Breaking On Fox

The fact it was backed by a group linked to AQ destroys Obama's narrative that AQ is being destroyed.

He could not have an attack by AQ this close to the election.

So he lied.

Why liberals defend it is sad.

It is being "destroyed".

Doesn't mean it stops all at once or they stopped fighting back.

Catch up. We've been at war in 2 countries for over a decade. And still are at war in one of them.

So why lie about it then?
 
The fact it was backed by a group linked to AQ destroys Obama's narrative that AQ is being destroyed.

He could not have an attack by AQ this close to the election.

So he lied.

Why liberals defend it is sad.

It is being "destroyed".

Doesn't mean it stops all at once or they stopped fighting back.

Catch up. We've been at war in 2 countries for over a decade. And still are at war in one of them.

So why did he lie about it? What was the point. Why not just say that we got hit with an attack by Al Qaeda?
 
Come on dumbfuck...you need to use Obamination's words "Overseas Contingency Operation." It's not a war in Afghanistan according to him, he got rid of Buuuuuuush's Global War on Terror for OCO.

If he says it is just OCO and not the GWOT, it downplays the threat of terrorism and our military action over there. Also, if you tell the lie enough times, the masscare in Libya didn't happen.....put on your ruby slippers and click your heels 10 times. :eusa_whistle:

The fact it was backed by a group linked to AQ destroys Obama's narrative that AQ is being destroyed.

He could not have an attack by AQ this close to the election.

So he lied.

Why liberals defend it is sad.

It is being "destroyed".

Doesn't mean it stops all at once or they stopped fighting back.

Catch up. We've been at war in 2 countries for over a decade. And still are at war in one of them.
 
CIA now says: "Barely planned, semi terrorist attack stemmed from other protests based on the video."

Pub dupe haters much? Brainwashed chumps of the greedy rich that got us here...
 
Last edited:
The fact it was backed by a group linked to AQ destroys Obama's narrative that AQ is being destroyed.

He could not have an attack by AQ this close to the election.

So he lied.

Why liberals defend it is sad.

It is being "destroyed".

Doesn't mean it stops all at once or they stopped fighting back.

Catch up. We've been at war in 2 countries for over a decade. And still are at war in one of them.

Catch up on AQ.

It's not being destroyed. We are not winning.

AQ will be around way after 2014.

Obama can't admit that this close to the ejection.

But you can.
 
The left called for the death and incarceration of one of it's own based solely on this administrations lie.

How about owning up for once guys. The administration and especially Obama lied to all of us making fools of us around the entire world.

I say if it wasn't for harming us more as a nation, he should be impeached
 
But we can send a united message to Obama and others like him to not mess with the American people.

Obama you are FIRED
 
The fact it was backed by a group linked to AQ destroys Obama's narrative that AQ is being destroyed.

He could not have an attack by AQ this close to the election.

So he lied.

Why liberals defend it is sad.

It is being "destroyed".

Doesn't mean it stops all at once or they stopped fighting back.

Catch up. We've been at war in 2 countries for over a decade. And still are at war in one of them.

Catch up on AQ.

It's not being destroyed. We are not winning.

AQ will be around way after 2014.

Obama can't admit that this close to the ejection.

But you can.

The Taliban and AQ are going to move in faster then we move out. Obama has been paving the way for them.
 
It is being "destroyed".

Doesn't mean it stops all at once or they stopped fighting back.

Catch up. We've been at war in 2 countries for over a decade. And still are at war in one of them.

Catch up on AQ.

It's not being destroyed. We are not winning.

AQ will be around way after 2014.

Obama can't admit that this close to the ejection.

But you can.

The Taliban and AQ are going to move in faster then we move out. Obama has been paving the way for them.

Damn right on both accounts.

It's appeasement from Obama. We'll back off, you be nice okay.
 
The fact it was backed by a group linked to AQ destroys Obama's narrative that AQ is being destroyed.

He could not have an attack by AQ this close to the election.

So he lied.

Why liberals defend it is sad.

It is being "destroyed".

Doesn't mean it stops all at once or they stopped fighting back.

Catch up. We've been at war in 2 countries for over a decade. And still are at war in one of them.

So why lie about it then?

He'll let you know when he gets the memo from the administration. The left only parrots Obamas propaganda
 
And?

Obama said it was an act of terror.

Obama said.....direct quote from transcript LINKED BELOW...

"No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done."

That would be "NO ACTS OF TERROR will shake the resolve" (NO ACTS BEING PLURAL)
Never did he directly call the Benghazi attacks and "act of terror"

In the same paragraph he said...

"to see that justice is done for this TERRIBLE ACT" speaking explicitly of the Benghazi attack.

Full Transcript of Obama's Rose Garden Speech After Sept. 11 Benghazi Attack - October 16 12 10:31 EDT - ForexTV.com

Conclusion: Specifically worded in that way to give Obama a phony claim that he called the "terrible act" a "terrorist attack".

HE DID NOT CALL IT A TERRORIST ATTACK. HE CALLED IT A TERRIBLE ACT.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top