Bias in SSM cake case?

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

With DADT, Republicans obsessed that we can't have gays in the military because of....showers
Now, with gay marriage, they obsess that gay marriage is not practical because of....cakes

As usual the point of the thread has went over the point on your head. It's about government bias in the case. Stop running around flapping your arms seeking attention

It is not the government that is biased....it is the business owner

Public Accommodation has been in place for 50 years
"We don't serve blacks (gays) here" is no longer allowed

Yo dumbass, READ the article, the GOVERNMENT is being accused of....wait for it....BIAS!!!!!!

The government is biased against bigots?

No, the government is biased FOR the bigots. Read it again. Understand it.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Why the hell does anyone get all worked up about freak'n cakes?

Ask your faggot friends who couldn't just find another bakery down the street.

They used to have motels down the street for blacks too

Public accommodation is the law

Religious freedom is the Bill of Rights. No law is valid that violates this. Did you bigots learn nothing from Hobby Lobby? The courts are not on your side.

 

[Katzndogz]

These two are claiming up to 90 symptoms. If that's true, they were mentally ill to begin with.

 

[rightwinger]

Why the hell does anyone get all worked up about freak'n cakes?

Ask your faggot friends who couldn't just find another bakery down the street.

They used to have motels down the street for blacks too

Public accommodation is the law

Religious freedom is the Bill of Rights. No law is valid that violates this. Did you bigots learn nothing from Hobby Lobby? The courts are not on your side.

They tried that same religious freedom card during the Civil Rights era and it still didn't work

If your business discriminates, you are guilty

Hiding behind Jesus does not help you

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Why the hell does anyone get all worked up about freak'n cakes?

Ask your faggot friends who couldn't just find another bakery down the street.

They used to have motels down the street for blacks too

Public accommodation is the law

Religious freedom is the Bill of Rights. No law is valid that violates this. Did you bigots learn nothing from Hobby Lobby? The courts are not on your side.

They tried that same religious freedom card during the Civil Rights era and it still didn't work

If your business discriminates, you are guilty

Hiding behind Jesus does not help you

Faggots didn't sue over wedding cakes, introducing a religious conflict that didn't come up in the civil rights era, bigot.

 

[rightwinger]

Why the hell does anyone get all worked up about freak'n cakes?

Ask your faggot friends who couldn't just find another bakery down the street.

They used to have motels down the street for blacks too

Public accommodation is the law

Religious freedom is the Bill of Rights. No law is valid that violates this. Did you bigots learn nothing from Hobby Lobby? The courts are not on your side.

They tried that same religious freedom card during the Civil Rights era and it still didn't work

If your business discriminates, you are guilty

Hiding behind Jesus does not help you

Faggots didn't sue over wedding cakes, introducing a religious conflict that didn't come up in the civil rights era, bigot.

The argument in the Civil Rights era was that the Bible supported segregation of people

Jesus would have baked the cake

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Ask your faggot friends who couldn't just find another bakery down the street.

They used to have motels down the street for blacks too

Public accommodation is the law

Religious freedom is the Bill of Rights. No law is valid that violates this. Did you bigots learn nothing from Hobby Lobby? The courts are not on your side.

They tried that same religious freedom card during the Civil Rights era and it still didn't work

If your business discriminates, you are guilty

Hiding behind Jesus does not help you

Faggots didn't sue over wedding cakes, introducing a religious conflict that didn't come up in the civil rights era, bigot.

The argument in the Civil Rights era was that the Bible supported segregation of people

Jesus would have baked the cake

You don't know Jesus but someday will face his wrath unless you repent. Jesus is the same God that said homosexual conduct is an abomination and those guilty should be stoned to death. Your plastic dashboard South Park Jesus doesn't exist.

 

[Katzndogz]

This particular aspect of the argument isn't over whether the bakers had a right to refuse. It's the amount of the levy. It's an excessive fine and clearly unconstitutional. It puts the government in the same class as any black gangbanger killing someone because he found the color of their shirt offensive.

 

[rightwinger]

They used to have motels down the street for blacks too

Public accommodation is the law

Religious freedom is the Bill of Rights. No law is valid that violates this. Did you bigots learn nothing from Hobby Lobby? The courts are not on your side.

They tried that same religious freedom card during the Civil Rights era and it still didn't work

If your business discriminates, you are guilty

Hiding behind Jesus does not help you

Faggots didn't sue over wedding cakes, introducing a religious conflict that didn't come up in the civil rights era, bigot.

The argument in the Civil Rights era was that the Bible supported segregation of people

Jesus would have baked the cake

You don't know Jesus but someday will face his wrath unless you repent. Jesus is the same God that said homosexual conduct is an abomination and those guilty should be stoned to death. Your plastic dashboard South Park Jesus doesn't exist.

I have faith that Jesus would bake a cake

 

[BullKurtz]

Real men eat PIE, not cake.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Religious freedom is the Bill of Rights. No law is valid that violates this. Did you bigots learn nothing from Hobby Lobby? The courts are not on your side.

They tried that same religious freedom card during the Civil Rights era and it still didn't work

If your business discriminates, you are guilty

Hiding behind Jesus does not help you

Faggots didn't sue over wedding cakes, introducing a religious conflict that didn't come up in the civil rights era, bigot.

The argument in the Civil Rights era was that the Bible supported segregation of people

Jesus would have baked the cake

You don't know Jesus but someday will face his wrath unless you repent. Jesus is the same God that said homosexual conduct is an abomination and those guilty should be stoned to death. Your plastic dashboard South Park Jesus doesn't exist.

I have faith that Jesus would bake a cake

Then you're an idiot.

 

[martybegan]

PA laws, people. Repeal them...work for it rather than sitting on your fat asses.

and how much actual work have you done on getting SSM passed?

 

[Delta4Embassy]

If the allegations are true it most certainly is bias and illegal. Keep pushing that agenda homos and we'll keep watching it blow up in your faces. Fools

Emails Raise Questions of Bias in Case Against Bakers Who Denied Service for Same-Sex Wedding

The Daily Signal has exclusively learned that the government agency responsible for enforcing Oregon’s anti-discrimination law appears to be working closely with a powerful gay rights advocacy group in its case against Aaron and Melissa Klein, owners of Sweet Cakes by Melissa.

Communications between the agency, the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, and the LGBT organization, Basic Rights Oregon, raise questions about potential bias in the state’s decision to charge the Kleins with discrimination for refusing to make a cake for a same-sex wedding.

In April, a judge for the agency recommended the Kleins be fined $135,000.

Communications obtained through a public records request show employees of the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries—which pursued the case against the Kleins—participating in phone calls, texting, and attending meetings with Basic Rights Oregon, the largest LGBT advocacy group in the state.

“That’s a clear conflict of interest,” Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal.

State agencies have a duty to represent the best interests of the general public, not the interests of one particular advocacy group. The relationship shown by these communications is inappropriate and raises basic questions about the objectivity, bias, and fairness of this agency and its proceedings.

Emails Raise Questions About Bias in Sweet Cakes Ruling

Wow, surprised anyone brought up the conflict of interest card. No conflict of interest in lawmakers who regulate industries accepting campaign donations from those very same industries?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Why the hell does anyone get all worked up about freak'n cakes?

The Kristalnacht that your party is engaged in targets bakers. What Sassylass has demonstrated is that government agencies (controlled by the party) are coordinating with homosexual hate groups in the targeting of small business to be harassed and hazed.

 

[bodecea]

They used to have motels down the street for blacks too

Public accommodation is the law

Religious freedom is the Bill of Rights. No law is valid that violates this. Did you bigots learn nothing from Hobby Lobby? The courts are not on your side.

They tried that same religious freedom card during the Civil Rights era and it still didn't work

If your business discriminates, you are guilty

Hiding behind Jesus does not help you

Faggots didn't sue over wedding cakes, introducing a religious conflict that didn't come up in the civil rights era, bigot.

The argument in the Civil Rights era was that the Bible supported segregation of people

Jesus would have baked the cake

You don't know Jesus but someday will face his wrath unless you repent. Jesus is the same God that said homosexual conduct is an abomination and those guilty should be stoned to death. Your plastic dashboard South Park Jesus doesn't exist.

Ah...said with a christian gleam in your eye. Not much difference between you and ISIS.

 

[Uncensored2008]

As usual...you run away

Shitflinger; you have zero integrity. No one can take anything you post seriously. Because you lie without hesitation, what you say is irrelevant. What you post will serve the party, but only occasionally will it have any relationship with truth or facts.

When you're a sociopath, people tend to ignore what you spew.

 

[bodecea]

PA laws, people. Repeal them...work for it rather than sitting on your fat asses.

and how much actual work have you done on getting SSM passed?

Quite a bit...first with Prop 22 (which unfortunately still passed) then Prop H8 (which unfortunately still passed but at a much smaller margin) then with supporting financially the legal case that won in CA, and continuing to support the Human Rights Campaign which is a prime force in working the legal case that is now going to succeed with the SCOTUS ruling at the end of this month.

Does the anti-PA forces even have a legal team or petition-writing team set up to work to eliminate state PA laws? Or is whining all that's being done?

 

[martybegan]

With DADT, Republicans obsessed that we can't have gays in the military because of....showers
Now, with gay marriage, they obsess that gay marriage is not practical because of....cakes

As usual the point of the thread has went over the point on your head. It's about government bias in the case. Stop running around flapping your arms seeking attention

It is not the government that is biased....it is the business owner

Public Accommodation has been in place for 50 years
"We don't serve blacks (gays) here" is no longer allowed

Exc

PA laws, people. Repeal them...work for it rather than sitting on your fat asses.

and how much actual work have you done on getting SSM passed?

Quite a bit...first with Prop 22 (which unfortunately still passed) then Prop H8 (which unfortunately still passed but at a much smaller margin) then with supporting financially the legal case that won in CA, and continuing to support the Human Rights Campaign which is a prime force in working the legal case that is now going to succeed with the SCOTUS ruling at the end of this month.

Does the anti-PA forces even have a legal team or petition-writing team set up to work to eliminate state PA laws? Or is whining all that's being done?

So basically nothing except writing checks. got it.

 

[bodecea]

With DADT, Republicans obsessed that we can't have gays in the military because of....showers
Now, with gay marriage, they obsess that gay marriage is not practical because of....cakes

As usual the point of the thread has went over the point on your head. It's about government bias in the case. Stop running around flapping your arms seeking attention

It is not the government that is biased....it is the business owner

Public Accommodation has been in place for 50 years
"We don't serve blacks (gays) here" is no longer allowed

Exc

PA laws, people. Repeal them...work for it rather than sitting on your fat asses.

and how much actual work have you done on getting SSM passed?

Quite a bit...first with Prop 22 (which unfortunately still passed) then Prop H8 (which unfortunately still passed but at a much smaller margin) then with supporting financially the legal case that won in CA, and continuing to support the Human Rights Campaign which is a prime force in working the legal case that is now going to succeed with the SCOTUS ruling at the end of this month.

Does the anti-PA forces even have a legal team or petition-writing team set up to work to eliminate state PA laws? Or is whining all that's being done?

So basically nothing except writing checks. got it.

Standing on street corners with signs is just writing a check? Signing petitions and contacting my Congressmen/Senators is just writing a check?

Does the anti-PA crowd even HAVE an legal team, petition writing team set up yet that people against PA laws can send checks to?

 

[martybegan]

With DADT, Republicans obsessed that we can't have gays in the military because of....showers
Now, with gay marriage, they obsess that gay marriage is not practical because of....cakes

As usual the point of the thread has went over the point on your head. It's about government bias in the case. Stop running around flapping your arms seeking attention

It is not the government that is biased....it is the business owner

Public Accommodation has been in place for 50 years
"We don't serve blacks (gays) here" is no longer allowed

Exc

PA laws, people. Repeal them...work for it rather than sitting on your fat asses.

and how much actual work have you done on getting SSM passed?

Quite a bit...first with Prop 22 (which unfortunately still passed) then Prop H8 (which unfortunately still passed but at a much smaller margin) then with supporting financially the legal case that won in CA, and continuing to support the Human Rights Campaign which is a prime force in working the legal case that is now going to succeed with the SCOTUS ruling at the end of this month.

Does the anti-PA forces even have a legal team or petition-writing team set up to work to eliminate state PA laws? Or is whining all that's being done?

So basically nothing except writing checks. got it.

Standing on street corners with signs is just writing a check? Signing petitions and contacting my Congressmen/Senators is just writing a check?

Does the anti-PA crowd even HAVE an legal team, petition writing team set up yet that people against PA laws can send checks to?

I'm sure its coming up as more people realize they are being prosecuted for their beliefs over something as stupid as a cake.