Breaking On Fox

Obama' hasn't fixed Booosh's catastrophes fast enough, over total Pub mindless obstruction. Must let W clone (with no personality) finish the job! Jeeebus what a bunch of morons...
 
Read all about it...Obama spins and lies!!!!


Time line of lies!

Obama's Benghazi Lies - Home

Destroys Obama's case. It wasn't about a fucking terrorist attack, BUT the protest over our freedom of speech.

On the 13th he was talking about the protest when he said terrorized.

Susan Rice said on the 16th that this wasn't a pre-planned attack. LIES

On the 18th Obama went on the letterman show and blamed our first amendment for the attack. LIES!!!

If the terrorized was supposed to mean a terrorist attack. Well, Obama sure inserted his foot in his ass.

Clinton on the 21st was the first to say it was a Terrorist attack. SPIN!

Obama on the view on the 25th said it was about the fucking video! Spin some more!!!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iD4a9GHBF_U&feature=related]Carney maintains Libya attack was not preplanned - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPzjayOh-PU&feature=relmfu]Who is responsible for the attack in Benghazi? - YouTube[/ame]




Biden blatantly lied about Chris Stevens wanting more Security
The Fact Checker


“We weren’t told they wanted more security there. We did not know they wanted more security.”

— Biden, speaking of the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya

Biden’s bold statement was directly contradicted by State Department officials just this week, in testimony before a congressional panel and in unclassified cables released by a congressional committee.

“All of us at post were in sync that we wanted these resources,” said Eric Nordstrom, the top regional security officer in Libya earlier this year. A Utah national guardsman who led a security team, Lt. Col. Andrew Wood, said: “We felt great frustration that those requests were ignored or just never met.”



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIxjz5wEcF0]September 12, 2012 - President Obama Speaks on Libya Attacks that killed US Ambassador Chris Stevens - YouTube[/ame]

@ 5:00-6:20 you can hear the context in which he mentioned terrorism, Romney was correct in his assertation as, in context, Obama was referring to terrorism in general and not specifically the attack
====

Candy wasn't even right here as Obama said "terror" in the context of the protest.



Crowley to Axelrod: Obama Never Said Benghazi Attack Was 'Act of Terror
Breitbart ^ | 17 Oct 2012, 3:44 AM PDT | Tony Lee
Crowley to Axelrod: Obama Never Said Benghazi Attack Was 'Act of Terror'
On CNN's "State of the Union" on September 30, Candy Crowley insisted David Axelrod, President Barack Obama's chief strategist, was wrong when Axelrod tried to claim President Barack Obama called the Benghazi attack "an act of terror" on the day after.
"First, they said it was not planned, it was part of this tape," Crowley said when Axelrod tried to spin her.
This was Crowley the journalist, unlike the pro-Obama advocate who moderated Tuesday's debate between Obama and Mitt Romney and interjected herself into an argument between Obama and Romney on the exact same issue -- and took Obama's side.
During the debate, Crowley affirmed Obama's assertion that he referred to the Benghazi attacks as acts of terror on the day after.
After Romney correctly said it took Obama 14 days before Obama said the the Benghazi attacks were acts of terror, Crowley took Obama's side -- to an ovation from the town hall audience -- and she proclaimed Obama had indeed claimed the Benghazi attacks were acts of terror the day after the attacks in the White House Rose Garden.
On September 12, the day after the attacks, Obama did say the words "acts of terror" but he was not referring to the attacks that killed U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens.
Crowley knew that on September 30 and she conceded it again hours after the debate when she went on CNN and said while Romney "was right in the main, but he just chose the wrong word." But the damage had already been done.
With Obama's reelection on the line, Crowley seemed to have conveniently forgotten the facts she knew two weeks before when she grilled Axelrod in a way she should have Obama.


---
Yet we learn today that Stevens was begging for months for security??? WTF is wrong with the Obama Admin. If you leftist had any honor you wouldn't vote for Obama.


Documents show Stevens worried about Libya security threats, Al Qaeda before consulate attack
Fox News ^ | 10-19-2012 | James Rosen
Documents show Stevens worried about Libya security threats, Al Qaeda before consulate attack | Fox News

Across 166 pages of internal State Department documents -- released Friday by a pair of Republican congressmen pressing the Obama administration for more answers on the Benghazi terrorist attack -- slain U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and the security officers assigned to protect him repeatedly sounded alarms to their superiors in Washington about the intensifying lawlessness and violence in Eastern Libya, where Stevens ultimately died.

On Sept. 11 -- the day Stevens and three other Americans were killed -- the ambassador signed a three-page cable, labeled "sensitive," in which he noted "growing problems with security" in Benghazi and "growing frustration" on the part of local residents with Libyan police and security forces. These forces the ambassador characterized as "too weak to keep the country secure."


Urgent: Fox Exclusive: State Department mails declare al Qaeda-linked group claimed responsibility for Benghazi attack

Per Pergram-Capitol Hill
Fox has obtained a set of internal emails which declare that the group Ansar al Sharia claimed responsibility of the attack in Benghazi virtually as the raid played out on September 11th.

Ansar al Sharia has been declared by the State Department to be a an al Qaeda affiliated group. The emails were sent by the State Department to across a variety of redacted national security platforms including the White House Situation room, the Pentagon, the FBI, the Director of National Intelligence and the State Department. Fox is told that approximately 300-400 national security figures received these emails in real time almost as the raid was playing out and concluding. Fox is told that figures directly receiving these emails work directly underneath the nation’s top national security, military and diplomatic officials.

The first email indicates that Ambassador Chris Stevens and other personnel were “in the compound safe haven.”

Emails show the Obama administration knew Ansar al Sharia was behind the attack in Benghazi « Gretawire
 
Last edited:
Obama' hasn't fixed Booosh's catastrophes fast enough, over total Pub mindless obstruction. Must let W clone (with no personality) finish the job! Jeeebus what a bunch of morons...

If by blaming Bush you are referring to the economic crisis of 2008, you have a very ignorant understanding of that crisis. Both parties are guilty. Democrats more so.

But yes, Obama has FAILED at recovery.


$16,000,000,000,000

Write a letter to your great grandchildren tonight explaining why you defended adding six trillion to our debt that they are stuck paying. I'm sure they'd want to hear it.
 
578607_518062284884607_1703183189_n.jpg
 
You stupid pile of shit....there was nothing in the emails about a protest over a video.

The video was a fake story invented to cover up their mistakes of ignoring previous security breaches of the compound which eventually got the Ambassador killed. Also it was to cover up their REJECTION of his requests for more security.

Obamination and Hillary are criminals, and you are a fucking piece of shit.

And?

Obama said it was an act of terror.

I'd go as far as saying Obama and Hillary are murderers, in my opinion of course.


.
 
You stupid pile of shit....there was nothing in the emails about a protest over a video.

The video was a fake story invented to cover up their mistakes of ignoring previous security breaches of the compound which eventually got the Ambassador killed. Also it was to cover up their REJECTION of his requests for more security.

Obamination and Hillary are criminals, and you are a fucking piece of shit.

And?

Obama said it was an act of terror.

I'd go as far as saying Obama and Hillary are murderers, in my opinion of course.


.

obama_BloodHandsHope-80.jpg
 
Yep....typical liberal scum.

Gotta throw out Buuuuuuush to cover for the black messiah.:eusa_whistle:

Obamination could run naked across a stage on live TV and scum like you would claim it didn't happen.

Conservative logic.

Attacking the wrong country as a result of a fully broadcasted terrorist attack which takes over a year to fully vette and kill close to 3000 Americans on American soil is okay..and in fact merits a second term for the President that presided over that disaster.

But, an attack that takes place way on the other side of the world, needs to be vetted instantly and evokes some sort of conspiracy theory for a President they don't like. In fact..during the attack..its okay for their candidate to score political points and put undue pressure on the situation.

You guys lack standards of any sort.

They'd be claiming that a frame-by-frame examination proves he had a handkerchief tied around the base of his wing-wang, and therefore he wasn't REALLY naked.
 

Forum List

Back
Top