Don't the people that visit Mar-a-largo have a right to privacy?
Pretty sure the majority of us immediately thought the same thing.....
So what does that tell us about the intelligence of Jimbo?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Don't the people that visit Mar-a-largo have a right to privacy?
Where was it he met with the Japanese leader.Of course. But it can also be counter productive to share all of our nation's information with the entire world. Is it paramount to the health of our nation that the whole world knows the identity of every person with whom the president communicates?
I'm sure that all presidents have cooked the books on this, i am just wondering if the freedom of information act covers this or not. It is a sticky topic for sure.
My Lord are you clueless. The FIA only covers government dealings--not private club dealings.
When he is running the government from his little hide away it becomes government business. Who is clueless now rainman?
It has nothing to do with government. That's the point.
Yes. And...?
I am asking the question, are we not do answers do to the freedom of information act? It is a question not a knock on Trump.
Of course. But it can also be counter productive to share all of our nation's information with the entire world. Is it paramount to the health of our nation that the whole world knows the identity of every person with whom the president communicates?
I'm sure that all presidents have cooked the books on this, i am just wondering if the freedom of information act covers this or not. It is a sticky topic for sure.
Anyone can request this information, but it would be a no-brainer to reject them.
Is that what the law says or what you say
Trump refuses to disclose most Mar-a-Lago visitors
Why not promise to release them and not do it, like his tax returns?
Like he said of the states refusing to release voter roll information, "I wonder what they are hiding?"
What a piece of Shit this man is...
You almost gotta laugh that Barry Hussein never lived on a piece of property that wasn't funded by some crooked democrat club or the U.S. taxpayers and the hicks from Arkansas pretty much stole everything they could get their hands on before and after they left the White House . So why is it important to the left that the president discloses the names of the visitors to his golf club?
It should be important to anyone not just the left. Obama did not own a resort where lobbyists and others with a financial interest can get easy access to Trump. This is about potential corruption.
I am asking the question, are we not do answers do to the freedom of information act? It is a question not a knock on Trump.
Of course. But it can also be counter productive to share all of our nation's information with the entire world. Is it paramount to the health of our nation that the whole world knows the identity of every person with whom the president communicates?
I'm sure that all presidents have cooked the books on this, i am just wondering if the freedom of information act covers this or not. It is a sticky topic for sure.
Anyone can request this information, but it would be a no-brainer to reject them.
Is that what the law says or what you say
It's my personal opinion and it's my belief that such requests would be rejected and supported by law.
Do you believe it's prudent to make public the identities of every single person with whom the president communicates?
Trump refers to his Southern White House.Isn't there a freedom of information act?
Yes. And...?
I am asking the question, are we not do answers do to the freedom of information act? It is a question not a knock on Trump.
Of course. But it can also be counter productive to share all of our nation's information with the entire world. Is it paramount to the health of our nation that the whole world knows the identity of every person with whom the president communicates?
I'm sure that all presidents have cooked the books on this, i am just wondering if the freedom of information act covers this or not. It is a sticky topic for sure.
My Lord are you clueless. The FIA only covers government dealings--not private club dealings.
Of course. But it can also be counter productive to share all of our nation's information with the entire world. Is it paramount to the health of our nation that the whole world knows the identity of every person with whom the president communicates?
I'm sure that all presidents have cooked the books on this, i am just wondering if the freedom of information act covers this or not. It is a sticky topic for sure.
Anyone can request this information, but it would be a no-brainer to reject them.
Is that what the law says or what you say
It's my personal opinion and it's my belief that such requests would be rejected and supported by law.
Do you believe it's prudent to make public the identities of every single person with whom the president communicates?
Pretty sure it would be ok to know who he met with. The content of the meeting maybe not depending on how sensitive it is.
Of course. But it can also be counter productive to share all of our nation's information with the entire world. Is it paramount to the health of our nation that the whole world knows the identity of every person with whom the president communicates?
I'm sure that all presidents have cooked the books on this, i am just wondering if the freedom of information act covers this or not. It is a sticky topic for sure.
Anyone can request this information, but it would be a no-brainer to reject them.
Is that what the law says or what you say
It's my personal opinion and it's my belief that such requests would be rejected and supported by law.
Do you believe it's prudent to make public the identities of every single person with whom the president communicates?
Pretty sure it would be ok to know who he met with. The content of the meeting maybe not depending on how sensitive it is.
I'm sure that all presidents have cooked the books on this, i am just wondering if the freedom of information act covers this or not. It is a sticky topic for sure.
Anyone can request this information, but it would be a no-brainer to reject them.
Is that what the law says or what you say
It's my personal opinion and it's my belief that such requests would be rejected and supported by law.
Do you believe it's prudent to make public the identities of every single person with whom the president communicates?
Pretty sure it would be ok to know who he met with. The content of the meeting maybe not depending on how sensitive it is.
I've already asked you this question twice and you've dodged me twice. Why are you avoiding a simple question? It's a "yes" or "no" answer.
Do you believe it's prudent to make public the identities of every single person with whom the president communicates?
Do you wake up every morning, wanting to prove yourself an idiot to everyone one this forum?^You almost gotta laugh that Barry Hussein never lived on a piece of property that wasn't funded by some crooked democrat club or the U.S. taxpayers and the hicks from Arkansas pretty much stole everything they could get their hands on before and after they left the White House . So why is it important to the left that the president discloses the names of the visitors to his golf club?
Anyone can request this information, but it would be a no-brainer to reject them.
Is that what the law says or what you say
It's my personal opinion and it's my belief that such requests would be rejected and supported by law.
Do you believe it's prudent to make public the identities of every single person with whom the president communicates?
Pretty sure it would be ok to know who he met with. The content of the meeting maybe not depending on how sensitive it is.
I've already asked you this question twice and you've dodged me twice. Why are you avoiding a simple question? It's a "yes" or "no" answer.
Do you believe it's prudent to make public the identities of every single person with whom the president communicates?
Actually I did answer your question, your to smug to acknowledge it. So let me make it simple, YES!
Do you wake up every morning, wanting to prove yourself an idiot to everyone one this forum?^You almost gotta laugh that Barry Hussein never lived on a piece of property that wasn't funded by some crooked democrat club or the U.S. taxpayers and the hicks from Arkansas pretty much stole everything they could get their hands on before and after they left the White House . So why is it important to the left that the president discloses the names of the visitors to his golf club?
Yes, but even God rested on the seventh day.Do you wake up every morning, wanting to prove yourself an idiot to everyone one this forum?^You almost gotta laugh that Barry Hussein never lived on a piece of property that wasn't funded by some crooked democrat club or the U.S. taxpayers and the hicks from Arkansas pretty much stole everything they could get their hands on before and after they left the White House . So why is it important to the left that the president discloses the names of the visitors to his golf club?
He's a libtard, so....
Is that what the law says or what you say
It's my personal opinion and it's my belief that such requests would be rejected and supported by law.
Do you believe it's prudent to make public the identities of every single person with whom the president communicates?
Pretty sure it would be ok to know who he met with. The content of the meeting maybe not depending on how sensitive it is.
I've already asked you this question twice and you've dodged me twice. Why are you avoiding a simple question? It's a "yes" or "no" answer.
Do you believe it's prudent to make public the identities of every single person with whom the president communicates?
Actually I did answer your question, your to smug to acknowledge it. So let me make it simple, YES!
You hadn't answered my question. Thanks for doing so. Most liberals here don't answer questions.
His business? You should be reminded that he works for us. Not the other way around.It's nobodys business who goes to his business. If you had customers in YOUR business, would you cave to demands to give the press the names of those customers? I would sure as hell hope not.Trump refuses to disclose most Mar-a-Lago visitors
Why not promise to release them and not do it, like his tax returns?
Like he said of the states refusing to release voter roll information, "I wonder what they are hiding?"
What a piece of Shit this man is...
You almost gotta laugh that Barry Hussein never lived on a piece of property that wasn't funded by some crooked democrat club or the U.S. taxpayers and the hicks from Arkansas pretty much stole everything they could get their hands on before and after they left the White House . So why is it important to the left that the president discloses the names of the visitors to his golf club?
It should be important to anyone not just the left. Obama did not own a resort where lobbyists and others with a financial interest can get easy access to Trump. This is about potential corruption.
Isn't there a freedom of information act?
Yes. And...?
I am asking the question, are we not do answers do to the freedom of information act? It is a question not a knock on Trump.
I asked the same question when referring to Obama's college records. Never got a response.Isn't there a freedom of information act?
Yes. And...?
I am asking the question, are we not do answers do to the freedom of information act? It is a question not a knock on Trump.