Discussion in 'Religion and Ethics' started by cbirch2, Oct 19, 2011.
How the hell does someone seriously believe the earth is 6000 years old?
Meh. It baffles me.
You should do not believe liberals!
Flash Darwin, Marx and other leftists "scientists" down the toilet.
Proof the earth was created 6,000 years ago in 6 days of 24 hours
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1msS71xL00&feature=related]Earth is 6,000 Years Old - YouTube[/ame]
LMAO WITH A HERMAN CAIN BANNER FOR HIS SIGNATURE!!!! LMAO!!!
that was the most ridiculous video ive ever watched. your very simple.
Well, I didn't have to watch much. When his first thing on how to determine the age of the earth he says "we go to the Bible." Why? Why not look at the physical evidence first?
And next he starts talking about "Evolutionists say the age of the earth is..." and "...the Big Bang theory, according to Evolution..." Neither is part of the Theory of Evolution. The first real theory of Evolution was Lamarkism, who published in 1800, 60 years before Darwin. But even before that, geologists and Naturalists figured out the Earth was much older than 6,000 years, going back to Nicholas Steno in the late 1600s.
He understood only a very small part of that
Who is John Morris Pendleton?
This is quite the CV, let me tell you........
The guy's got a bachelor's degree and worked as a mechanic and thinks he can slap a labcoat on and have instant credibility.
At least, unlike Kent Hovind, he didn't buy a Ph.D. at a Diploma Mill.
"you should do not believe liberals"
The Catholic Church, which accepts the old earth and most of evolution (seperate creation of the soul) is liberal?
That was me quoting the second poster and his horrible grammar. Nothing to do with the actual argument.
Oh, I knew...I was just trying to reinforce your point.
Liberal, yes, on points like the death penalty and torture. Not so liberal on things like gay marriage and abortion. It's really not valid to make a blanket statement like that from either side.
"You should not believe auto-mechanics who claim to be "chemists" because they got a bachelor's in chemistry on an issue of biological science."
It seems your "chemist" is a newbie with his head up his ass.
Babies toys from China with lead paint on them.
Creationists based their beliefs on a book 3000 years old... Darwin had his theories at around the mid 1800's. Millions of the smartest people in the world advocate the fact that the world is at least older than 6000. I don't know but given the facts I vote for the scientists.
Creationists then say: But it's highly unlikely the world was created from a simultaneous explosion into what it is today...
My reply: Well it is highly unlikely that the single specific sperm cell that fertilized the egg within your mother's womb was able to make the creature that you call yourself today yet it happened didn't it?
Here are some reasons.
Evidence for a Young World - Answers in Genesis
Chapter 4: Unlocking the Geologic Record - Answers in Genesis
Young Earth Creationism - Conservapedia
This video destroy's evolutionist timeline and makes a very strong argument for the global flood,and a young earth.
101 - The Earth In Time And Space - Amazing Discoveries TV
Literally the most retarded, intellectually dishonest arguments ever.
Usually when someone makes a claim like you just did you would back it up with something of substance.
You yourself on another thread said there was a 9,000+ year old tree, now you're on here defending those who say the Earth is 6,000 years old.
At least pick one psychotic idea and stick to it.
Or did God create that tree, use it as a toothpick, then later create the Earth and he planted it?
I'll go ahead and repost my partial review on this video (I need to freaking finish this thing already).
Separate names with a comma.