NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
The Science of Sex Education - Brent Bozell - Page 1
"There's no classroom experience the libertine supports more mightily than "sex education." They have struggled to banish even a whisper of a religious worldview from the classroom. Only the secular and "science-based" ideology is allowed.
The Daily Beast website recently celebrated a San Francisco ruling: "Hero Judge Rules Abstinence-Only Sex Ed Is Illegal." Judge Donald Black ruled "access to medically and socially appropriate sexual education is an important public right," and that one district had provided "medically inaccurate information," like the notion that sexual abstinence prevents pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease.
Do the guardians of "science" -- like the happy "reproductive justice" folks at the American Civil Liberties Union -- think this is "medically inaccurate" because no child can avoid having sex before graduation?"
Notice all the quotes of "science" like science isn't scientific? This is why conservatives and the GOP are breathing their last guys.
Are you really saying abstaining from sex won't prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease?
Not leaving the driveway in Dad's car will keep a kid from having a car accident,
but if students were only taught that in Driver Education class, would you consider that an adequate treatment of the subject?
Did you actually read the OP, here the quote I directed the question to:
""medically inaccurate information," like the notion that sexual abstinence prevents pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease."
Now tell me how that is "medically inaccurate information,"?
Does Townhall source that quote, or that rendition of what the judge supposedly said.
I say the judge never said that.