- Nov 28, 2011
- 42,919
- 16,055
- 2,250
How about this for starters, you could have said "It is found among certain groups and/or sometimes among many groups in society, a certain type of mindset or thought process in which is concerning sometimes to say the least about certain individuals who are found amongst the various groups" ? Then explain the mindset or process spoken of, yet still without (labeling any group), then let the people figure out who it is that you may be targetting amongst the groups, but not targetting the entire group by way of using the single label as you did.Think about what I meant by the words "other Christians" and if you have a lick of sense you'll learn something.No but Christians in label of was enough.. Why not make up a lable for the ones whom you feel donot represent the other Christians in which you feel are ok maybe ? You know like perpetrator (the blacks love this word) or perp or "crazy people" who think in this way in which you speak of to be found in their mindset or bad seeds or infiltrators or misrepresentors or you get the point. Then we may understand your fairness and unbiased thinking if were to be the case, instead of your labeling many problems under one group name as you just did. It's not that hard to sperate in words, those individuals who are perps or infiltrators in society, and for who are found among many groups having the same M.O. everytime they strike or cause trouble in society.Hey, Mr. Sensitive, I didn't say all Christians.
This is how groups are sometimes attacked out in society, because people are to lazy once words are spoken in various ways, to then go out and to decern or disect the groups in order to expose the perps amongst them, and this by individual character and not by group name instead, so they (the ignorant) just attack the whole group under the label instead of seperating by the individual, who might be the problem the whole time and not the entire group.
Last edited: