TeaBagger
VIP Member
- Jan 25, 2016
- 1,394
- 161
- 65
- Thread starter
- #61
The facts speak for themselves. The Saudi government has a huge controlling interest in Fox. Fox needs to change its name to al Jazeera.
Bull. Shit. As usual
Facebook group: The No. 2 owner of Fox News is Prince Alwaleed bin Talal who said 'a strong American government is not good for us'
"Alwaleed’s interest in News Corp., the media conglomerate of Rupert Murdoch and once-parent company to Fox News, started in 1997 with a $400 million investment, according to a description of the investment on Alwaleed’s Kingdom Holding Co.’s website. That was 3 percent of News Corp.’s worth. In 2005, he increased his holding to 5.5 percent, the site states."
"He is the third largest stockholder in the new News Corp., trailing Murdoch and aninvestment firm, with a 6.6 percent stake."
"It’s accurate to say he’s the No. 2 owner, but he’s more of a passive major shareholder, said Jay Ritter, University of Florida finance professor, pointing out Alwaleed does not have a seat on the company’s board of directors. His investment resembles other stocks held in major companies by mutual funds and investment firms, who invest big in public companies but do not intend to take over."
That is not a huge controlling interest.
It is not even a controlling interest.
Not even a huge interest.
A large investment by a mega rich dude is all it is.
Good grief Emptybagger even for you this is lame.
Well, no, it's pretty much on par would the rest of your silly stuff now that I think about it....
I have no idea what you're talking about. and I don't care about Fox news.
I wasn't responding to you. I was responding to the op's assertion that
"The Saudi government has a huge controlling interest in Fox"
Which it doesn't. Of course. And the op knows it. He's just trolling again. Or he has brain damage, which seems increasingly to be a possibility......
The Saudi Prince is the second biggest owner of Foxv. That is a controlling interest. Stop the lies
Bull. Shit. As usual
Facebook group: The No. 2 owner of Fox News is Prince Alwaleed bin Talal who said 'a strong American government is not good for us'
"Alwaleed’s interest in News Corp., the media conglomerate of Rupert Murdoch and once-parent company to Fox News, started in 1997 with a $400 million investment, according to a description of the investment on Alwaleed’s Kingdom Holding Co.’s website. That was 3 percent of News Corp.’s worth. In 2005, he increased his holding to 5.5 percent, the site states."
"He is the third largest stockholder in the new News Corp., trailing Murdoch and aninvestment firm, with a 6.6 percent stake."
"It’s accurate to say he’s the No. 2 owner, but he’s more of a passive major shareholder, said Jay Ritter, University of Florida finance professor, pointing out Alwaleed does not have a seat on the company’s board of directors. His investment resembles other stocks held in major companies by mutual funds and investment firms, who invest big in public companies but do not intend to take over."
That is not a huge controlling interest.
It is not even a controlling interest.
Not even a huge interest.
A large investment by a mega rich dude is all it is.
Good grief Emptybagger even for you this is lame.
Well, no, it's pretty much on par would the rest of your silly stuff now that I think about it....
I have no idea what you're talking about. and I don't care about Fox news.
I wasn't responding to you. I was responding to the op's assertion that
"The Saudi government has a huge controlling interest in Fox"
Which it doesn't. Of course. And the op knows it. He's just trolling again. Or he has brain damage, which seems increasingly to be a possibility......
The Saudi Prince is the second biggest owner of Fox. That is a controlling interest. Stop the lies liar.
You're just stupid.
A controlling interest is an ownership interest in a corporation with enough voting stock shares to prevail in any stockholders' motion.
Typically that's more than 50%, because that gives them a majority and actual control.
I'm surprised such a big leaguer such as yourself doesn't know this.
Although given that this nonsense was circulating as a Facebook 'fact' according to politifact I guess that's your idea of the big leagues. Everything's relative I guess, right small-time?
What's next, baller? "Mark Zuckerberg says if you like this post by midnight he's gonna give you a million dollars"
Lolz.....
You're just stupid.
A controlling interest is an ownership interest in a corporation with enough voting stock shares to prevail in any stockholders' motion.
Typically that's more than 50%, because that gives them a majority and actual control.
I'm surprised such a big leaguer such as yourself doesn't know this.
Although given that this nonsense was circulating as a Facebook 'fact' according to politifact I guess that's your idea of the big leagues. Everything's relative I guess, right small-time?
What's next, baller? "Mark Zuckerberg says if you like this post by midnight he's gonna give you a million dollars"
Lolz.....
Hey dumb fuck, share holders vote. Between the Saudis and Australian Rupert Murdoch they have more than 50% of the stock. Shareholders do not necessarily need to be physically present at the site of the company's annual meeting in order to exercise their right to vote. It is common for shareholders to voice their vote by proxy by mailing in their response. Unlike the single vote right that individuals commonly possess in democratic governments, the number of votes that a shareholderhas corresponds to the numbers of shares that he owns. For example, a shareholder that owns 100 shares will have a 100 times more sway than a shareholder that owns a single share.
Read more: Voting Right Definition | Investopedia Voting Right Definition | Investopedia
Follow us: Investopedia on Facebook
What can shareholders vote on? | Investopedia
Voting Right Definition | Investopedia
Fox News is not an American company. More likely than not it's a propaganda arm of the Islamist groups and other anti-American interests. Thank God for Donald Trump exposing and destroying Faux Noise.
Are you lying, stupid or both? I think both.