Anyone notice

Mr.Fitnah

Dreamcrusher
Jul 14, 2009
14,480
3,397
48
Paradise.
That when Obama care was ruled unconstitutional the government insisted on going ahead anyways .
and When the Wisconsin Legislation presumable legally passed a law that was signed into the law the government decided to halt it going into effect?Rather then having a proper trial ?
Anyone find this kind of behavior disturbing?
 
They certainly are blatant about disregarding law when they disagree with the election or legal decision .The media seems generally disinterested as well.
What an odd type of new rulers we now have , no longer government by law but ruled by political winds.
 
They certainly are blatant about disregarding law when they disagree with the election or legal decision .The media seems generally disinterested as well.
What an odd type of new rulers we now have , no longer government by law but ruled by political winds.

We are now a "soft tyranny"
 
They certainly are blatant about disregarding law when they disagree with the election or legal decision .The media seems generally disinterested as well.
What an odd type of new rulers we now have , no longer government by law but ruled by political winds.



Ah yes.. When the going gets tough... the Democrats are already gone..:lol:
 
They certainly are blatant about disregarding law when they disagree with the election or legal decision .The media seems generally disinterested as well.
What an odd type of new rulers we now have , no longer government by law but ruled by political winds.

We are now a "soft tyranny"

Interesting term

Soft Tyranny: Definition, Origination, Today.

The world is in a crisis. The nation is divided. Every time a bill is signed by congress, we lose a little bit of liberty. Over time, all of these small changes add up and form what we call a soft tyranny.
lens4023562_1239580708soft-tyranny.jpg

Soft Tyranny: Origination
Where did the term "soft tyranny" originate and where has it occured?
In 1835, Alexis de Tocqueville came up with the idea of soft tyranny during his texts titled Democracy in America. His goal was to explain why the representative democracy in America is succeeding and is failing everywhere else. He speculates in his work about the future of the philosophies of America and how they will be threatened.

He mentioned terms such as "soft tyranny," "soft despotism" and "tyranny of the majority" to describe how these events would happen. Basically, through gradual, small changes in policy, the United States would be fundamentally transformed into a state controlled completely by the government.
soft-tyranny9.jpg

When a soft tyranny occurs, there is usually a majority in the governmental houses. The system of checks and balances doesn't matter because they generally all agree on the same principles. This allows these representatives and policymakers to impose whatever will they wish upon the population.

In this case it is bureaucrats and the judiciary

 
Last edited by a moderator:
That when Obama care was ruled unconstitutional the government insisted on going ahead anyways .
and When the Wisconsin Legislation presumable legally passed a law that was signed into the law the government decided to halt it going into effect?Rather then having a proper trial ?
Anyone find this kind of behavior disturbing?

I know of no case against the healthcare legislation that is finished and complete. What are you talking about?
 
They certainly are blatant about disregarding law when they disagree with the election or legal decision .The media seems generally disinterested as well.
What an odd type of new rulers we now have , no longer government by law but ruled by political winds.

We are now a "soft tyranny"

Interesting term

Soft Tyranny: Definition, Origination, Today.

The world is in a crisis. The nation is divided. Every time a bill is signed by congress, we lose a little bit of liberty. Over time, all of these small changes add up and form what we call a soft tyranny.
lens4023562_1239580708soft-tyranny.jpg

Soft Tyranny: Origination
Where did the term "soft tyranny" originate and where has it occured?
In 1835, Alexis de Tocqueville came up with the idea of soft tyranny during his texts titled Democracy in America. His goal was to explain why the representative democracy in America is succeeding and is failing everywhere else. He speculates in his work about the future of the philosophies of America and how they will be threatened.

He mentioned terms such as "soft tyranny," "soft despotism" and "tyranny of the majority" to describe how these events would happen. Basically, through gradual, small changes in policy, the United States would be fundamentally transformed into a state controlled completely by the government.
soft-tyranny9.jpg

When a soft tyranny occurs, there is usually a majority in the governmental houses. The system of checks and balances doesn't matter because they generally all agree on the same principles. This allows these representatives and policymakers to impose whatever will they wish upon the population.

In this case it is bureaucrats and the judiciary



I just hope that America wakes up to what is happening before its too late.

Excellent thread :clap2:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The tyranny has come so slowly it is unnoticed
low flow toilets.
Cafe standards
CLF bulbs

I think a list of the infringing bureaucratic edicts should be listed so when a troglodyte elitist asks "What freedoms have you lost?, we can show them.
 
democrats and their ilk are thugs and use thuggery to have their way, or they flee like cowards. cowards and thugs..
 
That when Obama care was ruled unconstitutional the government insisted on going ahead anyways .
and When the Wisconsin Legislation presumable legally passed a law that was signed into the law the government decided to halt it going into effect?Rather then having a proper trial ?
Anyone find this kind of behavior disturbing?

I know of no case against the healthcare legislation that is finished and complete. What are you talking about?

yeah won't be total until 2014...however over 1,014 to date are signed up for waivers, 50% are UNIONS...

*Imagine that*?
 
when there are no consequences for violating the constitution, life is very easy for those who violate it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top