BREAKING: 200+ “Militarized” Federal Police Surround Peaceful Rancher in Nevada

[Asclepias]

Oh I see. To read your text correctly one has to be a mind reader. Got it.

Your comprehension skills seem to be lacking as well. You cant read minds son. You can only read text. In your case you seem to spectacularly bad at both. Does that make sense?

CMON dumb ass, show everyone what the subject is in your sentence. You can do it.

Go find someone stupid enough to fall for your deflection of the fact you cant read very well.

 

[RKMBrown]

Your comprehension skills seem to be lacking as well. You cant read minds son. You can only read text. In your case you seem to spectacularly bad at both. Does that make sense?

CMON dumb ass, show everyone what the subject is in your sentence. You can do it.

Go find someone stupid enough to fall for your deflection of the fact you cant read very well.

Cmon you can do it! Put some bold emphasis on the subject in your sentence. Don't run away.

 

[Asclepias]

Just watched Bundys response to the reactions from his hate speech yesterday. The guy is one of those that are so racist he doesn't even realize it. Its embedded in the fiber of his being and will not be removed.

Bundy: Media is prejudiced, not me - CNN.com Video

 

[Asclepias]

CMON dumb ass, show everyone what the subject is in your sentence. You can do it.

Go find someone stupid enough to fall for your deflection of the fact you cant read very well.

Cmon you can do it! Put some bold emphasis on the subject in your sentence. Don't run away.

Lets see you put those mind reading skills to work. Tell me what I am thinking in 3 minutes.

 

[RKMBrown]

Go find someone stupid enough to fall for your deflection of the fact you cant read very well.

Cmon you can do it! Put some bold emphasis on the subject in your sentence. Don't run away.

Lets see you put those mind reading skills to work. Tell me what I am thinking in 3 minutes.

I quoted your words, I used the literal meaning of your words. If you want me to read your mind for some meaning in your sentences that is hidden away in you haid go pound sand.

 

[holston]

I see...so with armed militias massing at Bundy's ranch and sharpshooters training their semiautomatics off a bridge in the Fed's direction...after him flouting the law for 20 years and refusing multiple efforts to collect legitimate fees in arrears...thru repeated court action ruling against him as a lawbreaker...
...the Feds should just drop by for a social call with arms full of flowers and candy and ask nicely...with a cherry on top ?! Whats the matter with u cons...aren't u the ones who endlessly repeat "the laws on the books must be enforced"?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Why do you think so many of Bundy's neighbors came to his defense? Are they all freeloading, tax evading domestic terrorists or what?

The way things are in Nevada with the ranchers are not the same as they are elsewhere.

Did you not read the article by Dr Pease?

Why Does the Federal Government own Nevada? | Liberty Under Fire

Why does the federal government own Nevada? It does not own New York or Virginia or Massachusetts.

But the problem isn’t Nevada’s alone where government owns 87.7 % of the land leaving private ownership of the state at but 12.3 %. The percentage of land owned by government exceeds fifty percent in Alaska (98.5), Idaho (63.8), Oregon (52.6), and Utah (63.6). Indeed, the federal government claims to own a third of all the landmass in the United States (Inventory Report on Real Property Owned by the United States Throughout the World, published by the General Services Administration, page 10).

Do you believe that all power, authority, and property belongs in the hands of the Federal government? Communists do.

87% of Nevada lands constitutes the majority of it. Right?

You don't believe that cattle ranchers who have grazed their cattle on this land since the opening of the West should take priority over the desires of the Reids to sell it to the Communist Chinese.

Tell me. Once this land is sold to the Chinese, does the U.S. maintain the right to buy it back?
If not, then whose land will it be? The Chinese. Right?

What then if the Chinese decide to colonize the land, conduct military operations on it, or even establish military bases?
Whose land would it be then?

Would the US have any grounds to cry foul at that time?

Would you people then cry out for the BLM to go in and disarm them or bust up their spying operations or whatever else they decided to do with THEIR land?

Would you prefer US lands to be in the hands of the Chinese? Or is it that you simply prefer that any ol' Communists own it? Just how much of the land mass of the US do you believe that people like Harry Reid ought to be able to sell? A 'little"? A LOT? ALL of it??

Communism is where the State, ie the central government owns everything.
This is what you people seem to want. Is it?

It would seem so.
If you didn't then you wouldn't mind so much if Bundy's cows just went right on about their business as they have for over a century.
Why would the BLM arrive in armored vehicles carrying automatic weapons if they had no intention of using them?
The only reason they would do so is with the intention of USING them in the event that Bundy resisted the confiscation or destruction of his cattle.

Therefore I may assume that you would approve of that action. That is to say, it would have suited you people fine if the BLM had massacred the entire Bundy family just so long as Uncle Sam got another nickel to send you, support immoral wars in the mideast, bail out Banksters and Wall Street gamblers, and provide Israel with more WEAPONS of MASS DESTRUCTION.

We see what is important to you. It isn't the fact that drug dealing, whoremongering, murderous Mexicans have already confiscated 36,000 acres of Arizona land, that Yomamma refuses to enforce immigration law, that Eric Holder is supplying those drug dealers with weapons and then lying about it while Yomamma releases them from jail.

You've made yourselves clear. You prefer to zero in on "Ol' man Bundy" and his cows. THAT is where you see the problem.



The point I am trying to make is that I don't care too much for what you people say about Bundy's cows eating free grass; NOT SO LONG AS ........KING Yomamma and his henchmen are in defiance of the law themselves!

No One Asked Me But? (April 9, 2014) - Moapa Valley Progress

By DR. LARRY MOSES

No one asked me but… There has been a great deal of discussion about rancher Cliven Bundy and his cattle. Some people support Cliven; others support the stand the federal government, egged on by environmentalists, has taken.

This caused me to turn to the Nevada Revised Statutes to see what laws Mr. Bundy has violated, if any. Why turn to state law to deal with the federal government on federal land? Because in the 1930’s, the federal government turned over to the various western states the responsibility of “protecting, improving, and developing public lands fit for grazing of livestock” within their borders.

The state of Nevada, which was dominated by ranchers and miners in the 1930’s, took that responsibility to heart and this effort resulted in the state passing The Taylor Grazing Act in 1934. This act is codified in NRS 568, and is in effect today.

According to NRS 568.010, it is “An act to stop injury to the public grazing lands by preventing overgrazing and soil deterioration, to provide for their orderly use, improvement, and development, to stabilize the livestock industry dependent upon the public range…”

NRS 568.230 states: … “It is unlawful … (to) restrict or interfere with the customary use of the land for grazing livestock by any person who, by himself or herself or the person’s grantors or predecessors, has become established, either exclusively or in common with others, in the grazing use of the land by operation of law or under and in accordance with the customs of the graziers of the region involved.”

That brings into question what does customary mean under the law? NRS 568.240 states: “Customary or established use… to include the continuous, open, notorious, peaceable and public use of such range seasonally for a period of 5 years or longer immediately before March 30, 1931, by the person or the person’s grantors or predecessors in interest, …Any change in customary use so established must not be made after March 30, 1931, so as to prevent, restrict or interfere with the customary or established use of any other person or persons. NRS 568.230 to 568.290, “…does not prohibit any such established user from continuing his or her grazing use, as established by operation of law or in accordance with such customs.” NRS 568.290 states: “Nothing in NRS 568.230 to 568.290, inclusive, amends or repeals existing law regarding the grazing use of the public lands or of water for the purpose of watering livestock, or modifies or compromises any valid rights or priorities which exist therein on March 30, 1931.”

Since the federal government closed much of the contested area to grazing, they surely cannot charge Bundy for not paying grazing fees.

They have charged Mr. Bundy’s cattle with trespass. However, the state trespass law states it is the responsibility of the landowner to fence out cattle, not the rancher’s responsibility to fence them in. According to state law, there can be no damages collected for trespass unless the cattle have breached a “legal fence.”

There are cattle legally being grazed by another rancher in areas being searched for Bundy’s cattle. If the Utah cowboys round up any of those or even herd them without permission of the legal owner they are in violation of NRS 568.350 which states: “It shall be unlawful for any person to lead, drive or in any manner remove … any head of neat cattle, … the same being the property of another person, from the range on which they are permitted to run in common, without the consent of the owner thereof first. …Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. …such person shall be civilly liable to the owner of livestock so removed from the range for the value of all such stock and the necessary expenses incident to their return.”

It should not come as a surprise that the federal government would ignore state law. This same government sued the State of Arizona to stop their enforcement of federal immigration laws. By imperial decree, the federal government today is selecting which law it will or will not enforce.

 

[holston]

N4T Investigators: Rogue Mexican Army troops crossing the line | KVOA.com | Tucson, Arizona

In January, soldiers from this lonely outpost of the Mexican Army drew their guns on U.S. Border Patrol agents just 50 yards into the United States. Then in March, they opened fire on Javier Jose Rodriguez, a young Tucson man visiting family in Sásabe when he was driving around the town early on a Saturday morning after drinking beers with friends. Rodriguez was shot in the arm and in the side, he spent three weeks at University of Arizona Medical Center.

The United States' reaction has been tepid, angering people who live and patrol along the Arizona border.

U.S. Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) revealed details of the January encounter between soldiers from this base and the Border Patrol. In a letter to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Coburn said a lone agent encountered two Mexican soldiers 50 yards inside the U.S. The agent and the soldiers drew their weapons; the soldiers carried G-3 rifles.

"From what I understand, this has happened hundreds of times before," says Sylvia Longmire, a border security analyst whose recent book, Border Insecurity, details the challenges and failings of some Homeland Security operations along the Arizona-Sonora border.

Reports obtained under the federal Freedom of Information Act show that members of Mexico's Army have crossed into the U.S. at least 300 times over the past 18 years.

But reports show that across the entire border, soldiers have driven into Texas, landed helicopters in Texas' Rio Grande Valley and encountered Border Patrol agents within the United States.

Sen. Coburn ordered the Homeland Security Department to produce answers into the Mexican Army incursion by early February. A senior senate aide tells KVOA News 4, as of this week, the agency hasn't responded to the senator's demand.

So where's the outrage over this?

We have a Department of "Homeland Security" that's amassing billions of rounds of hollow point bullets for who knows what and that gives 90% of it's funding to JEWS.

We have a Bureau of Land Management that can spend millions putting Nevada ranchers out of business so that some flaming Zionist Congressman's son can cut a sweetheart deal selling US lands to the Communist Chinese.

And then we have Attorney General "Fast and Furious" Eric Holder selling guns to Mexican drug cartels, lying about it, then defying Congress to turn over records about it.




» Holder?s Latest Scandal: DOJ Now Pressuring Banks to Refuse Service to Gun Stores Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

The DoJ has been caught shipping guns to drug dealers, terrorists and gang members in Mexico under Fast and Furious, yet Holder is targeting legitimate, lawful gun shops. This is completely outside of the law and resembles the behavior of a dictatorship.

Operation Chokepoint is flooding payments companies that provide processing service to those industries with subpoenas, civil investigative demands, and other burdensome and costly legal demands.

The theory behind this enforcement program has superficial logic: increase the legal and compliance costs of serving certain disfavored merchant categories, and payments companies will simply stop providing service to such merchants

Read more: ?Operation Choke Point? harmful to flow of commerce | TheHill
Follow us: [MENTION=27326]The[/MENTION]hill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook




But the "libs", Marxists, and Zionists in the US are screaming for Bundy's head.

Aren't they the least bit concerned over the rising cost of beef, or is this a round about way of forcing us all to become mandatory Vegans?


What gives ?

 

[RKMBrown]

N4T Investigators: Rogue Mexican Army troops crossing the line | KVOA.com | Tucson, Arizona

In January, soldiers from this lonely outpost of the Mexican Army drew their guns on U.S. Border Patrol agents just 50 yards into the United States. Then in March, they opened fire on Javier Jose Rodriguez, a young Tucson man visiting family in Sásabe when he was driving around the town early on a Saturday morning after drinking beers with friends. Rodriguez was shot in the arm and in the side, he spent three weeks at University of Arizona Medical Center.

The United States' reaction has been tepid, angering people who live and patrol along the Arizona border.

U.S. Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) revealed details of the January encounter between soldiers from this base and the Border Patrol. In a letter to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Coburn said a lone agent encountered two Mexican soldiers 50 yards inside the U.S. The agent and the soldiers drew their weapons; the soldiers carried G-3 rifles.

"From what I understand, this has happened hundreds of times before," says Sylvia Longmire, a border security analyst whose recent book, Border Insecurity, details the challenges and failings of some Homeland Security operations along the Arizona-Sonora border.

Reports obtained under the federal Freedom of Information Act show that members of Mexico's Army have crossed into the U.S. at least 300 times over the past 18 years.

So where's the outrage over this?

We have a Department of "Homeland Security" that's amassing billions of rounds of hollow point bullets for who knows what and that gives 90% of it's funding to JEWS.

We have a Bureau of Land Management that can spend millions putting Nevada ranchers out of business so that some flaming Zionist Congressman's son can cut a sweetheart deal selling US lands to the Communist Chinese.

And then we have Attorney General "Fast and Furious" Eric Holder selling guns to Mexican drug cartels, lying about it, then defying Congress to turn over records about it.




» Holder?s Latest Scandal: DOJ Now Pressuring Banks to Refuse Service to Gun Stores Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

The DoJ has been caught shipping guns to drug dealers, terrorists and gang members in Mexico under Fast and Furious, yet Holder is targeting legitimate, lawful gun shops. This is completely outside of the law and resembles the behavior of a dictatorship.

Operation Chokepoint is flooding payments companies that provide processing service to those industries with subpoenas, civil investigative demands, and other burdensome and costly legal demands.

The theory behind this enforcement program has superficial logic: increase the legal and compliance costs of serving certain disfavored merchant categories, and payments companies will simply stop providing service to such merchants

Read more: ?Operation Choke Point? harmful to flow of commerce | TheHill
Follow us: [MENTION=27326]The[/MENTION]hill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook




But the "libs", Marxists, and Zionists in the US are screaming for Bundy's head.

Aren't they the least bit concerned over the rising cost of beef, or is this a round about way of forcing us all to become mandatory Vegans?


What gives ?

The worse off the country becomes the more people they find willing to take hand-out from the government that are taken from income earning Americans. The more they tax the income earning Americans the less those Americans have to spend and invest. Why work your hands to the bone just to be punished for it when you can be rewarded for not working at all? Thus because democrats benefit from destroying the country's ability and desire to produce, the democrats are doing everything they can to regulate away our ability to produce, while blaming the republicans of course. In this case the conservatives are accused of polluting the air with non-green energy, of course everyone knows that green energy pollutes more than non-green, but that does not matter. The word green sounds better. In response solar power plants must be built, because they are green.

In comes the where discussion. On the other side of the green power discussion in the democrat party we have the kill all humans to save the planet folks, in this case save the desert turtle was raised up the flag. This is all based on the democrat laws passed in the Carter administration allowing political action committees to sue on behalf of protected species from salamanders to eagles, from molds to trees. This issue is probably the biggest problem in this country that is being used by the lobbies and lawyers to stop all progress in America. To save the turtle the democrats had to come up with a "mitgation" strategy that would be acceptable to their save the planet from humans brethren. The result was deciding to run all the ranchers in this area out of business. Note: once the decision was made to run em out of business the feds lacked any enthusiasm for reversing that decision, even after the solar project was given to China.

All around the country the libtards are gearing up for the big fight against coal scheduled for 2016, and the big fight against cow shit this year. See recent headlines for Obama's executive order plan to end dairy and meat production from cows in this country. You see the cows fart and shit, and that causes dreaded co2 and methane gases.

ROFL but hey it's ok cause the feds will subsidize cows and dairy from other countries using tax dollars so the democrat constituents are not affected.

 

[hazlnut]

Stop calling this CRIMINAL a "Peaceful Rancher".


The GUY IS A FUCKING FEE LOADER -- sucking on the public Teat.

 

[dr.d]

Yup...and a dangerous rabble rouser as well.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[holston]

Stop calling this CRIMINAL a "Peaceful Rancher".


The GUY IS A FUCKING FEE LOADER -- sucking on the public Teat.

SO. You are saying that the man is not a "rancher" but rather a "criminal"?

Does your definition extend to all the rest of the ranchers in Nevada or only those who support Bundy?

Did you intend to say "FUCKING FEE LOADER", "FUCKING FREE LOADER", or 'FUCKING FEED LOADER"?

Do you drink cows milk?
Do you think that qualifies as "sucking on a teat" or do you think that a person's lips has to be directly in contact with the teats themselves first?

From your outspokeness I take it you have a strong ideology. Would you call it pure?

Are you unwilling to compromise on any of these points, or would you consider that to be a weakness?

What exactly are your fundamental beliefs?

Do you feel a need to control people through taxes and the armed forces of the government?

Are you afraid of FUCKING FEED LOADERS?

Do you think that this boils down to an issue between the rights of States and FUCKING FEED LOADERS vs Harry Reid's right to sell State Land to the Communist Chinese and the US Government's right to ensure this transaction takes place by armed force if necessary?

Or do you think it is a case of The Cows vs The Turtles?

 

[holston]

Yup...and a dangerous rabble rouser as well.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Yup. Them Nevada cattle ranchers, they sure are a dangerous bunch of rabbles.

Nothing like the peaceful BLM or the DHS and the 50 odd Swat Teams associated with every government department imaginable.

Obama's Citizen Army

http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/08/1-service.htm

http://www.infowars.com/new-obama-executive-order-seizes-u-s-infrastructure-and-citizens-for-military-preparedness/

In a stunning move, on March 16, 2012, Barack Obama signed an Executive Order stating that the President and his specifically designated Secretaries now have the authority to commandeer all domestic U.S. resources including food and water. The EO also states that the President and his Secretaries have the authority to seize all transportation, energy, and infrastructure inside the United States as well as forcibly induct/draft American citizens into the military. The EO also contains a vague reference in regards to harnessing American citizens to fulfill “labor requirements” for the purposes of national defense.

 

[holston]

Dangerous Rabble poses threat to National Security.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Dangerous Rabble poses threat to National Security.

You know holston, if you'd drop the Nazi shit, you'd be a good poster....

 

[holston]

Dangerous Rabble poses threat to National Security.

You know holston, if you'd drop the Nazi shit, you'd be a good poster....

I'm not a Nazi. What I have to say about all the Jewish Political and Social activism in this country is just the truth.

Most people know little or nothing about Judaism, their culture, their race, their ethnicity, their tribalism, or even what Zionism is all about.

You cannot always identify a "Jew" by his appearance.

What concerns me about them is related to JUDAISM itself. It is not what most people would assume it to be. It is by no means as "harmless" as they would suppose it to be or as the Jews themselves present it to be.
This is because it carries with it the vestiges of TALMUDISM, which has less to do with the Old Testament itself than it does the teachings of men who are the spiritual heirs to the Pharisees and Sadducees of yore.
Because the "Jewish" culture grew out of those traditions the Jews CULTURE carries with it the same baggage. Their culture is inundated with those teachings and traditions. They bear more likeness to the teachings of Machiavelli than any thing Moses or the Old Testament prophets taught.

What has resulted from all that is a quasi religious SOCIAL ORDER, centered around the ethnic group of the Ashkenazim people and their mixed race offspring. The Ashkenazim themselves were originally derived from various mixtures of the Khazarian and Hebrew people and whatever else that entered the mix along the way.

They have maintained their ethnic and tribal identities despite the dilution of racial characteristics that has resulted from miscegination.


It used to be that the majority of Americans knew NOTHING about Muslims. Most of them would not have been able to tell you anything about Islam and some of them probably would not have even been able to identify it as a religion.
Because of the US involvement in Israel's affairs and particularly since 9/11 the majority of people ARE STILL largely IGNORANT about Islam, but they now would mostly identify it as a major religion..... A DANGEROUS ONE.

Not so?

So although they have now a nodding acquaintance with Islam, and Muslims, they still are about as IGNORANT ABOUT JUDAISM as they ever were.

Up until 9/11 you could not have convinced most Americans that Islam was of any significance to them or that it was a force to be reckoned with. I remember when no one paid any attention to me when I mentioned the subject to them.

Now the same situation exists with Judaism, and "Jews" as it did then for Islam and Muslims.

People in the US can no longer afford to ignore EITHER of these religions BECAUSE they are not merely writings contained in books somewhere. They are represented by substantial masses of people who live according to their tenets and act on them both POLITICALLY AND SOCIALLY.

Those who think that Judaism is nothing but an innocuous blip on the religious radar screen are ill informed. It is far more than that. It has become a MAJOR POLITICAL force and force for SOCIAL CHANGE.
In fact, the US government is now overwhelmingly under the influence and directives of people who are of the JUDAIC and ZIONIST persuasions.

This is not "anti-Semitic" to say so. It is merely a statement of FACT.

Non Jews can no more ignore the influence of Jewish ORGANIZATION than they can Muslim organization.
Both of these entities now exist within the boarders of the US. The difference is that the influence and control of the US by proponents and practitioners of JUDAISM far and away outstrips that of any other religion or ethnic control.
To say that they are here now and must be dealt with accordingly is no more "racist" than saying that there are at least 20 million illegal immigrants in the US.
The difference is that any dummy can easily recognize an ordinary Mexican by his racial features.
When I speak of a "Jew" I am talking about a group of people who often so closely resemble Anglo Saxon people that the majority of non-Jews cannot tell the difference.

This does not mean that Jews are unable to tell the difference themselves. Indeed they are the most keenly aware of those differences. A similarity in appearance doesn't necessarily imply any similarity in ideology, political or religious belief, or any other factor which would influence behavior. Can you tell the difference between say, a "Republican and a Democrat" by their appearance. I am not saying that there is any longer a practical difference between the two, but only if there was.

If there is no difference between a Jew and a non-Jew, then what pray tell IS the difference? IF there is no difference, then WHY would a person have any need to denote any distinction when none is there? Why would a person call himself a Jew if there was nothing about the title which would distinguish itself from any other?

So what I am speaking of largely pertains to AN IDEOLOGY, both POLITICAL and SOCIAL, and a RELIGIOUS MIND SET that has deep roots in the CULTURE of Jews and carries with it both ethnic and racial aspects.

Is it "anti-Semitic" of me to identify them as Jews when they identify themselves as such?

Why for example would it be "anti-Semitic" of me to call Ruth Ginsberg or Elana Kagan Jews if they call themselves that?


The reason why so many people resort to calling others "Nazi" or "anti-Semite" whenever they hear someone speak critically of them is because they have been conditioned by years and years of media and educational conditioning. It never occurs to them that there could be any other reason why a non Jew would even mention it other than some secret desire to load them all into cattle cars and have them gassed.

There IS! ( I'm not referring to my secret desire to have Ginsberg and Kagan gassed with cow farts.)

ANY ORGANIZATION which exists to induce changes into the POLITICAL scene, the SOCIAL climate, or alter the demographic landscape of this country or otherwise revamp it's legal system must be dealt with according to those terms.

In other words, any organization which seeks to effects those types of changes and lobbies and promotes the same, whether on TV, movies , advertising, in Universities, public schools or by any other means, opens itself up to the same scrutiny, criticism, and public awareness as the like of Clivan Bundy does.

Is that not a fair proposal to you?

Or do you believe that JEWISH LOBBIES and POLITICAL ACTIVIST groups such as the ADL, the JDL, The World Jewish Congress, Chabbad Lubavitch, or the Bnai Brith should be allowed to continue their work and intervention into all aspects of government and society without any oversight or public scrutiny at all?

If you think that they can simply be ignored without incurring any risk at all, then you are ignoring the fact that 9/11 and the resulting invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan were a direct result of the UNCONDITIONAL SUPPORT of APARTHEID ISRAEL in foreign affairs. And this unconditional support was a direct result of the influence of JEWISH MONEY and JEWISH LOBBIES.


In short, ALL the JEWISH organizations have ONE THING IN COMMON;
THEY ARE ALL JEWISH.

This means that it's members lobby on behalf of JEWS.

Doesn't that smack of "racism" and religious advocacy to you?


So what makes me a "Nazi" for calling attention to the inordinate amount of influence they are exerting on US POLITICS and SOCIETY?

Is it because that the "Jews" would rather that I did not do so?
If not, then why would they object?
Is there any reason why they would prefer to go unnoticed?


If you are inclined to take them at face value as they project their public image, then would you be as considerate towards those Islamic institutions which present themselves to the public as being charitable institutions as well? You are aware that the media has charged that some Mosques and ostensible Muslim charities have served only as fronts for religious extremism aren't you? And you have heard of cases in which certain men calling themselves "Ministers of Christ" did the most un-Christian things haven't you?

Do you believe it would be offensive to question the motives, intentions, or activities of anyone who presented an outward appearance of working solely in the interest of charity or as a benevolence so long as they assumed a "Christian" name?

Would a tank be any less of a tank if I painted it pink and put flowers on it?


I'm just trying to get people to think about who is calling all the shots in this country and why it is poised on the verge of bankruptcy, totalitarianism, and total self destruction.

It is no more racist of me to suggest that there may be "Jews" and Zionist ideologues among the ranks of that hidden cabal than it would be if I was trying to lay the entire blame at the feet of the Clintons, the Bushes or even Yomamma! I'm not trying to pick on the "Jews" per say as much as I want to get at their ring leaders. It's about cutting off the head of the snake so that the body dies with it.

I think it is dangerous to allow one particular group immunity to prosecution or even simple criticism based upon their ethnic or religious identity. And I am not asking for any special protection under the law in the event that I am caught committing an illegal, unethical, or immoral act. If someone robs or assaults me, then I only expect the law to administer justice in the prescribed manner as it would for anyone else. I am not calling for legislation which would punish those who offend me with additional severity.

No one thinks there is anything wrong with calling the hand of a hypocrite or Charlatan just because he is using the name of Christ to mask his con games. The same SHOULD BE said about Jewish, black, or Mexican crooks.

So save your "Nazi" and racist epithets for someone who really deserves it. Judaism is no less important as a topic for discussion and no less potent than something like Marxism than the dangers of cows stepping on turtles or mooching Harry Reid's grass. The entire Bolshevik revolution was based around it, and that resulted in a great deal of bloodshed.

I hope this country doesn't erupt in a civil war just because some people don't like the idea of eating hamburgers. Just look at those poor cows. What did they ever do to you?

 

[Nutz]

Dangerous Rabble poses threat to National Security.

You know holston, if you'd drop the Nazi shit, you'd be a good poster....

I'm not a Nazi. What I have to say about all the Jewish Political and Social activism in this country is just the truth.
.

...da evil Joo is gonna git you!

You are the best entertainment ever. (Please don't respond with a 10,000 word essay, I don't care. You have already defined yourself). LOL, a thread about Bundy and you are talking about Jews. What a fucking joke!

 

[holston]

You know holston, if you'd drop the Nazi shit, you'd be a good poster....

I'm not a Nazi. What I have to say about all the Jewish Political and Social activism in this country is just the truth.
.

...da evil Joo is gonna git you!

You are the best entertainment ever. (Please don't respond with a 10,000 word essay, I don't care. You have already defined yourself). LOL, a thread about Bundy and you are talking about Jews. What a fucking joke!

I was accused of being a "Nazi". What did THAT have to do with Bundy?

I explained why I wasn't. There was no joke about it. The inordinate influence of Marxists and Jewish Supremacists over our government and US society as a whole is no joke either.

You can't cure a disease by treating the symptoms.

Anyone who wants to put a halt to incursions of Federal powers over states and the systematic attacks being made upon white middle class America needs to address the source of the problem.

The conflict over Nevada lands between the BLM and Bundy did not originate with the armed men who were sent to confiscate Bundy's cattle.
The ranchers who came to Bundy's defense recognize a broader problem which extends beyond Bundy's case.

The increasing tendency towards Socialism and Centralization of all power to the Federal Government is directly related to the loss in State's autonomy.
The case of Arizona attempting to enforce it's immigration laws and being threatened with law suits and the interjection of Federal forces provides another instance of this.

The situation involving Bundy can no more be viewed in isolation of the events which preceded it than Lexington Square could with British attempts to confiscate arms or Fort Sumter with arguments over the South's constitutional right to secede from the Union and Northern attempts to provoke war.

People who are unable to see the Zionist hand in current events need to have it revealed to them.

The people objecting to Bundy's cattle grazing are more concerned with the collection of taxes according to what they saying. The high rate of taxation and efforts of representatives of the Federal government to exercise dominion over all US land is not unrelated to the Socialists attempts to centralize power and place control over all business and property into the hands of the ruling oligarchy.
These are Marxist ambitions. It so happens that Jews are traditionally Marxist/Bolshevik and that they happen to wield the most political clout in the US.

So there is no way to avoid dealing with the problem at it's root without allowing it to occur over and over again and reappearing first here and then there.

 

[Nutz]

I'm not a Nazi. What I have to say about all the Jewish Political and Social activism in this country is just the truth.
.

...da evil Joo is gonna git you!

You are the best entertainment ever. (Please don't respond with a 10,000 word essay, I don't care. You have already defined yourself). LOL, a thread about Bundy and you are talking about Jews. What a fucking joke!

I was accused of being a "Nazi". What did THAT have to do with Bundy?

I explained why I wasn't. There was no joke about it. The inordinate influence of Marxists and Jewish Supremacists over our government and US society as a whole is no joke either.

You can't cure a disease by treating the symptoms.

Anyone who wants to put a halt to incursions of Federal powers over states and the systematic attacks being made upon white middle class America needs to address the source of the problem.

The conflict over Nevada lands between the BLM and Bundy did not originate with the armed men who were sent to confiscate Bundy's cattle.
The ranchers who came to Bundy's defense recognize a broader problem which extends beyond Bundy's case.

The increasing tendency towards Socialism and Centralization of all power to the Federal Government is directly related to the loss in State's autonomy.
The case of Arizona attempting to enforce it's immigration laws and being threatened with law suits and the interjection of Federal forces provides another instance of this.

The situation involving Bundy can no more be viewed in isolation of the events which preceded it than Lexington Square could with British attempts to confiscate arms or Fort Sumter with arguments over the South's constitutional right to secede from the Union and Northern attempts to provoke war.

People who are unable to see the Zionist hand in current events need to have it revealed to them.

The people objecting to Bundy's cattle grazing are more concerned with the collection of taxes according to what they saying. The high rate of taxation and efforts of representatives of the Federal government to exercise dominion over all US land is not unrelated to the Socialists attempts to centralize power and place control over all business and property into the hands of the ruling oligarchy.
These are Marxist ambitions. It so happens that Jews are traditionally Marxist/Bolshevik and that they happen to wield the most political clout in the US.

So there is no way to avoid dealing with the problem at it's root without allowing it to occur over and over again and reappearing first here and then there.

I will repeat myself...

...da evil Joo is gonna git you!

You are the best entertainment ever. (Please don't respond with a 10,000 word essay, I don't care. You have already defined yourself). LOL, a thread about Bundy and you are talking about Jews. What a fucking joke!

 

[Uncensored2008]

I was accused of being a "Nazi". What did THAT have to do with Bundy?

You are a Nazi, and it's too bad.

It's also bizarre - JOOOOOOOOOOO hatred is uniquely left-wing.

I explained why I wasn't. There was no joke about it. The inordinate influence of Marxists and Jewish Supremacists over our government and US society as a whole is no joke either.

Nazi rhetoric fails to support your claim that you're not a Nazi...

You can't cure a disease by treating the symptoms.

Anyone who wants to put a halt to incursions of Federal powers over states and the systematic attacks being made upon white middle class America needs to address the source of the problem.

Anyone who thinks that the issue with the nation is a secret cabal of JOOOOOOOZZZ is mentally unstable.

The conflict over Nevada lands between the BLM and Bundy did not originate with the armed men who were sent to confiscate Bundy's cattle.

True, it originated with Harry Reid, a MORMON and a mobster. Some of the Vegas hoods in the 60's may have been left over from Bugsy Seagals gang, but that is as close to JOOOOOOOOOO as Reid gets.

The ranchers who came to Bundy's defense recognize a broader problem which extends beyond Bundy's case.

The increasing tendency towards Socialism and Centralization of all power to the Federal Government is directly related to the loss in State's autonomy.
The case of Arizona attempting to enforce it's immigration laws and being threatened with law suits and the interjection of Federal forces provides another instance of this.

The situation involving Bundy can no more be viewed in isolation of the events which preceded it than Lexington Square could with British attempts to confiscate arms or Fort Sumter with arguments over the South's constitutional right to secede from the Union and Northern attempts to provoke war.

Again, if you drop the Nazi shit, you'll be a top notch poster. Everything quoted is spot-on.

People who are unable to see the Zionist hand in current events need to have it revealed to them.

And here you go off the rails.

The Muzzie Beasts are not your ally - why you think they are is a mystery.

The people objecting to Bundy's cattle grazing are more concerned with the collection of taxes according to what they saying. The high rate of taxation and efforts of representatives of the Federal government to exercise dominion over all US land is not unrelated to the Socialists attempts to centralize power and place control over all business and property into the hands of the ruling oligarchy.
These are Marxist ambitions. It so happens that Jews are traditionally Marxist/Bolshevik and that they happen to wield the most political clout in the US.

Then why isn't Israel a Marxist state? Are JOOOOZZZZ running Cuba? North Korea? Venezuela?

So there is no way to avoid dealing with the problem at it's root without allowing it to occur over and over again and reappearing first here and then there.

You get close to reality, but you are distracted by Nazi idiocy, so you lose all credibility.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Stop calling this CRIMINAL a "Peaceful Rancher".


The GUY IS A FUCKING FEE LOADER -- sucking on the public Teat.

SO. You are saying that the man is not a "rancher" but rather a "criminal"?

Does your definition extend to all the rest of the ranchers in Nevada or only those who support Bundy?

Doesnt matter Bundy is a law breaker no matter who considers other ranchers anything