Is the Bill of Rights Kaput?

[Flash]

How does it prevent law abiding citizens from getting guns?

And I was wondering why you limited it to law abiding citizens, when the 2nd amendment makes ZERO mention of "law abiding"?

This is a great example of how stupid you Moon Bats are.

You have no idea what the Bill of Rights is all about, do you? It is protection of the American people from the government. It is things the government can't do. Like infringe upon the right to keep and bear arms.

Listen carefully because this important. I may quiz you on it later.

If you have to get permission from the government before you can enjoy the right then it is not really a right, is it? How can it be?

To have to get a goddamn permit from the filthy ass government to be allowed to enjoy a right specifically enumerated in the Bill of Rights is an infringement on the right, isn't it? Do you even understand that?

The government will give permission to some and not to others. Since the filthy ass Democrats are in charge of the stupid State government you can bet you bottom dollar they will abuse the system just like they have done elsewhere. For instance, the oppressive scumbag Democrats in DC said that Dick Heller (a retired police officer) could not get government permission to have a firearm in his own home, near a high crime area.

If you give Liberals the ability to infringe upon our personal Liberty they will always abuse it. That is a fact. The purpose of the Bill of Rights is to prevent the filthy ass government from infringing upon personal Liberty and the right to keep and bear arms is an individual Liberty. The Supreme Court has recently ruled on that three times.

It is pathetic to have to explain what the Bill of Rights is all about. Did you ever take a course in Civics in school?

 

[Auld Phart]

Because honestly, it's an awful weapon that even the military didn't want at a certain point.



It's not a stretch at all. In it's first draft, the Second was also supposed to have a restriction on conscripting religious objectors into the militia, but that was abandoned. The Second and THird were about militias, not guns.

Now that we no longer have militias, does it REALLY make sense to allow unfettered gun ownership without vetting?

Now that we no longer have militias, does it REALLY make sense to allow unfettered gun ownership without vetting?

you really are dense, aren't you?

we had unfettered gun ownership LONG before we became officially a country.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Because honestly, it's an awful weapon that even the military didn't want at a certain point.



It's not a stretch at all. In it's first draft, the Second was also supposed to have a restriction on conscripting religious objectors into the militia, but that was abandoned. The Second and THird were about militias, not guns.

Now that we no longer have militias, does it REALLY make sense to allow unfettered gun ownership without vetting?

WRONG

The 1911 is one of the finesty weapons ever made. The military eventually did replace it with more modern weapons but repeatedly brought it back.

The second is not about militia. The second was always about private ownership of guns

 

[surada]

Driving is not an enumerated right...

Lol. They didn't have cars.

 

[Soupnazi630]

You have a problem with gun registration? How about driver's licenses?

Gun registration ioos fine because it is opinional in most places. When it is mandatoryu it is a violation of human and constitutional rights.

Drivers licences and gun registration are a false equivelancy. Drivers licenses are actually optional as well and misnamed. They are actually permission to use government built roads. you do not one to drive on private property

 

[Vastator]

Lol. They didn't have cars.

Yet they did have guns...

 

[petro]

 

[Batcat]

The Democrats in Delaware probably don't even know the US has a Bill of Rights. Never studied the Constitution in school. They are so stupid they don't even understand what the simple phrase "shall not infringe" means. Consequences of being low IQ.

If you have to get government permission to enjoy a right specifically enumerated in the Bill of Rights is it really a right at all? More like a suggestion, huh?

Is the Bill of Rights even worth the paper it is written on when the government can infringe upon rights that specifically say can't be infringed upon?

'Permit to purchase' handgun bill passed by lawmakers in Delaware; governor to sign into law

Anyone looking to buy a handgun in Delaware could soon face a multi-step process.

6abc.com

'Permit to purchase' handgun bill passed by lawmakers in Delaware; governor to sign into law​

DOVER, Delaware (WPVI) -- Anyone looking to buy a handgun in Delaware could soon face a multi-step process.

On Thursday, the Delaware Senate passed a bill outlining permit-to-purchase regulations for residents who want to buy handguns. Gov. John Carney has said he will sign the bill into law as soon as it gets to his desk.

Jeff Hague, the president of the Delaware State Sportsmen's Association, said he is disappointed the legislation passed.

"This is not common sense, gun safety, firearm legislation. It's nothing more than gun control," he told Action News.

Hague said he takes issue with the entire bill, telling Action News it interferes with a person's constitutional rights.

"All it does is interfere with the right of a law-abiding citizen to exercise their constitutional right to keep and bear arms. It totally interferes with that process," he said. "You have to ask a government official who is not elected, is appointed, for permission to exercise your right to purchase a firearm."

People who value the right to bear arms need to move to Florida. Leave the liberal criminal loving Yankee states and head south.

The Free State of Florida is also known as the Gunshine state for good reason.

Plus no state income tax.

Gun Laws in Florida

Explore comprehensive, easy-to-understand information about gun laws in Florida. Find details on permits, purchases, registration, restrictions, carrying firearms, and additional laws. Stay informed and handle firearms responsibly.

gunlawsbystate.com

 

[Flash]

People who value the right to bear arms need to move to Florida. Leave the liberal criminal loving Yankee states and head south.

The Free State of Florida is also known as the Gunshine state for good reason.

Plus no state income tax.

Gun Laws in Florida

Explore comprehensive, easy-to-understand information about gun laws in Florida. Find details on permits, purchases, registration, restrictions, carrying firearms, and additional laws. Stay informed and handle firearms responsibly.

gunlawsbystate.com

For heaven sake's BC, don't encourage any more of that Yankee filth to move here. We have too many already. Besides, when the dumbshits get here they forget why they left and they vote Democrat.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Not at all. The range and firepower of the weapon make it military-grade.



The people, collectively, not an individual right. Furthermore, it is right next to the third amendment, which has further restrictions on the militia.



no, it says "the People", collectively, not an individual.

Wrong. "Civilian grade" weapons often have far longer range and lethality than "military grade" ones. I could easily list thirty civilian calibers that are far more lethal than .223/5.56 or .308/7.62 calibers. "Military grade" or "milspec" usually refer to reliability or strength of construction.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Lol. They didn't have cars.

But they did have wagons and other horse-drawn transport. The founders didn't regulate them. The idea of the modern bureaucratic state never occurred to them and would have horrified them. After all, they had just finished fighting a long war to stop far less intrusive conduct by the British Crown.

 

[JoeB131]

If you have to get permission from the government before you can enjoy the right then it is not really a right, is it? How can it be?

To have to get a goddamn permit from the filthy ass government to be allowed to enjoy a right specifically enumerated in the Bill of Rights is an infringement on the right, isn't it? Do you even understand that?

If that were truly the case, why can't I own a 88mm Howitzer that shoots shells with weaponized anthrax? I mean, if the government gave me a right to "bear arms", I want my damned howitzer!

Oh, wait, that kind of weapon has NO PRACTICAL USE for a civilian to have, because it's a weapon of war.

 

[JoeB131]

Wrong. "Civilian grade" weapons often have far longer range and lethality than "military grade" ones. I could easily list thirty civilian calibers that are far more lethal than .223/5.56 or .308/7.62 calibers. "Military grade" or "milspec" usually refer to reliability or strength of construction.

Oh, stop playing games. The AR-15 was SPECIFICALLY designed for the military. So was the Uzi, the AK-47, and a host of other weapons that guys buy when they want to demonstrate they have a tiny penis.

 

[Flash]

If that were truly the case, why can't I own a 88mm Howitzer that shoots shells with weaponized anthrax? I mean, if the government gave me a right to "bear arms", I want my damned howitzer!

Oh, wait, that kind of weapon has NO PRACTICAL USE for a civilian to have, because it's a weapon of war.

If it was to you stupid Libtards an American would have to get a permit to attend religious meetings. In order to get the permit an American would have to agree to supporting abortion on demand, the Queer agenda and never mention religion to anybody else or vote for anybody that was a Christian. Very few permits would be issued.

If it was up to you stupid Libtards an American would have to get a permit to practice free speech. You would to adhere to strict standards of never be critical of Socialism, Democrats or anything not in the DNC platform. Very few permits would be issued.

You little Moon Bat shitheads don't give a damn about individual Liberties. You assholes would do away with the Bill of Rights in a heartbeat if you could get away with it. You only want Leftest collective rights.

You really hate the right to keep and bear arms because that empowers those Americans that will resist your filthy destructive Socialist agenda.

You Moon Bats are scum.

 

[JoeB131]

If it was to you stupid Libtards an American would have to get a permit to attend religious meetings. In order to get the permit an American would have to agree to supporting abortion on demand, the Queer agenda and never mention religion to anybody else or vote for anybody that was a Christian. Very few permits would be issued.

try to focus on one thing at a time, buddy.

We don't let people have Howitzers without very special permits. Why shouldn't the same apply to assault rifles?

 

[Auld Phart]

Oh, stop playing games. The AR-15 was SPECIFICALLY designed for the military. So was the Uzi, the AK-47, and a host of other weapons that guys buy when they want to demonstrate they have a tiny penis.

so was the M1911 .45 pistol.

 

[JoeB131]

so was the M1911 .45 pistol.

Until people realized it was kind of a crappy weapon, even in 1911.

MP's were the only ones who actually "needed" a pistol, and they begged for Barettas.

 

[Auld Phart]

Until people realized it was kind of a crappy weapon, even in 1911.

MP's were the only ones who actually "needed" a pistol, and they begged for Barettas.

poor deflection

the m1911 was created for military use in the Philippines, an actually used by the military.

when was the AR 15 used by the military?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Until people realized it was kind of a crappy weapon, even in 1911.

MP's were the only ones who actually "needed" a pistol, and they begged for Barettas.

Wrong

No one realized any such thing.

It is still at the top of the design heap and one of the finest weapons ever made

MPs did not beg for any such thing. The baretta was forced on them

 

[para bellum]

View attachment 918414

This is priceless.