Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Breitbart: "Wait Til They See What Happens March 1st"...
March 6th...
Crickets....
PaulBot's credibility is fading to nothing....
The man passed away for God's sake. He made that statement assuming he would still be alive you silly dipshit. Give it some more time. I'm sure Andrew Breitbart was being honest about having info on the Dear Leader's Marxist Terrorist ties. Give it some more time. SHEESH!
Breitbart: "Wait Til They See What Happens March 1st"...
March 6th...
Crickets....
PaulBot's credibility is fading to nothing....
The man passed away for God's sake. He made that statement assuming he would still be alive you silly dipshit. Give it some more time. I'm sure Andrew Breitbart was being honest about having info on the Dear Leader's Marxist Terrorist ties. Give it some more time. SHEESH!
Because he had such a good reputation for being honest.
Wow, is this Breitbart's big bombshell?
Little Green Footballs - Everything Is Different Now - the Breitbartocalypse Is Upon Us
The Vetting, Part I: Barack's Love Song To Alinsky
So the article demonstrates that Obama is a Communist, a legitimate and for real Marxist.
We all knew this already - and you praise him because of this.
Never once said Andy altered any thing. Not cut for length, edited for effect, to make it sound as if she was saying something she wasn't.
The man passed away for God's sake. He made that statement assuming he would still be alive you silly dipshit. Give it some more time. I'm sure Andrew Breitbart was being honest about having info on the Dear Leader's Marxist Terrorist ties. Give it some more time. SHEESH!
Because he had such a good reputation for being honest.
Yes he did. He busted your Weinerman ddn't he?
The horrors. What a snob, attending a play about a man who helped organize poor black people and help them fight against the oppression of the established Jim Crow laws.
what kind of dumb shits will buy into this final hype from the master of bullshit, Andrew Brietbart (RIP).
Because he had such a good reputation for being honest.
Yes he did. He busted your Weinerman ddn't he?
No he didn't. He had a reputation for being a liar and a hothead. Actually Lipo-pauli, I'm close to Ron Pauls district. Wagging Weiner is from NY or something isn't he?
The man passed away for God's sake. He made that statement assuming he would still be alive you silly dipshit. Give it some more time. I'm sure Andrew Breitbart was being honest about having info on the Dear Leader's Marxist Terrorist ties. Give it some more time. SHEESH!
Because he had such a good reputation for being honest.
Yes he did. He busted your Weinerman ddn't he?
Because he had such a good reputation for being honest.
Yes he did. He busted your Weinerman ddn't he?
Busting??? one pervert is hardly any great claim to fame. Big whoop! The guy resigned. I once got a child molester/pot grower's property all confiscated and dude was sent to prison for a very long time. Breitbart was just a friggin tattletale. I REALLY know how to ruin someone..he wasn't even an amature.
Never once said Andy altered any thing. Not cut for length, edited for effect, to make it sound as if she was saying something she wasn't.
Edited for effect? You mean he cut selected words from the middle of the tape? Spliced together non-contiguous segments? Is that your claim?
Or are you just bullshitting like a good demagogue, knowing full well that the segment was just that, a snippet of speech that was unaltered in any way?
Never once said Andy altered any thing. Not cut for length, edited for effect, to make it sound as if she was saying something she wasn't.
Edited for effect? You mean he cut selected words from the middle of the tape? Spliced together non-contiguous segments? Is that your claim?
Or are you just bullshitting like a good demagogue, knowing full well that the segment was just that, a snippet of speech that was unaltered in any way?
The snippet that was used gives the viewer the impression that she is still an active racist. It was edited from her full speech as a means of attacking the organization and justify Andy's attack against them. Is that clear enough or do you need further clarification?
Edited for effect? You mean he cut selected words from the middle of the tape? Spliced together non-contiguous segments? Is that your claim?
Or are you just bullshitting like a good demagogue, knowing full well that the segment was just that, a snippet of speech that was unaltered in any way?
The snippet that was used gives the viewer the impression that she is still an active racist. It was edited from her full speech as a means of attacking the organization and justify Andy's attack against them. Is that clear enough or do you need further clarification?
Andrew Breitbart did not lie. Everything the woman stated was accurately reported. He did nothing different than all other Media Outlets do. Andrew Breitbart did not invent editing techniques. It's done exactly the same way by countless Liberal Media Outlets. The man did not lie about anything.
The horrors. What a snob, attending a play about a man who helped organize poor black people and help them fight against the oppression of the established Jim Crow laws.
Oh, that's what Saul Alinsky was?
Damn, here I thought he was a Marxist revolutionary - you know, seeing that he called himself one...
what kind of dumb shits will buy into this final hype from the master of bullshit, Andrew Brietbart (RIP).
Not those like you that see Pol Pot as just a helping hand for the downtrodden....
The snippet that was used gives the viewer the impression that she is still an active racist. It was edited from her full speech as a means of attacking the organization and justify Andy's attack against them. Is that clear enough or do you need further clarification?
Andrew Breitbart did not lie. Everything the woman stated was accurately reported. He did nothing different than all other Media Outlets do. Andrew Breitbart did not invent editing techniques. It's done exactly the same way by countless Liberal Media Outlets. The man did not lie about anything.
Give us an example
Andrew Breitbart did not lie. Everything the woman stated was accurately reported. He did nothing different than all other Media Outlets do. Andrew Breitbart did not invent editing techniques. It's done exactly the same way by countless Liberal Media Outlets. The man did not lie about anything.
Give us an example
Everytime you watch the alphabet Networks' Nightly News, you're watching edited video. And that's true of every other Media Outlet as well. Everything you see is edited. The Liberal Press invented the process. And now they're just bitchin because others are using it too. Andrew Breitbart did not lie about anything. That's all just sour grapes from the usual suspects.
Give us an example
Everytime you watch the alphabet Networks' Nightly News, you're watching edited video. And that's true of every other Media Outlet as well. Everything you see is edited. The Liberal Press invented the process. And now they're just bitchin because others are using it too. Andrew Breitbart did not lie about anything. That's all just sour grapes from the usual suspects.
Then it should be easy to find an example
Shirley Sharrod said she didn't want to help someone who was white, but changed her mind and ended up helping him and was glad she did
Breitbart reported that Shirley Sherrod refuses to help white people
Show me where the liberal media has done something like that...it should be easy
Everytime you watch the alphabet Networks' Nightly News, you're watching edited video. And that's true of every other Media Outlet as well. Everything you see is edited. The Liberal Press invented the process. And now they're just bitchin because others are using it too. Andrew Breitbart did not lie about anything. That's all just sour grapes from the usual suspects.
Then it should be easy to find an example
Shirley Sharrod said she didn't want to help someone who was white, but changed her mind and ended up helping him and was glad she did
Breitbart reported that Shirley Sherrod refuses to help white people
Show me where the liberal media has done something like that...it should be easy
The examples are there for you to see on a daily basis. Everything you see is edited. Nothing is presented in Media without being edited. And you being a GE/NBC sycophant should know that more than anyone. Do you really believe you're being fed non-edited media material all the time? Man, that just seems incredibly naive. Breitbart has been singled out for obvious reasons. He wasn't a Liberal Media hack, and that made him an enemy to many. It really is that simple.
Then it should be easy to find an example
Shirley Sharrod said she didn't want to help someone who was white, but changed her mind and ended up helping him and was glad she did
Breitbart reported that Shirley Sherrod refuses to help white people
Show me where the liberal media has done something like that...it should be easy
The examples are there for you to see on a daily basis. Everything you see is edited. Nothing is presented in Media without being edited. And you being a GE/NBC sycophant should know that more than anyone. Do you really believe you're being fed non-edited media material all the time? Man, that just seems incredibly naive. Breitbart has been singled out for obvious reasons. He wasn't a Liberal Media hack, and that made him an enemy to many. It really is that simple.
You are just repeating your previous post like this old poster Libocaplpse used to do
I provided an example where Breitbart intentionally reshaped a quote.
You should have no problem providing me an example of mainstream media doing it or admitting you are wrong
The examples are there for you to see on a daily basis. Everything you see is edited. Nothing is presented in Media without being edited. And you being a GE/NBC sycophant should know that more than anyone. Do you really believe you're being fed non-edited media material all the time? Man, that just seems incredibly naive. Breitbart has been singled out for obvious reasons. He wasn't a Liberal Media hack, and that made him an enemy to many. It really is that simple.
You are just repeating your previous post like this old poster Libocaplpse used to do
I provided an example where Breitbart intentionally reshaped a quote.
You should have no problem providing me an example of mainstream media doing it or admitting you are wrong
You didn't prove anything. All you did was make the same tired accusation. And i don't have time to point out all the daily edited shite your GE/NBC douches offer up on a daily basis. Breitbart didn't do anything that isn't being done by every other Media Outlet in this country. You just singled him out for obvious reasons. It is what it is.
You are just repeating your previous post like this old poster Libocaplpse used to do
I provided an example where Breitbart intentionally reshaped a quote.
You should have no problem providing me an example of mainstream media doing it or admitting you are wrong
You didn't prove anything. All you did was make the same tired accusation. And i don't have time to point out all the daily edited shite your GE/NBC douches offer up on a daily basis. Breitbart didn't do anything that isn't being done by every other Media Outlet in this country. You just singled him out for obvious reasons. It is what it is.
As he repeats the same lie for the third time...
Repeating a lie over and over does not make it true
Did Breitbart teach you that?
Go watch and enjoy those completely unbiased & unedited videos over at your GE/NBC. You're a very disingenuous person. You really do need to work on that. It's too obvious now.
