'Conservative sex education'

[AmericanFirst]

The Science of Sex Education - Brent Bozell - Page 1

"There's no classroom experience the libertine supports more mightily than "sex education." They have struggled to banish even a whisper of a religious worldview from the classroom. Only the secular and "science-based" ideology is allowed.

The Daily Beast website recently celebrated a San Francisco ruling: "Hero Judge Rules Abstinence-Only Sex Ed Is Illegal." Judge Donald Black ruled "access to medically and socially appropriate sexual education is an important public right," and that one district had provided "medically inaccurate information," like the notion that sexual abstinence prevents pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease.

Do the guardians of "science" -- like the happy "reproductive justice" folks at the American Civil Liberties Union -- think this is "medically inaccurate" because no child can avoid having sex before graduation?"

Notice all the quotes of "science" like science isn't scientific? This is why conservatives and the GOP are breathing their last guys.

Another sex thread by the retard delta.

Admit it. You were hoping there was going to be a picture of a penis somewhere in the thread when you clicked on it.

Admit it, you are as big an idiot as delta.

 

[Zoom-boing]

Admit it. You were hoping there was going to be a picture of a penis somewhere in the thread when you clicked on it.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

This board has a VERY unhealthy obsession with the subject of sexuality.

Bunch of weirdos

I agree, sex edcuation should be taught as a science and not a perversion.

That has nothing to do with my post. I suspect you're one of the weirdos too. Bunch of sex starved losers constantly posting about sexual shit. Get a grip

 

[HappyJoy]

This board has a VERY unhealthy obsession with the subject of sexuality.

Bunch of weirdos

I agree, sex edcuation should be taught as a science and not a perversion.

That has nothing to do with my post. I suspect you're one of the weirdos too. Bunch of sex starved losers constantly posting about sexual shit. Get a grip

No, I'm one of those posters who is pointing out to you that sex is natural and normal and our kids should be taught sex education in school so that they don't grow up not having the ability to talk/deal with it and think it's disgusting.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

This board has a VERY unhealthy obsession with the subject of sexuality.

Bunch of weirdos

I agree, sex edcuation should be taught as a science and not a perversion.

That has nothing to do with my post. I suspect you're one of the weirdos too. Bunch of sex starved losers constantly posting about sexual shit. Get a grip

No, I'm one of those posters who is pointing out to you that sex is natural and normal and our kids should be taught sex education in school so that they don't grow up not having the ability to talk/deal with it and think it's disgusting.

Except obsessing over it IS unhealthy.

 

[Zoom-boing]

No, I'm one of those posters who is pointing out to you that sex is natural and normal and our kids should be taught sex education in school so that they don't grow up not having the ability to talk/deal with it and think it's disgusting.

They should be taught the basics of sex in school, the morality of sex is the parent's job not the government's.

 

[HappyJoy]

No, I'm one of those posters who is pointing out to you that sex is natural and normal and our kids should be taught sex education in school so that they don't grow up not having the ability to talk/deal with it and think it's disgusting.

They should be taught the basics of sex in school, the morality of sex is the parent's job not the government's.

Give me an example.

 

[Zoom-boing]

No, I'm one of those posters who is pointing out to you that sex is natural and normal and our kids should be taught sex education in school so that they don't grow up not having the ability to talk/deal with it and think it's disgusting.

They should be taught the basics of sex in school, the morality of sex is the parent's job not the government's.

Give me an example.

An example of what? It's parents job to teach their children morals, not the governments.

 

[HappyJoy]

No, I'm one of those posters who is pointing out to you that sex is natural and normal and our kids should be taught sex education in school so that they don't grow up not having the ability to talk/deal with it and think it's disgusting.

They should be taught the basics of sex in school, the morality of sex is the parent's job not the government's.

Give me an example.

An example of what? It's parents job to teach their children morals, not the governments.

Give me a specific example of what you are talking about, what moral is being taught that you disagree with?

Who should put the condom on?

Who should buy the condoms?

Do you really have to give her a ride to the clinic if you're just not that into her?

What are you talking about?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Does left wing sex ed teaching emphasize the drastically increased risk of HIV and STD transmission via male homo sex? I bet they spend no time on that.
If they did honestly, male homos would be a pariah.

Probably one of the biggest problems with sex "education" is that it isn't education, it's indoctrination. If they really wanted kids to know the truth, they would tell them the best way to avoid pregnancy and STDs is abstenance, and that homosexual sex increases the odds of AIDs and other STD's. You'll never hear of kids actually getting the straight dope from sex education.

 

[kaz]

The Science of Sex Education - Brent Bozell - Page 1

"There's no classroom experience the libertine supports more mightily than "sex education." They have struggled to banish even a whisper of a religious worldview from the classroom. Only the secular and "science-based" ideology is allowed.

The Daily Beast website recently celebrated a San Francisco ruling: "Hero Judge Rules Abstinence-Only Sex Ed Is Illegal." Judge Donald Black ruled "access to medically and socially appropriate sexual education is an important public right," and that one district had provided "medically inaccurate information," like the notion that sexual abstinence prevents pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease.

Do the guardians of "science" -- like the happy "reproductive justice" folks at the American Civil Liberties Union -- think this is "medically inaccurate" because no child can avoid having sex before graduation?"

Notice all the quotes of "science" like science isn't scientific? This is why conservatives and the GOP are breathing their last guys.

There really is nothing you don't turn over to government to do for you, is there?

 

[Zoom-boing]

No, I'm one of those posters who is pointing out to you that sex is natural and normal and our kids should be taught sex education in school so that they don't grow up not having the ability to talk/deal with it and think it's disgusting.

They should be taught the basics of sex in school, the morality of sex is the parent's job not the government's.

Give me an example.

An example of what? It's parents job to teach their children morals, not the governments.

Give me a specific example of what you are talking about, what moral is being taught that you disagree with?

Who should put the condom on?

Who should buy the condoms?

Do you really have to give her a ride to the clinic if you're just not that into her?

What are you talking about?

Anything that falls outside the basics of puberty and sex (how to make a baby). Anything else is the parent's job. I'm sorry you are having trouble with understanding that.

 

[blastoff]

Un

The Science of Sex Education - Brent Bozell - Page 1

"There's no classroom experience the libertine supports more mightily than "sex education." They have struggled to banish even a whisper of a religious worldview from the classroom. Only the secular and "science-based" ideology is allowed.

The Daily Beast website recently celebrated a San Francisco ruling: "Hero Judge Rules Abstinence-Only Sex Ed Is Illegal." Judge Donald Black ruled "access to medically and socially appropriate sexual education is an important public right," and that one district had provided "medically inaccurate information," like the notion that sexual abstinence prevents pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease.

Do the guardians of "science" -- like the happy "reproductive justice" folks at the American Civil Liberties Union -- think this is "medically inaccurate" because no child can avoid having sex before graduation?"

Notice all the quotes of "science" like science isn't scientific? This is why conservatives and the GOP are breathing their last guys.

Another sex thread by the retard delta.

I disagree. It's by the attention whore retard delta.

 

[BULLDOG]

The Science of Sex Education - Brent Bozell - Page 1

"There's no classroom experience the libertine supports more mightily than "sex education." They have struggled to banish even a whisper of a religious worldview from the classroom. Only the secular and "science-based" ideology is allowed.

The Daily Beast website recently celebrated a San Francisco ruling: "Hero Judge Rules Abstinence-Only Sex Ed Is Illegal." Judge Donald Black ruled "access to medically and socially appropriate sexual education is an important public right," and that one district had provided "medically inaccurate information," like the notion that sexual abstinence prevents pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease.

Do the guardians of "science" -- like the happy "reproductive justice" folks at the American Civil Liberties Union -- think this is "medically inaccurate" because no child can avoid having sex before graduation?"

Notice all the quotes of "science" like science isn't scientific? This is why conservatives and the GOP are breathing their last guys.

It is rather typical of the socialist left to believe that without the government teaching people to have sex people will never learn how. How did people learn before public schools taught it? Maybe people never figured it out but then where did all the people come from? It is such a mystery. How did people learn to have sex before government schools? There is no way the average person could have figured it out because people are to dumb to do anything on their own.

It's not a question of how to do it. It's obvious that our teenagers already know that quite well. It's a question of how to do it without a lot of unwanted pregnancies and diseases.

 

[FA_Q2]

Teaching children about sex is not the governments job.

You don't think a very basic and necessary biological function should be taught in school?

No, it should not. That is why we have parents.

Unfortunately, parents in this nation have been largely absent from their basic roles and jobs so sex education has essentially been forced into the schools. The children need to get the information from somewhere and the schools are it because the parents have failed to do so.

The problem, of course, is that 'sex' is only a small part of what they want to teach in sex education. 'Alternative lifestyles' and the like are lauded as sex education and this is where you start to get into problems when you leave parenting to the government.

At one time my sister came home near tears because the school was telling the kids that broken homes were so much better than complete families. There was a list of all the wonderful things that children get when they have 2 homes rather than one. Asinine in the extreme but, again, when you expect the state to parent this is what you get.

Is there a good solution? Not really - we can no longer expect parents to step in so we cannot eliminate sex and other 'moralistic' education to be removed from the schools but they do a an extremely shitty job at it.

I think if parents do a bad job at teaching sex then it is NOT the role of government to step in. You assume that parents should do xyz and if they don't then govt has to do it. The entire thinking presumes a goal as in this and this should happen and if it doesn't then the govt should ensure that it happens. It takes away an individual's right to exist as they want by taking away their ability to decide what that outcome is in their own lives. In my opinion, if a family didn't want to teach their kids about sex then so be it.

I don't really assume that parents should do XYZ - I ASSERT that they are obligated to. It really is not a matter of advocating for the government to step in - the reality is that they are GOING to step in as long as parents are absent ion their obligation. It is almost assured.

I don't want the government involved but I can guarantee you that they are going to stay involved as long as parents remain to damn lazy to do this shit themselves.

 

[FA_Q2]

Does left wing sex ed teaching emphasize the drastically increased risk of HIV and STD transmission via male homo sex? I bet they spend no time on that.
If they did honestly, male homos would be a pariah.

I believe they teach that you should put a rubber on it. EOS.

Shit, they'll even demonstrate it on a cucumber for those horny little fucks. You won't get that kind of info out of some candy ass fantasy world abstinence only education.

I didn't say anything about abstinence only. I asked about teaching about the disaster that homo male sex is and whether or not that is emphasized. And that disaster has continued to occur long after condom use became a ubiquitous endorsement.

Truthfully I believe that they actually do teach anal sex is the most dangerous form of sex in relation to STD's.

A lot of people here seem to be assuming that they do not. I know that the sex ed I went through covered this though that was some years ago.

 

[BULLDOG]

Does left wing sex ed teaching emphasize the drastically increased risk of HIV and STD transmission via male homo sex? I bet they spend no time on that.
If they did honestly, male homos would be a pariah.

Probably one of the biggest problems with sex "education" is that it isn't education, it's indoctrination. If they really wanted kids to know the truth, they would tell them the best way to avoid pregnancy and STDs is abstenance, and that homosexual sex increases the odds of AIDs and other STD's. You'll never hear of kids actually getting the straight dope from sex education.

You don't really think that will convince them not to do it anyway do you? All your way will do is assure that there will be a lot more unwanted pregnancies, and a lot more diseases passed around.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Does left wing sex ed teaching emphasize the drastically increased risk of HIV and STD transmission via male homo sex? I bet they spend no time on that.
If they did honestly, male homos would be a pariah.

I believe they teach that you should put a rubber on it. EOS.

Shit, they'll even demonstrate it on a cucumber for those horny little fucks. You won't get that kind of info out of some candy ass fantasy world abstinence only education.

I didn't say anything about abstinence only. I asked about teaching about the disaster that homo male sex is and whether or not that is emphasized. And that disaster has continued to occur long after condom use became a ubiquitous endorsement.

Truthfully I believe that they actually do teach anal sex is the most dangerous form of sex in relation to STD's.

A lot of people here seem to be assuming that they do not. I know that the sex ed I went through covered this though that was some years ago.

I doubt they emphasize the type of sex as well as the frequency relative to the sexuality of the gender. That reality, that truth would not jibe with the agenda. It would inevitably result in anti-homo sentiment.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Does left wing sex ed teaching emphasize the drastically increased risk of HIV and STD transmission via male homo sex? I bet they spend no time on that.
If they did honestly, male homos would be a pariah.

Probably one of the biggest problems with sex "education" is that it isn't education, it's indoctrination. If they really wanted kids to know the truth, they would tell them the best way to avoid pregnancy and STDs is abstenance, and that homosexual sex increases the odds of AIDs and other STD's. You'll never hear of kids actually getting the straight dope from sex education.

You don't really think that will convince them not to do it anyway do you? All your way will do is assure that there will be a lot more unwanted pregnancies, and a lot more diseases passed around.

You mean like the way it was when there wasn't as much disease and unwanted pregnancy before the sexual revolution, welfare and homosexual liberation?

 

[FA_Q2]

Does left wing sex ed teaching emphasize the drastically increased risk of HIV and STD transmission via male homo sex? I bet they spend no time on that.
If they did honestly, male homos would be a pariah.

I believe they teach that you should put a rubber on it. EOS.

Shit, they'll even demonstrate it on a cucumber for those horny little fucks. You won't get that kind of info out of some candy ass fantasy world abstinence only education.

I didn't say anything about abstinence only. I asked about teaching about the disaster that homo male sex is and whether or not that is emphasized. And that disaster has continued to occur long after condom use became a ubiquitous endorsement.

Truthfully I believe that they actually do teach anal sex is the most dangerous form of sex in relation to STD's.

A lot of people here seem to be assuming that they do not. I know that the sex ed I went through covered this though that was some years ago.

I doubt they emphasize the type of sex as well as the frequency relative to the sexuality of the gender. That reality, that truth would not jibe with the agenda. It would inevitably result in anti-homo sentiment.

Really?

Should they also cover the fact that the LEAST likely to transmit sexual diseases is through lesbian sex?

Or is that different?