'Conservative sex education'

Delta4Embassy

Gold Member
Dec 12, 2013
25,744
3,043
280
Earth
The Science of Sex Education - Brent Bozell - Page 1

"There's no classroom experience the libertine supports more mightily than "sex education." They have struggled to banish even a whisper of a religious worldview from the classroom. Only the secular and "science-based" ideology is allowed.

The Daily Beast website recently celebrated a San Francisco ruling: "Hero Judge Rules Abstinence-Only Sex Ed Is Illegal." Judge Donald Black ruled "access to medically and socially appropriate sexual education is an important public right," and that one district had provided "medically inaccurate information," like the notion that sexual abstinence prevents pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease.

Do the guardians of "science" -- like the happy "reproductive justice" folks at the American Civil Liberties Union -- think this is "medically inaccurate" because no child can avoid having sex before graduation?"

Notice all the quotes of "science" like science isn't scientific? This is why conservatives and the GOP are breathing their last guys.
 
When did Townhall turn into a comedy site?!?! :laugh2:

Someone made mention of it just yesterday in some read I looked at. So seeing them as this bastion of conservative intellect I looked at their piece on sex-ed. :)

Comedy sums it up well.
 
The Science of Sex Education - Brent Bozell - Page 1

"There's no classroom experience the libertine supports more mightily than "sex education." They have struggled to banish even a whisper of a religious worldview from the classroom. Only the secular and "science-based" ideology is allowed.

The Daily Beast website recently celebrated a San Francisco ruling: "Hero Judge Rules Abstinence-Only Sex Ed Is Illegal." Judge Donald Black ruled "access to medically and socially appropriate sexual education is an important public right," and that one district had provided "medically inaccurate information," like the notion that sexual abstinence prevents pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease.

Do the guardians of "science" -- like the happy "reproductive justice" folks at the American Civil Liberties Union -- think this is "medically inaccurate" because no child can avoid having sex before graduation?"

Notice all the quotes of "science" like science isn't scientific? This is why conservatives and the GOP are breathing their last guys.

Are you really saying abstaining from sex won't prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease?
 
If liberals don't want the government telling them they can't have abortions or being gay is immoral, then in turn, they shouldn't want the government anywhere near their bedrooms.
 
Scientific fact: Abstinence prevents pregnancy and std's with 100% accuracy.

It is not the government's job to be teaching about anything other than the basics of puberty and sex. Everything else is the parent's job.
 
Abstaince only works, just ask those behind the pulpit.

That's the only offensive one liner I can think of right now, maybe I can think of more to contribute later on - as this thread degenerates further.
 
The Science of Sex Education - Brent Bozell - Page 1

"There's no classroom experience the libertine supports more mightily than "sex education." They have struggled to banish even a whisper of a religious worldview from the classroom. Only the secular and "science-based" ideology is allowed.

The Daily Beast website recently celebrated a San Francisco ruling: "Hero Judge Rules Abstinence-Only Sex Ed Is Illegal." Judge Donald Black ruled "access to medically and socially appropriate sexual education is an important public right," and that one district had provided "medically inaccurate information," like the notion that sexual abstinence prevents pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease.

Do the guardians of "science" -- like the happy "reproductive justice" folks at the American Civil Liberties Union -- think this is "medically inaccurate" because no child can avoid having sex before graduation?"

Notice all the quotes of "science" like science isn't scientific? This is why conservatives and the GOP are breathing their last guys.
Another sex thread by the retard delta.
 
The Science of Sex Education - Brent Bozell - Page 1

"There's no classroom experience the libertine supports more mightily than "sex education." They have struggled to banish even a whisper of a religious worldview from the classroom. Only the secular and "science-based" ideology is allowed.

The Daily Beast website recently celebrated a San Francisco ruling: "Hero Judge Rules Abstinence-Only Sex Ed Is Illegal." Judge Donald Black ruled "access to medically and socially appropriate sexual education is an important public right," and that one district had provided "medically inaccurate information," like the notion that sexual abstinence prevents pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease.

Do the guardians of "science" -- like the happy "reproductive justice" folks at the American Civil Liberties Union -- think this is "medically inaccurate" because no child can avoid having sex before graduation?"

Notice all the quotes of "science" like science isn't scientific? This is why conservatives and the GOP are breathing their last guys.
Another sex thread by the retard delta.
Admit it. You were hoping there was going to be a picture of a penis somewhere in the thread when you clicked on it.
 
The Science of Sex Education - Brent Bozell - Page 1

"There's no classroom experience the libertine supports more mightily than "sex education." They have struggled to banish even a whisper of a religious worldview from the classroom. Only the secular and "science-based" ideology is allowed.

The Daily Beast website recently celebrated a San Francisco ruling: "Hero Judge Rules Abstinence-Only Sex Ed Is Illegal." Judge Donald Black ruled "access to medically and socially appropriate sexual education is an important public right," and that one district had provided "medically inaccurate information," like the notion that sexual abstinence prevents pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease.

Do the guardians of "science" -- like the happy "reproductive justice" folks at the American Civil Liberties Union -- think this is "medically inaccurate" because no child can avoid having sex before graduation?"

Notice all the quotes of "science" like science isn't scientific? This is why conservatives and the GOP are breathing their last guys.

It is rather typical of the socialist left to believe that without the government teaching people to have sex people will never learn how. How did people learn before public schools taught it? Maybe people never figured it out but then where did all the people come from? It is such a mystery. How did people learn to have sex before government schools? There is no way the average person could have figured it out because people are to dumb to do anything on their own.
 
Teaching children about sex is not the governments job.

You don't think a very basic and necessary biological function should be taught in school?
No, it should not. That is why we have parents.

Unfortunately, parents in this nation have been largely absent from their basic roles and jobs so sex education has essentially been forced into the schools. The children need to get the information from somewhere and the schools are it because the parents have failed to do so.

The problem, of course, is that 'sex' is only a small part of what they want to teach in sex education. 'Alternative lifestyles' and the like are lauded as sex education and this is where you start to get into problems when you leave parenting to the government.

At one time my sister came home near tears because the school was telling the kids that broken homes were so much better than complete families. There was a list of all the wonderful things that children get when they have 2 homes rather than one. Asinine in the extreme but, again, when you expect the state to parent this is what you get.

Is there a good solution? Not really - we can no longer expect parents to step in so we cannot eliminate sex and other 'moralistic' education to be removed from the schools but they do a an extremely shitty job at it.
 
Teaching children about sex is not the governments job.

You don't think a very basic and necessary biological function should be taught in school?
No, it should not. That is why we have parents.

Unfortunately, parents in this nation have been largely absent from their basic roles and jobs so sex education has essentially been forced into the schools. The children need to get the information from somewhere and the schools are it because the parents have failed to do so.

The problem, of course, is that 'sex' is only a small part of what they want to teach in sex education. 'Alternative lifestyles' and the like are lauded as sex education and this is where you start to get into problems when you leave parenting to the government.

At one time my sister came home near tears because the school was telling the kids that broken homes were so much better than complete families. There was a list of all the wonderful things that children get when they have 2 homes rather than one. Asinine in the extreme but, again, when you expect the state to parent this is what you get.

Is there a good solution? Not really - we can no longer expect parents to step in so we cannot eliminate sex and other 'moralistic' education to be removed from the schools but they do a an extremely shitty job at it.

I think if parents do a bad job at teaching sex then it is NOT the role of government to step in. You assume that parents should do xyz and if they don't then govt has to do it. The entire thinking presumes a goal as in this and this should happen and if it doesn't then the govt should ensure that it happens. It takes away an individual's right to exist as they want by taking away their ability to decide what that outcome is in their own lives. In my opinion, if a family didn't want to teach their kids about sex then so be it.
 
Does left wing sex ed teaching emphasize the drastically increased risk of HIV and STD transmission via male homo sex? I bet they spend no time on that.
If they did honestly, male homos would be a pariah.

I believe they teach that you should put a rubber on it. EOS.

Shit, they'll even demonstrate it on a cucumber for those horny little fucks. You won't get that kind of info out of some candy ass fantasy world abstinence only education.
 
Does left wing sex ed teaching emphasize the drastically increased risk of HIV and STD transmission via male homo sex? I bet they spend no time on that.
If they did honestly, male homos would be a pariah.

I believe they teach that you should put a rubber on it. EOS.

Shit, they'll even demonstrate it on a cucumber for those horny little fucks. You won't get that kind of info out of some candy ass fantasy world abstinence only education.
I didn't say anything about abstinence only. I asked about teaching about the disaster that homo male sex is and whether or not that is emphasized. And that disaster has continued to occur long after condom use became a ubiquitous endorsement.
 

Forum List

Back
Top