Creationists

[orogenicman]

Funny, evolutionists insulting evolutionists

You evidently didn't read much of what he wrote to say such a thing. He most certainly is educated, and can actually defend your religion better than yourself.

What part of that post was grammatically correct? For that matter, what part of that post was correct in any way?

With people, sometimes they are in a hurry,and sometimes grammar errors occur.

Right. Explain how pointing out errors is an insult.

 

[YWN666]

Physical threat. Against the rules, reported.

You can't be serious.

The mods take it very seriously. Trust me.

Nonsense. It was obvious to any thinking person that it was not intended as a threat and stop fighting your battles with negative rep, idiot.

 

[daws101]

World's Most Famous Atheist Accepts Existence of God because of Science - YouTube

and ? it's only proof that he changed his mind, he could've said santa claus belifew is not evidence..(cue buzzer)

 

[daws101]

Hawly, Daws and Newspolitics real insidious agenda is to set up the artificial god government. Their propaganda is gaining a huge foothold in America today.

"There’s many psychological components to all of those questions, but the central theme must be remembered of government as an artificial God. The concept of corrupt leaders as an artificial God. Something that first requires the abolition of any God that is not the dictator himself. The result of such a system is ultimately the destruction of the entire society, usually lined with at least several millions deaths in the process. In the case of Stalin’s Soveit Union, experts place the death toll at around 40 million — a number that is extremely conservative and factors in around 20 million deaths from non-combat related events like artificial famine and executions.

According to one expert breakdown carried by the International Business Times, the numbers break down as follows:

“1 million imprisoned or exiled between 1927 to 1929; 9 to 11 million peasants forced off their lands and another 2 to 3 million peasants arrested or exiled in the mass collectivization program; 6 to 7 million killed by an artificial famine in 1932-1934; 1 million exiled from Moscow and Leningrad in 1935; 1 million executed during the ”Great Terror’ of 1937-1938; 4 to 6 million dispatched to forced labor camps; 10 to 12 million people forcibly relocated during World War II; and at least 1 million arrested for various ‘political crimes’ from 1946 to 1953.”"

Prison Planet.com » Obama Plays God, and Political Correctness Is His Weapon

When we take over, we're coming for you first.

Look and listen for the black helicopters.

Physical threat. Against the rules, reported.

false ....shut the fuck up!

 

[daws101]

When we take over, we're coming for you first.

Look and listen for the black helicopters.

Physical threat. Against the rules, reported.

You can't be serious.

jg is seriously psycho..the mods on the other hand...

 

[Youwerecreated]

What part of that post was grammatically correct? For that matter, what part of that post was correct in any way?

With people, sometimes they are in a hurry,and sometimes grammar errors occur.

Right. Explain how pointing out errors is an insult.

Probably by asking a person to take an English class that is clearly educated.

 

[Youwerecreated]

When we take over, we're coming for you first.

Look and listen for the black helicopters.

Physical threat. Against the rules, reported.

false ....shut the fuck up!

Anyone who takes you serious needs their head examined.

 

[Hollie]

Physical threat. Against the rules, reported.

false ....shut the fuck up!

Anyone who takes you serious needs their head examined.

Oh, you poor dear. Angry about having your arguments promoting fear and superstition thwarted?

 

[Youwerecreated]

false ....shut the fuck up!

Anyone who takes you serious needs their head examined.

Oh, you poor dear. Angry about having your arguments promoting fear and superstition thwarted?

Sure!

 

[Hollie]

Anyone who takes you serious needs their head examined.

Oh, you poor dear. Angry about having your arguments promoting fear and superstition thwarted?

Sure!

We'te in agreement.

As you will accept what is in your bibles vs. "secular" science texts, the natural world must thoroughly confound you. Those atheistic, evilutionist science texts give us answers to naturally occurring events: lighting, thunder, tsunamis, ocean currents, etc.

Your bibles would leave to believe that sailing the oceans would cause you fall off the edge of the flat earth. Your bibles promote anti-gravity inasmuch as men can rise to "heaven".

Is the biblical "firmament" described accurately vs. the atheistic, evilutionist descriptions of the atmosphere?

 

[Youwerecreated]

Oh, you poor dear. Angry about having your arguments promoting fear and superstition thwarted?

Sure!

We'te in agreement.

As you will accept what is in your bibles vs. "secular" science texts, the natural world must thoroughly confound you. Those atheistic, evilutionist science texts give us answers to naturally occurring events: lighting, thunder, tsunamis, ocean currents, etc.

Your bibles would leave to believe that sailing the oceans would cause you fall off the edge of the flat earth. Your bibles promote anti-gravity inasmuch as men can rise to "heaven".

Is the biblical "firmament" described accurately vs. the atheistic, evilutionist descriptions of the atmosphere?

Why do you blatantly misinform and lie ?

 

[Hollie]

Sure!

We'te in agreement.

As you will accept what is in your bibles vs. "secular" science texts, the natural world must thoroughly confound you. Those atheistic, evilutionist science texts give us answers to naturally occurring events: lighting, thunder, tsunamis, ocean currents, etc.

Your bibles would leave to believe that sailing the oceans would cause you fall off the edge of the flat earth. Your bibles promote anti-gravity inasmuch as men can rise to "heaven".

Is the biblical "firmament" described accurately vs. the atheistic, evilutionist descriptions of the atmosphere?

Why do you blatantly misinform and lie ?

Are you too befuddled to address challenges to your ideology?

 

[Youwerecreated]

we'te in agreement.

As you will accept what is in your bibles vs. "secular" science texts, the natural world must thoroughly confound you. Those atheistic, evilutionist science texts give us answers to naturally occurring events: Lighting, thunder, tsunamis, ocean currents, etc.

Your bibles would leave to believe that sailing the oceans would cause you fall off the edge of the flat earth. Your bibles promote anti-gravity inasmuch as men can rise to "heaven".

Is the biblical "firmament" described accurately vs. The atheistic, evilutionist descriptions of the atmosphere?

why do you blatantly misinform and lie ?

are you too befuddled to address challenges to your ideology?

au contraire !

 

[Hollie]

why do you blatantly misinform and lie ?

are you too befuddled to address challenges to your ideology?

au contraire !

I thought you would slither away.

 

[PMZ]

Everybody has Faith or faith. We're compelled to wonder about what can't be known.

But we don't need to explain what can be known. We just need to learn it. How could it be possible for knowledge and wonder to conflict?

 

[daws101]

With people, sometimes they are in a hurry,and sometimes grammar errors occur.

Right. Explain how pointing out errors is an insult.

Probably by asking a person to take an English class that is clearly educated.

that should read: "I'm not near as educated as I like people to think I am , being caught trying to bullshit my way around my lack of education pisses me off."

 

[orogenicman]

With people, sometimes they are in a hurry,and sometimes grammar errors occur.

Right. Explain how pointing out errors is an insult.

Probably by asking a person to take an English class that is clearly educated.

Even if that were true, educated people still make mistakes, even grammatical ones. That said, I am uncertain how the response in question is any indication that person is 'edumacated'.

 

[Youwerecreated]

Right. Explain how pointing out errors is an insult.

Probably by asking a person to take an English class that is clearly educated.

Even if that were true, educated people still make mistakes, even grammatical ones. That said, I am uncertain how the response in question is any indication that person is 'edumacated'.

That is true you meant to insult the person but once it was pointed out he was on your side you retreat from the insult.

 

[orogenicman]

Probably by asking a person to take an English class that is clearly educated.

Even if that were true, educated people still make mistakes, even grammatical ones. That said, I am uncertain how the response in question is any indication that person is 'edumacated'.

That is true you meant to insult the person but once it was pointed out he was on your side you retreat from the insult.

Being on my side is no excuse for being grammatically incorrect.

 

[Youwerecreated]

Even if that were true, educated people still make mistakes, even grammatical ones. That said, I am uncertain how the response in question is any indication that person is 'edumacated'.

That is true you meant to insult the person but once it was pointed out he was on your side you retreat from the insult.

Being on my side is no excuse for being grammatically incorrect.

Oh my you are confused lol.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/religion-and-ethics/190358-creationists.html#post4295914

He quoted someone else.