black folks.

Dont buy the medias bullshit.

"many" and "some" being the operative word.
List how many negroes have been awarded a Nobel Prize.
The list the 'field' they were awarded that prize.
I'll do it for you shall I?
Since 1901 fifteen negroes have been awarded the Prize.
Eleven for "Peace" whatever the fuck that means.
Three for 'Literature'.
One for 'economics'.
Ya. "many" and "some".

Strange that a so called white person just proved how stupid they are and don't even realize it.

 

[FJO]

On a 'individual' basis blacks are more gifted on the average in a 'physical semse', ---however you could take a football team made up of the highest rated black players and coached by the highest rated black coach vs. a team made up of the highest rated white players coached by the highest rated white coach and the whites would win more times than not....simply because white players are smarter...do not make the dumbass mistakes made by black players and would not get near the penalties the blacks do which often are game changers....not to mention the whites are 'team players' but the blacks look for individual glory hence all the celebrating one does when he scores a t.d. or whatever.

You are correct .....it is not a cultural factor at play that results in more blacks in the NFL...they simply perform better on a individual level...hence they make the cut...whereas the white guys do not.

I know that that is the image the media gives us, but it i simply not true.

Whites dont have the incentive to risk a sports career and so they forego it more often.

And many blacks are just as smart as any white person is. Some of the most brilliant people have been black folks.

Dont buy the medias bullshit.

"many" and "some" being the operative word.
List how many negroes have been awarded a Nobel Prize.
The list the 'field' they were awarded that prize.
I'll do it for you shall I?
Since 1901 fifteen negroes have been awarded the Prize.
Eleven for "Peace" whatever the fuck that means.
Three for 'Literature'.
One for 'economics'.
Ya. "many" and "some".

Actually, the Nobel Prize lost all of its significance as a measure of excellence, when it was awarded to shmucks like Al Gore and Barak Obama.

And even more significantly, by to whom it was NOT awarded.

 

[Correll]

Primates are indeed more athletic than white people. They run faster, jump higher, and are more violent and aggressive.

So what?

White people (humans) are primates, too.

Far more evolved. Negroes are barely literate, low in intelligence, and less able to control their primordial aggression. They are closer to being apes, which is why they have failed to assimilate to Western culture even after 300 years. They should be returned to their natural habitat to resume their evolution at their own, much slower pace.

That essentially what judge Alito said.
"If you put negroes into academic competition with whites the negroes will generally fail. It's not fair to the negroes. They ought to have places where they can succeed academically competing with each other."

I strongly doubt that is what he said.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Primates are indeed more athletic than white people.

Are you implying that white people are not primates?

Yes. Read Genesis. Mud people evolved from the apes, but the white man was formed from the dust and made in the image of God. The Adamic race was created to rule over all others.

Oddly enough, this was proven by Cain's conversation with God after killing his brother, something Bible fundamentalists still can't explain, that puts the lie to the claim that there were no people before Adam and Eve.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Blacks are superior in events involving running. It's more than just training, it's genetics.

Many of them (especially the Kenyans) train at high altitudes...this is a BIG advantage since it builds very high lung capacity.

 

[Conservative65]

Primates are indeed more athletic than white people. They run faster, jump higher, and are more violent and aggressive.

So what?

Obvious...blacks and whites should not play together...not a level playing field.

I disagree. What about football? For example, whites are better quarterbacks and blacks are better wide receivers. Blacks are better defensive ends and whites are better middle linebackers.

You can call it stereotyping, but many stereotypes are based on truth.

At some point, it's no longer a stereotype.

 

[NCC1701]

Blacks don't swim as well due to lower body fat and higher tissue density, as well as things explained below. Upper body strength is about equal to white but most powerlifting records are by whites.

It's the muscle and bones of the lower body that sets blacks apart,. there is no way they could win all these short distance events without some genetic advantage

Scientists Theorize Why Black Athletes Run Fastest

There is a whole body of evidence showing that there are distinct differences in body types among blacks and whites," said researcher Edward Jones, who researches adolescent obesity, nutrition and body composition at Howard University. "These are real patterns being described here. Whether the fastest sprinters are Jamaican, African or Canadian, most of them can be traced back generally to Western Africa."

Why center of gravity matters


Although there are also cultural factors at work, it all comes down to body makeup, Jones said.

"Blacks tend to have longer limbs with smaller circumferences, meaning that their centers of gravity are higher compared to whites of the same height," said Adrian Bejan, Jones' co-author, an engineering professor at Duke University. "Asians and whites tend to have longer torsos, so their centers of gravity are lower."

"These differences are small, and we don't really see them when we look at someone," Bejan told Life's Little Mysteries. "We are only rarely struck by how long someone's legs are."

But these small differences certainly matter in races lasting less than 10 seconds, Bejan said.

The height of a person's center of gravity affects how fast his feet are moving when they hit the ground, Bejan said. Each step a runner takes is like falling except the athlete breaks the fall with his foot. So the feet of a person with a higher center of gravity will hit the ground faster than someone with a lower center of gravity.

Torsos and legs

In the study, the scientists gathered data available from the militaries of 17 nations. Militaries measure their recruits for uniform fittings and are a reliable source of data, Bejan said. To approximate torso length, the scientists compared the average height of the military men with their sitting height – the distance from a chair to the top of the head.

Results showed the average sitting height of blacks was about 1.5 inches (3 cm) shorter than that of whites who were the same height. This means that, among blacks and whites of the same height, the legs of blacks were longer (think of a high-waisted person), while the torsos of whites were longer.

This physical difference gives a black athlete an advantage, even against an athlete of another race is who is taller and has a higher center of gravity, said Bejan. From a physics perspective, Bejan said, the legs do the work of running and the torso of the body is just extra weight that the legs must carry, so the race goes to the runners with longer legs and shorter torsos.

By contrast, whites tend to have the advantage in swimming, where a longer torso allows for faster speeds.

"Swimming actually generates a wave. The sport is the art of surfacing on that wave. When the wave is bigger – because the torso is longer – they go faster," Bejan said.

 

[NCC1701]

There is absolutely no reason to think that the brain also was somehow immune to evolutionary differences, I think the IQ gap is partially if not all genetic

 

[Sundance508]

There is absolutely no reason to think that the brain also was somehow immune to evolutionary differences, I think the IQ gap is partially if not all genetic

There is absolutely no reason to think that the brain also was somehow immune to evolutionary differences, I think the IQ gap is partially if not all genetic

The science of genetics is making advances despite all the interference from liberal acamedicians...who fear what the science might reveal....thus they label such research waycist and have opposed it to the hilt.
Ethics: Taboo genetics : Nature News & Comment

“Intelligence” Gene Identified

Performance IQ and gene link confirmed | The Source | Washington University in St. Louis

 

[NCC1701]

There is absolutely no reason to think that the brain also was somehow immune to evolutionary differences, I think the IQ gap is partially if not all genetic

There is absolutely no reason to think that the brain also was somehow immune to evolutionary differences, I think the IQ gap is partially if not all genetic

The science of genetics is making advances despite all the interference from liberal acamedicians...who fear what the science might reveal....thus they label such research waycist and have opposed it to the hilt.
Ethics: Taboo genetics : Nature News & Comment

“Intelligence” Gene Identified

Performance IQ and gene link confirmed | The Source | Washington University in St. Louis

Thanks. Science is very corrupted by leftist PC assholes, Stephen Jay Gould got caught lying about racial cranial measurements. There isn't any integrity in this field when the bias is so strong.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/14/science/14skull.html?_r=0

Scientists have often been accused of letting their ideology influence their results, and one of the most famous cases is that of Morton’s skulls — the global collection amassed by the 19th-century physical anthropologist Samuel George Morton.

In a 1981 book, “The Mismeasure of Man,” the paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould asserted that Morton, believing that brain size was a measure of intelligence, had subconsciously manipulated the brain volumes of European, Asian and African skulls to favor his bias that Europeans had larger brains and Africans smaller ones.

But now physical anthropologists at the University of Pennsylvania, which owns Morton’s collection, have remeasured the skulls, and in an article that does little to burnish Dr. Gould’s reputation as a scholar, they conclude that almost every detail of his analysis is wrong.


We do not yet have the genotype-to-phenotype maps yet, but when one phenotype (blacks) keep underperforming intellectually but over-perform athletically, the conclusion is obvious.

 

[Correll]

There is absolutely no reason to think that the brain also was somehow immune to evolutionary differences, I think the IQ gap is partially if not all genetic

Even more interesting is some recent research on evolution impacting group dynamics.

Where you can't look at the individual to see a difference but have to look at the interactions of the whole group.

 

[NCC1701]

There is absolutely no reason to think that the brain also was somehow immune to evolutionary differences, I think the IQ gap is partially if not all genetic

Even more interesting is some recent research on evolution impacting group dynamics.

Where you can't look at the individual to see a difference but have to look at the interactions of the whole group.

That seems difficult, genes are not passed to groups but to individuals. I guess if the brain composition of an entire group faces the same selection pressures then behavior traits might be similar.

For a long time the feminists were trying to pass off that men and women are equal. It took science many years to gather the collective guts just to point out the biologically obvious. Maybe this group thing is a way to do that while being PC

 

[Correll]

There is absolutely no reason to think that the brain also was somehow immune to evolutionary differences, I think the IQ gap is partially if not all genetic

Even more interesting is some recent research on evolution impacting group dynamics.

Where you can't look at the individual to see a difference but have to look at the interactions of the whole group.

That seems difficult, genes are not passed to groups but to individuals. I guess if the brain composition of an entire group faces the same selection pressures then behavior traits might be similar.
...

Individuals compete within a group for resources and breeding partners, while cooperating to compete against other groups, and to secure resources.


Individuals that are too greedy, harm the group.

Individuals that are too greedy and too obvious about it, get killed or outcast.

Different groups do this to greater or lesser degrees.

More successful individuals pass down more genes.

More successful groups pass down more genes.


Different genes get passed down in each group.

Some groups flourish, others die out, or struggle along.

Small, subtle but significant differences can emerge.

 

[NCC1701]

There is absolutely no reason to think that the brain also was somehow immune to evolutionary differences, I think the IQ gap is partially if not all genetic

Even more interesting is some recent research on evolution impacting group dynamics.

Where you can't look at the individual to see a difference but have to look at the interactions of the whole group.

That seems difficult, genes are not passed to groups but to individuals. I guess if the brain composition of an entire group faces the same selection pressures then behavior traits might be similar.
...

Individuals compete within a group for resources and breeding partners, while cooperating to compete against other groups, and to secure resources.


Individuals that are too greedy, harm the group.

Individuals that are too greedy and too obvious about it, get killed or outcast.

Different groups do this to greater or lesser degrees.

More successful individuals pass down more genes.

More successful groups pass down more genes.


Different genes get passed down in each group.

Some groups flourish, others die out, or struggle along.

Small, subtle but significant differences can emerge.

I see, the group is the environment.

Black people don't really like marriage as much as everyone else and they have a lot of bickering between genders. There are far more singles, divorces, and kids born out wedlock. This could be an outcome of this type of evolution. Interestingly enough, marriages of black woman and white man are more stable than white-white, while black men and white women are very unstable.