But two FEDERAL judges ruled in favor of it.But the JUDGE that RULED against it was FEDERAL...
Square that up...you cannot.
Which rules?
Latest Ruling rules...Obama and Holder IGNORE...
*NEXT*
What law are you basing that on?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
But two FEDERAL judges ruled in favor of it.But the JUDGE that RULED against it was FEDERAL...
Square that up...you cannot.
Which rules?
Latest Ruling rules...Obama and Holder IGNORE...
*NEXT*
Tell that to the communists Hitler had killed
Are we like, gonna have a seance in Russian?
They certainly are blatant about disregarding law when they disagree with the election or legal decision .The media seems generally disinterested as well.
What an odd type of new rulers we now have , no longer government by law but ruled by political winds.
Isn't it curious how conservatives and republicans only like legislation and laws that fit into their biased and prejudiced view of American and individual freedom? One wonders if conservatives ever had a thought would it drop out for lack of space in an otherwise empty head? The good things in life like individual freedoms, social justice for the wronged, a fair and level opportunity, and other freedoms are hard for conservatives, seems they never change, but thankfully life and society do change.
Interesting piece on change: CQ Press : Current Events In Context : Consitution Day - "Legislation Declared Unconstitional"
If anyone wants to understand political conservatism, I suggest Albert O. Hirschman's brilliant 'The Rhetoric of Reaction.' "He argues that a triplet of 'rhetorical' criticisms--perversity, futility, and jeopardy--'has been unfailingly leveled' by 'reactionaries' at each major progressive reform of the past 300 years--those T. H. Marshall identified with the advancement of civil, political and social rights of citizenship...Charmingly written, this book can benefit a diverse readership." The Rhetoric of Reaction - Albert O. Hirschman - Harvard University Press.
What Is Conservatism and What Is Wrong with It?
The Regressive Antidote - If Conservatism Is The Ideology of Freedom, I'm The Queen of England
Idiots with image macros
He's either a communist or a nazi
can't be both
You seem to have it reversed, it is the liberal agenda that must be enforced with out regard to what the election results or what the judges say.Isn't it curious how conservatives and republicans only like legislation and laws that fit into their biased and prejudiced view of American and individual freedom? \
Maryann Sumi, Mark Levin, and 'Legal Anarchy'
On his radio program on Friday, Mark Levin delivered a terrific monologue about the Democrats in Wisconsin and Judge Maryann Sumi.
Listen to the podcast.
He begins his show talking about the "legal anarchy in Wisconsin" and Sumi's decision. Levin succinctly reviews what has happened the past few weeks and explains the current situation.
snip
Now first of all, what this tells you, whether they lose elections, whether they lose votes in state legislatures, it doesn't matter. By hook or by crook, you are not allowed to effectively or successfully challenge the Left. You're just not. Whether it's the environment, whether it's health care, whether it's collective bargaining, you, ladies and gentlemen, are not allowed to reverse course. I don't care how much you pay in taxes, how miserable the health care system's going to be, I don't care how many illegal aliens are crossing into your town, it doesn't matter.
You have no say. Now you can go through the motions according to the Left, you can go through the motions and vote. And if the outcome is one that they like, they'll let it stand. But if it's an outcome they don't like, they're not going to let it stand. They're going to disenfranchise you in every way they know how.
If they can't get what they want by leaving town, they'll go to a liberal activist judge. And if they couldn't get what they wanted from her, well they'll go to the Secretary of State who will slow down the process of actually implementing the law so that the Left-wing locals can cut their deals with the government unions real fast before the law takes effect. If that doesn't work, well, they'll use the bureaucracy to punish you. This is what I mean - it's a soft tyranny. Absolutely a soft tyranny.
Mark Levin
FREEDOM EDEN: Maryann Sumi, Mark Levin, and 'Legal Anarchy'
That when Obama care was ruled unconstitutional the government insisted on going ahead anyways .
and When the Wisconsin Legislation presumable legally passed a law that was signed into the law the government decided to halt it going into effect?Rather then having a proper trial ?
Anyone find this kind of behavior disturbing?
They certainly are blatant about disregarding law when they disagree with the election or legal decision .The media seems generally disinterested as well.
What an odd type of new rulers we now have , no longer government by law but ruled by political winds.
The tyranny has come so slowly it is unnoticed
low flow toilets.
Cafe standards
CLF bulbs
I think a list of the infringing bureaucratic edicts should be listed so when a troglodyte elitist asks "What freedoms have you lost?, we can show them.