geauxtohell
Choose your weapon.
So long as it's a baby you won't find any Progressives going to bat for it.
They'd like them all dead.
Why did you change your handle from AllieBaba?
Are you just a fan of sock accounts or something?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So long as it's a baby you won't find any Progressives going to bat for it.
They'd like them all dead.
No one is forced to raise any child. That's why we have safe haven laws. What you propose is to kill a child instead of putting the child into a loving home and imagine that this is better for the child.
Forcing a person to birth a child is not better
Especially if that child is an unwanted girl-child.
Forcing a person to birth a child is not better
Especially if that child is an unwanted girl-child.
I'd like to see the evidence of all the women down through the ages who have been *forced* to bear children against their will, who wish they had aborted.
Thanks, I'll wait for that information.
When Barry Hussein was a state senator he used his power to continue a unique form of infanticide where Chicago hospitals would induce premature birth in women who wished a late term abortion. The hospital would then leave the baby naked on a cold table without so much as a blanket to comfort it as it struggled to breathe and died. A janitor found a living baby in the trash and alerted a nurse who blew the whistle on the secret manslaughter. Barry made sure she was fired and the procedure continued.
It's a shame that she wasn't arrested for murder.
Oh, right, the police determined she was lying.
No one is forced to raise any child. That's why we have safe haven laws. What you propose is to kill a child instead of putting the child into a loving home and imagine that this is better for the child.
Forcing a person to birth a child is not better
Especially if that child is an unwanted girl-child.
CaféAuLait;5373638 said:So you clowns don't want a woman to decide about abortion based on the sex of the fetus,
but you also want to force her to see an ultrasound, and thus learn the sex of the fetus?
lol.
It's hard for your average person to decipher the sex of a child on ultrasound. Either way, this is a slippery slope. If abortion can be based on gender will sexual identity be next? Skin color, eye color, obesity? If Gene GABRG3 is found, will one abort because he/she has an increased risk of alcoholism?
The name of the nurse who got fired for holding the baby is Jill Stanek. You can find what she did anywhere on the internet.
Her testimony before Congress in support of the Infant Born Alive Protection Act is here.
Testimony of Jill L. Stanek, RN on H.R. 4292
Keith Olberman once called her the worst person in the world.
obama eventually defeated the act.
What Nurse Stanek did is here.
Jill Stanek: Barack Obama unmoved by reports of infanticide « Doug Lawrence's Catholic Weblog
Stanek relates the story of how one night she saw a nurse bringing a baby to the soiled utility room to die, because the parents of the child did not want to hold it. The other nurse also did not have the time to hold the child. When she told me what she was doing I couldnt bear the thought of this suffering child dying alone, says Stanek. And so I cradled and rocked him for the forty-five minutes that he lived.
Stanek recounts how, besides testifying before the federal House, she also testified before an Illinois State Senate Committee, a Committee on which Barack Obama sat.
Barack Obama, she says, was unmoved, and actually opposed the Born Alive Infant Protection Act.
This one guy, Barack Obama, she says, thought that infanticide was acceptable and voted to protect it. Some people said that Barack Obama was uninformed or may not have fully understood the implications of this bill. But he voted against it three times. Thats calculated.
She was fired for her mercy.
Illinois Hospital's Name is Blasphemous
The nice thing about this is it isn't Republicans dying.
Another specious thread on this topic. I'm pretty sure most democrats and the president agree that the sex of the fetus should never be a reason for an abortion.
The nice thing about this is it isn't Republicans dying.
so only democrats get abortions?
Have liberals ever met a fetus they didn't want to kill?
CaféAuLait;5373638 said:So you clowns don't want a woman to decide about abortion based on the sex of the fetus,
but you also want to force her to see an ultrasound, and thus learn the sex of the fetus?
lol.
It's hard for your average person to decipher the sex of a child on ultrasound. Either way, this is a slippery slope. If abortion can be based on gender will sexual identity be next? Skin color, eye color, obesity? If Gene GABRG3 is found, will one abort because he/she has an increased risk of alcoholism?
If a woman is going to have the right to an abortion, it's nobody's business why she has it.
As soon as start limiting the 'why', you start infringeing on the right.
Another specious thread on this topic. I'm pretty sure most democrats and the president agree that the sex of the fetus should never be a reason for an abortion.
but they voted against it yesterday didn't they? try again