A Muslim and a Professor Argue… The UCSD Student admits she is FOR the eradication of ALL Jews.

[Coyote]

Wow all that effort put into a person who sides with Hamas and Hezbollah..So what does that tell us? For one thing i didn't see that smokin hot Jewish women wish for all muslims to be rounded up and killed which is not possible anyways. It is however possible for 1.5 billion muslims to eradicate 14 million Jews...So why do you defend terrorist organizations?

....and all she did was post an article by somebody else on facebook, and in that article, the writer made a case that those who foster terrorism and encourage genocidal antisemitism are every bit as responsible as those actually go through with it. He (the original writer) said that Israel should consider itself in an all out war with Palestinians (who have elected a genocidal terrorist organization to lead them).

Well, since this was in Hebrew, an opportunistic translator working for the known terrorist collaborators "The electronic intifada" (nothing quite naming yourself after campaigns of terrorism, eh) decided to translate the article in such a way as to make the original article look as bad as possible.

The way Hamas is trying to twist things in this thread, you would think instead of the Muslim offering a straightforward and very direct call for genocide of Jews, it was actually the Jewish women doing so despite not having even written the article she is accused of writing and which did not include any such direct calls for genocide to begin with.

That's just how Hamas rolls, I guess.

Did you note that she did not deny what she posted? When you post something on FB, that is your view - you own it, you are responsible for it. She claimed her words were mischaracterized and cherry picked. But she owns them. I love how you come up with excuses for an Israeli PM's "genocidal" comments but claim there is absolutely no mistaking the Muslim student's "genocidal" comment. Or the lovely way you are willing to take one side's rebuttal and excuses but deny the other. Sweet.

That's just how hypocritical bigots pontificate.

yeah, yeah, yeah -- we get it. Support your genocidal terrorists or you will call us bigots.

You don't need to repeat yourself a million times, you know. We understood it the ten thousandth time you said it.

Says someone who continously excuses a "genocidal" Israeli MP and calls those who don't agree "Fat Islamst Toads"

How cute - you somehow think some genocides are ok...is this one of your "liberal" things - selective genocide?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Says someone who continously excuses a "genocidal" Israeli MP and calls those who don't agree "Fat Islamst Toads"

How cute - you somehow think some genocides are ok...is this one of your "liberal" things - selective genocide?

Is this your way of trying to say you aren't fat?

 

[Coyote]

Says someone who continously excuses a "genocidal" Israeli MP and calls those who don't agree "Fat Islamst Toads"

How cute - you somehow think some genocides are ok...is this one of your "liberal" things - selective genocide?

Is this your way of trying to say you aren't fat?

I run 5 miles a day, I'm not Islamist, and you're not cute, though kind of funny.

Let me know when you've compiled your list of acceptable and unacceptable genocides

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Says someone who continously excuses a "genocidal" Israeli MP and calls those who don't agree "Fat Islamst Toads"

How cute - you somehow think some genocides are ok...is this one of your "liberal" things - selective genocide?

Is this your way of trying to say you aren't fat?

I run 5 miles a day, I'm not Islamist, and you're not cute, though kind of funny.

Let me know when you've compiled your list of acceptable and unacceptable genocides

You need to run something other than your mouth for it to actually count.

 

[Jroc]

Thread starts out with a video of a college student in a debate with Horowitz. She says something that can be construed as supporting Jewish genocide and set's off a fire amongst certain internet talking heads and she is labeled as supporting genocide. She posts a rebuttal which effectively states her position and that her answer "I do" was in supporting Hamas in regards to the Palestinian people's rights. Whether you agree with her stance or not, it's a reasonable rebuttal.

Then come the gang bangers (one of whom even whined about being "bullied" here) - if you don't villify this young muslim student with the label of "genocide" you are "in support of genocide".

That is the way these people’s logic goes. The taped discussion is irrelevant and so is her “rebuttal” despite the fact that we can’t find anything she said prior or since that supports genocide (if you can find anything – please provide it).

Ok, so the rules are set as follows: if a person ever says or can be construed as implying they support genocide they are to be (without argument) vilified with a label that can never be removed or countered.

A poster brings up another example of a person who made similar statements and asks if there is to be condemnation. Not surprisingly he is ignored and the post is (hopefully) buried. It’s brought up again.

In the second example, the person is an Israeli MP and her statement, like the student’s calls for genocide of particular people (or appears to). This statement was, of course picked up by the anti-Israeli side and “propagandized” (much like the student’s). The MP rebutted it and claimed her words were distorted and mischaracterized (sound familiar?). You would think that the same standard would be applied given the aforementioned rules.

No, it appears we have hit an “inconvenient truth” head on. So what has the response been?

Excuses, deflections and redirections and claims of “off topic”.

The topic involves two words by a Muslim student in a debate with a Jewish “Professor” and includes discussions of Hamas and Israel and genocide. How you and your buddies can claim that pointing out a very similar statement made by an Israeli MP and asking whether you would condemn it as well, is “off topic” is ludricous.


Deflections:

Wow! she's smokin hot!... I love her

...You might be a hater because of that fact, I know how you women are.

People like you are useful tools. Is your man musilm? (if you have one) Just curious. There is no comparison to radical islam...None... Jews fight for survival. There are more than I.5 billion muslims in the world, it's not possible for a small number of Jews to comment any kind of "Genocide" even if they wanted to. You're comparisons are a joke, your moral equivalency is laughable. If the real world ever actually hit you in the face, you'd be lost in the world of reality and unable to function

Translation: Her advocation of genocide is ok because (insert excuses)

• She's good looking and Jewish
• Jews have to fight for survival
• There are many more Muslims then Jews that it’s not possible for Jews to commit any kind of genocide

In other words – advocating genocide is excusable for some and not for others.

More deflections – claims that the source is biased, etc. The Israeli MP does not deny what she said, rather she says her words were mischaracterized and misrepresented in her rebuttal.


Redirections:

I love her because she's smokin hot and brilliant. So what does your Jew hater, muslim boyfriend see in you?.I don't know how you look, but you're not very bright and easily brainwashed by leftist, pro terrorist, propaganda..That's it!!

You end up throwing everything hoping something will stick so you can avoid an awkward question. You finally end up with false claims that I am defending baby killers, supporting Holocaust denial and defending people who behead babies.

You posted a what you thought to be a comparison without condemning the original post. So what does that say about you? instead of condemning what that women said. you looked around and found some Jew who you think may have said something similar. You also compare other religions as if they are the same as the islamic nutjobs which they aren't, but that's your first inclination that's what you do.

and you're the one who laughs... I don't believe this women as actually killed anyone, you defend killers, people who behead babies. I mean "all religions do it" you are sick personyour sunni friend here that real attempts at genocide with the Holocaust didn't happen? what do your muslim master tell you?

You make excuses, you defend every time people call out these radical muslims for what they are. You throw out your moral equivalency bullshit when there is no equivalency to the radical muslims. So when you have a video of this women agreeing and supporting terrorist organizations who want all 1.5 billion muslims in the world to slaughtered post it. Do you think it possible that those few million Jews could kill all muslims? So you think Jews who are able to protect themselves is a bad thing?

You seem to be saying that genocide is ok if it’s portrayed as “self protection”. You’re also deliberately misstating the issue since the MP’s statement was directed at Palestinians, not “all Muslims”.

You do everything possible to avoid condemning the statement by the Israeli MP including using the "anti-semite" card. My position, in these two people is this – I would condemn them for saying something stupid (especially in such a charged and misleading environment that they find themselves in) but before applying the label of “supporting genocide” – I’d like to know a lot more about their feelings and positions.

How about you JROC? You clearly condemn one, and from all appearances it is because she is Muslim. You excuse the other multiple times and throw garbage at anyone that tries argue differently. You get incensed when someone mischaracterizes *your* position, but then turn around and routinely do it in turn.

Meh.

Wow all that effort put into a person who sides with Hamas and Hezbollah..So what does that tell us? For one thing i didn't see that smokin hot Jewish women wish for all muslims to be rounded up and killed which is not possible anyways. It is however possible for 1.5 billion muslims to eradicate 14 million Jews...So why do you defend terrorist organizations?

And in the end, you just make more deflections - you have neither the integrity nor the cajones to condemn genocide when it's not a Muslim making the statement - do you? It's ok to make genocidal comments directed at Palestinians because it doesn't equal "rounding up all Muslims and killing them"? You'll do anything to avoid condemning your own side, is that it?

So, where have I defended terrorist organizations?

And while you're at it - where have I ever supported Holocaust denial - yet another one of your claims.

Where have I ever defended people who killed babies or beheaded babies or for that matter murdered civilians?

Links please.

You're defending not me, you said this women didn't mean what she meant, and you know this. You go look for some Jew, any Jew whom you believe is just as bad. You also attack David Horowitz for outing her. He's evil you know...Attacking that poor genocidal, terrorist organization supporter .Who is deflecting really?

 

[Coyote]

Says someone who continously excuses a "genocidal" Israeli MP and calls those who don't agree "Fat Islamst Toads"

How cute - you somehow think some genocides are ok...is this one of your "liberal" things - selective genocide?

Is this your way of trying to say you aren't fat?

I run 5 miles a day, I'm not Islamist, and you're not cute, though kind of funny.

Let me know when you've compiled your list of acceptable and unacceptable genocides

You need to run something other than your mouth for it to actually count.

OK...five minutes and I don't have a comeback. Touche. That was a good one.

 

[Jroc]

Says someone who continously excuses a "genocidal" Israeli MP and calls those who don't agree "Fat Islamst Toads"

How cute - you somehow think some genocides are ok...is this one of your "liberal" things - selective genocide?

Is this your way of trying to say you aren't fat?

I run 5 miles a day, I'm not Islamist, and you're not cute, though kind of funny.

Let me know when you've compiled your list of acceptable and unacceptable genocides

You need to run something other than your mouth for it to actually count.

OK...five minutes and I don't have a comeback. Touche. That was a good one.

Is this some kind of competition to you? Grow up

 

[Coyote]

Thread starts out with a video of a college student in a debate with Horowitz. She says something that can be construed as supporting Jewish genocide and set's off a fire amongst certain internet talking heads and she is labeled as supporting genocide. She posts a rebuttal which effectively states her position and that her answer "I do" was in supporting Hamas in regards to the Palestinian people's rights. Whether you agree with her stance or not, it's a reasonable rebuttal.

Then come the gang bangers (one of whom even whined about being "bullied" here) - if you don't villify this young muslim student with the label of "genocide" you are "in support of genocide".

That is the way these people’s logic goes. The taped discussion is irrelevant and so is her “rebuttal” despite the fact that we can’t find anything she said prior or since that supports genocide (if you can find anything – please provide it).

Ok, so the rules are set as follows: if a person ever says or can be construed as implying they support genocide they are to be (without argument) vilified with a label that can never be removed or countered.

A poster brings up another example of a person who made similar statements and asks if there is to be condemnation. Not surprisingly he is ignored and the post is (hopefully) buried. It’s brought up again.

In the second example, the person is an Israeli MP and her statement, like the student’s calls for genocide of particular people (or appears to). This statement was, of course picked up by the anti-Israeli side and “propagandized” (much like the student’s). The MP rebutted it and claimed her words were distorted and mischaracterized (sound familiar?). You would think that the same standard would be applied given the aforementioned rules.

No, it appears we have hit an “inconvenient truth” head on. So what has the response been?

Excuses, deflections and redirections and claims of “off topic”.

The topic involves two words by a Muslim student in a debate with a Jewish “Professor” and includes discussions of Hamas and Israel and genocide. How you and your buddies can claim that pointing out a very similar statement made by an Israeli MP and asking whether you would condemn it as well, is “off topic” is ludricous.


Deflections:

Wow! she's smokin hot!... I love her

...You might be a hater because of that fact, I know how you women are.

People like you are useful tools. Is your man musilm? (if you have one) Just curious. There is no comparison to radical islam...None... Jews fight for survival. There are more than I.5 billion muslims in the world, it's not possible for a small number of Jews to comment any kind of "Genocide" even if they wanted to. You're comparisons are a joke, your moral equivalency is laughable. If the real world ever actually hit you in the face, you'd be lost in the world of reality and unable to function

Translation: Her advocation of genocide is ok because (insert excuses)

• She's good looking and Jewish
• Jews have to fight for survival
• There are many more Muslims then Jews that it’s not possible for Jews to commit any kind of genocide

In other words – advocating genocide is excusable for some and not for others.

More deflections – claims that the source is biased, etc. The Israeli MP does not deny what she said, rather she says her words were mischaracterized and misrepresented in her rebuttal.


Redirections:

I love her because she's smokin hot and brilliant. So what does your Jew hater, muslim boyfriend see in you?.I don't know how you look, but you're not very bright and easily brainwashed by leftist, pro terrorist, propaganda..That's it!!

You end up throwing everything hoping something will stick so you can avoid an awkward question. You finally end up with false claims that I am defending baby killers, supporting Holocaust denial and defending people who behead babies.

You posted a what you thought to be a comparison without condemning the original post. So what does that say about you? instead of condemning what that women said. you looked around and found some Jew who you think may have said something similar. You also compare other religions as if they are the same as the islamic nutjobs which they aren't, but that's your first inclination that's what you do.

and you're the one who laughs... I don't believe this women as actually killed anyone, you defend killers, people who behead babies. I mean "all religions do it" you are sick personyour sunni friend here that real attempts at genocide with the Holocaust didn't happen? what do your muslim master tell you?

You make excuses, you defend every time people call out these radical muslims for what they are. You throw out your moral equivalency bullshit when there is no equivalency to the radical muslims. So when you have a video of this women agreeing and supporting terrorist organizations who want all 1.5 billion muslims in the world to slaughtered post it. Do you think it possible that those few million Jews could kill all muslims? So you think Jews who are able to protect themselves is a bad thing?

You seem to be saying that genocide is ok if it’s portrayed as “self protection”. You’re also deliberately misstating the issue since the MP’s statement was directed at Palestinians, not “all Muslims”.

You do everything possible to avoid condemning the statement by the Israeli MP including using the "anti-semite" card. My position, in these two people is this – I would condemn them for saying something stupid (especially in such a charged and misleading environment that they find themselves in) but before applying the label of “supporting genocide” – I’d like to know a lot more about their feelings and positions.

How about you JROC? You clearly condemn one, and from all appearances it is because she is Muslim. You excuse the other multiple times and throw garbage at anyone that tries argue differently. You get incensed when someone mischaracterizes *your* position, but then turn around and routinely do it in turn.

Meh.

Wow all that effort put into a person who sides with Hamas and Hezbollah..So what does that tell us? For one thing i didn't see that smokin hot Jewish women wish for all muslims to be rounded up and killed which is not possible anyways. It is however possible for 1.5 billion muslims to eradicate 14 million Jews...So why do you defend terrorist organizations?

And in the end, you just make more deflections - you have neither the integrity nor the cajones to condemn genocide when it's not a Muslim making the statement - do you? It's ok to make genocidal comments directed at Palestinians because it doesn't equal "rounding up all Muslims and killing them"? You'll do anything to avoid condemning your own side, is that it?

So, where have I defended terrorist organizations?

And while you're at it - where have I ever supported Holocaust denial - yet another one of your claims.

Where have I ever defended people who killed babies or beheaded babies or for that matter murdered civilians?

Links please.

You're defending not me, you said this women didn't mean what she meant, and you know this. You go look for some Jew, any Jew whom you believe is just as bad. You also attack David Horowitz for outing her. He's evil you know...Attacking that poor genocidal, terrorist organization supporter .Who is deflecting really?

I'm "defending" no one - I said, repeatedly - I won't judge someone as supporting genocide on such little evidence.

Who is deflecting? You.

You claim I say and take positions I don't.

You give a free pass if the genocidal comments are not made by a Muslim.

Deny it. I'm sure you will because you lack the integrity to admit that you only care if it's a Muslim and you deliberately accuse others of positions they do not take - something you yourself have a fit over when it's done to you.

 

[Coyote]

Says someone who continously excuses a "genocidal" Israeli MP and calls those who don't agree "Fat Islamst Toads"

How cute - you somehow think some genocides are ok...is this one of your "liberal" things - selective genocide?

Is this your way of trying to say you aren't fat?

I run 5 miles a day, I'm not Islamist, and you're not cute, though kind of funny.

Let me know when you've compiled your list of acceptable and unacceptable genocides

You need to run something other than your mouth for it to actually count.

OK...five minutes and I don't have a comeback. Touche. That was a good one.

Is this some kind of competition to you? Grow up

Why grow up in such juvenile company

 

[Jroc]

Thread starts out with a video of a college student in a debate with Horowitz. She says something that can be construed as supporting Jewish genocide and set's off a fire amongst certain internet talking heads and she is labeled as supporting genocide. She posts a rebuttal which effectively states her position and that her answer "I do" was in supporting Hamas in regards to the Palestinian people's rights. Whether you agree with her stance or not, it's a reasonable rebuttal.

Then come the gang bangers (one of whom even whined about being "bullied" here) - if you don't villify this young muslim student with the label of "genocide" you are "in support of genocide".

That is the way these people’s logic goes. The taped discussion is irrelevant and so is her “rebuttal” despite the fact that we can’t find anything she said prior or since that supports genocide (if you can find anything – please provide it).

Ok, so the rules are set as follows: if a person ever says or can be construed as implying they support genocide they are to be (without argument) vilified with a label that can never be removed or countered.

A poster brings up another example of a person who made similar statements and asks if there is to be condemnation. Not surprisingly he is ignored and the post is (hopefully) buried. It’s brought up again.

In the second example, the person is an Israeli MP and her statement, like the student’s calls for genocide of particular people (or appears to). This statement was, of course picked up by the anti-Israeli side and “propagandized” (much like the student’s). The MP rebutted it and claimed her words were distorted and mischaracterized (sound familiar?). You would think that the same standard would be applied given the aforementioned rules.

No, it appears we have hit an “inconvenient truth” head on. So what has the response been?

Excuses, deflections and redirections and claims of “off topic”.

The topic involves two words by a Muslim student in a debate with a Jewish “Professor” and includes discussions of Hamas and Israel and genocide. How you and your buddies can claim that pointing out a very similar statement made by an Israeli MP and asking whether you would condemn it as well, is “off topic” is ludricous.


Deflections:

Wow! she's smokin hot!... I love her

...You might be a hater because of that fact, I know how you women are.

People like you are useful tools. Is your man musilm? (if you have one) Just curious. There is no comparison to radical islam...None... Jews fight for survival. There are more than I.5 billion muslims in the world, it's not possible for a small number of Jews to comment any kind of "Genocide" even if they wanted to. You're comparisons are a joke, your moral equivalency is laughable. If the real world ever actually hit you in the face, you'd be lost in the world of reality and unable to function

Translation: Her advocation of genocide is ok because (insert excuses)

• She's good looking and Jewish
• Jews have to fight for survival
• There are many more Muslims then Jews that it’s not possible for Jews to commit any kind of genocide

In other words – advocating genocide is excusable for some and not for others.

More deflections – claims that the source is biased, etc. The Israeli MP does not deny what she said, rather she says her words were mischaracterized and misrepresented in her rebuttal.


Redirections:

I love her because she's smokin hot and brilliant. So what does your Jew hater, muslim boyfriend see in you?.I don't know how you look, but you're not very bright and easily brainwashed by leftist, pro terrorist, propaganda..That's it!!

You end up throwing everything hoping something will stick so you can avoid an awkward question. You finally end up with false claims that I am defending baby killers, supporting Holocaust denial and defending people who behead babies.

You posted a what you thought to be a comparison without condemning the original post. So what does that say about you? instead of condemning what that women said. you looked around and found some Jew who you think may have said something similar. You also compare other religions as if they are the same as the islamic nutjobs which they aren't, but that's your first inclination that's what you do.

and you're the one who laughs... I don't believe this women as actually killed anyone, you defend killers, people who behead babies. I mean "all religions do it" you are sick personyour sunni friend here that real attempts at genocide with the Holocaust didn't happen? what do your muslim master tell you?

You make excuses, you defend every time people call out these radical muslims for what they are. You throw out your moral equivalency bullshit when there is no equivalency to the radical muslims. So when you have a video of this women agreeing and supporting terrorist organizations who want all 1.5 billion muslims in the world to slaughtered post it. Do you think it possible that those few million Jews could kill all muslims? So you think Jews who are able to protect themselves is a bad thing?

You seem to be saying that genocide is ok if it’s portrayed as “self protection”. You’re also deliberately misstating the issue since the MP’s statement was directed at Palestinians, not “all Muslims”.

You do everything possible to avoid condemning the statement by the Israeli MP including using the "anti-semite" card. My position, in these two people is this – I would condemn them for saying something stupid (especially in such a charged and misleading environment that they find themselves in) but before applying the label of “supporting genocide” – I’d like to know a lot more about their feelings and positions.

How about you JROC? You clearly condemn one, and from all appearances it is because she is Muslim. You excuse the other multiple times and throw garbage at anyone that tries argue differently. You get incensed when someone mischaracterizes *your* position, but then turn around and routinely do it in turn.

Meh.

Wow all that effort put into a person who sides with Hamas and Hezbollah..So what does that tell us? For one thing i didn't see that smokin hot Jewish women wish for all muslims to be rounded up and killed which is not possible anyways. It is however possible for 1.5 billion muslims to eradicate 14 million Jews...So why do you defend terrorist organizations?

And in the end, you just make more deflections - you have neither the integrity nor the cajones to condemn genocide when it's not a Muslim making the statement - do you? It's ok to make genocidal comments directed at Palestinians because it doesn't equal "rounding up all Muslims and killing them"? You'll do anything to avoid condemning your own side, is that it?

So, where have I defended terrorist organizations?

And while you're at it - where have I ever supported Holocaust denial - yet another one of your claims.

Where have I ever defended people who killed babies or beheaded babies or for that matter murdered civilians?

Links please.

You're defending not me, you said this women didn't mean what she meant, and you know this. You go look for some Jew, any Jew whom you believe is just as bad. You also attack David Horowitz for outing her. He's evil you know...Attacking that poor genocidal, terrorist organization supporter .Who is deflecting really?

I'm "defending" no one - I said, repeatedly - I won't judge someone as supporting genocide on such little evidence.

Who is deflecting? You.

You claim I say and take positions I don't.

You give a free pass if the genocidal comments are not made by a Muslim.

Deny it. I'm sure you will because you lack the integrity to admit that you only care if it's a Muslim and you deliberately accuse others of positions they do not take - something you yourself have a fit over when it's done to you.

I can see you now typing, searching, desperately to find some Jew who may have said something comparable. Instead of at least first condemning the statement. Deflect much?

 

[Coyote]

Thread starts out with a video of a college student in a debate with Horowitz. She says something that can be construed as supporting Jewish genocide and set's off a fire amongst certain internet talking heads and she is labeled as supporting genocide. She posts a rebuttal which effectively states her position and that her answer "I do" was in supporting Hamas in regards to the Palestinian people's rights. Whether you agree with her stance or not, it's a reasonable rebuttal.

Then come the gang bangers (one of whom even whined about being "bullied" here) - if you don't villify this young muslim student with the label of "genocide" you are "in support of genocide".

That is the way these people’s logic goes. The taped discussion is irrelevant and so is her “rebuttal” despite the fact that we can’t find anything she said prior or since that supports genocide (if you can find anything – please provide it).

Ok, so the rules are set as follows: if a person ever says or can be construed as implying they support genocide they are to be (without argument) vilified with a label that can never be removed or countered.

A poster brings up another example of a person who made similar statements and asks if there is to be condemnation. Not surprisingly he is ignored and the post is (hopefully) buried. It’s brought up again.

In the second example, the person is an Israeli MP and her statement, like the student’s calls for genocide of particular people (or appears to). This statement was, of course picked up by the anti-Israeli side and “propagandized” (much like the student’s). The MP rebutted it and claimed her words were distorted and mischaracterized (sound familiar?). You would think that the same standard would be applied given the aforementioned rules.

No, it appears we have hit an “inconvenient truth” head on. So what has the response been?

Excuses, deflections and redirections and claims of “off topic”.

The topic involves two words by a Muslim student in a debate with a Jewish “Professor” and includes discussions of Hamas and Israel and genocide. How you and your buddies can claim that pointing out a very similar statement made by an Israeli MP and asking whether you would condemn it as well, is “off topic” is ludricous.


Deflections:
Translation: Her advocation of genocide is ok because (insert excuses)

• She's good looking and Jewish
• Jews have to fight for survival
• There are many more Muslims then Jews that it’s not possible for Jews to commit any kind of genocide

In other words – advocating genocide is excusable for some and not for others.

More deflections – claims that the source is biased, etc. The Israeli MP does not deny what she said, rather she says her words were mischaracterized and misrepresented in her rebuttal.


Redirections:

You end up throwing everything hoping something will stick so you can avoid an awkward question. You finally end up with false claims that I am defending baby killers, supporting Holocaust denial and defending people who behead babies.

You seem to be saying that genocide is ok if it’s portrayed as “self protection”. You’re also deliberately misstating the issue since the MP’s statement was directed at Palestinians, not “all Muslims”.

You do everything possible to avoid condemning the statement by the Israeli MP including using the "anti-semite" card. My position, in these two people is this – I would condemn them for saying something stupid (especially in such a charged and misleading environment that they find themselves in) but before applying the label of “supporting genocide” – I’d like to know a lot more about their feelings and positions.

How about you JROC? You clearly condemn one, and from all appearances it is because she is Muslim. You excuse the other multiple times and throw garbage at anyone that tries argue differently. You get incensed when someone mischaracterizes *your* position, but then turn around and routinely do it in turn.

Meh.

Wow all that effort put into a person who sides with Hamas and Hezbollah..So what does that tell us? For one thing i didn't see that smokin hot Jewish women wish for all muslims to be rounded up and killed which is not possible anyways. It is however possible for 1.5 billion muslims to eradicate 14 million Jews...So why do you defend terrorist organizations?

And in the end, you just make more deflections - you have neither the integrity nor the cajones to condemn genocide when it's not a Muslim making the statement - do you? It's ok to make genocidal comments directed at Palestinians because it doesn't equal "rounding up all Muslims and killing them"? You'll do anything to avoid condemning your own side, is that it?

So, where have I defended terrorist organizations?

And while you're at it - where have I ever supported Holocaust denial - yet another one of your claims.

Where have I ever defended people who killed babies or beheaded babies or for that matter murdered civilians?

Links please.

You're defending not me, you said this women didn't mean what she meant, and you know this. You go look for some Jew, any Jew whom you believe is just as bad. You also attack David Horowitz for outing her. He's evil you know...Attacking that poor genocidal, terrorist organization supporter .Who is deflecting really?

I'm "defending" no one - I said, repeatedly - I won't judge someone as supporting genocide on such little evidence.

Who is deflecting? You.

You claim I say and take positions I don't.

You give a free pass if the genocidal comments are not made by a Muslim.

Deny it. I'm sure you will because you lack the integrity to admit that you only care if it's a Muslim and you deliberately accuse others of positions they do not take - something you yourself have a fit over when it's done to you.

I can see you now typing, searching, desperately to find some Jew who may have said something comparable. Instead of at least first condemning the statement. Deflect much?

Still no integrity from you?