Obama' hasn't fixed Booosh's catastrophes fast enough, over total Pub mindless obstruction. Must let W clone (with no personality) finish the job! Jeeebus what a bunch of morons...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The fact it was backed by a group linked to AQ destroys Obama's narrative that AQ is being destroyed.
He could not have an attack by AQ this close to the election.
So he lied.
Why liberals defend it is sad.
Throws a wrench in the whole Arab Spring thingie too.
No it doesn't.
On CNN's "State of the Union" on September 30, Candy Crowley insisted David Axelrod, President Barack Obama's chief strategist, was wrong when Axelrod tried to claim President Barack Obama called the Benghazi attack "an act of terror" on the day after.
"First, they said it was not planned, it was part of this tape," Crowley said when Axelrod tried to spin her.
This was Crowley the journalist, unlike the pro-Obama advocate who moderated Tuesday's debate between Obama and Mitt Romney and interjected herself into an argument between Obama and Romney on the exact same issue -- and took Obama's side.
During the debate, Crowley affirmed Obama's assertion that he referred to the Benghazi attacks as acts of terror on the day after.
After Romney correctly said it took Obama 14 days before Obama said the the Benghazi attacks were acts of terror, Crowley took Obama's side -- to an ovation from the town hall audience -- and she proclaimed Obama had indeed claimed the Benghazi attacks were acts of terror the day after the attacks in the White House Rose Garden.
On September 12, the day after the attacks, Obama did say the words "acts of terror" but he was not referring to the attacks that killed U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens.
Crowley knew that on September 30 and she conceded it again hours after the debate when she went on CNN and said while Romney "was right in the main, but he just chose the wrong word." But the damage had already been done.
With Obama's reelection on the line, Crowley seemed to have conveniently forgotten the facts she knew two weeks before when she grilled Axelrod in a way she should have Obama.
Across 166 pages of internal State Department documents -- released Friday by a pair of Republican congressmen pressing the Obama administration for more answers on the Benghazi terrorist attack -- slain U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and the security officers assigned to protect him repeatedly sounded alarms to their superiors in Washington about the intensifying lawlessness and violence in Eastern Libya, where Stevens ultimately died.
On Sept. 11 -- the day Stevens and three other Americans were killed -- the ambassador signed a three-page cable, labeled "sensitive," in which he noted "growing problems with security" in Benghazi and "growing frustration" on the part of local residents with Libyan police and security forces. These forces the ambassador characterized as "too weak to keep the country secure."
Fox has obtained a set of internal emails which declare that the group Ansar al Sharia claimed responsibility of the attack in Benghazi virtually as the raid played out on September 11th.
Ansar al Sharia has been declared by the State Department to be a an al Qaeda affiliated group. The emails were sent by the State Department to across a variety of redacted national security platforms including the White House Situation room, the Pentagon, the FBI, the Director of National Intelligence and the State Department. Fox is told that approximately 300-400 national security figures received these emails in real time almost as the raid was playing out and concluding. Fox is told that figures directly receiving these emails work directly underneath the nation’s top national security, military and diplomatic officials.
The first email indicates that Ambassador Chris Stevens and other personnel were “in the compound safe haven.”
Emails show the Obama administration knew Ansar al Sharia was behind the attack in Benghazi « Gretawire
Obama' hasn't fixed Booosh's catastrophes fast enough, over total Pub mindless obstruction. Must let W clone (with no personality) finish the job! Jeeebus what a bunch of morons...
And?
Obama said it was an act of terror.
Rose Garden.... ???
Bullcrap.....
You stupid pile of shit....there was nothing in the emails about a protest over a video.
The video was a fake story invented to cover up their mistakes of ignoring previous security breaches of the compound which eventually got the Ambassador killed. Also it was to cover up their REJECTION of his requests for more security.
Obamination and Hillary are criminals, and you are a fucking piece of shit.
And?
Obama said it was an act of terror.
And?
Obama said it was an act of terror.
Rose Garden.... ???
Bullcrap.....
Sallow still hasn't figured out that people aren't buying that line.
You stupid pile of shit....there was nothing in the emails about a protest over a video.
The video was a fake story invented to cover up their mistakes of ignoring previous security breaches of the compound which eventually got the Ambassador killed. Also it was to cover up their REJECTION of his requests for more security.
Obamination and Hillary are criminals, and you are a fucking piece of shit.
And?
Obama said it was an act of terror.
I'd go as far as saying Obama and Hillary are murderers, in my opinion of course.
.
Yep....typical liberal scum.
Gotta throw out Buuuuuuush to cover for the black messiah.
Obamination could run naked across a stage on live TV and scum like you would claim it didn't happen.
Conservative logic.
Attacking the wrong country as a result of a fully broadcasted terrorist attack which takes over a year to fully vette and kill close to 3000 Americans on American soil is okay..and in fact merits a second term for the President that presided over that disaster.
But, an attack that takes place way on the other side of the world, needs to be vetted instantly and evokes some sort of conspiracy theory for a President they don't like. In fact..during the attack..its okay for their candidate to score political points and put undue pressure on the situation.
You guys lack standards of any sort.
CIA- "Unplanned terrorist attack based on the video" NO LIE.
Pub dupes!
Rose Garden.... ???
Bullcrap.....
Sallow still hasn't figured out that people aren't buying that line.
Yes he has. That is why he is mad
Sallow still hasn't figured out that people aren't buying that line.
Yes he has. That is why he is mad
He was mad way before. Now he's angry too.
CIA- "Unplanned terrorist attack based on the video" NO LIE.
Pub dupes!
CIA- "Unplanned terrorist attack based on the video" NO LIE.
Pub dupes!
Geez, what a loser
CIA- "Unplanned terrorist attack based on the video" NO LIE.
Pub dupes!
Geez, what a loser
Please tell me you're not just figuring that out...
Geez, what a loser
Please tell me you're not just figuring that out...
I never paid much attention to his irrelevancy till now