*****BREAKING***** Trump campaign CEO once charged in domestic violence case .

[JoeB131]

President Obama cuts a deal with Iran to allow them to keep their nuclear facilities some of which is underground, gave the country with connections to ISIS $400 million in a ransom for hostage exchange while their leader was quoted as saying he would like to wipe Israel off the map, and this is the "breaking news" Jews should be concerned about? Either this is a desperate attempt to find anything they can on Trump that will stick to counter Hillary's emails and foundation reports, or they are just complete idiots.

Um, Iran is the one fighting ISIS right now, dummy.

And if the Zionists don't want to be wiped off the map, they can always go back to Europe where they came from.

 

[easyt65]

*****BREAKING***** Trump campaign CEO once charged in domestic violence case .

Stephen K. Bannon, the new CEO of the Donald Trump campaign, was charged with misdemeanor domestic violence, battery and dissuading a witness following an incident in early January 1996, though the case was ultimately dismissed, according to a police report and court documents.
The Santa Monica, Calif., police report says that Bannon’s then-wife claimed he pulled at her neck and wrist during an altercation over their finances, and an officer reported witnessing red marks on her neck and wrist to bolster her account. Bannon also reportedly smashed the phone when she tried to call the police.

Trump campaign CEO once charged in domestic violence case

Well, trump has red necks and assholes running his campaign.

1.) 1/3 OF ABEDIN EMAILS 100% REDACTED --- too sensitive even for Congress to see.
2.) Emails: Hillary Aide Huma Abedin Left Important 'Burn' Papers in Car's Front Seat
Well Hildabeast has irresponsible, blithering idiots running her campaign.



Read more at 1/3 of Abedin emails 100% redacted

THAT has to be some of the most stupid BULLSHIT I have ever heard - anything Huma Abedin has in her e-mails is too 'sensitive' for Congress to see?!



It's like Hillary's schedule that the State Dept won't release until AFTER the election - it's an admisson that Huma & Hillary are guilty as hell and to release them would only hurt Hillary.

And how the HELL does Huna Abedin, a woman who worked for a radical Islamic media and whose family has ties to terrorists, have access to information so classified ('sensative') that SHE and Hillary can see it but Congress can't (has to be redacted)?!

IF YOU DON'T SMELL THE BULLSHIT HERE IT'S BECAUSE YOU'RE USE TO THE SMELL BECAUSE YOU HAVE YOUR HEAD UP HILLARY'S ASS!

 

[JoeB131]

It's like Hillary's schedule that the State Dept won't release until AFTER the election - it's an admisson that Huma & Hillary are guilty as hell and to release them would only hurt Hillary.

And how the HELL does Huna Abedin, a woman who worked for a radical Islamic media and whose family has ties to terrorists, have access to information so classified ('sensative') that SHE and Hillary can see it but Congress can't (has to be redacted)?!

wow, man, you still going on abou the e-mails... talk about the butt-hurt.

 

[SmokeALib]

*********BREAKING*********
Trump staff member received a parking ticket in 2007.
Fuckin idiots.

 

[bripat9643]

*********BREAKING*********
Trump staff member received a parking ticket in 2007.
Fuckin idiots.

I read that another one tore the tag off his mattress.

 

[easyt65]

wow, man, you still going on abou the e-mails... talk about the butt-hurt.

Nah, man, I am not the one going on about e-mails - THE MEDIA is, which is killing you libs.

 

[Iceweasel]

*****BREAKING***** Trump campaign CEO once charged in domestic violence case .

Stephen K. Bannon, the new CEO of the Donald Trump campaign, was charged with misdemeanor domestic violence, battery and dissuading a witness following an incident in early January 1996, though the case was ultimately dismissed, according to a police report and court documents.
The Santa Monica, Calif., police report says that Bannon’s then-wife claimed he pulled at her neck and wrist during an altercation over their finances, and an officer reported witnessing red marks on her neck and wrist to bolster her account. Bannon also reportedly smashed the phone when she tried to call the police.

Trump campaign CEO once charged in domestic violence case

Well, trump has red necks and assholes running his campaign.

Charges were dropped but Hillary needs a conviction to prove anything. Thanks for proving once again how retarded the left is.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Oh whatever. The entire Trump campaign thinks women are idiots and most of his supporters have probably beaten a few. Trump himself has been quoted as saying that if a woman is griping and bitching, then that's grounds for divorce.

They embrace this. You have to argue with them about something else if you want them to take you seriously.

Wonder why no one takes you serious except other hacks?

 

[ClosedCaption]

*****BREAKING***** Trump campaign CEO once charged in domestic violence case .

Stephen K. Bannon, the new CEO of the Donald Trump campaign, was charged with misdemeanor domestic violence, battery and dissuading a witness following an incident in early January 1996, though the case was ultimately dismissed, according to a police report and court documents.
The Santa Monica, Calif., police report says that Bannon’s then-wife claimed he pulled at her neck and wrist during an altercation over their finances, and an officer reported witnessing red marks on her neck and wrist to bolster her account. Bannon also reportedly smashed the phone when she tried to call the police.

Trump campaign CEO once charged in domestic violence case

Well, trump has red necks and assholes running his campaign.

Case dismissed, asshole. Just about every guy who has been divorced has been charged with domestic violence. Calling the police on their husbands is a favorite tactic with women going through a divorce.

Lol...plenty of people are divorced and never been accused of beating their wife. Let alone a cop seeing the injuries for himself.

 

[bripat9643]

*****BREAKING***** Trump campaign CEO once charged in domestic violence case .

Stephen K. Bannon, the new CEO of the Donald Trump campaign, was charged with misdemeanor domestic violence, battery and dissuading a witness following an incident in early January 1996, though the case was ultimately dismissed, according to a police report and court documents.
The Santa Monica, Calif., police report says that Bannon’s then-wife claimed he pulled at her neck and wrist during an altercation over their finances, and an officer reported witnessing red marks on her neck and wrist to bolster her account. Bannon also reportedly smashed the phone when she tried to call the police.

Trump campaign CEO once charged in domestic violence case

Well, trump has red necks and assholes running his campaign.

Case dismissed, asshole. Just about every guy who has been divorced has been charged with domestic violence. Calling the police on their husbands is a favorite tactic with women going through a divorce.

Lol...plenty of people are divorced and never been accused of beating their wife. Let alone a cop seeing the injuries for himself.

What injuries? I know plenty of guys who had their wives call the cops on them while they were in the process of getting a divorce. It's what women do to get leverage in the settlement. They also get accused of molesting the children. It's quite common. Nothing a woman claims during a divorce can be accepted without hard proof. Only a douche bag would deny it.

 

[ClosedCaption]

*****BREAKING***** Trump campaign CEO once charged in domestic violence case .

Stephen K. Bannon, the new CEO of the Donald Trump campaign, was charged with misdemeanor domestic violence, battery and dissuading a witness following an incident in early January 1996, though the case was ultimately dismissed, according to a police report and court documents.
The Santa Monica, Calif., police report says that Bannon’s then-wife claimed he pulled at her neck and wrist during an altercation over their finances, and an officer reported witnessing red marks on her neck and wrist to bolster her account. Bannon also reportedly smashed the phone when she tried to call the police.

Trump campaign CEO once charged in domestic violence case

Well, trump has red necks and assholes running his campaign.

Case dismissed, asshole. Just about every guy who has been divorced has been charged with domestic violence. Calling the police on their husbands is a favorite tactic with women going through a divorce.

Lol...plenty of people are divorced and never been accused of beating their wife. Let alone a cop seeing the injuries for himself.

What injuries? I know plenty of guys who had their wives call the cops on them while they were in the process of getting a divorce. It's what women do to get leverage in the settlement. They also get accused of molesting the children. It's quite common. Nothing a woman claims during a divorce can be accepted without hard proof. Only a douche bag would deny it.

Do some women fake it? Yes. Do all women fake it? No.

What injuries? The ones the cop saw when he arrived.

 

[bripat9643]

*****BREAKING***** Trump campaign CEO once charged in domestic violence case .

Stephen K. Bannon, the new CEO of the Donald Trump campaign, was charged with misdemeanor domestic violence, battery and dissuading a witness following an incident in early January 1996, though the case was ultimately dismissed, according to a police report and court documents.
The Santa Monica, Calif., police report says that Bannon’s then-wife claimed he pulled at her neck and wrist during an altercation over their finances, and an officer reported witnessing red marks on her neck and wrist to bolster her account. Bannon also reportedly smashed the phone when she tried to call the police.

Trump campaign CEO once charged in domestic violence case

Well, trump has red necks and assholes running his campaign.

Case dismissed, asshole. Just about every guy who has been divorced has been charged with domestic violence. Calling the police on their husbands is a favorite tactic with women going through a divorce.

Lol...plenty of people are divorced and never been accused of beating their wife. Let alone a cop seeing the injuries for himself.

What injuries? I know plenty of guys who had their wives call the cops on them while they were in the process of getting a divorce. It's what women do to get leverage in the settlement. They also get accused of molesting the children. It's quite common. Nothing a woman claims during a divorce can be accepted without hard proof. Only a douche bag would deny it.

Do some women fake it? Yes. Do all women fake it? No.

What injuries? The ones the cop saw when he arrived.

The fact that not all women fake it isn't proof that she didn't fake it.

The fact that the case was dismissed is evidence that she faked it.

You really have trouble with this logic thing, don't you?

 

[ClosedCaption]

*****BREAKING***** Trump campaign CEO once charged in domestic violence case .

Trump campaign CEO once charged in domestic violence case

Well, trump has red necks and assholes running his campaign.

Case dismissed, asshole. Just about every guy who has been divorced has been charged with domestic violence. Calling the police on their husbands is a favorite tactic with women going through a divorce.

Lol...plenty of people are divorced and never been accused of beating their wife. Let alone a cop seeing the injuries for himself.

What injuries? I know plenty of guys who had their wives call the cops on them while they were in the process of getting a divorce. It's what women do to get leverage in the settlement. They also get accused of molesting the children. It's quite common. Nothing a woman claims during a divorce can be accepted without hard proof. Only a douche bag would deny it.

Do some women fake it? Yes. Do all women fake it? No.

What injuries? The ones the cop saw when he arrived.

The fact that not all women fake it isn't proof that she didn't fake it.

Now you get it! So saying that some women fake it also isn't proof she's faking. Gotcha!

The fact that the case was dismissed is evidence that she faked it.

You really have trouble with this logic thing, don't you?

The fact that the case was dismissed is only evidence that it was dismissed. Not that it never happened....OR she faked it.

You really have a problem with this logic thing, don't you?

 

[bripat9643]

Case dismissed, asshole. Just about every guy who has been divorced has been charged with domestic violence. Calling the police on their husbands is a favorite tactic with women going through a divorce.

Lol...plenty of people are divorced and never been accused of beating their wife. Let alone a cop seeing the injuries for himself.

What injuries? I know plenty of guys who had their wives call the cops on them while they were in the process of getting a divorce. It's what women do to get leverage in the settlement. They also get accused of molesting the children. It's quite common. Nothing a woman claims during a divorce can be accepted without hard proof. Only a douche bag would deny it.

Do some women fake it? Yes. Do all women fake it? No.

What injuries? The ones the cop saw when he arrived.

The fact that not all women fake it isn't proof that she didn't fake it.

Now you get it! So saying that some women fake it also isn't proof she's faking. Gotcha!

The fact that the case was dismissed is evidence that she faked it.

You really have trouble with this logic thing, don't you?

The fact that the case was dismissed is only evidence that it was dismissed. Not that it never happened....OR she faked it.

You really have a problem with this logic thing, don't you?

The fact that it was dismissed means there no evidence that it ever happened. That's why judges dismiss cases.

The fact that some women are actually abused isn't proof that this woman was abused. There is zero evidence that she was abused.

 

[JoeB131]

*********BREAKING*********
Trump staff member received a parking ticket in 2007.
Fuckin idiots.

I read that another one tore the tag off his mattress.

I read one of them used the wrong kind of e-mail server....

 

[JoeB131]

The fact that it was dismissed means there no evidence that it ever happened. That's why judges dismiss cases.

The fact that some women are actually abused isn't proof that this woman was abused. There is zero evidence that she was abused.

Okay, you keep telling yourself that. You keep telling yourself this isn't going to really hurt Trumpenfuhrer with women.

so who are you going to blame when Trump loses 40 states?

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Case dismissed, asshole. Just about every guy who has been divorced has been charged with domestic violence. Calling the police on their husbands is a favorite tactic with women going through a divorce.

Lol...plenty of people are divorced and never been accused of beating their wife. Let alone a cop seeing the injuries for himself.

What injuries? I know plenty of guys who had their wives call the cops on them while they were in the process of getting a divorce. It's what women do to get leverage in the settlement. They also get accused of molesting the children. It's quite common. Nothing a woman claims during a divorce can be accepted without hard proof. Only a douche bag would deny it.

Do some women fake it? Yes. Do all women fake it? No.

What injuries? The ones the cop saw when he arrived.

The fact that not all women fake it isn't proof that she didn't fake it.

Now you get it! So saying that some women fake it also isn't proof she's faking. Gotcha!

The fact that the case was dismissed is evidence that she faked it.

You really have trouble with this logic thing, don't you?

The fact that the case was dismissed is only evidence that it was dismissed. Not that it never happened....OR she faked it.

You really have a problem with this logic thing, don't you?

Who really cares about an investigation that has been dropped on someone who isn't running for president? Yet any further investigation into Hillary Clinton is considered a complete waste of time? It's evident the left is either desperate to find something on Trump, or just wants to flood the media with dropped cases from years past that holds absolutely no barring on the run for he White House to keep others from piecing together what's being uncovered through a deeper look into Mrs Clinton's emails or foundation.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Lol...plenty of people are divorced and never been accused of beating their wife. Let alone a cop seeing the injuries for himself.

What injuries? I know plenty of guys who had their wives call the cops on them while they were in the process of getting a divorce. It's what women do to get leverage in the settlement. They also get accused of molesting the children. It's quite common. Nothing a woman claims during a divorce can be accepted without hard proof. Only a douche bag would deny it.

Do some women fake it? Yes. Do all women fake it? No.

What injuries? The ones the cop saw when he arrived.

The fact that not all women fake it isn't proof that she didn't fake it.

Now you get it! So saying that some women fake it also isn't proof she's faking. Gotcha!

The fact that the case was dismissed is evidence that she faked it.

You really have trouble with this logic thing, don't you?

The fact that the case was dismissed is only evidence that it was dismissed. Not that it never happened....OR she faked it.

You really have a problem with this logic thing, don't you?

The fact that it was dismissed means there no evidence that it ever happened. That's why judges dismiss cases.

Cases are dismissed for a number of reasons not only because there was no evidence of abuse. Your assertions don't mean it's true

The fact that some women are actually abused isn't proof that this woman was abused. There is zero evidence that she was abused.

The cop saw the evidence she was abused. Sorry champ.

 

[bripat9643]

What injuries? I know plenty of guys who had their wives call the cops on them while they were in the process of getting a divorce. It's what women do to get leverage in the settlement. They also get accused of molesting the children. It's quite common. Nothing a woman claims during a divorce can be accepted without hard proof. Only a douche bag would deny it.

Do some women fake it? Yes. Do all women fake it? No.

What injuries? The ones the cop saw when he arrived.

The fact that not all women fake it isn't proof that she didn't fake it.

Now you get it! So saying that some women fake it also isn't proof she's faking. Gotcha!

The fact that the case was dismissed is evidence that she faked it.

You really have trouble with this logic thing, don't you?

The fact that the case was dismissed is only evidence that it was dismissed. Not that it never happened....OR she faked it.

You really have a problem with this logic thing, don't you?

The fact that it was dismissed means there no evidence that it ever happened. That's why judges dismiss cases.

Cases are dismissed for a number of reasons not only because there was no evidence of abuse. Your assertions don't mean it's true

Really? Like what?

The fact that some women are actually abused isn't proof that this woman was abused. There is zero evidence that she was abused.

The cop saw the evidence she was abused. Sorry champ.

What "evidence" what that?

 

[ClosedCaption]

The defendant can drop the case among other things. The judge didn't say there was no evidence. That's just you saying that's what happened with no evidence.

The cop saw bruising on the wrist and neck. Sorry again you lied about the information or just don't care about the information and prefer your made up scenarios.